Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Parts III, IV, V)

Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Parts III, IV, V) October 7th, 8th, 2011

III Marking the Pathways

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsPsiO6K8Cw&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL



Bruno laughed at Caleb while they were walking aimlessly down another corridor when he realised what Caleb was doing.

"What are you doing, Caleb?"

"Well, I'm marking my territory. There is nothing to smell here in this new place. It is as if you were blind."

"What good is that if you are only seeing your own thoughts and paths?"

"On the contrary, Bruno. Should we need to go back the way we came I can find the way. Like when we play chess - you can only "connect the dots", analyze the game in the past moves you made. The future, we can only make a reasonable guess seeing but a few simplified moves ahead. But we do learn and get better at the game."

"I have heard, Caleb, that in the quantum theory we can only see into the future to the extent we can see into the past."

"Would it were that simple. As with any game in the many-world and multi-verse the winner is the last one not to make a blunder as their centers shift and their thoughts in one world a chess master even for those who can barely play or for the master falling from his skill briefly far away from the mastery where all games become draws."

"Do you get a glimpse of anything in our future leave these hallways and catacombs with your traces of hot prime Caleb odor?"

"I see that this orb will bear your name, Bruno with a face as if one of our once touching the worlds time of godhead and even other Bruno's in paradox. As if a star with its twelve rays and wires between such worlds, free or stolen from each other, metered, taxed with tolls where magic becomes light. I the K-group or sphere and lesser god too, of the ninth dimension of hypernumbers, playing K-9 fetch."

"I sense something also, that we face another cycle of the equinox of autumn, still a higher space. But as we look back we can come to where our branching paths begin and there transcend this time, so to begin anew, we once existing now solid in our knowing."

"I suppose that could be so, Caleb, somewhere in the tidal pools and tugs of incredible perfection, we who find the best of possible worlds. Yet in the furthest visions of Time's awakened while alive I sense beyond the faerie fields and their faerie particles and waves, so many parallels or perpendiculars consuming each other that they may as well have never been.

"But this is just a vague feeling and all too close for we lived long enough, surprised we survived that as unique yet ubiquitous we gaze upon in awe and marvel.

"But by that I don not mean the gargoyles stone or spirit here at the quoin of a new cathedral to decorate for our claims of arrogance in pride or whispers in our ears, heard or unheard for humility, that in the fissures of the fabric of space and time no matter where the steeples point to each other or away, that the dark mirror of our ongoing surpassed wisdom must ever return to chaos."

* * *

IV Nothing Cold

How naive I was, childish or childlike in the genius, to believe we all capable of growing wings. That not everyone desires awakening, clings to the gift of life. They, who have no grounds of justice save formality in going thru the motions -nor peers to measure the confessions and forgiveness unseen in our hearts.

As I await the flame to light my bond fire to be branded by it, timeless its glory to follow and define me that otherwise I, today's monster in their real or rumored superstitious consensus not be the eternal but forgotten Martyr thus not as much a model for their lives.

Yet it is as if the gods, or nature that can still heal herself despite us, were merciful. For we can only boil and not endure the thousand melting lead degrees, loosing consciousness where the spectrum of our ignorance is still bliss.

Some sense our worlds in the hierarchy of acceleration, as do the paramedics in their siren chariots that the worlds end in ice - saying nothing cold can be declared dead, nor warm the time of birth or death a certain tally mark, so to our halos of the boundless fire.

* * *

V Homecoming

One last vision looped through time after Bruno became insensitive to physical pain. He recalled Caleb asking what he thought it would be like the last few seconds and what would he see with his disembodied head during the exploding frenzy and maddened crowd at the time of guillotines.

Peace came over him, that lost or gained when life passes in review or in a fleeting moment revelled in the dream as much anything as real. Olney, earthbound, homeless and bare-footed, Eros, a shabby description of a god as Holy Plotinus wrote in his book of Nine- walking through the quad at the great Midwestern University too long delayed his admission despite high scores from the entrance exams. That place the news said was the best for woman's studies, that and the highest rate of them all for women binge drinking.

Sunday after homecoming he comes across the Mermaid as if her walk of shame became her passed out on the chilly, dewy grass. "Are you OK?" he shook her and recognized him, asking if he would point the way to the bus stop so she could get home. It was on the other side of the quad but she could not walk far.

Being morning at this time many well dressed faculty walked their dogs. She was following Oln on all fours. Coming near them, if they pretended not to see Oln and the Mermaid at all, they glared and made loud "Hmmmmmf's". Olney reach for comic but biting humor in the awkwardness of the moment:
"At least I do not have to keep her on a leash." Then the ladies turned their heads away.

* * *

Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Part IIa)

Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Part IIa)

I am not in my usual coffee shop but the library so I will submit tomorrow part three there vaguely to be written. But it does cover the theme today, especially ethics, politics, big science, and technology as with the dialog with Ulla on Pitkanen's blog today. The illustration for part three will be the sun-star with twelve rays and a power line down to the meter at the back of this old bakery printing but I cannot post it from here. The coffee shop is closed for HOMECOMING at the university and I will avoid Water Street and the all night long drunk students so I am staying at Katie's watching her house when she is working in Madison, now it was so amazing to have a soft bed and not my roommates floor that I slept late- and dreams related to this which I doubt have any science significance- Banded (a recurring term not like bonded) for such an environment to extend ones rest and dreaming time and another term (I forget)that if one sleeps so well one would tend to wake up refreshed and sleep a little less.

ok - It occurs to me, Matti, that that link on hydrogen bonding on the surface of water would have some special interest to you for today's and your ideas of "teleportation imprinting on water of the DNA". But I wonder if a theory of everything can actually include all such concepts right or wrong? Look, if you showed how you derived certain number ideas- publish it- perhaps I could be a little more certain about how these may apply to other such hopes for total theories :-)

So I wake up to Inside Edition that points out the sit com "Big Bang" had become very popular and got emmys. More than the first offerings (Maybe it is all about promotion really.) But if these guys are geniuses as portrayed as one's favorite nerd stereotype- then that perhaps is how the mass of humanity regard scientists- as certainly mad and less good people in some ways. Interestingly enough, the same show had Steve Jobs life data- most interesting really. All the money and magic in the world will not heal his cancer it seems- this seems so strange that my life extends a little further before and after his as if parentheses or some way to adjust our clocks as the world spins on the time zones.

* * *

http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/10/p-adic-numbers-and-cosmology.html

Matti,

I have read that some say the internal content of black holes is not there- they have no within, only the surface- and that is very thin.

Now there can be a wide inside, or we imagine our universe inside a gigantic one, and so on. But this conception of things is far beyond the concept of Black Holes.

Of course the p-adics are concerned with absolute values so look for something deeper than asymmetry.

While I still cling to a notion similar to your concern of a sort of "prime number space" - not quite sure how it will find a place or fit in- Lubos today has a link where the explanations for such greater than c particles is a deeper mixing of reference frames (this as an adjustment after the fact!) In any case, well, the limited concept of Eternal Inflation seems to me a global limitation and conceptual error if these concepts are not allowed to generalize.

In fact your take on biology involving wormholes and the like, would explain a lot if we saw the system inverted into internal symmetries and not to general external space. There is no outside! Such inversion by the way are conceptually things people have done to justify reversed views as the pendulum swings for say the justification of a totalitarian state.

For me the primes are best we have for some stability as to what is unique, and what unique is the scaffolding for what is a sound theory evidently. The numbers are unique but not as much as their expression in a biological like system- the good part of information technology to come.

Part of the general idea of applying this idea of numbers (indeed the very question of what can be independent egos or discoveries) is inadequately stated as we pass the event horizon of discovery by the idea of quantum results as in Lubos post that considers 1+1 pr 2+1 and so on without a better M like theory.

From one view, if we accept the facts of what a living form such as a paramecium or amoeba can do, we are not that far away actually. So any just claims you have for arrogance of these noble and a little better people, the scientists, is if they are the only ones that think their consciousness can spin a little faster than the speed of light :-)

In a self contained system can an entity know itself and still be invisible to all others? Is there but one electron or monopole or mind and how is it we observe the difference? Does the general tree of p-adic numbers not contain the same information as the ones and zeros of the canopy in any given state of growth down a unique branching?

The PeSla

(wondering if Matti discovered such numbers independently or as a competent engineer applied them? I agree there is so much more to be discovered in this area.)

* * *

Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Part II)

Bruno Burning (Sci-Fi Part II)

I was going to add a page or two but got caught up in the art of it- I may do so today here later. But those who are thinking about things like sequences and transcendental numbers should really think about where the randomness applies here.

Last night I tried to play at the bottle and barrel but there is no house guitar and one of my machine heads is broken. I promised the workers there whom I have known a long time I will play next week. The moderator of the groups there said he was reluctant to loan me his 3000$ Martin and I said I understood, like borrowing a toothbrush.

http://www.nutters.org/docs/monkeys

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem_in_popular_culture

* * *

WLS came in loud and clear on my radio last night and the Coast to Coast am show was interesting to a point, a view that we have been here for ages and may have had superior creatures similar to us visit and change the genes and all- all this apparently from evidence in the Torah and Sumerian records as to the nature of Gods or the birth of monotheism from the visitors. Why do they call it "Dream Time"? This is certainly a convincing way to go if we can start from some vague origin that cannot explain origins... but it seems to me a fanciful crock, especially when it comes up on morning television preacher shows- the ages of the earth and all that- Well something is touching our psyches here- but even in such discussions it always comes to some point of speculation where the authors of such analysis for those of us with a little more discernment find it stammering and lacking.

* * *

Well, rare but sometimes we can see evidence of Triality and Beyond in our rainbows:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111005111001.htm

Rainbows...tertiary and quaternary exist...

* * *

Well, it is a blog- and yes let Bruno gaze into the arrogant who act outside the mainstream in their priestly roles be their God one of darkness and ascetic love or of human light and kindness--- the following rant, forgive me, but I am finally annoyed at the poster to Kea's blog- where is the science- and where is the understanding that is wiser than such narrow fundamentalism?

EST,

She can see a few rainbows further into these abstract dimensions you only think you see there. Even a child can see this, she once said- and I am not much of anyone and can see it- I think the difference is she has found more of what is real than some stray vague idea of how the world works. I too would welcome a serious discussion, but I dare you to defend your position- that is if there is anything to it beyond opinion.

Her insight was here long before now and will be here long after some of the lesser but bold ideas of strings and cosmology are forgotten in the dust bin with mere names of those forgotten, their real lives and gold stars to make the less than adequate feel good in their unjustified sense of psychology. My, you protest so!

The PeSla

* * *

Bruno Burning (Sci Fi Part II)

L. Edgar Otto October 7, 2011

In the halls of the center of learning, once a castle with such small and narrow doors, the myth and magic of Dacia and the thirsty impaler of the realm- who knows what in our human hearts this desire for dreams and warm blood we newly evolved lizards attach our hatch-lings to the womb.

Yet one can walk all around the buildings, go down the paths, here at the center of the know universes and debate the gate keepers of the keep and imagine what it is like to find the silence and loneliness of the cells of isolation, shackled in the shackle of isolation rooms judged without justice the meaningless confessions to condemn you by those who hide behind the rood.

But what did the villagers know beyond the torch fires and sooty air and once in the procession to protest the master on the hill, how limitless their time, how scarce the waste in the burning of wood, how rusty the scythes and shouts that only the master could see and watch them? They but embers like fairy rings depleting the soil in circular expansion the creosote catching fire and the occasional spark that lights the gowns and carpets of the higher beings who themselves can only make a crude sketch of the worlds to explain things.

Bruno stayed the night, only a blanket between the stone floor and him to keep out the chill. Yet he rolled it around him a couple of twists that between the floor and the morning dropping foggy air he could sleep awhile in his own heat. How odd he thought, how instinctive, he could sleep on the outcropping over a steep drop into the valley below and not roll over or fall down- he thought of this because for awhile now he slept so close to the flat and solid ground.

Somewhere in his dreams he played with the expanding numbers and the echos of such numbers that after all what those before him had describes in the abacus and runes could be applied to make calculations in the world and so let him navigate between the worlds, transit the grounds of time, distinguish the spin of spiral things that when the equations were reversed they did not change.

"I have my strength again." he thought to himself, now as much the monk as he was once the childlike SphereDream of the godhead, " And my monument is strong and sound pointing to the pale model of the higher sky somewhere as if the north star from all twists and processions stayed fixed to set the directions of the pyramid- or for all such cathedrals some reality in it all beyond flying buttresses and fan vaults, some building them in time to so test them as if the weather, see the patterns if any in the circles square. But in my new power and strength I fear I have lost so much sensitivity and the beauty of my hair has gone gray, my nose is broader and cannot see myself its beauty, and to listen my ears have grown larger that I can hear the whispers so far beyond the stars- also what is that noise of snarling animals- Oh, it is the chorus of my gut."

Bruno then prepared himself the next morning to explore other directions to the worlds. Over one gate the sign said "GIVEN LONG ENOUGH YOU WILL FIND THE KEY TO TRANSLATE ALL WISDOM WRITTEN IN THE COSMIC SCRIPTURES" Bruno marveled that he could have the time after all, long since at ease with infinite calculations in finite time. But the way became a path of three parts, three rainbows of the dark spectrum of which it seemed being a lesser god he could choose but one at a time.

Before the first gate were the half monkeys making random sounds and decorating the shadows of the hall walls, even in the dark... drawing straws that the monkey who got the short one could compute to the infinitely fine degree the on's an off's of the sequence despite randomness they found some such great books, some even not yet written in any world- all these thought to be contained in the great cosmic circle and castings into uncertainty of the value known as pi. Pi was but the surface of the planet Bruno, somewhere between the light and the black hole of creation, for if we think of properties lost or that can return anything can come out such as this story I now repeat for you and entertain the fisher-folk that they can inscribe on their cave walls and spiral wormholes, blankets and survival in the work-a-day world, and a little rest from the violence in the main of the cosmos- so too they understood the dream and making of arrowheads that summarized all dreams stored in dreams to be so read in the explosion of light and in the germ.

Caleb sniffed around, said "You monkeys are so mixed up, mating between your species. I think you do not smell the worlds so well. Anyway, this idea of reaching out into the unknown and finding the great works of even the never known Shakespeare to come- he off the dream of a living world into some beyond- what do those who say the new language brought to the village catches on and passes like a new fire- that those burned now and full of blisters are jealous and threatened and will not change this lifetime to acknowledge the win and new ways- they say the usurpers are anarchists and dealers of chaos as good as any other dream- and these are but lucky stumblers with their endless summaries of papers of summaries far from the original and not documented manuscripts- yet they are the monkeys sifting through the endless type and random sparks of light so to prove this the true and only path through worlds."

Bruno smiled in the end glad for a companion on his journey, and because he knew that Caleb's life span so much shorter than his own.

* * *

Bruno Burning (Part 1- a Sci Fi)

Bruno Burning (Part 1- a Sci Fi)

{Not much happening as far as physics posting goes- Marcus and I looking into the internet marketing of our music. There were a few suggestive notations as to how we might deal with some of these ideas of novel ways to view space. Lubos put up a good series of videos and I must admit they have convincing scenarios- but it seems we could just as well make other ones- so this morning I decided another sort of science fiction plot based on this- one that does not depend so much on the idea of a big bang or acceleration as part of some still unclear dark fluid dynamics. I saw the sit com yesterday, "The Big Bang" and it will be interesting to see just how this goes over as so humorous on a low level with some rather advanced traditional themes of science and nerd-dom, and string theory. I understand Lubos was a consultant for those things for the program. I must say the show is growing on me, it may have a camp following more than Red Dwarf or any other spoof on Star Trek.

Well, in yesterdays episode the main character had to take time to move all his files and so on, clean up his computer. When the roommate came in he had a book open saying it was taking awhile so he was learning Finish. I took a picture of this but do not know if such a thing can be posted. It evoked the connection that exists between TGD and Ulla- perhaps if Lubos knew Finnish he could understand Pitkanen's views a little better.

I suppose there is the usual anecdotes we all learn from somewhere and sayings that relate to science and math- I wonder just how the non-scientist hearing these things for the first time, memes of a sort, would relate or enjoy them. Anyway, I looked back a bit as some of the stray things I have encountered in bygone decades and tried to reevaluate them with my new grasp of our more advanced physics. One stands out, the universal topology of Rene Thom that seems relevant to our concerns here lately. This probably was the origin of the theme for this sci-fi if I find time or inclination to write it- for embedding non-Euclidean spheres in Euclidean planes and seeking the several catastrophes in the background by the so called butterfly flips was after all inspired by embryology, an embryology of the universe perhaps.

Another idea was the realization that Bruno (I could have made him a dog or a dog Caleb as one of the characters in this vague place which as a center is not to be thought of as the center of a big bang) burned at the sake for his cosmological ideas which after all seem to ask all the logical possibilities. Did the universe begin then end, was it here forever and will one day end? and so on. Wittgenstein says that if we could hear a dog speak we would not understand what it says. But it all cannot be only a linguistic relativism- why then when something seems absolute it surprises us. If in my link of yesterday the alternative theory of worm holes through an organic molecule rather than the fitting of shapes as a way to smell as if a tunneling effect- imagine what the canine "sees" as his vast brain for scents organizes this reduced but comprehensive data. Can someone not see that if this is the proper theory that we understand the dog's brain well enough and being adaptable and naked creatures this could very well make a technology where we could have hand held mass spectrometers that determine most any issue, and cheaply too- but Oh that sounds like one of the minor devices from Star-Trek only a little less far fetched.

In any case, Matti complains today that his work, the p-adic as perhaps a form of absolutes, is not even half acknowledged. Well, the whole scam of the educational system here is about ready to implode anyway over the credit student loan issue. But as a theory it should be clear that Matti's idea can apply in a sort of reverse micro cosmology, a mirror to what topology and arithmetic there is- a, well, dark fluid like concept that we see more like space flight rather than internal symmetries. Beyond the unfolding world of the so called big bang, the precipitation of broken forces and particles, the point where the universe accelerates to overcome some idea of gravity- the ladder of differentiation applied- but beyond acceleration and in a way beyond the lower dimensions if we as humans recognize these at all what differnces do such disembodied dreams make to the real world- can we accelerate any faster than infinity? Is the rest, velocity, and acceleration all we can see or in some sense, and some greater integration of a theory such as TGD do these things have effects, say more than making strange ideas like ten or eleven dimensions seem more real- and then to magically try to limit things to them again? }

Bruno Burning
L. Edgar Otto (Pe Sla) October 5, 2011

Olney took off into the cosmos seeking the pathways in the sky to make sense of his life, his fantasy of purpose, and how the worlds were made. If one is already of the Godhead, to what appeal can we go any higher- not even the SphereFather could explain Creation to him. Yes, his head was clearer now that the Mare-maiden whom he thought he rescued from the tidal pool, She, herself the SphereVigin, could do more than doubt her place beyond begetting the Sea-lings sinking from her height of marble moonlit skin to scuddy scales that festooned the beach returned to driftwood after the mindless gulls picked through her scales of the scud of forgetfulness.

Olney, the SphereDream, fifth of the broken fallen gods, no longer marveled at the mystery of the endless beach. He had walked all through it time and time again, returned, relived, found the fisher folk high in their mundane wisdom and the teachers proud of their gowns lost in the corn maze to which they, entering the wrong way, found the search for the center then the final escape exceedingly complex.

Eventually, given more than time itself, Oln grew tired of arguing with them at some junction of choices or loop of paths, even the ones who did not dare the labyrinth but kept their hands against the right walls as if the world owed them a solution as all silent nuns who know their place. Their lives they could not wait to be over yet when the book was finished and done they mourned the cycle of the seasons in the relentless roundabout of it all. Olney then tried to take otherworldly flight above the maze, Icarus like, a moth in search of height and some flame of his melting wax wings sun, and found the orb at the center of all worlds- The crackling fire and half burned logs that suggested tortoise shell cracks and yarrow runes, naked or charred their carbon bark, the bonfire not yet but embers in his world, the timeless flame delayed against the faster flight that leaves the worlds eternal ice- and the people of this world called it Bruno.

* * *

I too must gather my dreams and redefine my path- but Matti and others- there is a point when we no longer feel old. No one can copy your work, claim it or otherwise, that would be an honor if they did as good a job when changing things- there is no big science as such- only the bright and burning star at the center of our space and time and hearts- Bruno gazes on the excesses of the church as inquisition- but the mercy of it all is that humans can feel only so much heat and pain before we become unconscious. I once drew the essential equation on the sand by the cold North Sea and knew that I have seen it, odd little human with ancestors in waves that built the pyramids and Stonehenge, somewhere between Africa and Australia, between the dream time and written words that watched the loud whispers of the starlight- I saw you in that equation too.



* * *

Well, I find it hard not to post another comment on the neutrinos- what is it anyway that you guys just cannot seem to see?

#
John Ståhle says:
October 5, 2011 at 12:24 pm

- and before I tumble: Nobody knows if a neutrino is a Majorana fermion, AFAIK none have ever been observed, but the possibility exists that neutrinos are Mfs, and the (as yet hypothetical) neutralino is/should be.
Reply
#
Leonard Edgar Otto says:
October 5, 2011 at 4:37 pm

John Stahle,

It does have something to do with our ideas of mirrors- in any case these can be Majorana and not be and it can be shown theoretically in terms of information theory. It is a matter of counting the right bits, and even on one side of the “mirror” we can show (as in Penrose’s idea of “quantanglement” that this has to be the case.) If by neutralino you mean to divide the concepts from the general case- well that is a matter of taste. I am sure the sensibility of theory will stand even if such speculations cannot be observed.

But does this matter when we deal with hyperbolic models of the universe? I can image a world where the standard model and cosmology is the ground- but it is only a small part of disjoint possibilities as we see a wider sea of foundations.

The PeSla

* * *

Murod,

There are a few respected physicists who would disagree with you - but they are theories. What are we to make of the setting up of two or four bit stations that it takes the speed of light travel to establish them but once they are the exchange of messages is non-local and instantaneous? How do you account for this especially if of all the mirrors the totality may in a sense have a mirror? This is also a multiverse issue is it not? Perhaps we need to generalize this concept of what frames are? On what does anything bounce back, silvered or abstract that we can establish something to react against and measure the direction of flow.

Have we not detected particles sent from the future? Have you never thought the phone may ring and it does? OK, we scratch off a lottery ticket and have some remarkable series of wins- was this coincidence or if we take the quantum theory at face value the actual numbers changed before they were scratched off? How can you be so sure of such calculations with such a possibility of numbers?

With due respect also,
The PeSla

* * *

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111003075531.htm just saw this! But can we say we make a theory or discover it somehow from it there as a future fact? This should be of interest to those to whom I commented above. Well, a beginning and a sort of experimental proof for all you topology oriented theorists. Of course perhaps what some of you do not see and I can be wrong, was that in the more general case if we have a sort of balance, one quasi-reversible as far as laws go, the systems such as what we think of as dark fluid in contrast to normal matter- well, the balance can be what is dissipative is a congregation in the other side or that which congregates represents a dissipation on the other side. I have come to realize this as a unified theory was one of my early assumptions that stuck with me and I did not see the significance would have a more mature application. But it does not take an experiment to discover some of these effects if we just reason a little better. As far as the few abstract motion formulas go- these are still a little fanciful to post other than as a general description- after all in a sense we can exchange the perpendular and parallels more generally than their concept in the several non-euclidean geometries involving the vague notations of zero and infinity.

But such a notation is useful and a little like differentiation.

* * *

You know, I have not made a big deal over who got the Nobel Prizes- now about the quasi-crystals... was it for a physical experiment? Again, what was not already in Coxeter's discussion of such symmetries? In the three dimensional case I mentioned it to the admissions at NC State- back when I thought admission officers could see something important or useful. There are dozens of names I could associate with this recreation- Penrose, the lady in Australia who was not part of academia, and so on... The winner of this prize for this? just a name for what it is worth and hardly a household name I would imagine. But as in the sitcom the Big Bang, the main actor could not get a Nobel Prize in physics so he looked for the Peace prize by making a replica of Jerusalem in the Sonora desert- If you build it they will come... a dream of Fields I guess.

* * *

The Language of Experiment and Measure

The Language of Experiment and Measure L. Edgar Otto October 3, 2011

I thought I might step back awhile and become more familiar with the standard ways to describe and view physics- to learn the language so to speak. Well, good luck to you who might also share the naive faith in what we know and who knows it. No sooner than starting to look at some of these things did I find out just how different the foundations can be. So I post today some things along the way before I put the books aside again- one would think there was better agreement as to what sort of units we use to describe things- Can any of our cosmologists say to me what is fundamental when it comes to mass and the Einstein and De Sitter descriptions? Matti? This post will have something to suggest to you. Lubos? You too- for what good is a partial chart when the stability or instabilities of the vacuum may actually have inverses? Physics can deal with the real world and not fight disembodied theories of anthropocentric effects with such disembodied theories.

But who are the experts we need to learn to trust- peers? Those who assume we who learn are forever stupid and can be manipulated by those who think they are more aware or have superior intellect (perhaps money)? Yes we can show we have to trust others to make a better educated judgment- but in the end the only peers are the few who recognize each other and not some reward from the society or state. Nevertheless in looking back, as noble as the quest was and as not well regarded the desire to pursue such work- and if I have any claims to be a teacher how can I say this? - that I feel so stupid looking back at myself but a few years ago- learning as always a two edged sword. But this evaluation too comes with its ups and downs of climate as the price of awakening as in the next era we will find a deeper change of vision as to what is time in the cosmos- and yes in how we perceive it, ourselves, and in others. "Let us not unto the marriage of true minds impediments admit..." Even if you style of arrogance is comic, tragic, or is recognized by others for the sake of a better world in that rare balance even the children can discern- of common sense.

* * *

Stray Foundational Thoughts while reading Physics Texts (in the lonely world of self study - damn, I am pronouncing Dirac's name wrong... Crust on Crotches! it is all self taught study. We really should take a better look at the foundations of the calculus as the guide- that and just how closely the transcendental numbers relate that infuse the nature language with words mysterious and numbers almost not computable.)

*That which seems conserved (reversible) from on a level of hierarchic dimensional levels (thus conformal and normalizable on the higher stable level completes inverse matrix relations and inverse ideas of coordinate vanishings) may seem irreversible from a different dimensional level.

*The range of shape possibilities from rectangular differences of the axes on different levels may require reconsideration of the spin or rotation of shapes as a change in the local or global complexity of the constants balanced between levels.
**The differences as contributions and balances may be mirrored or implied in the diagonal kinetic virial motion.
** Partial generalization for physical dimensions as dimensionless unity or not is usually indefinite indicating metaphysics whereas what is explicit as metaphysics may express a concrete physicality.

*No measure can be considered as reversible or irreversible ultimately, especially if differences are suspected holographically between adjacent and contiguous dimensions.
**But a consistent system within boundaries is reliable in itself as much as based on reasonable data samples (ie statistical methods).
**Outside or even inside these boundaries , or redundancy in loop paths can become chaotic.

Iota Mechanics:

It seems clear to me today that the reason some papers seem clearer to me and make sense (such as those Kea linked to concerning M theory and so on) is that the entity and cosmology I have assumed the natural case long ago is very similar to some of the ideas of string like theories- the D-brane for example an open string? But the iota is after all a small scale version of the omnic principle of the cosmos- this is a subtle difference and one we should keep in mind when we choose to emphasize things as fields or points or rays and so on (and counter project the power of such theories on the others with duality in their emphasis.)

1- We can distinguish iota points, strings, branes... in two or more ways. Iota points may be purely field structure or purely mass structure. Iota strings may be an inverse (is co-variant a good simplifying standard therm here for a reduced vision of general space?) to this as well the Iota n-branes reversing physical system stability.

2- The general difference may be the source ground of work (Energy?) in wider physics? In any case what we mean by energy may subjectively change soon too.

3- We can distinguish iota point particles as nth roots of natural and shifted n-dimensions as focused partial harmonics (wave, spherical) between quasic brane cells (the element or filaments of) more generally than in closed math systems as the quasic span resolves multi-linearity in n-dimensional n-symmetric Iota-brane singularities as if a philosophy code for quasi-causality.

4- The conservation of such iota mechanics remas a quasi open question locally and universally. (So to the objective question of D brane open strings or the sense of physicality when viewed teleologically or tachyonically). Real entities are quasi-finite in the firmament over omnic and non-necessary philosophy code with persistence not forbidden as a paradox of a necessary case.

We also need to generalize the concept of configuration space possibly taking advantage of diverse kinds of fractal paths on qs-n-branes.

It would follow that least action should be generalized also, especially as in Noether's ideas as teleomnic paths concerning symmetry and conservation laws (surfaces)

* * *

Once we grasp a theory as an advance in depth or leap over the previous compass of a theory we can then reach toward the possibility, able now to realize it. of the next level of insight and always ask how far this can go and how real was any theory in totality.

I am much surprised, while methods work to a point, when I grasped the body of literature of a theory, how much we know we do not know of such ramshackle Frankenstein Monster patchwork... Physis, nature code, works and proceeds without or despite us. In this sense physics of our time is subjective and linguistic and such intuitions we think to contain intrinsic value as such mathematically (for example the equation of centripetal forces as a term or sign and not a new grounding in a physical sense and sometimes a sign post that detours away a thought's direction.

This brings us back in a sense to how heat propagates- that is, the relations of the weather fronts, of what thought must leave such that an other can fit in overall balancing the climate to some constant or zero sum- that the best if not perfect description of general physics. A sort of keeping a Quasi-diffusion of heat in mind in life like processes that may indeed be suspended without the lost of vitality.

Oh and for what it is worth if we arrange 27 hypercubes (as in the jack stone with a fourth axis in the center for 8 colors- we get 216 and all kinds of relations near by one less usually of these numbers that hauntingly try to tell us something. Yes this means a sort of 3 + 1 way to view things somewhat.

* * * *

Oh it is such a gorgeous day and week here in Wisconsin- and was a great day for the sports lovers- Packers, Brewers, and Badgers all won. I am still a little under the weather but in better shape than others with this nasty little bug. I also get the feeling that these thoughts have put more distance socially between me and many others as if there is only so much time and energy to take up other projects or some of the older ones again. Anyway I hope no one minded my posts like this one today as I have to wait until later to get going so check on line- Phil Gibbs blog project and others:

Kea,

That 2/9 value is certainly interesting to think about. (I wish I could say more about this and knew more). This does seem to me to relate to the things like dimensionless constants and so on and our systems of units in the physics- but as such what seems physical to one really is but a metaphysical statement to others and indeed may be one or the other despite what we may feel. I feel still that yours is the best of meaningful explanations that has sound intuitions and a careful program of research. The others need to adjust their theories and world views a bit and should feel great joy in our era of new enlightenment.

It was once thought that the reason a neutrino only had one spin observed was that we could never go faster than light so not get ahead of it to see it spin the other way. Then we find it may have mass, albeit small. Then that it can be superluminal From my view the theoreticians of these seemingly incompatible speculations do not realize they are dealing with half a deck to which claims can be made, but not very scientifically about the rightness another view.

Most I imagine have not tried to generalize enough and what is freedom for some a restraint for others depending on what their subjective perception is as to what vanishes on whatever side of some mathematical mirror.


Lubos,

The choices of coordinates for a physics system may be all important in the new physics- as a point of view or an objective fact. Our idea of motion is after all that things vanish when we impose arbitrary curved spaces in and Euclidean frame. In this sense the most general of values of the coordinates reduce to one thing of the matrix involved all other zero. This describes an orthogonal view of space frames. But we can imagine that a space exists where the minimum motion is the maximum change of all coordinates and the zero is left as room for differences in singularities for interactions. Both ideas of motion can apply and objectively without appeal to some idea of human subjectivity that may underlay the theory for some insistence of world view. The super-symmetric view itself is subject to such possible false bias constraints of which the experimental jury may long be out of reach.

Fernando,

In view of these new topological possibilities organizing the ideas of such bubbles, black hole like objects, merging boundaries and so on can hardly reach the depth of new physics to realistically make any measure that can help us manipulate space time in the way you imagine- nor an explanation of micro bubbles be the foundations for a more rational cosmology in themselves.

All,

We are close enough to deeper truths that our notions can be seen as reaching more complexity and chaos, or some new level of pointlessness.


Happy Enquiring! The Pe Sla

* * * *

It is likely I will go back to the books rather than work so alone much longer as it is likely I will have a change of place and perhaps a change of fortunes. One would think that if this work here becomes the core and thing to save it would enhance rather than exclude much of my other projects like music and maybe romance. We become such creatures of habit. But if I ever do make anything by the music it will certainly cause me to support many of my physics bloggers of all kinds- and that I predict would be a very good investment :-)

* * *

Just found two articles on the sci mags which I feel especially relevant for the themes around this post.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2011/10/time-for-the-hard-questions.html

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128321.500-quantum-life-the-weirdness-inside-us.html

* * *

Stereonommetry Precedes Metaphysics

Stereonometry Precedes Metaphysics L. Edgar Otto October 2, 2011

*Quasicity comes before that followed by to predicate essence and existence... In a sense intelligible structures have equal reality to notions or physicality as a grounding reality. In this sense we look even deeper than some of the notions of physics, such as the iotas, the fields, strings, and so on- even the next level of information as if particles such as neutrinos as existent's.

*Considering the notion of greater than Omega Infinity (such as with Cantor) such if it exists is transitive throughout all scales of the cosmos as if a reference frame- thus the paradox of the grounding and conservation of energy in the remote initial and end conditions of the universe can apply on the local levels of space and time.

*Kea's hypothesis- The depth of insights, a subtle difference and attainment I find in Kea's statement that in a sense the role of neutrinos in these new physics stands in for the Higgs idea (if that captures the idea and forgive me if there are others involved) yet it is implied in my notes of the graph where I used the square symbol as Higgs-like in the 5th level of the Conway Matrix- but did not make this leap of obvious speculation.

*After the apparent earthquake of new data there seems certainly a run to rebuild again long standing structures. For now there are so many cardboard cathedrals until things can be on more certain theoretical grounding again. Some of the cardboard ideas are just general and at least superficially intelligible such as Pitkanens and similar notions in others such as Martin's assertion the "dark energy" converts into matter. Leo also promotes on this level the creation as a series of black hole like objects that leads to star production for example. These ideas have their place (after all we can read several formulations in one clear sequence of information in the "Philosophy Code") and perhaps can be better worked out in detail. Hoyle's creation field for new matter (protons) arising in space for a steady state depended on regions of relative emptiness and barely perceptible gravity- thus this idea is not as complex as these various current speculations and is certainly not worked out in view of physics since 1969.

I did not notice or think it significant the observation of the commenter "26" that the sum of 1 1 2 3 5 8 is 20 and the product 240, a one to 12 ratio. Yet it certainly can be trying to tell us something- like about broken symmetry in the standard notion of it. So the chart above is an example of structures, where in this case the five tetrahedra become the eight cubes of these unfolded polytopes.

We can in general assume some law of structure or numbers on some level will work out as if it describes or actually does find a concrete physical effect.

The application of these geometric structures, seen literally, or abstractly rigidly in relation to our notion of dimensions can be modified by a deeper grounding than even of the string, or point or iota idea... for that matter any abstract motion or intelligible mapping of the cosmos, or assumption of something like inertia and flows. Thus, we can image the cosmos as a single multi-brane in a quasic array where each of its units or cells for abstract relative motion between them are also some sort of branes or multi-branes (Qs-branes).

We note that in this sense the holographic principle may not hold between structures or dimensions so certainly we cannot say that some property exists in the volume and not the surface or diagonal of some descriptive matrix that such notions are illusions, time, etc that violate the application of the underlying default information in an intelligible cosmos. There does not have to be a necessary connection in specific cases. But the idea of orthogons or anorthogons or even simplexes is algebraically obscure as to the count and reading of how they apply to structures. These paradoxes of infinite extent and ideal points at infinity can give some credence to common sense notions taken from the familiar world such as asking if there is a wall to the universe- or say a spin or direction, or an axis, or a center and so on as part of the structure which we imagine can only be outside of space and time.

So on the fundamental level the walls of the Qs-brane have less abstract motion possibilities than the cells in the center (as if such boundaries were only quasi-torus in form if at all. In any case the properties between these boundaries of no certain distance, such as the information of color, do not necessarily vanish as in the usual way to integrate regions and vectors and entropy etc... But on what does some item react to or push against or spin as some invariant velocity presumably if it does not so relate absolutely and rigidly to inertia as a principle? I can be thought of as the abstract motion pushing against these non-necessarily torus quasic cell walls and the resistance and history of their substructures and other abstract ideas of what a structured singularity and vacuum may be. Or we can again ask what is the source of light problem or any source and sink.

In some ways many of our cherished notions- such as what energy ultimately means that we can define it - or perhaps a new notion and terms should be understood of it.
An entity does not know as a singularity complex what dimension it is in but an interpretation of structure (even as abstract theory) will intelligibly indicate the possibilities. The duplication of a ground is not necessarily a perfect mirror or copy of some sub ground, nor the covering of symptoms necessarily the cure for some problem in the sub-surfaces or depth of a design structure system. Dimensionless constants can cut thru the hierarchical scales via discrete analogs based on the holographic- fractal principles.

Just as we can imagine a charge difference over say the ground and atmosphere of the earth, so too this difference universally can persist as if a change of some invariant value (perhaps c?) otherwise how would a concept of minimum distance or duration if scaled at no differences in Planck values be intelligible as a fact in the overall cosmos- for such action differences would be meaningless as strings only if the are not tachyonic (in my sense of the application of the idea as teleoms or teleoscoping informational iota point string entities in the deep gauge field context).

If we can have an axis to the universe and it said things spin around it- have some not shown that from this view dark matter ideas may be eliminated- and yet from the Casimir like considerations on the micro level can these forces not have several descriptions that do not seem to be the same one that apply to what is obviously a shared reality of all the information observable in such a philosophic encoding? Are some of us so narrow we but fight for our styles here? Or perhaps too wide in view that all things necessarily connected to all things in effect connect to and explain nothing deeply at all?


* * *

Philosophic Encoding

Philosophic Encoding L. Edgar Otto October 1, 2011 It occurs to me that a somewhat better understanding or resolution of the paradox or concern about biological cosmic models would be to treat the information of encoding more generally than that of the "nature" or the "cosmic" codes. This leaves a little more relaxed view of the understanding of the less than explicit source and sink of our physics and notions, how we interpret and make the implications from what we see or imagine. Roughly it divides the same sequence into the three philosophy realms (hence a philosophy code) of the chance, mechanism, and teleology in the same code. Of course it was much more complicated to work out than this in this morning's dream exploring things in more depth and holding on to the general idea until it evokes awaken thoughts on the matter.

One such thought was that some codes can be read as coexistent on the same level rather than some degenerate or outline of another level (in a causal coincidence or not, in an illusion of order or not, in the explicit source of the signal transmitted within a meaningful physical invariant speed or not...). For example, it is clear that in the expression of the engineered genes in a bacteria to make a certain protein that it also makes a sugar. This came from PBS today concerning ticks, the lone-star or deer tick and the allergy to red meat in the "Alpha-gal" allergic reaction. But a good example would be the reading of the methylation or epi-genome with the genome on the same level but with coexistent codes. Of course we can expect a difference with the same DNA so to explain this. The article on the future of new discovery praised the biochemical era as the great industry of the twenty-first century much as electricity was that of the last century. In this sense we see that tailor made chemicals made specific to individuals will be a boon for prevention and better medicines where we know what we are doing- if we can do it and not as fast (fast as it is and a million times cheaper to sequence) as without a general theory. There are other physical technologies or questions of if these are possible of which I may speak later.)

The illustration is from yesterday when a small songbird chasing flies I think hit the window at the coffee shop and fell on the bench. It could not hold its eyes open at first and barely could perch on anything nor fly. I eventually gave it water from a straw and it drank. After a half hour or so it could stand and keep its eyes open and did not seem to mind me. A student from the university walking by as they do for photography assignments each year came by and got a picture which I said would not be the same old one of this view from the bike trail. It did seem to shy away from her when it got close. A little while later a fly came by and it took off in flight without a problem. Yes, there were many morning by the river on a picnic fence I would write poems in the morning waiting for places to open and this little bird would come to the end of it and sing- I was never sure what it was trying to tell me or if it just wanted to share the dawn. I never gave it any breadcrumbs.

Dave has a post today On this topic:

http://picsandpoems.blogspot.com/2011/10/plan-b-on-writing-poems.html

end of the poem there:

Words on their own, I find
solve fewer mysteries
than they create.
Great poems excavate
the very depths of what we call
the self - the source
of what is most mysterious.

And can the grains and streams of words,
can rays they shine upon the riddles
be set by us in the right order,
be set to replicate
the world that Nature crafts,
the genius of their genesis?

by Dave King

* * *

Now from the science mags: Take note of this important consideration which for me relates to the issue at hand about time and chirality and so on... but of course the various origins of the tilt to this asymmetry, space, crystals, well some views seem to me not fundamental enough or even defensible as a hard science.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110929171658.htm

This too significant:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110929122749.htm autism and brain connections

Take note of this all who would make a cognitive disconnection to how we define underling notions like dark matter or the standard theories as totally wrong in principle:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110929144645.htm

Ahhh... a sci mag link to my report from the radio posts back:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128323.400-epigenetic-clue-to-schizophrenia-and-bipolar-disorder.html

* * *

One consequence of the Philosophy Code is that the idea of cancer is not as solvable as the new biotechnology of the genome would suggest- but then it is not rigid either. Science should not just be throwing things into the wind and collecting the tea leaves in the bottom of our quantum cups. We really need to step back and look at the world's issues, take a breath, ask the reductions to absurdity in the reductionism- ask basic questions of the how if not the why or why not change or save or prune the world and its peoples... Energy too is a very elusive concept- now
practically, would any of the vague ideas we can call dark matter like (or of the old idea of some sort of neutrino condensation of which Kea feels as real or more real than the gravity waves for example as the stuff of such "matter" - ie the connections between galaxies-) in any case the philosophy sequence read as teleology thus tachyonically at a chiral front or surface etc... is the condensing in the background that can orchestrate the physicality of nerves and galaxies. Let us not go blindly into such unknowns but we do not need shells as much as wings as we cross these great divides that we mostly build within ourselves. The remote view is there but it is after all but a view in what is still wide opportunity for the evolving of life.

One thing, the future possible ideas on the new physics I mentioned earlier in this post, where in the near future the technology is bright in the biochemisty industries- and molecular theories in general- I think we could very well have certain mechanisms that clean up and control certain fission products if some who discuss this relation of cold fusion ideas and dark matter ideas I read right. Would this not be good for the song of old japan?

* * *

Kea,

That was a wonderful paper (2004) which for the most part is in a language I can easily relate to.

BTW in the comments lately I still strongly feel that yours makes the most sense.

How else will the string theorist salvage anything from that theory? Or the standard theory and our notions of things like dark matter?

I do not think the answers are relevant in non-linear spaces to the physicality of what works as physics. It is strange to think of neutrinos as real even after experimental data for me nor know why I too long ago abandoned the idea of gravity waves.

Thank you for the research.

The PeSla

comment may be posted here at:

http://pseudomonad.blogspot.com/2011/10/opera-act-iv.html

* * *