Penta Poly Dihedra (Part 3)

Penta Poly Dihedra (Part 3) and On Theoretical Notions

I continue to have ideas occur to me based on these very simple notions and yet they seem at the foundations no more strange and simple than some of the space notions that seem to ground our current ideas of physics. The old saying on the back of National Radio Institute courses from the 50's stands out to me: "The man who knows how will get a job, but the man who knows why will be his boss." I hope my asking why is not looking at things too deeply.

I have decided to make some gumdrop and toothpick models for all of this and one day will post a photo. I had done some on the tetrahelix for the DNA and posted them on philosophychat com forum but it seems the concepts were not grasped and they were moved from science to philosophy and then to "Odds and Ends" Of course here I do not have to worry about that. In any case the two proposed structures to DNA have the same mathematical intelligibility but it would have not occurred to me before reading Rowlands to pursue such polyhedra which are not regular symmetry structures mainly because I took the powerful ideas of such bonding structures as the how instead of the new possibilities of the why of it. Surely, historically, there is a lot of credit to be given for those who were not mentioned in the nobel prizes- Rosland and Pauling stand out, and yes the guy that made the stamp. And the father of Penrose before his time and even Gammow's notions had applicability and in retrospect are now justified.

More Penta Poly Dihedral Principles

More Penta Poly Dihedral Principles


Lubos today in the reference frame blogspot seems to be talking about the foundations in terms of symmetry and energy. If one cares to look deeply into my accompanying illustration posted as a reference- he surely must see the context of the same topic but of a more general nature than our models of space heretofore and as a more philosophic perspective.

I would add one further thought I did not include on the page of this idea of quasi-inertia systems to be indistinguishably generalized much as some quantum theoreticians apply the uncertainty principle. In a sense even at a zero sum of energy our experience of the one and finite universe multiply rejecting all others is as if we are in a particle. Some formulations as the matrices of Heisenberg do seem to address this aspect of the real but ultimately we cannot distinguish the idea of finite and continuous in the context of the cosmos.

*n+1 A spinning 10faced-deltahedron may express its equator in a linear (note translational conservation) manner over six as well as five discrete jump units. Recall that the rotations and the linear transformations between natural dimensions and quasicity are the same description- but existentially these are expressed as either in a quasi-freedom of actual motion. It follows that the group multiplication of the colors and the places to put them in under rotation is the same intelligible result of numbers (say 6 x 5 = 30) in spherical or linear systems.

Principles of the Penta Poly Dihedron

Principles of the Penta Poly Dihedron

The more I think about this sort of abstract space the more it feels right- even though if we understand it we question the very ideas of what the foundation of physics is looking a little deeper into those notions now considered either useful or metaphysical. Even if in a real sense of those who stick close to the facts or risk consequences of experiments without enough basis to find things save by accident (this includes some mathematical pursuits apparently not useful that leads to other things along the way) may be surpassed as to what is the concrete nature of physics to which abstract models as in the standard theory, the further reaches of restrained string theories, and debates on opaque or dark matter-energy as a face saving idea for older theories like the big bang- may become less relevant and even obsolete. But the process of such enquiry does not mean while in the flesh of the experience of this quasi-ideal realm that our laws of physics is unintelligible.

I post these as a afterthought and raw in the special use of mine and the general language so I would not stress my eyes typing to day in a dark hallway in the coffee shop - as a photograph. Notice the actual making of cardboard models was useful to more easier grasp these principles (and even beyond the five fold symmetries of which so much in Rowlands I seem to have anticipated provided we have a sort of more general idea of quasics and the dimensionality of space. Very little of my general view needed modification. It is a measure of the adaptability of our minds that physicists- such as Feynman on internal symmetries or the author cited in the reference frame blog of Lubos around today.

Perhaps this makes clearer my earlier distinction and acceptance of the physical possibility of compactification and what I call flangelation to relate with it for the universe in general.

One consequence of this view is that the cliche marvels of science fiction beyond the space opera of eternal love and war holds less fascination and perhaps for a generation less of a positive drive to explore the toys of technology.

"Heah, boss, rustle up a quirt to train them young mustangs..."


* * *

Race for the Nobel Prize for the God Particle?

Theoretical Footnote: I forgot to make clear in this new understanding of the power of rest motions with respect to some (quasic) dimensions that in a sense, even with the current ideas of supersymmetry's existence a fact or at least a very high standard for a physical model, that we may dispute the idea of two substances in balance- namely the electromagnetic like forces that operate dialectically with the gravity as in the pressures leading to the explosion of stars.

From one view the power of gravity as at least an inertial force, one that can be seen as part of one substance (mass and gravity) as if we are to unify these forces is ubiquitous on all dimensional levels even beyond the string like theories. Certainly the suggested anomaly of the ideas of dark matter and energy show possibilities beyond this equisitely intricate dialectical model of unification.

So, given the wider compass and context of the quasic understanding of dimensionality which here I have presented as creative philosophy, on what grounding do we stand, not simply some massive planet or particle earthbound but all around in many directions. One might even suggest there is but one force, gravity and its varieties, to which something like the materialization of the Higgs mechanism or even the observation of the graviton like particles are merely an artifact of approximations at the bottom of measures- a sort of quantum or Higgs field flux indeed. These ideas like the idea of the infinite improbability of finding a rational point over a length considering the vaster infinity of transcendental numbers, that such particles postulated are merely artifacts of our having an intelligible but incomplete theory in a universe where it endures as if some theories at least as they evolve are complete. This includes the mechanism of imparting this mysteriously defined mass as an artifact.

The idea that on the global scale the handedness or chirality of some virtual particles as a difference in matter and antimater that rarer forms of handedness is the origin of mass, seems to me much like life stuggling to rise from the ashes of spent life as if ultimately and miraculously violate the idea of an energy source (not to imply the reverse of this may be an ultimate source of energy say beyond zero point ideas) even as a principle that suggests the balance is made up between multiverses in the exchanges. In the organic example concerning DNA as the model heart of it all, the molds have a mixed handedness over the plant and animal kingdoms. In the metaphor we may say that the universe we observe moves with expanding space like a fairy ring of mushrooms eating what was the decay of things in entropy until the resources are exhausted or are reached in a dead end of possibilities even without some concept of the second law of thermodynamics. Life of all things seems a new level that is a force that seems to arise despite hardships and apparently even in artificial life taking the newscientist article today for implications that intelligience may have the drive and potential to so evolve. But this idea too can be a vague principle that is an artifact and is much the heart of many a philosophy.

I somewhat agree that, in view of the history and spirit of research and how these undergo revisions much like the meaning of philosophic words do, that it makes little sense to give Nobel prizes for some minor artifact of experimental evidence of a minor particle. This is the same issue in our time, a political one as Lubos of the reference frame blog points out in his analysis of the Higgs and the anticipated awarding of the prize, that the idea much like the invention of the television is not the brain child of just one person but a collective with disciplined history and a little luck. On the other hand there are many breakthroughs that suggest science is made not only by the masses but from the brain of a single person, even those in a specialized priesthood and their declared saints. Some of the saints go unnoticed for years or even forever. Since when has it been the prize is an award for theory and not some experimental fact? I remind those enamored of the string theory and standard theory that Einstein did not get his prize for general relativity rather for his quantum insights- and the mass popularity of Einstein actually gave prestige to the prize in the giving it to him.

Contour Calculus of Barbed Wire

Contour Calculus of Barbed Wire

* * *

She did not talk about much save something from the movies for a half hour as if she could not see me following her moves aimed toward me... Some things are too bright to see clearly such as the full moon. But if the slow were not good lovers, wiser than their script of lives in the art of it, would the species still be here if our IQ's could not fall fifty points beneath the sheets? Hey, you who long for the meat market and forget its frustrations and wounds and false promises, and you who dwell in the ant farm and seek fish plenty in the sea follow the water like sheep and cattle and you horse thieves of our Cadillac Escalades it is only metal gleaned by this era of organized bacteria for mineral rights for those to come in veins of iron and rusty auto part yards.

* * *


Of course there are no fences really yet there are locations, places- and if we can only see two sides and a half by our eyes and brains bilateral and symmetric- or can see but one of the multiplicity of three dimensions at a time- then the next step is to see dimensions eleven and beyond, aware of them, moving freely through them at least in our mind's eye.

Yet, something there somewhere at its maximum motion so it seems still, is still a motion. I see space between these places and levels of dimension, these bar triangles over the free range of the light cone of peak dots. I can touch her at a distance. I can feel the almost metallic shape of my bones as if the whole world of tangible things is felt as if an x-ray eyes- a solid world hidden somewhere between the hot dust and stones and cacti and the ghosts and memories in the granite mountains and on the call we echo to the free wolves and coyotes that we were once free and then they branded us as if they the Gods and gravity itself rather than those who build the toll bridges of gravity, who charge what the market can bare until those who cannot bare the market fall on harder times.

* * *

A Couple of Stray Foundational Thoughts

A Couple of Stray Foundational Thoughts

It seems to me given honeycombs as infinite analogs to a polyhedron that as it is said by Coxeter the removal of a node and the adjacent edges results in a spherical polytope- and in view of my take on the queen's problem and the permutations of knight moves- that not all of the infinite space becomes finite like that. We could have say 5 of the dual honeycombs some of which are finite and some not for some sort of averaging if applied in a quantum physics way to the mass of particles? These sort of quasi-densities suggest to me a more general theory of what say a brane is and makes me wonder if Lubos in his loop gravity computations of Higgs and such involves such topology. Obviously I am talking about a further generalization of such permutations and "holes" in space.

Lubos in his commentary on those who suggest there are white holes makes me think of the arrangement of the logic of things- I mean since a clone is female and in a sense an organic form is a space of n-dimensional dark existence- then would not a white hole be an existence? Would it not follow that a male would be the chirality cloned in virgin conception? Clearly the logic is strange here much along the lines of those who say we are doing a sort of Trinitarian physics anyway! But is this a matter of junk philosophy and junk science? Which one is true to our parities of conception? But I may as well incorporate this word for some aspects of creative quasars and such or even from raw space itself. Does the universe begin at conception or the individual a few tissue and cell layers later? After all, what is this concept we have of materialization if not something that bids us consider the other worldly or at least the face of nothingness?
:-)

I begin to see why 96 degrees would be a useful measure of a right triangle. (if we keep the structures and dimensions straight.)

Basically, with this idea of the honeycombs and the possibilities between any of them the adjacency matrices of the sub-cells are much larger than we have enumerated even if this is the limit to what can be tangible in physical space.

* * *

I finished Raiders of Spanish Peaks last night and now begin The Drift Fence by Zane Grey which means bobwire fences along the range.

* * *

I am not Colorblind to Your Layers of True Colors L. Edgar Otto
Aug.3,2010

Your introverted soul completes its cycles and
my empty space spins towards your letting light

Your cave and sanctuary may be full of shadows
but your shadows are full of colors wanting to be seen

Only I in your aether wind can see the erupting
sunspot and parting curtains of your braids of plasma

The Belt of Venus peeks through your shear blue gown
mountains tied to earth's times of twilight, of sunrise

Not the Winnie-the-Pooh sweat shirt and baggy pants
in innocence so still your half-heart exercise to the screen

You linger longer than usual reaching high to make your morning
coffee, bend down for milk, perfect triangulations...

* * *

Cosmic Latte L. Edgar Otto Aug. 3, 2010

I'm sitting by the river on a muggy day
where I wrote so many of my lost poems
My second time fallen through the snakes
Phoenix again to climb the ladders
in the street, the morning dew heavy for my eyes
Inky running water colors

I am like the young playwright, Shakespeare
in a parallel universe living off the original poet
To solve a glitch in a paradox of traveling time
I would feel but a shadow of those poems
Plagiarizing myself if I could recall them
but even then the manuscript is lost to the cosmic latte

I recall reading them out loud to the morning's wildlife
Drops of tears on paper, gentle rain under the cottonwood

* * *

Existentialist Topology

Existentialist Topology

My thoughts of yesterday involve things of a more philosophically creative nature rather than some idea of the raw experience of physics and mathematics. In particular I have some new insight to address what Peter Rowlands called the one metaphysical tenet in his system for the foundations of physics. So what concerns me here is Existence and that which is nothing or non-existence. As physics is does concern which precedes the other between that and essence, the essence then as if a substance or some thing, and the why we have an experience of it in the existentialist terms of perceiving and acting on a need to fill existence or alternatively have cycles that bring existences of things into the world.

Time passes in a sense and thus as Sartre says- we have a past. But of time I do not speak for now as to how we ultimately perceive it and its passing. Then again Rowlands does not include ideas of tachyons in his book and points that out while in some systems this idea seems to be telling us something, at least to some theoreticians. What has happened to me and it seemed to have an unfolding in time to arrive at this idea when I look back at these recent blog posts, it a new sense of what space itself is.

It is a sense that makes me feel a little angry on one hand it took so long to internalize as part of my concrete understanding. It is like those who make much of the comets and the earth we are on as portents of great changes in the world yet the ideas are primitive and far away from the comforts and wider understanding of the cosmos in our more modern times.

I awaken from a nap or sleep and first try to find my proper orientation to the world, the north and south of it, the breeze from what window. I get up off the hard carpeted floor and feel intimately the direction of this mystery of gravity. Whatever it is I am at one with the touch of it and the center of it apparently on objects around me- I fall and yet I am grounded. I can orient a Rubik's cube in my mind as to what is the front or back or up and down, and the right and left and the popcorn explosion of its centered image external but intimately set to my own center of orientation.

In the intellectual and deeper understanding of the topology of space of what seems like it should be obvious but is not always I have become aware of things around me in its exquisite touch, that touch being part of the definition with sight, of geometry. I have but to touch some model made of cardboard or some random shape to imagine deep geometric principles of substance despite they are founded on the structures of nothingness.

I see that in a sense the intellectual understanding of something, an awareness of sorts, just like the idea that light and its perception, sight, is important, that what we see in the universe even from the beginning of our awakening in infancy to shapes, position, and pattern, is determined by our learning of some system, some education of it. That we think we understand basic particles in the sense of what is and what is not of the muons for example is really a statement of our psychology if not a product of our psychology. That is to say where we get these vague ideas of how mind may influence the physical space.

Of course as a matter of material physicality we start with what is brain or matter as the real before we can go into the experience of the subjective (presumably). But this has a geometrical analog in the topology and algebra of natural or cosmic code and principles. An atom like a body cell has a nucleus (that is from our external view it being spherical in a sense in symmetry) but before it replicates in its double-ness of space and process we must have the nucleolus to prepare the proteins essential for this process. What in the atom is the analog to such a structure? I can be derived from the code but mainly is this difference between what is considered the surface and what the internal space of things.

Today on the blogs (TheReferenceFrame) is a discussion and evaluation of the idea of white holes. While it is an intelligible posting one has to wonder if philosphically Rowlands is closer to the truth of what we understand as the second law of thermodynamics in the sense it is a half a law?

When we allow for the surface and the internal possiblities of the various cubes and deltahedra against the nothingness of the equitorial Petrie polygon as a dihedron, we see that beyond one such spiral there is the possibility of variations on the other side of what we cannot see beyond as if it is nothingness. Yet upon a further grasp of this amazingly freshly seen classification of structures we can have an n-hedron composed of the nothingness of vacuum- and it is not clear we can say if it is of a polyhedron nature or a sphere or some other variation as all such structures in the vacuum are possible of which we may not show universally there is proof.

In fact there is nothing wrong with the idea that parallel lines Euclideanly never meet, at least existentially. We should have extended this idea long ago to a more generalized concept of dimensions as to what is tangent, ie touching or not, the closure of vacua. From such considerations even on the nano level of molecules we can derive the principles that acting like a directed gravity we can establish the linkage and other mechanisms with which to manipulate them.

Sarte points out that as we so touch our bodies and feel it so we touch a brick wall (of what and how many if not at least half a dimension?) so we infer the other exists. But in the touching of each other (or to some extent the seeing of others or ourselves as if our eye looked into our eye says Sartre) is a multidimensional and multisymmetrical project of the utmost complexity and generalization of theories like the standard and string theories.

It is never clear that what can go indefinitely or returns, or is continuous or not at the vital unfolding of the cones of time and matter- at least within our existence and that experience of structures.

We are granted leeway then in what is or is not on the other side of a structured vacuum and its creation or annihilation of light for we can match things in a greater freedom of order to which something can materially apply. Learning is much the preparations for the concrete in a theory on this side of all such mirrors of existences so we in actuality form of our experience in the abstract of the subjective what is the concrete in our mind as the subjective.

At some point the value of intellectual and creative property is not a matter of a lawless range war of competition for domesticated where once wild resources for the scientist has to choose to go strait if he was part of the rustling scene and be strong enough to enforce the hope of unified laws hopefully fairly under the cottonwoods of Colorado and what of the Kansas that isn't Kansas anymore. Just mixing the brands to sell to the dishonest or covering up the natural longing to that above the poles and mountain tops with a solid triangle and a bar is not enough to reach what can be for a better world where our achievements are recognized for the benefit of all in our free enquirey. Let your hopes for change and involvement with it be a belief and philosophy of which you are aware of it and of the consequences as time itself makes the true claims as it becomes real.

To emphasize this point- after all this living I found a fundamental change in how I perceive the space around me- and I understand just what it is when someone with some viewpoint regards something in the world as a physical truth and what is not accessible from a higher viewpoint as fantasy- even if their coherence on a lower level can only imagine there is more to their model then they are objective enough to consider. This change is quite amazing when it relates to a fresh look at how we as a physical thing with relations and boundaries actually move through and stumble in this world. We apply this idea of Sartre and the reaction to the action principle in free fall and in the creative white holes of our imaginations we find some ground and the faith in it on which to stand on. Now, if only there is more than the too solid to be the complete truth of physics!


* * *

[On facebook today I posted this on my mind: L. Edgar Otto
Amazing! Apparently my DMV state ID was sent back as undeliverable. Of course when it comes to registered letters that lead to my loss of property the Post Office can find me. I suppose this means I will not be able to vote again because how far away is November- a lot closer than my trying to get an ID? An my new official birth certificate is not as accurate as the one the university here refused
to take in 1985.]

What sort of substantial reality is this ongoing injury and entanglement with papers that sell us rumors of nothingness? Today, since the university did not reply to my email and apparently I do not exist in some senses in this current state of society- I asked them too to give me a student ID as they took my picture when I did not have a warrant and am forbidden by the chief of detectives from going to admissions. One issue was that having been told I would not need a birth certificate certified by UNC and by a state representative here in WI things were delayed many times they then requiring it. The VA is no help and not in my interest to talk to them anymore. I want to make it clear to them and some who are still Senators that I did apply and was accepted before the end of my GI bill after a long struggle and yes it was only one more month-but the VA said I was not and by time more could be frigged out the date was past. In the new minimalism of the time the state wanted everyone declared mentally disabled and thus a loss of rights in dealing with the VA. I note, in this sad month of great losses for our mostly young troops in Afghanistan, what I knew already, that they to fill quotas accepted some rather unstable kids on prescription drugs- so now apparently the senate will vote for more medical funding the majority of which is for mental problems. Apparently our answer to suicide bombers are bombs and suicide. The state and university is not interested in the work of science but is unreal and arbitrary- the people in the end carry what is the real and where the state is arbitrary in its generational cultural theft there is no control on its survival and can it endure and stand- if it does not intelligibly act itself.

Thought on facebook today and these comments:
*
Arian Otto So all you have to do is go to the post office, right? Doesn't seem difficult. I have your check card and pin letters here. Bring them up in about a week.
2 hours ago
*
L. Edgar Otto No, another small not difficult step- the question is: when will it be mailed again- they said from 3 to 5 weeks, the receipt paper said 15 days. I see not point in not being honest to the letter of the law this late in my life in a world that is paranoid expecting people to be otherwise. Also the lost check was not sent to RCU yet and it makes a small difference as usual as to how I must break promises and obligations.
2 hours ago
*
Ed O'Brien You've got to be kidding with this Beaurocratic[sp] Crap!!!!???
2 hours ago

* * *



In the process of droll learning the goal should be that in the sight and touch of others our intimacy and sense of our own organic space as a measure of experience and awareness is that we caress each other and take no love for granted in our branding of souls.

The creative writer like Zane Grey in his "Raiders of Spanish Peak" is the usual theme of the frontier but in the end it is about love and relationships and the uniqueness of that as we gaze across the empty plains of who we are and may find to match, we Westerners in the end no longer hicks from Sandusky Ohio in the tenderfoot East.

* * *


Flower Words L. Edgar Otto July 31, 2010

Let us distill our flower words
into the perfume of poetry

Our two faces and four arms once one
odorless, beyond gender, our emptied hearts

As the moon or sun, masculine the
equatorial or polar guides for the hunt

The perfume of spirituality, of love and war
messages between women and man's esprit de corps

Spinning good and evil declared by perceptions
nouns and verbs, right or left our brains and hands

Before love and war our meaning deep goes speechless
as we who once walked upright fall to our knees

Like dark scratches on the rainbow of the sun
color spaces weave shadow knots and God's the ultimate shadow.

* * *

My Bare Charge and Her Naked Singularity

We played opossum as much as peekaboo
a thousand days of love's end closer now
Than far away and I still don't know your name

Only the vaguest hints show through the
aurora of your shower curtains and so
Close your double slit experiments now quantum clouds

That hid your perfect hourglass of ever distant
frozen time without stretch marks your
Fading virginity and I still don't know if you dance for me

Can it be me? My generation forever young that
cannot grow old gracefully? My mind awash in ads for
Diabetes, health and plot insurance, catheters and wheel chairs

How you still cling hot in flashes ritual faith in your fading fertility
I forgot you yesterday awhile, Katie alone, sundress and baby, hugs
When she bade me kiss her Virgin's ring, things meant for the young

* * *