De-knoting Quasicized Quantum Foam

De-knoting Quasicized Quantum Foam

(Cotton Candy Cloud Compression Field Symmetries)

The above illustration contains several new ideas from the Diracian view- the chief thing that in the quasic concept we do find the 3 + 1 formalism as part of general space structure.

* * *

http://bridgeheadcarbons.blogspot.com/2011/09/what-is-bridgehead-carbon-anyway.html

cheminformatics A blog showing some activity lately I follow and very relevant to my structural projects of late.

* * *

Comment on Facebook to Marie today:

In the ideal world, in the equifinality after struggle if one survives it, all comes out light in the end- despite what everyone thinks is common sense outcomes- but one cannot hear things in the silence of our companion of our darker moods- for we are deaf to the inner light save the intuitive laying up of treasures investing in your own soul and staying positive at the loss of parts of it of vanished others.

* * *



Dark Nucleon Apocalyptic Space Or perhaps Eschological Spaces I thought as a title after my intended post of the work of last night- for it is not clear these mechanism need be seen as evolutionary or teleological although there is a certain logical and intelligible direction which when applied to the idea of genes shows deeper than quantum theory as foundational.

I suppose this thought comes from two people in moods like this from the change of the weather and a few that have nightmares in disrupted sleep- I had one myself and with only a sharp stick defeated three biker types with a gang name I thought cleaver but cannot recall it- in defense of some people and children in this old house as if in an alternative space seeming so real. I cannot recall the last time I had any sort of nightmare and my dreams are back to normal again. It also comes from the odd concept on the way to the coffee shop this morning on Dark Nucleon Apocalyptic Space Bombs as a novel surprise scenario if we go into a cold fusion scenario- after all these hits of concepts come from the work on foundations- it asks a question from the Diracian side of the clouds, my cotton candy quantum foams quasicized. That is if we can measure intelligibly any sort of what appears as a violation of conservation- for example the idea of dark matter (the idea of opaque matter I have used as a caveat in my reference to it) as a measure of our quantum ignorance if that can be measured and if there is anything to the generalized idea of micro level macro-verse effects that somehow are looping or self constrained as they may be part of the cosmology that is relevant to the points of origins, small changes leading to larger ones, of the compression of the information as physics some way. There are of course mental analogs to these foundational physics processes to which we may describe thinking in the physics of the day.

Of course this suggests, in a sci fi scenario at least, that if we ever did get some small gain of free energy from certain "cold fusion" processes, say we made a large plant to supply this, that in effect the so called lost mass (a way the collider suggests we may understand in the lost mass the hidden dark energy as we do infer the neutrino as lost momentum) that somewhere in real space the excess particles may accumulate to make a massive physical explosion- after all in such big science projects without understanding say the nuclear industry the problem is rather more evident with what to do with the waste. But we do not know if somehow the vanished or postulated dark photons or other particles do necessarily come back by some sort of general cloud looping process over some structure of space reaching some informational critical remote mass or other inertia conditions. The speculative relation of such dark physicality and the idea of black hole productions seems a much deeper thing to me than our grounded in different theories the ideas of the vague concept of zero point energy. In the foams or gels is not the holes in such entities doubling the compression mass? But as with all new technology where we know only so much of what we are doing- this could promise some rather clean higher energy sources and new mathematics for the transfer of mental informational structures.

* * *

For what it is worth I also did some flag logic logo doodles:





* * *

Rowlands and Otto On Foundational Unified Gene Codes

Rowlands and Otto On Foundational Unified Gene Codes L. Edgar Otto September 6, 2011

As with other possibilities of how the geometry of dimensions in relation to physics is to be generalized and unified- Peter Rowlands et al suggest the "nature code" and I the quasic code. From the first terse communication (now some months ago and since I have had to slowly go into the depth of his book in stages and feel the first impressions justified, especially in the particle theory) in praise of his book I wondered why his emphasis was on he 20 and mine the 24 codons that code the amino acids. From a geometric view these are aspects of one system of the geometry of space and time and physical applications of the hinted at unified theories.

*1 - The genetic code is quasi-plastic, diverse in expression, under this umbrella of a unified physics and geometrical interpretations.

*2 - The number of codons up to 2^6 divides the logical space (and its sense of direction as an open or closed system unto infinity) fractally and holographically such that divisions expressed may merge or duplicate at terminators and initiator points in the overall polyhedral-polytopal count of elements- in particular these naturally arise on the least dimensionally complicated brane or last face of 6 of the cube that contains these condensed shadows or things moving in them in relation to shadows. This is also, from the inductive stance the ratio of charge induction.

*3 - The charges are important as systemic induction in the molecular structures as from an iota's point the ray can be a star as if an electrostatic field or a loop as if a magnetic field- but these systems are mutable as quasi-plastic ones.

*4 - Just as the Diracian quaternion system establishes the 120 group as 32 x 32 elements and thus we expect some multiple of 20 for the reading- this quantized aspects of distinct and privileged parts of the quasi-local field is also quasized into sets of four, sixteen of the 64, intelligibly. This issue of the nature of vectors in a system also akin to that of Eddington's uranoid as in his Fundamental Theory- as a good complement to Dirac.

*5 - Part of the intuitive motive for this line of research was inspired by the director of research at UNC (who now passed on long ago with Alzheimer's but whom I dedicated my last unpublished book to for her help when our family was on the street and giving us $100 said it was for "research" I was doing. She was especially interested in my application to the color patterns of the skin of salamanders and the relation to new systematic theories of which I said at the time was a sort of unitary field theory.)

*6 - The emphasis between dimensions as a principle and the dodecahedral and 5-cell symmetries being the 24 of a rigid cube or the 4-space analog of the octahedron is the idea of such condensing here (which I suppose compacting as in string theory may relate in a quasi-plastic manner depending on how we view the continuities or the centers of things) Essentially the polarization (the ideas of Rowlands weak force focus aside insofar as the chirality goes) is the information of the quasic quadrants as well the arrangement of certain elements in other theory grounds as say determinants. The essential idea here is that the orthogons are on some level of complexity embedded in the simpler simplexes of which the cube of course fits the complexity of the icosahedral symmetry. (It would be interesting to see if after all we can have analogs to this symmetry beyond 4 space in some sense or show why with a firmer foundation than we now have in our old and limited physics).

*7 - One interesting consequence of these age old pattern views is the acceptance of the Platonic ideas of the Metatron Cube as appears in Rowlands book and has a sort of mystical or New Age following in which many paint intuitive ideas. For such people the fascination of philosophers with such solids, and recently of the physicists with the playing of quasi-regular tesselations of five fold tiles, we find this stella-octanga deep in the heart of possible interpretations of structures.
In particular edge to edge of tetrahedra shows 27 sub octanga of which these degenerate again to the one metatron of condensed 3 and 4 space shadows and to the idea of chains of such tetrahedra edge to edge and thus chirally face to face. In fact if in the depth tunnel we find a loop back to the world and not the open infinite parts in concrete reality or as imaginary time (this model does in a sense explain at least the shadow points in the cube as open or time like dimensions 4) then the debate as to if on the micro-level the Lorentz group consideration falls then the argument on this is mere assertion and not a logical argument as unification. Such assertions seem to me the vague, popular, and new age ones that has assumed the guise of an expert and exact science.

*8 - While this logically evolving set of notions on this creativity stance for enquiry blog continues to reach new levels (which of course surprises me as well) I would think that a 5 x 5 x 5 system would better focus the count of such things while the 4 x 4 x 4 is useful in the application of the 32 + 32 code expression, but this is just a guess for the odd number of things for an exact centering in digital drawing as the source of the intuition. While in presentation of a theory we do not show we are surprised and have doubts as that will impede somewhat the transmission of the notions I must keep in mind those things to which I myself am not aware to be surprised or not about- that is we cannot just assume that in one system of the reading of nature and her cosmic code expression even full compass of a practical theory that it is the proven only code. There are many more foundational things to think about here in the very wide and optimism inspiring new physics. For one thing it is clear that some issues as to what is the depth or surface of the effects of molecules and catalysts on an organic system may find more scientific grounding.

*9 - The distinctions for a certain code element or amino acid and so on (of which this double code space system explains some things heretofore mystery as the reconstitution of a deleted chromosome from the cell fluid context or the growth of some shapes even if the DNA code is missing) as to what dimension their influence feels and level it is in- is of course quasi-plastic. But in a world of pragmatic physicality and reasonable concepts of multiverse and non local duplications and of superpositions, is this not true of the Nonnecessity in general of a universe of the widest general theory?

* * *

The Non-necessary but Pragmatic Universe

The Non-necessary but Pragmatic Universe
L. Edgar Otto September 5, 2011

Before I begin my abstrusely worded philosophical shot post with odd logic, I would like to say that Lubos post today is right on the issue, the money- that is if that can be the case of the discussion by the author of the notions of D-branes. I do not quite see, while these topics are relevant to my contemplations presented here especially lately, how such clear statements of issues do not resolve with other such statements on the micro-level view considering the high quality of our theoreticians as far as ability to think is concerned. Is the issue of things violating some way to see a plane (some group idea like Lorentz) or that of a lack of understanding of some idea concerning say the nature of things at the Planck level?

In any case one objection to yesterdays ten new time principles paper (which is aware but compares yet does not resolve the asymmetry on the micro level with a more general theory of such groups and violations of their role as general gospel law) I see the Noether ideas, basically one of a Judaic- or Spinozan notion of God, as in the depths of what happens if we short circuit the go-around rather than default through the inversions, as far as symmetry and action goes, a statement of limiting notions (closed minded rather than open insightful) of which the doing of science, especially in biochemistry, is a superficial thing with hidden and unseen consequences.

This would suggest to me for example the recent voicing by the nutritionists and others that the quality of food in the United States has gone down hill from its relatively healthy and safe state in the early 70's. Pesticides aside, the artificial flavors and so on are mimics of what is actually the deeper content of the chemical structures. We are not like the canine with very high ability to smell things and gather a larger picture, even as chemists. We do not have the dedicated brain power for such an emphasis on a world view. What smells and tastes like cream in the Twinkies is really lard as far as a holographic sense of things is concerned. It is too obvious that anti-freeze in the potato chips could have some effect of defaulting to the center if such symmetries were not thought a matter of cost benefit and homeopathic logic of our toxins on no better grounding that that potentially useful but overly vague idea of medicine. Now other than the evidence that the correlation is almost certainly the cause- there are hints and suggestions that this change of our diet is the reason for obesity, diabetes, some cancers, and the so called epidemic of autism among other things. But this is more vague than my philosophy post below, as science perhaps.

Today is Labor Day, whatever that means by the Cross of God President Cleavland who initiated it... hey, the Soviet constitution had free education and guaranteed work and no need of insurance for the State, ideally at least, paid for everything. But apparently this can only be an idea- such is the idea of home ownership, health care, unemployment insurance, education access leading to a better level of jobs- the so called American Dream (and Veteran's Administration- where was the small business or job or home or education you promised or for that matter my teeth- if it comes to choices in our day for to pay for school or pass the burden on to the children to dispose of my remains- I told them to leave me at the county doorway of your office. If it turns out one benefit comes, the death benefit, I have changed my mind about the honor of burying me in Arlington in the mass graves. But my deeper point is, in this world the nation, region, or group that understands the new physics will make a better and stronger world for themselves at least and this can arise most anywhere. Yet things on the macro or familiar scale seem to have lags and take a little time- yet there is a logic and intelligible direction to the development of general history given so many who may be there to throw in their thoughts, not as many as the left-right culture that is killing our oceans with mass pollution, an ocean responsible for 80% of the air we breathe. Did some not wonder not so long ago why in the last mass extinction that a third of ocean life vanished also ?

I must add in my post of yesterday- which certainly seems an emphasis on the geometry over the physics despite I agree with Rowlands who suggests as physics it is otherwise and that includes the emphasis on other Platonic like mathematics such as arithmetic and group theory as not the goal but the means (although I tend now to see these as all part of a still bigger picture)- that the relations of things in the 5-cell is a good explanation of the reason we have such concerns and observations of how the elements are formed in stars and so on - and what is possible of the nucleons, and at what higher level say Iron things break up into Helium or beyond a certain level no higher elements form even with novas and so on...)

For the development of these color theories and structures should be investigated in a logically developing manner- say two color relations to begin with for we are talking about the general structure here of the abstract leptons and the iota string ensembles of them and that essential difference of the so called fermions and bosons which for more than a string theory or gravity theory begs for ways of unification.

* * *

NNPU

The philosophy question (recently mentioned again by Hawkings et al) "Why does the world exist rather than does not exist?" is not as deep or the right question. To ask it assumes things about the universe as a given - it exists and thus is self-evident as if a proof of the assumptions.

In the first place the world in general and in any part thereof does not "rather exist than not exist" for as both it is the most general and intelligible design for all possible designs so far conceivable clearly insofar as physicality goes. Otherwise we can imagine the universe could not exist and in any but an absolute sense be a totality or something somehow greater than that, that is some idea of something external to physicality. (This too as in Lubos's post today, is the sort of vague philosophy of reasoning behind what happens in the extremes of logic if we try to find the totalities of the various current ways to unify or explain the physics.)

Such a principle can of itself, and quasi-deterministically in space or time notions, be a creative force or power fluid in its relative directionality also as if annihilation. But would time as directional exist or not otherwise?

*This of course is conceptually grounded on the Omnic connections of iota point-strings. However, that this grounding exists in a sense can be that that it cannot "rather not exist". A way out of its certainty of hegemony if resolved of singularities and directionality (and of schemes of lesser unified physics of laws that also are unresolved as to the rather than exist or not to some degree at least of reasonable and intelligible aggregation) if resolved- that is if I did not exist or will not exist in any sense or pointless past vanished or future sense of the reasonableness as a cognitive state - would not this theory itself rather not exist?

* * *

New Scientist has an interesting post today: It seems we have finally found it acceptable to discuss some sort of quantum connection and the mind, human thought. Such theories were generally regarded as not very scientific not long ago by the debaters, usually the established scientists as I have seen it over the decade on the internet as in the philosophy or sciencechatforums.com

But before some of you jump on this to say I told you so, or some come on to show where the article is wrong or incomplete or really not quite relevant. Note the conclusion that something deeper is going on here- and that applies to something more than the ordinary debate as to what is the logic, classical or otherwise.

In other words, we need at least the next level of logic and the mind which for me is over course the quasic level of things- but then again quantum ideas is hard enough and has taken a long time and more and more needed to explain some of our intelligibly progressing technology where such theories are engineered practically and seem real enough to demand at least speculation on the reasons behind things.

So much of our thinking is still too vague or crude in any so called logics- to say for example negative energy or zero point energy has nothing to do do with gravity is to say things rather vaguely and the knowing this is not clearly demonstrated in the mere assertion of it (Lincoln with a good vague reply to a very confused questioner).

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128285.900-quantum-minds-why-we-think-like-quarks.html?page=3

Quarks? well, that stretches the argument a bit. Maybe not if we just see the quarks as the surface of things vaguely built on some imagined and only probabilistic origin with all of these old physics holographic ideas only of the symmetry of equations and so on...

The quantum computational era may be a long time before the next breakthroughs and understanding of human cognition and the physical universe. Let us hope it passes rapidly this time for the sake of future generations.

* * *

The Intelligibility of Abstract Theories

The Intelligibility of Abstract Theories

L. Edgar Otto September 3 & 4, 2011

1* A Structure can be that which imposes a topological restrain on the compass of its parts.

*2 The combinatorial, p-adic, and quasic informational theories form a unified description of structural possibilities.

*3 An abstract quantum is the set of simplexes within and between the several dimensions.

*4 The representations of simplexes may consider their embedding in higher spaces, point, edge, face and volume centered vectors and so on that makes distinctions in the physical expression or that observed.

*5 For the 4D 5-cell polytope (singularity, string edge or iota) centered structure exhibits vibrational ranges of uncertainty.
* For example: the Wolfe theory of NH3 between synapses while true is spirit is not asserted globally as is any theory with this limitation or defect of Quantum Theories.

*6 In the 5-cell there are two 5-linkage circuits that if no two colors are adjacent at a point then the sequence is a b c d e and a c e b d
*6x5 or 30 of these.

*7 In even dimensions where the sum of substructures is zero in real or virtual as odd dimensional centering it is two, we imagine a dialectic or dipole duality where
*two planes (branes) intersect in a point or a brane decays into two superimposed points.

*8 The spatial location of a "soul" or "psyche" that there is room for such beyond the familiar compass and dimensions of physical space, intelligibly, these coordinates full or empty as with general ideas of space (charge) itself, if we can somehow determine that it is actually full, this idea should not confuse the content of consciousness or spirit with the topology even as with mass there is physical link.
*(Notation added today on Lubos ten new time idea post: He needs a conception of how to compare time when it is a continuous value to other discontinuous objects. Perhaps to define what is actually the continuity involved in pure strings or points.)

*9 Color substitutions (just as that of group permutations and multiplications, rigid rotations etc... which btw is scaleless as far as general asymmetry matters) on a more foundational and informational level, two colors alike at right angles as edges and points for a total of 15) is 4X or 2^n quasic bit space.
*The matrix representations of the 0's and 1's levels are intelligibly structural, as does these mathematical formalisms relate to or define and co-determine physicality structures and states. Ulla

*10 Ramsberger suggests after color levels of a quantum (lepton actually) come the psi-effects, this still debated as a notion or interpretation may nevertheless describe mental states or its global trends and situations, even if such effects are not in fact supernatural, ultimately.

*11 The distinction or directionality of ambiguous color states is decided by whats is inside or outside or neutral in the extension across a quantum state. 12 in the illustration above.
*This difference may drive the global Omnic entropy directionality including abstract mirrors of so called dark symmetries and energy mass that may appear as an artifact of the p-adic concern with absolutes in physical and arithmetic systems.

* * *

God's-Eye Space

God's-Eye Space L. Edgar Otto September 3, 2011

Having taken a short break into the more poetic or mythical mood I still find a few stray thoughts on the more general nature of geometry as to physics. Was this change in mood necessary to make progress when it will certainly be regarded by most as a laspe in reductionism as the ideal of the sciences? Perhaps, from a higher view, one for now I call the God's-Eye view, after all to call something the "God Particle" gets attention, at least is a metaphor for the generality level involved. Of course if we are to see this blog as a coherently evolving whole all these new and necessary terms- necessary to think with if we take as gospel recent data on such regions of our brain activity related to ensembles and nuiances of words, I would have to make clearer the connection of certain ideas of space as to where they apply from the different and difficult to achieve independent methods of a more general view. What relation to the quasic and arquasic metaphores to this space? I am amazed that going down a different track at the fundamental level of folding and cutting these geometrical objects is so rich a side stepping view from my centering in my generally quasic (and intelligible, forgive me the overuse of this word as I forgive myself the constant footnotes to explain my practical use of coined symbols).

Perhaps on some deeper level than say the common or popular understanding there is deep reasons and explanations for the terse principles offered. Maybe not, I mean how is it that light can bend back on itself in a model in the intrinsic curvature of the the Einstein universe and how can it change handedness at some remote point and can we pass that. Surely some have reason to feel these are comfortable physics or mathematical ideas, whole areas of independent development, and yes it is clear that some can treat flat planes as if mirrors in recent discoveres that modify or changes the fundamental laws we have held as refraction- technology can get on fine without the imposition of a fanciful or limiting theory, but slowly and in a way that one cannot encourage the next generation of possible surprises. But what is light coming back again in what is the inside or outside of such planes but the "Eyes in Back of the Head of God" so to speak in the myths and metaphors- ones that as art however maybe lead the notions of physics in the culture rather than reflect the state of the culture?

I would like to add first that you will find many cherished ideas and methods challenged here or questioned in this blog of quite fundamental mathematical nature of which we certainly must wonder if the author is off base in his world views or that there is something greatly lacking in how we do and interpret the math. One such today is the question of the general utility of any sort of coordinate system that utilizes the Euler type angles to bring things to prefered axis notation and then apply this to some idea of phase space- I mean, the principle is sound and if there is a new prinicple to assert to explain some things like asymptopic freedom that will do rather than a new theory of a more unified or God's-eye view. But all this simplifies for me in the look at a more conventional way of cutting and folding orthogons between adjacent natural dimensions at least - and the eye openning discovery of why in four space we have such a variety of more than the Platonic three space solids.

This, for those philosophers still attatched to Plato's early intuitions I will call metatronics from his metatron cube. The difference between dimensions is concrete now but comes from the two great intuitive thoughts I had in 1968 - one is that the electron (now leptons in general) could have subdivision as six iotas- or that these not quite points but point-string rays, for the octahedron so importaint the recent theories such as those of Triality. This was really quite a leap. But not as important as the other idea that in the eight dimensional chessgame we find the core of the four dimensional one informationally and so on. The six iota directions is a result of the imposing of two tetrahedra one of which is the self-dual inverse to form the stella octanga of Kepler. Note that in it is the octahedron of three squares, and that these may shift along the edges of a tetrahedron such that the orientation of the axes in effect have limits and prefered thus different coordinate shiftings. In effect the notation of the analog to the octahedron where we have the cube and the diagonals between them to form the four space polytope of 16 tetrahedra we have indeed this sort of abstract centering that extends in fact to higher space structures as if the rhombic dodecahedron is in a way the 3D analog to the 24 cell. I leave it to those who can work in the area of smashing of volumes and so forth to determine if such axial shifts have useful formula. For now I have this vague intuition labeled *6 below:

*6 The difference in the natural and quasic dimensional space may ground intertia ideas such as mass and gravity notions, locally as remotely globally expanding or contracting entropically and intelligibly.

The Octahedron involved in the transformations above are in a sense scaleless and Euclidean, inside and outside the complex of the metatron compressions and condensings.

I would like to add that the unfolding of the cube to 11 possiblilites and then to divide them into the 7 cuts and 5 folds, folding them back again to make matching cubes leads to some interesting patterns and ways to draw these relationships. Leads to interesting numbers for example when only two forths of the face is used there are 27 faces of the 11 cubes. I did not find yet a good symmetrical matching but it occurs to me that a set of cubes that may connect in any dimension but does not default to some globally intelligible geometric symmetrical shape is a very useful notion which may ground foundationally the general ubiquity of quasi-entropic order.

* * *

*1 If we imagine different levels of Planck constant values, what prevents them in a continuum from collasping to a value of singularity as zero or as an infinitely descending limit?

*2 If the distinction between successive Planck values is maintained by something such as pattern shape fractal recursion, what sets a privileged location that can distinguish among them? (this too a problem of philosophic similarity and identity especially of the immediate one we are in to the lesser and higher focusing.)

*3 A "pixel" or quasic plane ground unit rigion may have quasic grid depth or it may have natural dimensional depth as a series of additive component structures and these may be different as to the Euclidean geometry of parallels or not. What arithmetical value beyond itself is held constant?

*4 A set of such pixels may combine intelligibly into structures of coherent parallels by depth tunnel additions and within one pixel (brane) these may fill all linear set continua and possibly continua beyond that.

*5 At the remote limit of such extension as if an horizon, can it be exceeded, perhaps along the lines of closed hyperbolic (therefore its associated space group views as a space ground, Lorentz?) such that globally time and handedness and local space reverses in loops?

*6^

*7 Each of these partial views of space may likewise contain modified or intrinsic matrix representations which as a God's-eye view establishes variations, diversity, discontinuities, and physicality intrinsically or evern randomly intelligibly when considered together.

*8 In the multiverse time paradoxes that there has to be an original (thus unique initial origin) "Shakespeare" to solve it is thus not obviously a true explanation or necessary notion although one rather advanced and interesting.

*9 Can that somewhere between paradox and contradiction these cancel in relation to multiple others (as if a double dialectic) to find general intelligiblity?

*10 Can a program of instructions based on this asserted connection of quasic and natural dimensional spaces result in a point-fixity of vibrational differnces as say in robot arms in a range of uncertainty becoming as if an absolute rest? Is there therefore a stable coordinate space as an absolute continuum after all?

* * *

Illustration for the Geometric Origin of the Chemical Elements: (Lately the discussion on the star without metals on the sci mags and on Pitkanen's blog):



Yet in general, but more rare, what conditions are at supposed origins are present throughout time over the omnium as far as creation goes. Now for rank speculation perhaps such considerations biologically finally may explain the observation that Lithium works on the brain upon the manic depressives.

* * *

Dancing with Stars

Dancing with Stars from the Book of Worms and Lilly-pads L. Edgar Otto Sept 2, 2011

The soul is not concerned with what of the design of your heart binds the feet or grows the twig- these things are secondary, and the descent into the light or our arising from it is the prime glory of creation wherein all things love.

You with false beliefs who have found the false god- certainly a match made in Heaven, and who am I to enlighten you, deny you the mercy of what the soul can bear, steal your dreams and change your path that among the mistakes of nature you shall not awaken.

The light is the source of things in this world and yet it is the end of all, the final mirror fall to back whence we come- and no one knows if our view into the light and dark is an endless walk or a final destination calling us to some higher end. We but pass the days to get there or we stumble flashed to the clouds to arrive there- and no one keeps the clock.

The stars and these centers of creation, the depth of tunnels and the descent of spirits, demons and angels, these things are part of the thought and dreams of man.
For what is vanished in the sea of broken toys is built again. The Norse men seek the trade winds and the equator, the desert tribes dream of the top of the pyramid as the door to heaven fixed at the dog star. Howl then, and heed the loops and hidden passageways pointing North- and in the secrets these alone the protection of the prophets and priests. For as you bask in the light you collect it into grain and drink of the flood waters, stars and death stars vie for the sky and the gravity that holds you on the thirsty earth does not know if it is the metal and the chalk that holds up the sky that one day will crush you.

You who sleep on the ground face its coolness in the heat of summer or face away from the sky and dig into its warmth in winter - creatures of the storm this is why for lives keep to the days capricious climes and begets the fog.

The cloud does not allow the vanishing of hard gained wisdom by the aging human soul as much the grasp as contained in a lifetime one mote of light all of space and time. What a shabby design that would be for mankind and universe - only the sunlight craved by the wanderers lost in it can welcome and dispel the fog.

Denizens of the cloud cannot hide from us as much as we have journeyed far from them as if we need not the dew when all else is dry in the desert.

Have I lived by the cloud, my ancestors there or in my soul this side of the bright end light, or do they now live by me?

God is like unto the owl, his pounding wings and rapid dive in the stealth of starlit night and only the wind felt too late to see him after he plucks a single hair from the numbers on your scalp, razor sharp his talons. All for a string among the countless to build his nest.

God gave you as lovers a double soul like the dolphin's brain, not that you crave to return what nature has torn asunder but that you can play freely like the dolphins.

You ladies born rotund and Ruby-esque, recalling how fleet and slim, immortal and innocent your fleeting fragile youth, playing fasting games or denouncing the imagined jibes of inconsiderate devils, you cannot hide the beauty of your camel's toe.

You who live a like but appear to believe it so that others conform and in the main heed the laws, but do not believe in your hearts the book, the scroll, the awakening. You will have a double surprise before you pay with eternal night having plucked out your own eyes.

When we lost our brother, and his lingering shadow now forgotten in the rust and dust and light, we lost everything again and so became shadows. Only the spark and isolation from the living souls keeps my heart from from being now made of only shadows.

The day of martyrs has past - the fear of them and holy days and gilded Mare maid memorials in their honor will no longer protect them nor the prophets by their examples.

At the gate of Heaven, traveling to it through time and time around, what guarantee is it we enter therein and our unique soul persists beyond the vanishing of the old memory grounding of the stars?

The animal soul sees and responds to evil - but in stealth the immoral higher incarnate soul knows and uses this to control the animals.

Not that we must die to know if there is more beyond the Gods-eye higher dimensional view through the depth tunnel into the light, there at the gate so to speak, but that we can know about if we return.

Only he who knows the game is fantasy can play it well, win and learn something from the game as real.

There was a time when the runes were magic and divination with them gave warnings and bearings. The seafarers close to the land played Morris with counters and wagers, their compass in the fog and depths.

The adult of your species have lived beyond their years, fragile shells of seep spent time held together by drying seaweed. That you evolve is nature's struggle to reach the point where the jewel and purpose of creation is a long and happy childhood.

Once a soul awakens no matter how short its life past quickening, it cannot vanish - only in rejecting it comes the rejection of what your life with it could have been, regrets or not you have taken away from your own light.

In ancient times, in war there was restraint and mercy or formal respect for those villages obeying the laws of conquest and defeat, for the fear that some souls may return seeking vengeance. We have forgotten that as now more than the wine and lime we insure that no skeleton breaks out from the grave, slow the iron womb that sends all things to fire and ash. Dismissed as an unknown we er on the side of dust and light against simplistic superstition. Consequently, wars are now more unrestrained in violence done with indifference.

No one in heaven or earth can accuse the innocent soul when truth is known in our own open hearts, to only ourselves and God some ever uncertain testimony that is our right of being against the torture that welds swords of lies. But only God can advise and forgive, permit, allow for expediency our actions and for others our sacrifice or intervention, if contrite and worshipful of life even the self-deceptions in our soul's heart.

If we cannot talk to the spirits, the tower strong through the depth tunnel and that as much with us as our shadow made of the dark pure light, how can we know or talk to God? The city roads to heaven are easier to prove and hard to surpass in understanding than what of God is that He exists.

You think yours is the right by knowing another, an accident or by birth to make some claim on their love and life- insist this tax on my time, little bird who could fly keeping an open mouth- beware how I might fill it.

You are drawn to the cloud in the screen as with any light, mistaking it for a purpose, end, sharing of wisdom- the moth in a mindless holding pattern mechanical the brush with flames until it cannot fly and becomes insensitive to touch.

But is this not implied if our animal soul shows no relation of the physicality of the world and the entropy and stacking of diamonds, the steps of our animal and higher souls as we dance until the closing of the feast, with the stars?

* * *

God's-eyes L. Edgar Otto 2 September 2011

God is like the field mouse that peeks so fast from the mouse hole to see what you are doing you are not sure you've seen Him save for an uncertain feeling. If you try to see Him no matter how you turn looking over your shoulders you still but glimpse this feeling.

The Devil is more a shrew or mole that assumes you're looking for him. You will not catch him in a mousetrap, for he waits until the mouse takes the cheese then he has both.

You rabbits, long your ears and reversed the silhouette of ducks on the sky your eyes seeing innocuous as evil. So you stand still at one with the grass or snow as if God's-eyes cannot see half again in the depth of dimensions.

While we cannot see the other half behind us, God has perfect vision. His eyes in the back of His head.

Only the bunnies captured by man long enough to cross the channel survive, unlike the adults who freeze and die from shock and fright.

In love as in faith we can see a wider picture, see our selves and each other with greater clarity that banishes all other stalking, prying eyes.

If our bond, its joys and mirth and tragedies were foreseen, such prophesies in our eyes, as with God's, would make no difference come the Kingdom.

God is as much the weaver of the dust, His eye for colour, and greys, as His warps and woofs of light. Our pale logic, our designs and explanations, cannot improve upon what in His we see as lack when that is the most sensible, free and beautiful- without His permission.

The philosophy of God serves to bind the seed and tribe of men over as long as the traveling star crossed the constellations known before text and script. But outside the pale of its people united by iron and steel it has no reach or can remain this useful function. The people beheld the star and saved its light by voice as wisdom.

* * *

Lockean Spring

Democracy of the revolution where justice blind can give good weight but cannot weigh anything truly, the chandeliers of powdered wigs, ripe and perfumed the falling figs splattering on the Tri-cornered hats of cavaliers ever half way lost through the forest but full of hurry, like the girdles and bustled gowns hang down through the crystal beams of light like dangle berries.

* * *

He Used to be an Expert at the Dawn of the Age of Computation

I am not so sure of that One-that-Sleeps-Long-without-the-Sun, they have no more funds to study you? They admit they could not make sense anyway if they biopsied your lumbar? At least that is honest. Surely the world can hold vastly more beings that you do not have to vanish that the new ones have place.

Neurologists come close and it is interesting that they cannot explain how you sleep at all without melatonin. Something must serve that function.

But do we need the nerves anyway to transmit the messages of touch and motion? And what is the light of which we dream so as to turn our heads away from the brightness of that sun? Did not the motes before animals so arrange the chemicals for the mind to come? What are we, lowly bacteria on the face of the world, so make like it for greater things to come?

Does not your furnace of your cells emit light even a thousandth as bright as day? Or is there some deeper light to which your mind in stroke so see by it halfway into the place of only such light?

Does the oatmeal work at least in summer when you hibernate the less? Why do you find in dark meat so much that is bleached out in the white meat of the fowls?

* * *

Polyomnic Plyctals (Four Space Unfoldings)

Polyomnic Plyctals (Four Space Unfolding's)

When extended into four space these fold and cut concepts find many wonderful and new patterns and physical principles. Some of which I may post later or as an illustration of the original notes of last night.

Briefly, in the n-Phoenix physics (Phph) we have three areas which meet sometimes coincidentally at a singularity point of three kinds of singularities (for example a point itself in a structure may be considered a cut as also the count of edges and planes). We have the Polyomnic Structure (QsPh), the topological guage (QlPh) and the Physicality entity (QmPh) all part of the Omnium and roughly corresponding to quasic, qlassical and quantum physics.

The three forms of singularity, the singularity itself and the first pixel, the complex over all of quasic space and half of the infinity between, may meet in a point that expels one of eight cubes of the hypercube as unfolded.

These ideas may exist in the literature such as the proof for the twelve in closed packed sphere although here we by volumes can make use of the room for one more and a part of one more- a question to ask again of foundations. In any case the level of ideas here is found from the foundations up rather than from the topological common level down. There are disphenoids possible as a dual to these polynomic rhombidodecahedra just as in the natural dimensions we can think of analogs to the dihedron of zero volume and two faces- that is say for example zero hypervolume and two cube faces connected... and so on.

Such "conflangelation" (condenser flangelation) as superimposed doubling is equivalent to cutting as virtual guage alternative lattice is in effect a folding.


Of course if these principles were understood and accessible in general perhaps there would not be all the confusion, the scandal really, of what to do to describe the yang 6D manifolds and so on. Is there a uniqueness of primes (p-adic TGD-like) based on the general axiom of hyperspace where orthogons such as two branes may intersect a a point (two ditopes of many dimensions intersect at a singularity).