Nature's Desire for Symmetric Balances

Nature's Desire for Symmetric Balances

Almost nothing today other than the amazing thing of waking up and the timeless enjoying the morning weather. The thought was, that it is not the field of directions that may be thought by some an illusion- but the deeper idea of directionality in the context of universe itself. I see no good reason for this bright mood this morning or cause of it- not even the weather.

So, with most unaware, the string and certain gravity theories so unified to the M and so on... But is the missing idea about the clock or the time itself? We break the clockwork apart and then try to put it together- and it may work with things left out, mysteriously , but never the same way- a neutral curiosity and tinkering really as when we take apart ideas or each other.

As I personify Nature here, do I not mean more fundamentally than the universe as like us anthropocentric- I am here that I am here or I would not be here so are there worlds where I could no be there, and so on...

Sometimes too much light, and too pure a single frequency of it, in the whispers of the stars- is blinding save only to our persistent memory, fading or not, annoyed or not with even our awakening and first opened eyes.

In the shadows of the canopy of stars there are no ill whispers today, nor guilt, nor unexplained disconnections with our close ones as we move through the market place, a fete or farmers with their produce and antiques, going nowhere really on this mirror of the world- I know they feel the same way here and now for neglect and the fact only near are our problems severe for you, being at an image distance have to take comfort in the reality you are not me. Nor would we trade our lives far out to so many variations of what we could have been. Not that we have come closer to nature or the Gods today or that makes a difference in our life's events, but that we have come closer to redemption and forgiveness to each other here and now in this awakening and awareness, when on the face of it, taking thought it seemed to be going nowhere.

* * *

Ulla perhaps its Time We Looked at Bioinformation

Perhaps it is time we looked at these things from a more biological or bioinformatics view (Ulla sent two links and I looked over the field, we should do this while the physicists fight it out, what else is planned anyway?). Which can have some variations on the views. But it seems to me not so much that particular bits of information and their logical symbols can change the tone, as in clear, gray, black or white or any of the imagined color space- that makes things move or is a model of growth we paint upon the few dimensions of the world or thought- what is an interchange of fractal like or holographic like ideas that is this question of the ultimate motive and source of reality that makes more concrete and abstract motion- but the abstract structures of these ideal and half-real bits that have their own level of what we now imagine as broken or super symmetry. And beyond the physical in the biology the mental seems to be a leap of complexity above this. Still, we can map the body into the mind which ever way the information flows or adjust the body somewhat from experiences of the evolving mind- Again, the octonions expanding, almost replicating from the quaternions for example, but this reductionist way of using the DNA for programming is not its proper expression or if from raw parts some other matter mimics its biological structure, it must mimic its internal code expression too- but why be amazed when it can be arranged to compute square roots when a drop of it so programmed best solves the traveling salesman problem in rapid time to rather large graphs? This super symmetry like potential is after all a dynamic clear relation between intelligible binary bases, and can be of different tones and hues also.

Biology, as with the dreams of quantum computation, may not be the end of encryption for it may form from either pole, and in a sort of reverse source sonar from itself, a quasi reality of stealth and encryption, as life has long figured out. In this context it is most likely that the cosmic or nature code is quasi-concealable and that some codes exist- regardless of factoring over time or infinite touchstones and primes for example, simple machine deciphering may not decode some broken and hidden metaphors. Nor in a relaxed background no necessity really forbidden but rare, it is intelligible to ask if between us, and between body cells, we exchange poetry.

* * *

Do we lose Dreams Forgotten upon Awakening

Do we lose Dreams Forgotten upon Awakening I think there is a recent article on this I have not read, but it is such a question that strikes me as part of a new concept how we will understand how we think - that and fresh looks at recursion from the power set view mentality -that too not to be imagined only in our limited and evolved, or leaps of insight as consciousness in combination's as to what is physical falling from notions and equations- this quality of a consciousness complex at least of structure begging for new physics.

Clearly, something trumps the level of generalization afforded by quantum theory and its subjective or objective interpretations- considering recent blog speculations here this new article seems to come a little closer to a more unified view of things, and puts a strain on what we are seeing from the supposed new data from more complicated experiments. Make the connections readers.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-double-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle

* * *

http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/06/quantum-tgd-as-generalized-homology.html

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/06/atlas-standard-model-passes-two-tests.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

Here are examples of how with further refinement and understanding there is a choice to maintain certain world views with refinements, experimental or theoretical as breakthroughs
One that begins to think of some sort of infinite computations over finite time so as to extend things into ideas on fixed views of numbers (primes) as a unified continuum of sorts. The other looks for support within the wider system for the general trend of our standard theory. A few are dipping their toes into the new ocean of new physics and trying to interpret the sounds of those who are kicking the tires. Some still stuck with what is proved to be ultimately non-issues or questions.

This lack of focus in general debate that remains only on precursors to a better general theory
takes time from the task of finding it. It obscures the paths and questions that in the end are more critical and with useful solutions that surely will result.

Yet we have to do the best we can for what we do. One such higher question I cannot quite formulate in the back of my mind- something new or a better way to see one of the same old metaphysical problems. Can we pin down certain arrows of directionality in a way that is not merely an observation or assertion of things? What is still missing in a better general theory?

* * *

I see a new scientist article that talks of approval of two new elements and the illustration with it has four blanks still beyond the usual table- Is it possible that they finally have discovered elements beyond the 120 and that after all these decades this pet insight of mind is finally superseded? Well, the article just said we are coming closer to what is thought of as "islands of stability" at element 120 and perhaps 126- yeah, the old Bicentinuum embarrassment in publications in '76. Has anyone asked why this finally end of known elements takes so long to reach as our technology has accelerated?

* * *

I saw this yesterday and did not remark what an excellent concept is here recognized that fits well in the awakening of the new physics:

http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/blog/really_surprises_me-79527

* * *

Just posted:

http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-data-from-atlas.html

fresh views all around! Well, whatever the actual application to these numbers or resonances or echos of particles and how far they may extend- when, in our lifetimes at least, will they be lost in forgotten dreams? And if from some future time, quantumly seen to the extent we may see into the past, will there be archeology to mine the old ideas in transition for nostalgic or historical reasons- even perhaps to recreate the total environs in some parallel theory? That is, it is not that some have no lucid dreams or day dreams, this is normal and quite normal to regard them as perhaps a more random process- NP and P and all that computation-wise, although individually it can be intimately disconcerting to see such presumed messages in our mental bottles we grow to fill- but that learning or not from history there are some scenarios we seem to visit and live there again in those parts of the reality as if our dreams. But why, in the freedom of possibilities is there a direction, that is the question, that so distinguishes things such as real and dream, what is the source of awakening and the fixing of clear grounding as existence and history? It is not just our setting of laws for the continuity of our commerce- the sole proprietor of a theory after all takes with him the reality of it all in a sense just as in legal issues of the continuity of life.

* * *

We do find a sense of surprise, perhaps rude awakenings, encountering the dark flow in our hearts- did we do this? What are we that we are the authors of our world and yet so distant, yet need the connection and touch, with the pointing to or the minds of others?

We quite imagine, some otherness of a scenario, some expertise in recognition of the landscape to evaluate it, fight it or flee from it. The surprise then in the stream is that even while intimate with and at one with the flow it is hard to see it even if we part of it, so near and so far what is within us. The storm front of our dream of life is well known it can be severe or catastrophic, make no sense as to the mind of some myth or idea of a greater Being. The climate for all its philosophy that at least we survived and our belongings and life styles but debris- is the expected but surprise of this season's weather. Some quote from Walden observes this of the village dwellers, there in the simplicity of quiet contemplation with keener eyes the warbler for the horsehair for a telescope it find outside the front door when the author has to find one at the stable. And yet what is in the awakened world compliments our dreams- if indeed the songbird can be said to dream beyond its rhythm of life in the living- its hidden purpose to its daily landing on some ground, fetching its own needs at one with its awakenings and special adaptions to some ritual, some playfulness even with its drive for curiosity yet does not know nor can be surprised it is awake. And as all such creatures on some level of change will not be surprised- not in our human way with its advantage and moral sense as to how we live and work together- even with the world itself growing scarcer of resources and crowded. The blocks of ice harvested from the pond from winter at last takes all summer to melt so much concentrated into a great pile.

So, upon reflection we should not be surprised either- or either way what more we may find and verify beyond the twists and turns and dreams like ghosts as the many worlds and multiverse clarity of regions pass through each other, that we do bond in greater ways, that we do justify our optimism where our better dreams surpass even the cost so vastly wider of our decline and disintegration.

Somehow our preoccupation with surfaces return again to the empty clarity of what we measure in cubits, our spaceship of world and universe, crystalline its heaven, we outline only so as to half behold and measure again the face of God.

* * *

There are many similar articles on this "weak measurement double slit idea" but I chose this one as rather interesting:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110405084252.htm

Perhaps a little deeper than it appears, on the mirror itself the paths indistinguishable so it is the simple apparatus and preoccupation with simple mirrors! So, even if the quantum formalism applies as a principle to assert and part of the flow observable or not- why in the mirror form do we experience a difference of energies of organic molecules? What is this deeper nature of the seeming asymmetry in more complex scales as well as where we could think of it as the general case at the fundamental grounding of physics? Of the mirrors themselves in the reality- perhaps some are real and some are not in their existence- that is where as one of the articles say quantum mechanics meets philosophy.

* * *

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110601091441.htm

Of course this sort of thing applied to say fusion, well I thought our technology was a little further along- but the principles seem a little more sound.

* * *

A Little More Cosmic Thought Experiment (Clear Holes)

A Little More Cosmic Thought Experiment (Clear Holes) L. Edgar Otto June 2, 2011

Xv and Xw and Xvw (symbols for multi-verse, many-world, and combined concept) for the continued consequences of such notions.

*1 There exists a region in general space, a Clear Hole CH, in which coordinates as information are variably clear bits.

*2 The universe XvXw is also conceivable as everywhere a Clear Hole.

*3 Between continua, information may be passed from translucent, or opaque or such shifting intelligible regions thru a CH complex Xvwx.

*4 Clear Holes may be ambiguously empty.

*5 A White Hole WH ( energetic emitting, radiating in the usual conception) coordinate complex and an (observable if only indirectly inferred) Black Hole BH is a Gray Hole GH color wise which in general contexts may be indistinguishable in process such as dynamically defined as a Clear Hole.

*6 The dynamics of such "chromatic holes ChH", by scale averaging topologically or by energetic mixing alternatively, implies a certain intelligibility reference frame between them as if the binary representation and variations refereed and intrinsic to it is of unique order or contains multiplicities and persistence's, acting as 1 or 0 as intelligible abstract entities- that is, metaphysically to ask (and make some progress on the answer) as to why the universe is rather than not, especially applied as physicality by apparently inert structure, combination's, and the logic of falsification, or even this potential as a vague and quasi-ideal freedom in existing- such that this core question is an intelligible question.

*7 Conceivably then, OR or XOR, two negatives as black may invoke a positive within some either or implied restrictions.

*8 The universe as a general parallel Xw or XvXw ambiguity shares the physicality as a principle on a macro, meso, or micro dimensionless yet concrete non-local scales.

*9 Some coordinate values may be distinguished as absolutely positive or physically are implied so.

*10 Any dynamic concept of WH Wormhole connections are subject to these same notions and may exist like gravity waves only as inferred or implied, objectively and subjectively as a lesser scope of general notions or the default mixing XvXw states of hidden physicality instead of these unreal and unnecessary connections. Thus we can identify vaguely the power continuum approach and the combinatorial mind approach as both necessary, in our perceptions and reality, with the multiverse and many world models, perhaps interchangeably.

Thus I present a thought metaphor in hopefully somewhat familiar and simple terms for as the sequence clear groups, black and white groups (and gray) or color groups then hyper or super color groups ascend they may at the remote pole become clear groups (of coordinate information and its order and structure even of the vacuum) again.

*11 It seems there is another overriding principle to consider or conclude- what I have called the Neotericontinuum. Ntcm This was meant to be an inclusion of things learned or made historically concrete in the widest sense in the universe. This principle has is mirror in chromatic group theory ideas akin to that of memory or some idea of a completed existence over time. But it is not clear that even given infinite expanse of time that is ambiguously open without beginning or end that there is not a flow of complexity between the learning and the memory directions, and that in a sense this is what I call omnomic, the vagueness crystallizing into more intelligible and ordered thought to which the stars and BH models mimic, and so the development individually and collectively of law and science theories.

* * *

Nothing, Dreaming

Nothing Today, Dreaming, Rest.

Last night I looked at combining in higher dimensional complexes and count of iota particles but it seemed rather trivial as it just described what we know already of stacking objects.

The above illustration will be repeated when I have little or nothing to say save maybe no comment. My email for any dialog is LoversOfWisdom@yahoo.com

* * *

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110601134300.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110601161129.htm

These two articles today are most relevant to my recent concerns at hand but of course should be viewed from a little beyond the quantum foundations of things. Then again heat and synchronicity can seem a very strange thing beyond the explained coincidences in a wide world- why at this moment to relevant articles appear (as if we can intermix the landscapes and even entangle beyond some range of perception as if before the fact or timing of things?) And why do such articles appear in clusters sometimes with little relevance at all?

Sometimes, even as in the other link today on bacteria mimicking protein structure to adapt as invaders, structures themselves in the raw fact of them material and not abstract only achieve certain functions- is it not clear that a crystal of germanium with an over all nearly exponential slope on either side with current trough it case one end to heat and the the larger flat end to freeze- how too do we ever explain the vortexes of the Hirsh tube that so separates the hot and cold in pipes used for example by firemen but only a third as efficient as other air conditioning? If we ever air condition the world (and global warming if it is a fact would be a real result of this) is there some way to transfer or moderate the heat after all?

It is still good that the universe, with a little novelty at least, surprises us. And that to some extent we could in theory see who may have developed these remarkable regions of our brains and who not- my chemist friend will be thrilled to see there was a link yesterday on how we recognize faces as he has that problem.

* * *

http://riofriospacetime.blogspot.com/ has today a general comment from her novel position.

But dark energy existing or not, or even dark matter, all these things I have held tentative under my term opaque matter or the idea of dark matter- and whatever may be its creative aspects and fluid formulations- that the description of light slowing down instead of the universe accelerating is to me equivalent as an idea.

That of course logically leaves an invariant of c as a possibility- perhaps either of these interpretations are there but are opaque including the comprehensive reach either side of Einstein's positions. In fact one way to see it is that since light is roughly a velocity- what time change is the dynamics capable of exhibiting here?
Thus we could as well observe, without much more interference over time or space of vast expanses, that a ray would actually gain mass- as in cosmic ray singularity complexes that is the observable. These are very fundamental if not philosophic issues for the present. The mirror result of her idea of black holes is indeed worth the study and a tenable way to interpret things also.

Now from my thought experiment on cosmic design post of yesterday- an example of trying to make sense of our thinking as physicality in these areas- that and the link on heat above- and the consideration of surface differences where they involve at least a difference in linear and transcendental measures, there may be some sort of limit of dimensional effects (and the ground for what happens at nine dimensions in Euclidean space) in which there is a diminishing of what can be stored in such a singularity complex as to energy. In which case it is conceivable a level of things could exist in the description of these orthogonal objects (that is gravity also works at right angles in nature and moving things do become disordered and paradoxically radiate) a certain depth threshold where adding the energy may actually accelerate to where it becomes less- that is seems to cool things. But of course these are considerations at the heart of things in the three or four laws of thermodynamics as to what is an absolute zero or zero point energy idea or not.

* * *

I am not sure if I can slow down the blog from some stray ideas arising nor if it is as in the continuing a series of poems or not somehow morally right to do for any artist that may or may not owe things to the world or herself. Art for art's sake and Science for science's sake should be a given as radical as that sounds in general for those sane people who do take an interest in these higher human activities.

So the stray thought last night is that between these multiverse ideas where there is a sort of distance between the parallels (despite the fact that zeros and one's are vastly more dynamic in the coloration's than many yet can imagine) that in a sense as if by default to what can be clearly observed in reality- and I do not mean the simple possible not question of at what level do quantum things become classical or some higher things have relativity fall out from the picture, or even quantum things from that, - that in a sense this dsXv (distance, multiverse) is an intelligible measure and mystery if not in all such wider concepts of scale differences we find commensurable connections, I find it hard to believe that we just impose this unity of physics and its intelligible commensurable's on the world or our own perceptions.

Also, between the gods of theory here, as with all entangled things even before they encountered each other and have more to say from the think tank of dialog- again some weird mystery of time, that it is ultimately unclear just who came up first with what- but where it is clear it is important to respect the originator- even if it seems many find some idea at the same ripe time. Can we really then peer review each others work and judge it as sound or not, significant or not? Perhaps, if in a wider almost mystical sense awaiting solid science, we are part of a council of intuitive peers as if the old gods of Greece preoccupied with the affairs of man.

The truth of the universe seems to me beyond our petty beliefs and conflicts, even beyond our programming for altruistic cooperation where socially things transcend beyond our local experience. This could be wrong, as well those philosophical thought experiments and questions where I do imagine in a wider resolution, as if of the mapping of the world and ourselves- that by reason and imagination alone in a dark room intimate with its shadows on the walls or the self and not certain of the encoding s or their worth and viability in surface and depths, connects and disconnects, that one working assumption is by thought and blind I could recreate the structure of this universe.

* * *

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1

from one of my general bloggers this link (I agree with a commenter this could use some work, but the spoof of it is entertaining- you see, if we can only read sound bites and a picture is worth a thousand words then why should we expect a reader not to read that many of them?) But then there is a funding crisis for science there I hear?

* * *

I found an interesting book, a fairly recent discard from the uni, on Internet Law and so on.

* * *

Lubos seems to have an interesting take on quantum collapsing today insofar as one can relate things to the eigenvalues- but the gist of it shows promise if we could just get beyond such a rigid view of space or the possible ultimate grounding of it in chaos from one vague view. After all, although we insure some matching values with the diagonal these are not as wave equations self limiting to physical states as in the Heisenberg matrix view. So part of this seems to me the unification is needed at least philosophically of these two approaches to quantum theory which is shown really equivalent in some sense- this we need a little transcendence here or more generalization. On the other hand, again, what grounds these sort of states and where they are embedded of informational coordinates in entangled multiverses? Still, it strikes me Lubos is trying to direct things toward true attempts as science in keeping the fundamentals in mind. We can see then a sensitivity as a pointing toward the deeper theory as not a vague realization of a new question but what seems a matter of sharing wisdom as information and history here is after all in view of the environs of some of the nagging questions as say the multi-verse and the vast landscape, a fresh statement we should acknowledge as evidence of originality. Of course it is hard to surpass our heroes of the past, even if one day as in my music I go way beyond them but in eyes and the first hearing of them and of that music I will never feel I can ever equal them. You Cleavland, wherever you are since you vanished from the Village in the folk and folk-rock days. :-)

* * *

Thought Experiment on Cosmic Design

Thought Experiment on Cosmic Design L. Edgar Otto June 01, 2011

*Ideally, we do not assume that an iota complex or a singularity complex are the same thing, or that either may, as far as observed effects, contain multiples of the other, or if multiples of themselves are in that neutral to external physical effects.

*We assume a singularity complex can be a stable structure and a contained continuum at least n-dimensional (an overview suggests infinite matrices are bounded).

*A reasonable and symmetrical model of a singularity complex is one as an orthgon.

*The subsets are power continua while in a field density as holographic is one that is fractal-like unto themselves.

*Creatively, including ideas of a false vacuum or lack of things in empty space as a structural motivator, as far as energy and the mirrors or loops of entropy as related to such structures go, we assert energy may be inserted within but not arise de novo from within to outside the singularity complex.

*By nature of its linearity (set theoretic alph1 also) and orthogonality, energy within in may be expressed outward in integral steps and clear paths and freedoms intelligibly in particle and radiation decays.

*There exists a hierarchy of abstract distances related to natural or integral and arithmetical dimensions such that an amount can be stored but released at slower at its surface regardless of any statistical virtual many-worlds considerations.

*We assume in the general background of universe-multiverse that where parallel continua meet, the contained energy may be released or pulse out all at once (gamma bursts?)

*We assume that the dimensions of such condensed entities may exceed some binary value such as 2^256 individually (just past the octonion axioms of properties) or that collectively this constitutes hidden mass and mirrored order.

*We further assume that such singularity complex entities are independent of time and its notions, specifically we cannot warp space in such a way as to accelerate, condense, or jump through time.

*As iota complexes or singularity complexes may have a dynamic relationship in the depth and span of the cosmos, at a certain level or number of say iotas we may establish, call up, or create a singularity complex as potentially a physical structure.

*The creation of such an entity is assumed to be or become metaphysically distinct from other relatively similar observed entities, including its relation to a void.

*Let us say we condense the energy as if a hydrogen bomb (much as in the general dynamics of stars in reverse) and place it into such a topological trap - if it is stable and the energy will not leap or jump into other traps, conceived and measured by whatever statistics , that the energy may radiate (much like radioactive decay) at a continually and relatively stable amount until exhausted.

*Of course on lesser global levels mass contain much vaster energy than light expressed as released and its interval invariant velocity, as if all hierarchies are consumed at a zero discrete unity as a grounding constant.

*There may exist such entities on some scale, even moving ones already with some stored energy from remote places and time. Such structures may accumulate such energy over a directed time or intrinsically lose it over a directed space.

*Two stars, two galaxies, black holes, or two atoms may exchange momenta and other forms of hidden energy which by proximity (locality) in a classical configuration has greater n-body but invisible intrinsic weights.

*In the presence of such higher creative energies the hypercolor of abstract coordinates may pass as if neutral or empty or may vary their color of abstract coordinates with perhaps intermittent mixing or non-necessary combination's of connections between them.

* * *

Pyrons and Xylons

Pyrons and Xylons L. Edgar Otto June 1, 2011

This theory goes way back to early 1964 so it took awhile to recall just how I arranged the diagrams. It turns out that, while structurally there are greater freedoms to combine things, even a sense of mirror thing that may make a particle or atom, from the Platonic view one can imagine some sort of subatomic theory. Thus to find 11 things in the background potentially to be filled with iotas, the micro parts and their symmetry (see Lubos today on string theory- it seems that that theory is in the transition to perhaps a sounder count, yet after a couple of decades at least they begin to understand the problems and symmetries of the small scale, and I think the idea of 16 dimensional bases. Yet they do not understand the more general idea of the E8 symmetries nor how it can be a periodic table of things just as these iota-fields may make combinatorial or power continuum field count.

The combinatorial mind (the view more in keep with the conclusions of Pinker as to over time the selection and adaptation gains from multiple methods to solve things) strives to understand the other pole of tentative consciousness and meet it half way, but the environment or endowment may be futile to do so. But where we find this cross over, and I mean it uniform across all the concepts of physical space not just a local view that may or may not be invested with some sense of expertise of one self, that is the mirrors imagined of some particles as a neutral and maybe a third place to so organize the structures, field and data. At this place it surely, as if the string theory itself seeks the hint of it beyond string theory, thinks there are neutral objects or the discovery of them which gives the discover both the sense of a unified theory and frustrations it is not seen by those who extend their views as the only such theory possible and an endpoint of their extension. Hence, the claim for historical prescient interpreting some movement towards and forever to remain even if not justified as physics done by their point of view. Yet, in this vagueness the theoretician may if finding more favorable but neutral gain in general remain adaptable for the rare new breakthrough discoveries.

Some systems as self logical are this self falsifiable, but other systems as with the simple count and intelligibility of complicated formulas go beyond narrow views even if a more general one is hopeless not there as we worry beyond the world as well as the worry and scientific interest in this one.

In the above illustration, the outer circle is the flat mirror of the last posts illustration (after all the confusion of what is inside or outside in discrete matters is not brought up here- we assume as in black hole concepts all points to a within even if that may be empty. We see, on this level the enumeration seems complete so we count the possible iota atoms... we count it like the young Gauss did for the first hundred numbers in a sort of look and the realization by pairing that we can develop arithmetical laws. In this particular models we have 49 possible subatoms or particles. But this is true only for iota complexes as a sort of mirror for structures as singularity complexes that seem to be essentially Euclidean and orthogonal.

* * *


Some Ulla Dialog as I am Wrapping things up:

Hi Ulla,

links of blogs listed on the right as in your page- hmmm you have here, did not know that.

the idea of heat, you see Pitkanen needs a better way to explain things considering Lubos replied and added that this was a bad concept- so I was thinking how he could defend it or nail it down.

There is no heat (molecular movement) in the subatomic particles but there is a relation to it at the surface of black holes as a description.

Dawkins makes more sense talking about natural selection than his anti religion lectures. I notice Matti uses the concept of memes which came from Dawkins.

Last I heard there was no good explanation for the time arrow as you pointed out as many have as good a theory as anything- and the big bang reference is OK in this respect and definitely a sort of motion or volition is involved in the evolving dynamics.

The problem is teleology, causes and effects and what direction and why. But I am at ease with effects that actually come before a cause (outside the light cone) or the illusion thereof, but we can see things, the four terms for distance as all positive and all space only. It does not seem to matter for the final theory. (sorry, too long)

The PeSla

* * *

Ulla

Neither Pitkanen nor I think that much of Yang-Mills. I recently posted a way to better control the hot fusion. My world needs in terms suggested in this paper at least octonions if not a step further 16-ions.

I am not sure if there is a source of this sort of energy- we looked into it in the mid 90's but as far as we could tell, like in the machines from the Brazilian we only generated investors- but cold fusion in itself is a reality but not very productive by quaternion or quantum methods. At the ground point or zero state there are good machines being produced for large scale use in South Korea. But it is at the zero state and not some new source of zero point energy like in the science fiction shows lately. It is quantum theory based- but as Kea posted how long will we keep seeing things in quantum field theory?

The PeSla

* * *

The link sent me was from 2007 and theories, even TGD has advanced well beyond then, if there is one thing I see as annoying other than if gently adding not so much to enquiry a healthy chaos as taken up research time, a teaching requirement really, it is the promotion of such a theory and term by the author, it is those who seem to be their followers who seem to defend and promote the theory beyond reason and honest evaluation. Then again who can see the general problem of how our different brain or mind arrangements work as we try to put it into a familiar but vague theory that makes sense but one that fly's our own colors? What is the point in a war or cold war of ideas, like a football game, if it is certain in the main over time some will win and some will lose for sure? If Pitkanen will not defend TGD why should I deal with the abstract of it? All have lost the opportunity for great new explorations into the beauty of physics and the better world to be chosen from discoveries that explanation brings.

The freedom of expression on the internet will not replace the real world any time soon, so what is there to trust in it as a place to learn in the chaos? But of the real notions it is clear that we should beware of those who limit and control such information and thus in reality have no respect for intellectual property and the holiness of learning and art in itself. But this caution, lies or truth, applies to anyone among us who would so try to control the information blindly perhaps and innocently perhaps in a soap opera of alarmist we now call the social nets.

Of course this issue needs further thought- but in the real world at least, those who have tried and actually think they can control things with lies, are not very stable people and they seem to lie mostly to themselves with disconnections in their world views that shift.



* * *

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028154.200-when-the-multiverse-and-manyworlds-collide.html

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1105/1105.3796v1.pdf

Issues I have raised on this blog and one sort of quantum unification of notions of which I see as the multiverse- or issues of the richness of the underlying continua and hierarchy of them - for those that have followed- and I am not sure in the quantum sense of seeing these things that a good enough mathematical foundation is afforded us as the article claims. So, and people use the terms like casual diamonds and so on... decoherence and recoherence and so on... But it is hard having been raised with a simpler universe picture to accept or at least not feel a little uneasy with the complexity in nature of these general cosmological pictures and speculations having been so long now familiar with them. It is clever but seems a little science fictiony or perhaps a closer step expecially when the deeper models still debate things like inflation and so on (for me the transcontinuum level with the overall irreversibilities) and with more defined thinking we enter the new realm (new in the sense that not even the great Eastern religious philosphies have the equipment to speculate beyond these "Ultranscontinuum" (or multi-continuum-transcontinuum physical realms)... well, things are coming along and I should perhaps feel a little more secure in my own speculations if our great established scientists will present us with such theories. While the world catches up and we find simplicity again and a unification of our speculations- it all still looks a little obsolete to me in most areas- I think these same general, well philosophic or metaphysical notions will benefit greatly from a better arrangement of our mathematical foundations, notations, and symbols. In the combinational mind it is clear that any one theory may be comprehensive, but nature too can sort things out as if it evolves and adapts effeciently with combinations.

Now for those who have really follows some of my areas of concerns- beyond all this been there done that- there are deeper questions too which involve identity and such and the uniqueness of our individual being, experience, and perceptions of which the speculation and methods in this paper and theory are way to conservative even if they are shy for good reason that most likely a vastness of change may grow more chaotic than find a solid ground for certainty no matter how the limit of a local perception may reach that limit and seem to stay there if not go beyond.

The idea of some sort of notion of a multiverse-like idea that information can flow between them- well, clearly it has to be the 8 and not 4 bit in what is to be considered the set up taking time to that of instantaneous non-locality linking, so those issues also have to be considered and may be combinationally far beyond our quaint notions of what may happen in the evolving quantum computation technology.

In the abstract it should become more clear with the informational stances of this article, in concrete detail, that the way to see and work with the information itself in mundane terms of space and time is not simply our centering, as a matter of changes of chance or not as the measure, but whole new realms of what we think of what we mean by symmetry and its breaking in its various informational terms- even beyond the idea that a bit may contain an active or be colored by such now vague higher notions of topology as dimensions and number.

From the power subset continuum position we reach the philosphic adjustements of our notions which heretofore presented at best paradoxes that could be resolved in theory, but taking this much at least as asserted by the article, it suggests that some of our more limited world views as to the methods of approaching and grounding physics will have to be transcended if they are to make anymore than accidental progress for it is clear that in a dimensionless and even empty world of scale that one cannot consider the macro or micro effects alone and claim that for the entire universe or multiverse that these things do not also resolve on any scale especially the middle. In that sense the article should be bravely faced and required reading by anyone aware but avoiding the problems its possible inferences and implications present. The leap to a new world view from an old physics is as much a human and intellectual one as it is the application or discovery of theory and as such in our lifetimes at least the human and poetic elements will trump the theory.

* * *