Let us Make Ourselves Perfectly Clear

Let us Make Ourselves Perfectly Clear

*1 Given a string of nodes or points of 0's and 1's we assume it is in a discovered or imagined ordering.

*2 We assume it can have a certain length or can form closed cycles which may lose or reset the information or gain in the scope of its general multiplicities of freedoms.

*3 Two or more strings in their freedom may clearly merge including special multi-dimensional variations of numbers and coordinate shape ordering.

*4 From one unified or general view, at least, of clear and indefinite possibilities, numerical and topological effects may appear as if an intelligibly designed system.

*5 Relative to a reduced or more general system, at least around a local compass, an intelligible multiplicity of clear binary systems may spontaneously (at some reference space) break or build degrees of clear symmetry.

*6 From one view, nothingness, black, gray or white tones, spectral hues, hyper-color or more general notions, analogs, of such color as say "technicolor" as abstract or literal as with the case of "spin" is to be seen metaphysically as clear in the physical conception.

*7 In the design of an intelligible theory we discern or fix what is distinguished and symbolized by color analogies.

*8 The combining of color coordinates, assigned arbitrarily but uniformly, hue symbols may combine with fixed ones, ones with saturating depth or density, and opaque mirror ones real or virtual depending on the needs and design of a given theory.

*9 Thus, intrinsic or extrinsic curvature or computation somewhere is neutral or equivalent to clear processes in nature herself. These effects or realities need not be continuous nor intermittent if intelligible.

*10 With respect to some intelligible theory there are many ways to combine and perturb the sequences as fundamental factoring or multiplicities clearly somewhere equivalent.

*11 As things appear or move in preferred directions as if on all scales the most general model of space and time, of ultimate physics of the universe, is at least the OMNIUM, existence with intelligible changes of indefinite extent, clearly, strives for the core principle, dynamically and inductively, as Being and not being reaching an overall unity- that is in a clear context zero and one equals potential infinities.

*12 Under this generative but quasi-distant and creative unity an organism, on many levels that quasi-relate, may exchange assigned colors of 1's or 0's, but systematically and intelligibly, both in the metaphor of meaning and physical information as a substantial or material reality where these with less a general view may seem conflicting or confusing.

* * *

Can there be Clear Dialog

Can there be Clear Dialog

The simple thought that struck me last night, a rather muggy day here, trying to post pictures of life around Eau Claire and the sculpture tour (see my other blogspot www.spheresend.blogspot.com) but the coffee house computers and other on line storage or transmission paths were undergoing maintenance) I tried to read more of the recent posts with a feeling that we have all gone beyond each other in our separate detailed and esoteric directions. It if as if I finally got to that point where I cannot read what I write- it being so obscure or simple- that is, it seems that the others have caught up in this respect. For all practical purposes who really will read all this and who has the time to decipher the hieroglyphics in the language and formuli save those with an avid interest in archeology to come- or even the buyers and sellers of these entertaining cosmic issues, some already mummified.

Do we even hear each other when the nature of total theories, if we looked deep into them as an overview and reach a core simplicity, a clear understanding and communication, an x-ray vision in terms of applying what seems empty information and meaning in terms of clear coordinates and artistic distinctions, as our core ideas converge? In the doing so, have we found a state of isolation or useful dialog for in the chaos, the white noise by which our imaginations try to measure things and internalize them as evidence by statistical data, in the computations of life that is not just endless repetition or crazy randomness but a grasp of the processes and content that can be, as in the DNA, useful information in artistic contrast to whatever the background of the weight of the worlds?

Of course whether we desire a graph or picture rather than ordered and intelligible strings of symbols, formulas, is a matter of taste and emphasis of brain-mind design given and its ability to adapt to the background of meaning and information. The music of the mental spheres is as much a question of melody as it is of harmony and each emphasis has its limitations and advantages.

From a more unified view as to what languages and methods we learn, the various papers presented or buried deep,(of which we have at heart a few profound core principles the theoreticians relate to one way or the other) in effect archived as reference - the end and beginning really of a library to which we are close to foundational information when in the body of knowledge in the process of enquiry.

Forgive me if I of late use the Lockean inputs and good weights, that is the meaning of the idea of Liberty- but it is just a philosophy among others while the frontier of the enquiry is a tightrope between balancing allowing or rejecting all inputs. The paradox of democracy is that it allows the other philosophies of input that is as much a weakness as its strength of method.

We can only read and not check out the core references - as we translate a popular or obscure writing- take time to be sufficiently fluent in the symbols presented. It seems to me in that a theory makes progress toward a more general unification, our expert authors, theoreticians and tinkerers, dabblers here all point to core foundational issues to which a given discipline becomes more clear.

We have our own internal thoughts and dialog to consider also. But such an issue, a philosophic one, does ask things about the background of a more physical theory as well as to ask if we as a poet, full of emotions, write about ourselves and not our love, or of love and not any particular object of our love.

Some ideas, a few core ones, if they make sense at all to what is familiar to a receptive reader, seem so outrageous or foreign as to seem irrational or not seen in the clarity and simplicity as an issue worthy of comment and in general the weight of information and ideas that are of a greater depth and scope are not seen as unique or that relevant to the order undertaking the enquiry no matter how much the point is shouted or the equations worked out- most likely such new ideas that does not conform to the agenda in power are dismissed as most likely in error or from a source that wastes effort and pushes the results of that effort into obscurity. It is a sorry time for science when for one idea to come close to clarity it meets resistance for the fact that another school must vanish- but it is simply not the general case that for one person to gain another has to lose something. Even the sciences are subject to such a grounding of unscientific politics applied without the sense of consequences, purpose, or understanding.

But insofar as the clear physicality in the exchange of content as dialog it is a core question and principle as to when and where, what and who, how and why, and at what precise abstract coordinates and background, any such wisdom is conveyed or exchanged that after all seems independent of either the physical or spiritual source of things in the multiverse.

* * *

The White Noise Effect

The White Noise Effect

This is a general post about new results from studies on coffee. And about the chaotic white noise of randomness in general as the only method toward the truths we might find in science. We do not have to have very deep studies or ideas in order to influence the masses and their behaviors as to what is or is not good for them.

Coffee lately has gotten some pretty good reviews- caffeinated or decaffeinated it seems to ameliorate first the breast cancer and the prostrate cancer. But this comes at a time when some say we all have such micro cancers and our technology in detecting them has gone too far in the suggestion of a need for medications or operations on what over our limited lifetimes is benign for all practical purposes anyway. On the familiar scale some say that the self breast exam is useless and a few more say that excessive radiation will actually increase the risks of cancer.

There was a time when the statistics, of sufficient scope of participants and time-lines, said that coffee will break chromosomes, that is caffeine. This was a bad things in principle- Scientific American and other such magazines used this very principle to show that LSD, a hallucinogen, breaks the chromosomes. I went a year without drinking coffee and one year with not eating more than one egg a week- but eventually it turns out the popular magazines lie to us. For example, LSD does not break the chromosomes. In fact as with the spiders they make a perfect web while under the influence of lysergic acid. This is bad because it is the imperfections in the web that fool the wasps who search for spiders.

Let us recall that the brain makes its own hallucinogen and that without it our view of things (as shown in cats) would saturate into a blankness where we could not see any differences in the view. Moreover, it seems that the body, say exposed to radiation to some extent, or its immune system challenged as with broken chromosomes especially of one of the DNA strands broken and cancerous, becomes stronger and does not fade away into dissolution or an indistinguishable mass.

Yet some may read the popular news that suggests that coffee is psychotropic in that it makes one after 6 cups "hear voices". Coffee makes you schizophrenic some may conclude and hallucinogens are not neutral but do irrevocable harm. Perhaps, certainly low class 40's and meth has such effects, and perhaps opiates as a read once only of what may be stored in our chromosomes as memory or access to memory.

White noise was used in this study- and here we raise the question of placebos and the expectations of the experimenters. Listen to the white noise and tell us when you will hear Bing Crosby singing- and many reported, after coffee, the hearing of such voices.

But what some forget, and it is a deeper issue yet on what we may conclude from statistical methods say in our analysis of particle data, is that there are studies that show our ability to hear can actually be enhanced with some white noise in the background. I might conclude that coffee frees of allows enhancement of our imaginations. When the brightness is turned down and there is nothing on the television but white noise on some unused channel at night- a few photons get thru and we say they are left over from the big bang- evidence of that view- it is no wonder some feel that some of our theoreticians are at best hallucinating.

What was God smoking anyway?

* * *

Intrinsic Curvature and Intrinsic Computation

Intrinsic Curvature and Intrinsic Computation L. Edgar Otto June 6, 2011 (Eau Claire Interpretation- Clear Water or Flow) Note this from Library Computer as coffee shop ones are being upgraded.

We see then there are two poles of new fundamental theories. At the extremes we introduce the notions which may seem but assertions or philosophic stances only as to the fundamentals of physic. By intrinsic curvature I image that things are really curved but as in the relativity's they are actually curved but only if seen from very large or small scales- the results of Mercury's orbit is a classical example, and the article Lubos posted on the center of the sun, such ideas of inertia then asked what influence it has on climate- shows a topological centering of such notions as a view of physics.

The situation is not different from the quantum view for we can square things as if probabilities just as this virearl concept utilizes the inverse square in the gravity equations of Newton. But between these (well what is an actual symmetry or super symmetry and its concept of breaking or not) is such a squaring (see the link yesterday on DNA) which shows in life we unify the two physics in one model. But the principle of computation and a direction or history (neotericontinuum) is not a certainty in the usual QM sense as apparently it is not in quantum theory either now.

We treat some grounding at a distance and say that in the complexity we can use life or mimics of life molecules to work computation at a certain level. This can be done and perhaps with certain assumptions, centering rather than needed global generalizations, this works, but it does not describe a free and general principle of intrinsic computation upon topologies of curves and spins.

The principle of squaring things or taking the roots, holographic for example, is deeper than what we may apply it to as a reductionist principle of external computation or say some history of Bayslean notes to apply to such history, even. This is a clear principle in the sense of the clear coordinates involved in the concrete applying and the breaking of organized system. Another such principle is the mere fact of replication in that it is clear that the parts done as separate steps may maie a more rapid reproduction than each entity made all at once in succession, but this is not obvious as it is a clear principle.

In theory then, given two sets of codes wherein they are distinguishable, more or less like the idea of strands of the DNA helix, but of this theory we certainly can predict if we did not already know the possibilities of protein arrangement and the real determination of the RNA encoding- and the topology of such mixing in an organism in its complexity, that we can do the computation intrinsically in say a disc which replaces the hard drive as the only mechanism really needed is a way to read what is set up on a disc as to the mimic of a concrete physical structure.

Of course there may be deeper such principles and theories on certain scales where a more unified theory of all physics may connect with that of the other scales including the atomic and internal computational possibilities in the Molecular subatomic patterns themselves.

In a sense the arrow of asymmetry in such physics is a choice or an illusion of the emphasis to one side of things- in that sense so is the braket notation as a function generator.

Clearly, the link of yesterday is but another confirmation that the methods to analyse this life "force" as a factoring or division algebra of wider group theory and the various number theories requires new physics, for me the clear universality of the theories of Quasicity. However, there is not good reason to rely or stay with a limited theory, even my own, when the issues of the real world are much like energy ones in the creation and destruction we observe in the further or Phoenix physics.

I invite my European bloggers to taste our local beer, it is of Texas size compared to the minds of the university students who make their there minors, sometimes majors during the 5 or six years they are here at the uni. The illustration is thus a metaphor of post graduate work, most likely a Phd.

A theory is a terrible thing to waste one's life on, especially a unified theory that tries to unify the crack and the pot. There is more to genetics and replication than beer.

Of course what occurs locally but seems a general law is that extrinsic computation and paths on scales and curves can and does apply too. Even SUSY begins to look good after a few clear beers.

* * *

A Point on Metaphysical Thermodynamics

A Point on Metaphysical Thermodynamics L. Edgar Otto June 5, 2011

In that the metaphor of the idea of a Clear Hole (an idea since 95 or so) or the monopole as a "clear electron", One may reasonably ask how might you say something about something that not even in principle can show evidence it is there, and if someway it is there really makes absolutely no difference to anything physical?

Precisely!

To the extent Rowlands principle we acknowledge and know as metaphysical, the idea of a further level, perhaps an absolute one as if treating empty space as if the positive as the concern of physical models (see Lubos and Pitkanen for most relevant articles today on Greene that suggests a 9 multiview quotes Motil there These are of course how we may understand or apply quantum principles to the mix of things or how we may not. Both theoreticians are due for a breakthrough or refinement of their methods.) From that extent of insight and cognition we see that Rowlands principle becomes one that grounds and shores up these issues of physicality at to what the world it or matter, or something in it. This I relate to the two first or pre-laws of thermodynamics for that seems to me the grounding for various positions for these core debates as to what is the fundamental physics.

Ideas like "density" or how we relate to the hyperbolic spaces idea and twistors- and so on have to have a core logic if not vague evidence from physics. It seem to me not so much a mystery as I have developed these points over the years and last few years in particular that as philosophy its grounding that there are many abstract papers exploding out of this generation and its researches. These have to deal with the philosophy that has long slept in its implications for physics- just as our ideas of higher dimensional and geometry did for so long- now the sleeping baby is awake and seems to be crying too long in the night until exhausted that any lullaby works to soothe him.

There are laws beyond the third law of thermodynamics, in many forms suggested and a form I did on sciencechatforum if the post still exists- but I do not address that here. I address the zeroth law of thermodynamics, so-called, for at this point if we conceive of it as a mirror it is just before or behind the mirror for images that may be one handed or shadows that are particles, and such a distance from the mirror suggests that space is not just an empty vacuum in general but a quantum foam.

Zeroth Law- two objects in equilibrium to a third are in equilibrium to each other.

Clearly ideas that suggest we can vanish on one hand the monopoles as in the cited paper of my last post, or the suppression of certain more massive particles with these new experimental results of the usual idea of symmetry on the fifth quark- and see that link to the blogger who says he is surprised at the acknowledgment- Is the simple idea that in space the sample of things eventually reaches an equilibrium or on the average does so by this simple and reduced zeroth mechanism.

So as a "clear view" the higher level application of this law, that is of say dice far from the idealized but not physical law and mirror, the so called Null Law, we observe the sense that this is the proper realm of quantum space which does seem to have a paradoxical flow A to B to C to A in probability and average directions.

Of course on what side of the multiverse mirrors or even the lowly mirror are we on?
(Do I await further experiments with photons and multi arrangements of mirrors not just as thought experiments, up from simple physical models and common materials much like Coxeter walking around with his kaleidoscopes and boxes of mirror? There should be a whole technology here, not just the planes and flow between them nor the pairing of electrons as if they descend or ascend in the depth and span of equations, not if they are in a sense an analog say between sound and black hole? Let us make analogous terms but keep in mind they are but stepping stones- as perhaps the idea of quarks are or where, useful in their time. If we imagined three of them more classically (and this issue of when things become classical, as far as the issue from the clear view goes it can explain why some see in in a context where there is no issue really- and that goes for cognitive issues of subjectivity) what sort of zeroth or null law might we imagine them in a sort of analog to equilibrium?

Between the zeroth law (and the confusion with what is scale and mass and unity as the fundamental constants as fundamental or not) and the null law of thermodynamics we see (and the same thing can be imagined for relativity and its structures too) that each can be a mirror to the other structurally and that the philosophic implications one may make from one side of this mirror applies the laws oppositely and diametrically opposed sometimes as to which is the proper grounding and more basic grounding of the physics or which is seeing the other entropic principles wrong.

Perhaps there other quasi-thermodynamic laws (for not all our hidden dreams are deep and strange but lucid and interesting or reasonable and sane, some for whatever reasons have nightmares. This walking in our sleep does not scare me, it is the ones wide awake and dreaming who seem to be falling apart around me and who are metaphysical beings really that do not connect to others- that ultimately when we have a true sense of self and theory- these creatures do not have to be in any equilibrium at all with you for the default is that we can as awake recall nothing at all and death whose depths are a little deeper still as to physical connections, these ghosts walk the world but are not a part of any world being cold disembodied ectoplasm and not the sweet warmth of a body at least lying beside them.-

"Do not be fooled by the propaganda of the mentally deficient!"

* * *

Ulla,

You see, antimatter as that side of a mirror is a zeroth law thing and I am trying to talk at a deeper level which may or may not show chirality in clear space involved and yes it could be nothing at all absolutely.

But this link:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110331104014.htm

Should warm our hearts that our emphasis and the importance of biology in the mix as well as some of the complex theories and speculations- quantum only or not- is the case. :-P~ to all the "to make he best science forum on the net" who banned me for such ideas- may your children's children ask what you did in the TOE wars as they understand the landscape and terrain of life and all the spins and matrices of which you had the credentials and power and did not consider as more and more fall by the wayside at what would really be, for our generation at least, rather simple cures.

* * *

http://uduality.blogspot.com/2011/05/harmony-of-scattering-amplitudes.html

The conclusion of this paper, certain depth obscured by Feynman diagrams, need I point out this was among my topics a few times over the last year or so? Clearly, a lot more of theory as in this approach is going on than just the reductionist quantum field theory- not to say that Feynman was not aware of such hidden symmetries and adapted his position on them. What is a reasonable position that our heros hold is sometimes vastly misunderstood and misused by their followers who read too much into what the founder said- but is this not the human condition? We adapt sometimes by our errors as much as assertions- a cultural thing really where no matter which way the outcome goes it is the nature of theory that a jump between the theoretical mirrors in such Wonderlands and Looking Glasses - either way one wins playing both sides of a more general idea. After all, if we load the jury it is like being between two chess masters playing them against each other so that for one of them you win or reach a stalemate. Is this not the relaxed logic of being to which we sometimes illogically despair of the heat and game, a thermodynamic problem of extents and isolation? Making much of nothing, and too little of what if awakened things are?

* * *

Clear Electrons and Other Null Energy Entities

Clear Electrons and Other Null Energy Entities

Kea Link to this paper in her update today-

I too would modify the inferred idea of crackpot with a little genius here: I mean
what are they talking bout so long winded but a mechanism to reject the monopoles to match the observation- or a higher symmetry breaking concept and perhaps a deeper, and to them surprising asymmetry of directions in nature. So it is that while some have used the source points of monopoles as a grounding theory, others have tried to fit things in to a wider generalization to at least keep some continuity of speculative enquirey.

So, perhaps one may say, metaphorically and in relation to the new discovery of such symmetries and the apparent demise of some cherished ideas, monopoles are clear electrons!
But at this point why be conservative, the radical views are quantum cats out of the bag? Perhaps put in a bag and thrown in the river.

* * *

http://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-ph/papers/0508/0508257.pdf

"Now, at this point – even without yet having resolved the “zero charge problem” – we
actually have enough to consider breaking the symmetry between electric and magnetic charges. In
breaking this symmetry, we shall borrow from electroweak theory, and impose what we shall refer
to as an “electroweak-like” symmetry breaking condition."

Which as the foundations it is to raise the metaphysical question - the muon creates its own everything else not muon or a vacuum when it exists- Rowlands point out as the one in his book as such as the nature of his assumptions (again ideas of tachyons left out of this general approach and a much closer dependence on earlier ideas of Dirac in pehaps a generally scaleless or indefinite reference of a steady state universe- of which the vacuum may indeed exhibit conditions rather locally for what Hoyle called the creation field.)



"It is then very natural to ask, as a mathematical question, is there a similar connection between some expanded type of
duality, and larger non-Abelian groups? For example, what would be the nature of a duality that would lead to the
larger Yang Mills groups SU(3)D, or SU(4)D, etc.? This is not by any means clear at the moment, but in searching for a
phenomenological understanding of the SU(2)D gauge group that emerges from a local duality symmetry for U(1)em, and
at the same time in looking to find a mathematical basis (and a physical motivation) for the phenomenology of the
fermion generation replication, it is worth exploring if the generation replication and the local non-Abelian Yang Mills
gauge groups that naturally emerge from local duality symmetry might in fact support one another once larger groups
such as SU(3)D, or SU(4)D are considered. The author will explore the possibility that local duality symmetry is the
source of generation replication, in a subsequent paper."


"Notwithstanding this valuable input from others, the author, of course, is fully responsible
for any errors of form or substance."

This the usual and seen as a point of possibly illogical caveat by a (literary) author- but of course
these are about possible errors of form or substance!

* * *

A Brief Look at Superconductive Issues

A Brief Look at Superconductive Issues

In a comment now placed on one of Ulla's earlier posts- I place here so it is not lost in the flow of things, and mine is perhaps a superficial familiarization with the issue- I ask in the background a little deeper about these very geometrical stuctures of a lattice such as the truncated octahedron (Lord Kelvin's solid and nearly a space filler- at some point, where in metals (that is the area between the ceramics and the plastics as material) electrons may flow (unpaired)in the lattice.

It is strange to go back to holidays to see what I was doing a year ago and how long there have been some exchanges here with everyone. What was I doing someone asked me today last New Years... or my how my Memorial Day traditional rant has grown. It just does not seem it has been a year unless we look at things day to day...

Ulla,
http://zone-reflex.blogspot.com/2011/05/antimatter-asymmetry.html?showComment=1307224580700#c820467712932636856

hmmmmmm

Josephsons junctions is a very neat idea of which I just read up on. Not sure it applies to our long dialog of comments here either.

But as some scale level the DC becomes AC at some cooling.

Surely this has some sort of biological application to our mental perceptions- that is if we think about such tunneling and resistances with cooler heads.

Some strange things happen with such force like entities, mathematical things where we wonder if the zero point is a filled vacuum.

Tension and Compression tends to reverse at some ground state. While this may be true in the usual quantum sense, say TGD applied to biology in a quantum manner, my problem with the idea of a zero point- a relative scale and a moving scale at that- at least to one Planck level- is that there is no consideration given to a Null-Point description of the energies involved.

If gravity, in hopefully what we mean as "dark" can change from attraction to repulsive as a force on the large scale- at least in the middle or life scale there is a level where this happens too- and on the micro scale it must be in some sense a deeper property of our still vague notions of the mathematics involved.

At this point we again have to consider the thermodynamic symmetries of whatever nature as a general issue to be solved before we can solve other things clearly.

In a general sense these are issues of density of some sort various bloggers here have recently discussed.

Thank you for the effort help keeping peace with the sensitive theoreticians around us :-)

The PeSla