Neotericontinuum (Learning as Creative Existence)

Neotericontinuum (Learning as Creative Existence)

L. Edgar Otto  April 26, 2012

Just when I think in some deep sense of changes in the world there is no room for the old dreams, of arts and the state of the art science I find returns again the age old debates of which as with an imagined complete science of an age or the pendulum swings or rests at some height before free fall again, we water drops in the fountain on which the curves as efficient trajectories of cannon balls are also things we recognize as patterns of great beauty.

So I notice Science Daily has two relevant articles today which inspired still another post as if it were a commentary on thoughts already on my mind. For did I not end a post with the assertion that the structures in the vacuum are innate to our minds and bodies what we at least if not the universe in general can be characterized, that ultimately there is a common truth in the math and geometry as well as the freedom to paint on the one canvass our decoration on the walls, the gaze of us unto ourselves and others that is a viable and free style of life yet sound and not here vanishing.

The first article suggest that the number line is something learned and not inborn.

The second article is that of what many think the source of some mass in the physics but here a social source of our handedness in matters of competition and cooperation as social progress (perhaps the sociobiology ten percent as if the hidden ratio that refers to things hidden or from some state of ends or origins).  As physics before I became aware of the more advanced mathematical dreams of others I too reached the stage where, foundationally like Rowlands, I thought my chiral principle the mechanism that was the engine of the evolution of galaxy's.  But such a principle while that evolution is still not explained proved but a stepping stone.


A third article and another one today suggests the relation of autism to a physical cause like PCB's that is known to affect learning in the development as it increases dendrites (now reportedly in this age were we give great weight to the fragments of Buddhas skull, did not one side of Einstein's brain have many more dendrites than the other side? It is not given that we are better so on which side to arrange the freedom of our dreams and learning or expressing freely and creatively our arts- for even the confused in distractions so gaze upon this deep thing in the unknown that others recognize even if distracted and abstract as not just evidence of levels of disorder or decay but of something looked into in its own right and language to which we can expand our own limited bounds of awakening and understanding better our own experience of being and just how safe it is in the reality of things.  The article is careful enough to suggest at least the idea that it may just enable a tendency say in the genes and not be a direct cause for lesser neural nets which monitor what is the logical necessity and design of our creation that get lost in our daydreams perhaps to the point of no return.

Let us accept then that we should be content with the sense of our existence as real as our creative sense of things aware of them or not and not be caught up so much in the tangles of life and ourselves or the lesser graffiti of others that may or may not stand higher in this world even if they may be vastly greater in wisdom than we. In a philosophical sense all such art on all levels of human progress of which we need not strive so hard to find or make and do, are morally equivalent as is the middle world of human self observation and the social as well as particle continuum.

Oh, and happy birthday sister wherever you are and whatever you are doing- time can be a strange and cruel thing once we lose contact for so long as we each have to find, generation to generation, our remarkable and unique paths.  While I am now everywhere I also am nowhere to be found but this is such a canvass that while vanished is not vanished in matters of dark and light.  Somewhere I know that you are having a great and wonderful day.

* * * * *

Conceptual Crisis of the Higgs Mechanism

Conceptual Crisis of the Higgs Mechanism 26 April, 2012
L. Edgar Otto
Next morning, Thursday: From the hint of the structure of the illustration, an intelligible hierarchy of self dual structures in natural three and four space as a sort of Majorana mass difference, we could see the idea of mass in general as a state of the vacuum structural field expressing this and other forms of polytopal duality,

Here in looping paths I excluded the centering of the 25th iota state of the particle of which a loop can in the sense vibrate in this space of the same natural dimension and in fact only in this 24 cell. The mass does not require the Higgs particle view but that seems more like a condensing idea analogous to gravity. In this general duality of structures we find that we can divide things into alternating vibrational games into some perceived or actual ordering of plus and minus zigzags or iotas of equivalent parity over minimum spinning quantization that limits the programming of vectors to these rules of operation of the eight.

So in the computation of mass like values we can distinguish over the natural inertia or the Euclidean duality the count of so many things in the generational mix along the quasized lines of the mapping of grids, especially the orthogonal ones in the 20 or 24 or 16, 32, 36 magic number mirrors of mass and momentum transfer or defect self leaking into parts of the system of self virtual numerology where the idea of mass is also to be understood as structures of time-entropy in relation to it being the special and global logic of information.

The problems, as many have suspected, of the finding of the measurement, regardless of the gains and success of the standard theory or of not finding the Higgs and the like, nor what is in reality the beginning of a supersymmetry even if the description of physics cannot just be a closed system only, is one of our conception as theory and not of the hypothesis the projects were designed to test.

Such paths as matters of sentience and thought simulation systems or experiments, where the counters or zigzags represent intuitive decisions that can hold together in this sense intelligibly but have not intrinsic order likely to be a successive gain toward the truth of a system- and consequently there is no guarantee in the publication of some theory or the reporting of some discovery that these are in fact close to the innate faculty of creative and intuitive truths that tend so be self dual and monitor our physics of consciousness as such structural processes about or analogous to the quasi-preternatural physics of vacua.

Again, at the core of this is the difference between the finite and continuous self dual and virtual curved and straight paths as imagined or actual with their mirror inversions where the processes reversible or irreversible can in a sense be decisions of intuition or physical processes as interchanged potentially where these are local or non-local actualities of dynamic or passive non-necessities. Clearly the self organization of a systems can have a hierarchy of quasi independent yet connected analogous shells hidden or influenced from what seems other total systems or parts of what is essentially the same system as in the coherence of thoughts and personalities.

In the sense physics strives to describe forces going toward a unique center of a sphere or global object as a reductionism, in the higher Triality of such cube structures that duality to the breakdown of the 24 cell into two 4D analogs to the octahedron (this an error even those who understand three space structures are likely not to see as the higher space analog to an octahedron), we can say the Higgs is such a center as what there is and we do not know what where all there is if not the premature question of the existence of supersymmetry and operations beyond the usual enumeration of those in arithmetic and geometry. Has anyone suggested this entity as a candidate for the grounding of dark matter itself with all the intuitive paradoxes or errors of intuition that at first glance suggests? Yet nevertheless even as invisible in our local system as a central but spacious perspective such a particle is a phenomenon as a place which has a quasi existence and possibly a higher order and this self dual analogy to the tetrahedron and 24 cell as unified abstract vacua structures.

It is interesting for example in the evolution of galaxies once the chiral effects are understood that the rare ring galaxy can be seen as both elliptical and a disc, as with the hints of the dark and natural matter relation. But we should not think but can imagine it as a possibility that one type of galaxy eats the other anymore than Higgs like things have this appetite. It seems clear to me that such particles reflect in themselves in spacious vacuum potentiality the maximum symmetries we imagine possible as an alternative fractal invariance to this idea of a quasi-closed expanding or in decreasing cohering closed universe systems. The issue here of similarity is that between the convex to the convex in matters of density and so on.

Perhaps this answers Lubos insightful question today. As perhaps our theoreticians with their white boards should have asked all along while we wait for them to comprehend and catch up to the wide possibilities of new physics directions and answers. Of course I just saw this while the posting of these pages.  Evedently, as with Pikanen's look at the new contemplations- the physics community and speculations have new things to consider, perhaps as a matter ultimately of our philosophy.

* * * * *

Superquasic Abstract Motion Lattice Pictorial Notation

Superquasic Abstract Motion Lattice Pictorial Notation

L. Edgar Otto 25 April, 2012

This I offer as in the stage of a mathematical recreational game level for the sake of pictorial hints only of what is evidently in isolation from some more general theories a viable source of intelligible formulas and intuitions somewhere in the literature or theoretical focus of someone in the world.

Yesterday I started a long post but my living circumstances were in the cycle of stress again due to the emotional state of others around me. Other than the first two paragraphs that added a footnote to the general theme of theory the rest of it seemed too negative to post.

Out of boredom or exhaustion for want of anything to do I tried to take a more formal approach realizing this is a problem and not sure it is my own, but I need to work things out anyway. Consequently I merely added to my output of graphics off line and of them certain programs that underlie the logic of things, paint and vector graphics, I found many things and shortcuts of methods in the drawing of which this simple grid came out of the very relaxed and informal enquiry.

As with those who develop lattices of quasi independent geometric structures like the tetrahedron, for example Leo Vuyk's recent post this week, this close to the logic of four way things that the April 23, 2012 pdf treats in what seems these questions of counting numerology for particle physics, of which we can build from these parts cosmic structures this grid considers the 24 cell patterns as itself self dual and unique in Euclidean four space and now in arithmetic, and in the quasic formulations and the complimentary inverses which directly apply to the structures of the gene code. This also explains in parts the very nature of generation mixing which globally was always a quasic view of contiguous meso motion abstract or physical structures.

The information by which we can encode things that adds a dimension by color that increases the paths and permutation possibilities and on them assume an order or accentuate and artistic unique fact as a picture is a way to say at the foundations that the abstract structure of space considerations itself adds dimensions to the reality of the physical processes expressed that persist in their own right despite the characterization by the concepts of the mathematics and possibly even is paradoxes from the design or properties of logic systems.

I do not expect everyone will see the same thing or be able to decode some reason I chose this or that color or pattern or line, or that in the pattern recognition they can develop ways to see the intelligible purposes of these creative choices. We are all in a sense double blind for the effort and deep into the desire for seeing the seriousness of perceptions. This explains much as to what can be a delay of discovery or limit to a given and untrained mind in the sound mechanisms of thinking and the doubt of its soundness that such lack of creative imagination itself becomes a conceptual limit where there are patters of intuitive recognition. But once someone sees the pattern they cannot help but see it as someone who already has taken the leap and strives to draw such a picture for the general rise of wisdom.

In a deeply connected sense of the dynamics we are trying to discover and invent by way of physics as for all practical purposes the most fundamental of the sciences, should we accept or understand these new physics innovations, it will be clear that the same problems native to our organic species are expressed in the special structure

There are no givens, but it seems to me that the breakdown between communication formally and informally between the supposed power as the backbone of an institution of learning- the professors and wise administrators who respect the freedom of enquiry of that faculty, even between departments and especially between the university as an economic presence in the town is now the beginning or a reflection of the loss of arts that can be done individually and in engaged dialog. Ideas are not just another commodity to which we reestablish an indentured servitude to the general faith by law in the economic system that aims intrinsically for no restraints to take over their perceived hegemony of the world or what it thinks he world is as it consolidates its limits.

Those who would forgive my lapses in reductionism I ask that they also forgive my lapses in the faith in liberty and the method of democracy. Information and science is also that paradox that sometimes the reactionary is the more learned response and the liberal is for those who have not learned to think for themselves let alone their capacity to advise others.

It is perhaps a bad sign of our times or of the society when we have to censor our own work as poets for that can be seen as a breakdown in the sanity, sovereignty, and privacy we can still imagine as an inalienable right of our souls. What is the news that by law the city must clean up the graffiti for that in a sense is a message and an art and the expression of something to which so is the news as a form of appearances as advertising. Now there may not be a message there worth the analyzing or of some intelligible pattern other than some social condition in the prison of society where even in the actual prisons the inmates crave art. But for the police to causally suggest they fight the problem by more and more cameras that spy on the people who is worthy to watch those painting the pictures?

What is it that behind stealth as on the Internet we find so many bullies, as if they have a mask, as if the trolls can reach in the real world those who distracted take such virtual words as serious weapons and arrangers of their actions? Maybe there is something to the pen mightier than the sword or in the end the reality of a fallen brick that matter exists as the old cliche goes, more than the sticks and stones. But what sort of world is it when there are those who monitor the flow of words and pass laws that charge as if real crimes in a community against the ever more presence of graffiti we call to ferret out criminals on the Internet? The news that is not also balanced as neutral is no longer news, nor some awakenings in the expediency of science any longer science.

I add that there are always people giving lip service at least that we should come together and those who would have us grow apart. It is refined lately in local politics as to whom it is responsible for doing of one or the other of those stances. In my naivety I ask for creative dialog of which the love of wisdom is nothing a thief may profit by against his fellows whom he takes as a model and so the worst of examples of his faith. Those who draw pictures and raise the failed corporations in the clouds and bubbles to patterns for their faith in the real world are in the main crazed dreamers who draw really abstract pictures of which the art as such is long dead to what is a greater art to come. Yet in this sea of dreaming the source of things is found if we so survive the questing. But where I have found such wisdom as rare as true mystic vision some claim as routine, I know the truth of my dreams as if that between me and the Creator. Let no artist or theoretician not cradle with care nor lose his ability to judge his own work as his intuitions awaken.

Still, I am not sure how useful this particular diagram is in itself- yet that is often the hint of a better generalization if we choose to try to see.

　

　

* * * * *

Principia Unum et Omnica

Principia Unum et Omnica

L. Edgar Otto 25 April, 2012

As the branches of a hyperbolic model reduce to a line it can cross over to expand again- but is it the same lobes that bounce back or are exchanged across the ambiguous sides of the line in this expression of general planes as quadratic? Or can it be conceptually absolutely and positive as both? What would this mean for the TGD take on more general structures of wormholes and the mouths of wormholes?

We cannot say in the next level of conceptual hierarchy of plane or brane structure that the division of the rotocenters can be integral beyond any number of slices- while these are nodes in algebraic space they are the beginning of chaos at 8 dimensions and as a hyperbolic dialectic we should raise questions of remote changes and scale to which the preternatural laws of conservation and symmetry show that this stands as a postulate as did the parallel one of Euclid for our ideas of generalization of dimensions and information and the like.

Having some evidence conceptually of the division of an electron (or quark) as halved in the viriality and in Leo Vyuk's recent post can we so subdivide such point like objects? Does this not speak for the square and square roots of the quasic boundary perhaps multiply with limits? Are such stereonomic limits if existing the origin of a quasifinite hierarchy of scales, masses, reduced inverse square laws as with gravity and its strength by proximity and the relation generally between them such as with color and frequencies.

The acceptance or the fact in retrospect of the inevitability of theoretical and technical progress shows the scope of the non-necessity of principles such as in sociobiology particularly of social altruism as the driving force in evolution (here considered the only dynamic progressive force) But where there are connections it is clear that the lifespan under stress of organic systems including thought changes in the general context as a self reflecting global system- the search and destroy the stance of keeping the peace as if complex space at right angles.

Society then goes through awakens wherein the core faith or ideas of physical reality vanish all at once in the general society if this connection becomes a necessary state and those left after such a rapture are lost again for awhile on such a highway to general wisdom. But in matters of truth and not some delusion of self or rights at the core of things we imagine this is how it is or it should be. Social problems can be solved as social problems and not by the actions of individual to individual to deny the problems of society or individuals for such interaction over stresses the adaptability of general disease and what axioms we regard as reality.

The price of such awakening in an individual is that those around them in need or in anger have not changed in their silliness of their stance. Society has become the undesirable in the campus or cave asylums of ghettos of a few generations of individuals who do not know what they do to what to them is a smug and stable world of which they have the right to profile outsiders with their paranoid fears and grandiose ideals the average soul knows but the myths of dying ideologies. The people as individuals are a danger to themselves as well as to others and not necessarily the ideas or people they profile.

Three generations of imbeciles is enough for sooner or later in the balance of nature and the neutrality of beauty of so called equal weight and symmetry for all vanishes in the natural beauty as well the whitewash of their words far from their actions, and the reaction no longer sees them as human to correct in their politics or medicine and thus in the judging of others they have set the stage to be in social principle less worthy of altruism and mercy. In a unified conception which should have been found in the source of academia we find the disruptive chaos that from a distance shows no mercy to the continuity and concerns of families and individuals. As far as truth goes the system of enquiry has become meaningless in its application of laws thus the laws are rendered so, and the system is suicidal like the confusing messages of cells that self destruct.

Only the unstable minds are influenced with care and altruism for the memory of such people and in that they take on themselves the drama of these others they so are led down the same path when there was no real deep care of he departed in the first place- nature abhors compassion when it is blind to its own moral ground.

Think not that we become ruthless and thus too hardened if we reply with fire such fire or that all is hopeless for those who are still human enough to try to care- for those may yet inherit the world and peace. That we become thereby the kinds of people we react against.

Would you change the world then? There are two ways, one is the intimacy of higher magic from the general but earthbound view of that personal that touches all worlds. The other is the finding of more fundamental truths in the depths that are hidden and bring to the world finer details that let us in the distance to see the false vacua as simplicity.

But to think one can do it politically only, or by force, or by some denial of what is individually or generally a right, is not to be in a state of authenticity of self, and social shared delusions- for the community of man in spirit can be disembodied as supernatural questions in a cloud and that is only the virtual measure and value beyond even an empty world. We should neither demonize or forbid the general faith in our physicians but solve our problems in the neutral but not always destructive awakening by science.

Yet despite all these words in profusion and even what you think is confusion where your arrogance of discovery to the perceived and socially acceptable myths of the day of which some expect acceptance or reward from the momentum of a movement safe in the herd or the lip service to an ideal but a mirror of the same thing on the other side of some evil balanced if there in another age, I still have a great deal of things I have not written in the higher theories and wisdom and careful not to do more than mark the breadcrumbs along the way as hits and hopes- so take not but in your blind hearts in private thought or public view what we each contribute individually and independently to the unity of the whole of theory. What matters if of a billion pictures you are mortal enough that in and beyond a thousand lifetimes all of these cannot be seen?

* * * * *

Echoes Coming Back from Burned Violets Sent to Her

Echoes Coming Back from Burned Violets Sent to Her

L. Edgar Otto 24 April, 2012

Hero came to the grave where he had prepared her for the journey beyond her lifetime. One spring ago since the toll on those who took shelter in the caves against a long and cold winter. Now, like the sunflower that faces the burning star he wanted to send her flowers to cheer her on, and to find surcease from the mocking awakening of prairie blooms.

He prepared some violets and burned them that their spirits would follow her, point the way as he had done laying her out to the four directions of the spinning sky that this stars not seen so far from the fountain of auroras would follow her as she faced the greater light of darkness that cannot burn and heals against all wilting.

She was not much more than dreams and his love for her stood to his mind as deep as the mysteries she did not care to think about or explore. She thought his game of counting stones of many colors and casting bones or arranging the nest with patterns of painted sticks, knotted leather strings she said was cute. She bore his sons. Her promise missed.

He collected the eighteen colors he used as runes to paint on the cave walls in the dark to record the dream time and praise the fallen beasts given in the hunt or the passing of the chief, or the victory of the wars. Men in time alone who seek to decorate the subterranean but he did not know why he craved the pigments more than food, or often love.

The little one was with him. Young enough to think of him a king or god, someone to fear who could see everything in this world, to fear him that he saw beyond the stars that nothing could be hidden. Just the average shaman in the end with his tricks and lights and slight of hand he put his cell phone to the bar code on her tombstone.

They watched her sing as she prepared the meal and plant the seeds for corn, hang chimes made of shells above his crib, scoot away the hound dot from his sleep and growing dreams of the wild birds that ate from her hand. But somehow in this world more filled with light, cycles of the moon, there was no more room for ashes even in the caves.

* * * * *

Footnote: I know there will be more to explore it is so hard or perhaps meaningless to wonder where a work or journey begins or ends- and my drive to do this has doubled and would be quadruples if I did not have external problems, that and what still must learn about this virtual medium, its changing tools. But things in the theme of this blog, in the direction of the course of creative philosophy and science, seem to be going well and close to a better path of enquiry after all as if I have said enough for now- so perhaps I can return awhile to the poems and music.


* * * * *

Postulates on Preternatural Principles

Postulates on Preternatural Principles of Symmetry L. Edgar Otto 24 April, 2012

• That divided by commensurate integral angles of a radial symmetry may appear a continuous region contiguous to the quasic boundary of its region of scale change possibilities but really can be an aggregate of independent slices of the circumference of that boundary in a lattice span.


• Such a centered entity may be extended radially into multiples of the integer numbers or fractions of such divisions.


• The overall symmetry operations may thus apply rules of arbitrary merging of the parts as a group theory by a dynamic determination or by invisible but not hidden chance alignment of the parts as if the rotocenter of no span is so subdivided or just a matter of chance alignment by general default.


• A system of symmetry to which conservation laws are thus ambiguously derived in the preternatural span also have depth of which the vectors kaleidoscopic in generalized directions said to be parallel as a linear loxidrome that approaches a rotocenter can meet at a point of intersection in the ideal as the depth is zoomed out to higher scales.


• At which point the overall group symmetry obeys a neutral chirality in a neutral spin direction and this might be a fulcrum of reversal of the handedness at such a rotocenter.


• From the zoom in at the beginning of dynamic direction toward a rotocenter the vectors become tangent to the circumference as if a boundary seen as divided or continuous as if a reduction in generalization to a polygon.


• Between these two dynamic permanent motions of default relative environs of some point of rest the zooming may be seen as an invariant relative interval as if all reality in totality


• In the completion of rotation across the division of the boundary or beyond with regard to the span or to other systems in an abstract lattice or in random chaotic positions we can derived the abstract principle of uncertainty by vacuum structure in that this applies to intelligible physical realities and the general foundational laws of depth and span considerations of observations directly or indirectly present.


• These principles of spin depth and zooming also apply to what may be considered rectilinear postulates of the Euclidean principle of parallels reduced as a spacious kaleidoscope of the vanishing unity or zero connections as one reduced totality in a sea of rotocenter singularities as if group lattices or scaled fractal like unit crystal cells in a non necessary aggregate of an axiom of no intrinsic vector directions that upon observation attempts betray vacuum structural uncertainty described above.


• An interval of information, looped or without bounds over a dynamic encompassing at the convex flat boundaries may itself be quantized as bits of analogous material systems. Thus in the abstract and with intelligible laws of count such an interval, quasi fractal or quasi holographic on some insightful level of inter-dimensional relations that implies a unique individual abstract center of the identity element as if a total organic individual in systems in systems context or if not part of a system potentially so, contains in its interval of bits of information an evolutionary directionality of these principles of more general but non necessarily super symmetry.


• When two symmetrical systems are superimposed in a pattern on the same rotocenter the integral count of the items as if unit points or cells in a lattice these generate differences that show the intrinsic patterns within numbers as if the super-positioning not transparent.


• The potential for the resolution of subsystems of these lines of codes or circles of symmetry is that a general system of such may show a directionality that self combines or compares the coherent intelligibility as a machine of self repair for the resolution of its general modeling or functioning around a real or abstract idea of the rotocenter that defines it.


• The bits of code on such boundaries and the meaning with regard to a unique general system in the widest generalization does create what extension of symmetry operations apply as if in a wider span of dimensions, areas and volumes and so on, holographically, and in effect the condensing or compression of this information by the preternatural environs of generalized definitions of symmetry may have intelligible expression tractable back through what may seem arising from a chaotic environs in the resulting decompression of the information the systems of information as thus conserved under all boundaries.


• At remote conditions of space and time, matter and vacuum, at some creative or entropy eating vacuum entity in its volume or at its surface, that is a black hole like object, such symmetry information and the physical objects related to it in a vacuum can be converted into subsystems that remain from some view independent of the question of where the now general isolated subsystem goes to or returns from. Yet at this level no such objects necessarily are conserved as unique identities for here existence and nothingness are conjugate.


• It is possible to read and understand, even beyond my special terminology and special use of phrases the information or meaning contained in this post of parallel connections of Eide physics concepts yet still not comprehend the significance or consequences of such extended theories save perhaps at a quasi axiomatic awareness of the ambiguity of what is seen or not seen as intelligible as a principle thus of comprehension and communication that is analogous to the above preternatural generalization of the core concept of symmetry operations.

***********
I would like to add this sentiment: Of what use could such a foundational approach as the above post be? Perhaps, when things seem to connect in the shared epiphanies and awakenings of new science, to the point perhaps it seems we discover what is awakening in the world or being centered and in some sense close to the original ideas one might feel that the world is created or changed according to his unique experience of consciousness, being. In any case this may be a measure of the worth of our projects of intuition. We have come so far and I will put a quote from the Science Daily link to new thoughts on Fusion. It seems that there are some vast areas of theory of which we slowly find a way while costly diversions in the search of which without a more fundamental theory as above we are surprised that no one, usually opened up by an individual really, had see such before- here it amounted to the use of simpler formulas after all. Of course I feel there are other paths to such hot fusion and many things I quite image are advanced in the hidden researches of world governments- from Yahoo news there is the report of a craft that goes 20 times the speed of sound to which this lost of its skin caused it to crash, they think. Now this is speculative for me but I ask in these general principles, we recognizing something now that we begin to understand so notices it, focus on it, find more instances of it. Is there some sort of limit which may be one of the integral symmetries involved here- if not in the music of the atmosphere then in the music of the vacuum? I imagine also that these are abstractions of our concepts of things like physical or geometrical ideas of density and so on as the article suggests. Another interesting observation is where the theories are lacking and speculations are put forth as probes and tests and repeated results affirmed- from another view such as this some of the speculations while intelligible seem to me rather silly- but it is not my place to point this out to the thinker nor to discourage such creative enquiry. The university, especially there for its own persistence and reach as an organization rather than a source of wisdom for all of us can be the source of chaos and breakdown in the culture. Where there has been secondhand debate of students so trained in the commons or the quads I can usually trace this source from the university of which it too seems so silly to me that they think the people cannot see past their propaganda ultimately- the old fool all of the people all of the time. Nevertheless, in the interplay of the town and gown I do hope we can fulfill better the promises of education. I did not post the link of yesterday concerning to the back to the drawing board on the evolution role of the viruses- of course such cycles of information in the quasic grid I have posted long ago where these can be loops and so on... Nor of what is going on in the different strengths of magnetic pole reversals in the sun in an article recently although the sun is after all subject to eide views of quasic symmetry principles as science and not just the unknown or mystery as if supernatural as applied to such hot fusion entities with a difference in temperature as information cycles, reduces and plasma pinches.
When it rains it pours I guess: from a fellow blogger I see this PDF thru a fellow blogger (actually to me an analog to the deeper structures at the virial foundations as if the proteins to the codons as an analogy...) which is pretty much this sort of preternatural quasic and Eide system thinking which does seem to charge nature with some real numerology. Note the blogger begins to ask questions on the zero state of it all... Oh, of course if there is anything to Zero point theory of course we can have Nil and even Nullhedral point theory by the same sort of geometrical analogies.
* * * * * I like today's dated paper in the pdf link and the idea of the order of the s b c quarks (as if some point of combination theory, see Kea) now to post a similar theory before I see the link the very same day is quite synchronous- well, much of theories were developed long ago or so many years before publication and so on... I like the analogy of the muon to the neutrons and the count of particles, it is both Conway matrix like and the other views of things in many directions. I posted this to Jester: all the soul searching and the thought of who comes out standing as silly in retrospect. For those of us close to the wisdom this is the career creating or killing thing that progress sometimes does.
Again I am surprised about the sidebars, if I added one would it loose things? But when people add or take my blog off them it makes me wonder if they are not mad at me or for some other reason- when I am on one I feel I have to be more formal and more careful of what I say in the dialog. I bare no ill thoughts against anyone who dares think or reflect on our higher wisdom. Welcome to a better range of the new physics- I was wrong, those who have some form of a theory of everything turn out to think so because they are a little closer to the truth of things.
* * * * * Jester,
A most interesting post but I have to disagree. These abandoned theories as if theories of everything needs a clearer idea of natural and never was supernatural in the first place as science.
If we solve the system the standard theory does not need LHC chemotherapy to delay the inevitable.
If you read carefully some of the bloggers and links of this date you will recognize principles some of them printed on line before in the formal press or rumors of news of new discoveries. Is the muon close to the Neutron in structure?
We shall see but if theories are to vanish or be invisible it is theory and not just experiment that kills the upstarts.

ThePeSla

General Majorana Particles and the Filled Vacuum of the Dihedron (Eide Physics Continued...)

General Majorana Particles and the Filled Vacuum of the Dihedron (Eide Physics Continued...)






　

L. Edgar Otto 23 April, 2012




The quasic physics of abstract rest and motion in its algebraic like notation already contains the insights of alternative views of dimensions and symmetry. Of course there are variations on but one view in different formulations,




By 'insight' I mean what was said the key insight of Riemann which concerned a relation between adjacent dimensions and that taken a little further than the conventional Euclidean treatment of abstract concepts like a plane. It discusses a middle ground between the view of groups as continuous or discrete. The filled aether as a vacuum is such a middle ground wherein one can develop things like string and brane theory, with cues taken from experimental observation or theoretical conclusions that assumes some vague and general principle like the Pauli exclusion or Filled vacuum, also the assumption that Majorana particles are to be taken as neutral with respect to charge,




Some of these principles beginning with the quasic and a more unified view by geometry can be put on firmer ground.




A dihedron, a point on the graph of the dualism and restraints of convex polyhedra as to the count of faces to a point or the total number of points and faces is a flat object that has two sides but contains no volume. It has a point, rather like a fixed point in that it is movable as in the crinkling of an array of numbers that the balled up mass tossed on the array will find at least one point corresponds cell to cell. Today's theme will distinguish such points as geometric objects and in a sense extends in to the depths what we see as relatively negative and apparently alternating if an extension of Pascal's triangle, that is minus one to the nth in succession, as first considered by Newton- which can lead to fundamental variations on the calculus in style including the middle ground of motions and rest of an algebraic grounding of numbers. We extend the concept into the vacuum.




By such nilpotency of dimensional insights we can quite imagine new principles, for example in the Riemann insight we establish by such a point vertically in a plane of which its circumference being composed of infinite polygons as a group, this can lead to discs in particular, or square or round things in the abstract or any vague shape in between. A principle then could be stated like this: if the disc containing a point vertically from one side of the dihedron to the other (regardless of the need for one higher dimension should we choose to flip it or to do so if that would distinguish the parity, we observed and instantaneous jump quantum like from area to area of the double surface. Again the count of such points as to what dimension they are end should be generalized in the inter dimensional relationships as well the ideas of groups and symmetry and their interrelations not necessarily to be generalized beyond our compass of lower dimensions, the concrete ones.




Another principle is that the jump by Riemann at the completion of a cycle of complex space, like slices of bread over time or the possible concept of a series of branes that have connections of changing distance between them including certain angles askew of such slices, that from the filled vacuum view (and not the resultant manifold of gauges of which by compactification they are in a sense places in coordinates as distinguished hidden dimensions as discrete) this a ground for the oscillating Ekpyrotic universe model as wells as the then equivalent ideas of Inflation cosmology in this question of the continuous and discrete, that such jumps over he interval of a cycle as in string theory these can be multiple as well in the complex number analysis, that in the ...

...

Aether upon such multi discs rotations we can see the multi density as a linear reentry of such factors in a polyhedron and the polytopes albeit unclear in the higher dimensions beginning at four, that Riemann's insightful jumps and leaps of wisdom and reduction to zero and eventually a Cartesian one quadrant of his grid the three ignored as not relevant to the theory of his plane, a positive space only (the diagram of such a path to exclude the zero and negative axis and this method in its present metaphor can be questioned as it too need a grounding in the foundations) that between such abstract jumps such Riemann density, as to it also taking observable time can be seen at least as continuous.




On which side of the Lie and Klein views does such a point decide what in dimensions or the inversions or the continuity of powers ultimately of duality as defining a given continuum where as if there is a choice in the Majorana the choices as in the origin of chirality of matter and antimatter are equal at the neutral vacuum level? We can regard the ideas of Clifford where the power is the dimension integer as part of the Lie considerations wherein there is a sense of discreteness in the gauge realized as some sort of quantization question of objects or entities of hidden continuity.




We can insist that no matter how thin or far we go into this path as if divergent there is always some small bit of continuity that does not vanish even in a world emptied of its light and matter and the last mini black hole will vanish. For an empty space, without even the quantum vibrations so as to fill it crudely or in the gross observations above the aether vacuum empty level is replete with abstract structure. Perhaps this will vanish but it is a question of what goes beyond this analogy to reduction from the next super space of symmetries into a quantum form and form and from that back down to the classical form of our ideas of ergonomic potentials and kinetics of differentiation as the key expression of physical laws.




Of what sort of geometric objects would a null polytope of which the subscript by convention is minus one, less than the zero of a point, composed? And if we go further it is clear that (as I suggest tentatively in the illustration) that we can distinguish say the nil point and the null point as if double nullification. This also grounds the idea of different geometrical objects, say a point and face, or a point and a ten dimensional volume as a complex of higher singularities of which it remains responsive to the context and flow of the universe in the observable structures and information of how we view singularities as if the null point or a complex of them most likely Euclidean in the simplicity of connected convex surface or volume, fractal or holographic truths and illusions of force and information.




This is too simple to see even right before our eyes as it cannot be hidden in plane sight, nor under the rug of the Aether. We generalize the enquiry of knowing things by the awakening of science as an extension of this philosophy that began in Ernest with the Greeks.




* * * * * *


Idea left out to point out something:   In the nilhedron in the illustration we have a fundamental definition of the concept of a string both in the latter and former idea of them- in a sense they are certainly not  strings with no area or volume a the ground of being, nor in the consideration of other dihedron like structures must we postulate ad hoc some natural added dimension for them to vibrate within.  From my geometric view, these point like vacua objects as symmetrical and Platonic like have hidden depth and span after all and from it we can see of three objects which one of them is in the center of a flat string?  Which of three quarks for example is to be considered relativistic?  And ultimately in some formulation is it not clear there are five quarks the sixth, presumably the top, being slightly different on a reduced level.  Of course if all this is true and was the picture of handed things I was trying to understand and express then the table of fundamental particles has to be widened but not in the sense of super-symmetric partners as a general addition of things but things more interrelated and fundamental, perhaps more things than we now imagine even in Rowlands formulation over the Dirac nilpotency and exceptional groups of which I understand the royal road to unified string theory.  It may be we can regard such things as Majorana neutrinos as somewhere an addition to a table of such particles in their own right in addition to those which are not of that form of n-bit iota information contexts and expression.  It is perhaps unfair of me to not know that I can make my arguments and pages easier to read in the internet posting- I did not know- such alternate views do cloud the usual order of marching to the theories of the time- and there is no way to see right away that this beat is the better and sounder one.  Yet I have striven in the metaphors as a poet for clear meaning no matter what is required of language to invent to convey in a concise form some symbol- one of which in this rather geometric way of interpreting structures such as the soma the general analogy to the nilhedral string idea is the jokers and the grand joker of all such things centered, that is that do have a definite center among the triality of quarks or any lepton that has such an intricate way to oscillate between flavors or some that do not, and so on.




The technicality of a missing piece of such a collection of regions or pixels in a quasic plane- as I said is the answer to say Pitkanen on the nature of the Riemann hypothesis as a half value that acts like a grounding or limit of some unit measure of one- but this speaks of higher things- but the thing is, I welcome these confluences of views as a simpler and more beautiful theory to which we must also feel sorrow for the loss of our familiar systems we work so hard to find.  Not that things are not beautiful unto the evolution of the day but that they are so much the more so now that those who enter a new territory even humbled on the checky shores are more expert than those still crawling up from the sea.  I may laugh to myself when I see some point of overestimation or stance that thinks it is not one of ignorance- but I laugh with joy as to what we do and can do, surprised as a species- even the cleaver scorpions and insects that come first to tame the land and who inherit the earth because they endure.  I should formally develop this as it is not evident even with the pictures (wow, I can draw with vectors that was designed for a math program it seems, another leap close to the logic, another night of sore fingers and blurry eyes when I was used to it.) - I leave this long footnote as it is.