On the Ybrane

On the Ybrane

L. Edgar Otto   02 February, 2013

Yuri's pdf on the Planck value  (the Celestic pdf could not download to copy for the message vanishes to a blank page so to ponder over carefully... I meant to mention this before the coincidental encounter after today's post that I can see the worth of Yuri's stance, drew a tetrahedron suggesting a formal system of generalized linear strings that so combine into sets or thirds of each other- the division by three on the same level, the unknowns needed or not in at least the discrete formulations to which other self dual structures, as Conway's 24 dimensional view continues as our universe converges with its binary Hilbert distance or that itself reaches again the mirror of a chaos of divergent systems in parallel- who knows beyond that save that some very exotic looking curves is this property of a linear attractor of intrinsic rectitude that is merely the slicing of tori mapped to a plane when in general such forms as Langdons ant do not depend on its action and purpose on this sort of definition of how an abstract quasic plane is defined on itself, or for that matter from simple rules its containment in  the rules even if they apply to an infinite grid of such space.  Perhaps, with sufficient comprehension even these ideas of a possible wider idea than even Hilberts formalism of groups may open new patterns beyond the octonions and supermatter or superfractals, ideals as if space itself within its five fold symmetry and invariance of honeycombs also ponders some link to the whole as we try to find the details of this known five fold division of patterns as if minimum distance or action.

In my hierarchy of continua the quasicontinuum stood out as different in the generalization.  But at the beginning, beyond the discontinuum, metacontinuum, on the same level as the continuum or rather beside it one that stood out of the scheme I simply called the Celestic and eventually the Celesticontinuum (Ccm).  This proved the grounding in groups as that of the self dual simplex or the tetrahedron in relation to natural volume.  This is perhaps why the concept of a slightly larger compacted scale half hidden dimension in that viewpoint or stance appeals to me as a novel possibility for it can have such parallels within hierarchies and between these broken and compactified dimensions to which at the flat (Euclidean) ground state transitive over natural physical dimensions, many theories may be built up from this along the lines of if we have one that remains significant in a unified theory that is observable and measurable it would be Yuris idea it the Planck constant generalized in span and depth and reduced to ideas of space beginning with a Tetrahedron (or alph3 in Coxeter's notation) to which we may build up or down... In this respect I quite imagine a brane level of continua also by which I style the Ybrane for Yuri although I am not convinced by the grounding of his calculations.  I understand also that at this level and throughout wider space dimensions this holds in theories of action where these in a sense are also of various scales and dimensionless quantities such that we indeed raise the issues of information and thermodynamics.  But as this larger dimension is presented it is not as general in its implications as the intuitions or insight of our Yuri who seeks that direction of wisdom explicitly.

An odd dream this morning wherein I had fallen asleep at a party and someone gave me a lebrae piercing to which I looking in the mirror thought I would have to hide it at work but the ring nosed young lady thought it so cool.  But this is not a lebrae (thus easier to hide) I told her- still it was rather interesting as a design I worried I did not know how to take it out or what effect it would have on my teeth (interpreted as creativity in teeth some say...)  But is was in the form of a skeleton key with a large ring on one end,  Those rather normal but strange dreams were over as I stayed up awhile then went back to sleep and the explicit issues of physics kicked back in beyond these themes as I got my general energy back with coffee and pizza pie and so on.

Where it left off with the idea of being able to convey some aspects of drawing directly to the computer only I lingered int he dream to make sure I would recall what was drawn although it is difficult to draw such abstract structures so much wider than our awakened life, and awakening I went to the computer but alas it pasted nothing... on which proceed to draw as best I could the amazing rules of transparency that vibrate the superpositions on the screen unto the interpretation of what stand out in depth and count in the optical illusions regardless of right or left or which is the figure or ground illusions of color that come up unexpectedly yet as we may now know what to recognize in the symmetry.  So much of this is simpler to do with basic ideas of math methods such as the calculation of area by vectors or of the discrete ones if we take the unknowns awhile in what amounts to our flight and back into natural four space, the Heron triangles...  But on this, with the question put in my mind as to who maintained h the only constants of foundational importance in the unification of physics, I put down the pale copy in my mind that could be programmed or lit up so as to see an animation of all the icosahedral stellations- what an impressive star in space that would be!- that these dreams prepared me to take the time to add one more drawing to my intended morning post.  I wonder if some why, such as with our hopes for quantum computing, we may be able to interface and exchange information with machines yet not be in any sense ultimately (for it seems to be part of the case in this generation) merged with them.

I mention also in this footnote to the last post- that in the reflection of which the falling ice ball into the ice bound pond in the river, the accidental sound of trucks and auto behind me with their sense of Doppler shifts and intensity as if the origin in the waves and reflections, what may appear to be a brilliant rather than a circumstance that caught my eye to which I was photographer enough to forget the wind chill, the issue of coincidences or destiny perhaps,  that what seems one small reflection in the controlled chaos of the shock waves slowly moves up, persists, as if with a path or mind of its own.

I did spend some time playing the guitar and realizing that even deeper into the circle of fifths the cycles and permutations of the notes, the chord names and inversions of this western tempered finite system, the smooth transition of fingering and the progressions, augment over three keys, tells me what I did not pursue or think to teach myself on my own as the creative in new awakening arts in the raw is closer at the foundations if we do try to figure things out from scratch ourselves- how much I should have thought to try that I did not know... save the chords grow somewhere in the back of my mind-  I doubt I can be free to create music and lyrics without the ideas of such physics coming up- but whatever the language, over intellectual or childishly simple not even the classical wisdom of the old country songs dumbed down and sold to a new generation- well, even in our moon walks, even in the time markers of our songs before they decohere and paths diverge, these loved for the nostalgia of more innocent and simpler times yet with hope before us as wide as our lives seem immortal in the main, we buy all our deep and diverse culture of music, classical, such that perhaps the hard practicing and gifted rock star gets competent enough to teach...  How unsung and of what a great influence Marie Camille a teacher whom his students Klein and Lie went on to divide the work and conquer new mathematical fields, all praise to those spark in us truly for the social reward and state of a civilization, original and fundamental, yes and intuitive, knowledge.

* * * * *

Self Creative Hierarchical Systems Loops

Self Creative Hierarchical Systems Loops

L. Edgar Otto   02 February, 2013

In the tribal mentality, the desire for unification as an advance over a chaotic polytheistic view, up from the flat plane of the ideal desert or what locally we imagine the surface of a body of water, the conception of what happens abruptly where the beginning of a hierarchy returns again at the end, this advancement on the search for unity and the division in the world of what then is unnameable thus real in the sense of an over mystery, this with an analogy to our idea of consciousness and intelligence, the endless analysis in depth as to the laws of earthy sand as a condensate, boson, one of views of what is the mind that even in the analysis, the proof by the complexity of the theory in detail, these speak of the dust as evidence in its abstraction from the abstract reduces to things that have the dimensions on all relative levels, of mystery coloring the stance toward what is substance.

But there can be other stances and foundations of mind, and there can be a general stance of unification, and there can be some unity of a few things yet one suggested by our experience of the natural dimensions of space to where these arise from some place, some dimensionless structure of information that was the possibilities in the universe of and if not the unity of the analysis in the first place.

Inside a castle or a keep, even a cathedral with windows, in the structural arts of the skyscrapers and bridges of the honeycomb hive of cities and its cycle of its denizens, or its veins of highways where the dwelling is mobile, on the road the driver invariant between translations, private stances that the surface of the tent, abstract as a symbol, far from the wealth in isolation found beneath the bowl of the stars,

The Hertz mountains with faults and cracks against the assault of barbarians and gravity be it the match to a perfect sphere to measure, or as Gauss equivalently did, the velocity of light, this then the metaphor in which central to the warmth and light inside the tent we find the single candle and so imagine it to arise to meet higher creation.  The sleeping volcano erupts its pillar of fire as life is cleansed yet clings and comes bask to the island all directions its pole to the zenith of some land, mountaintop or mythical place, the top of the world. 

That such a place may not exist enhances our sense of reality that darkly shadows our dreams and dust.  But one soul in flight knows not if it is full of gods or idols.  Or with our wings of wax to escape the morals set in a maze also a labyrinth, and the heart of singularity as if evil that may dwell as a light within- you know the rest of that story, even if in our forging of alloys and metals, electrum that dilutes but attracts us, we may like the gods travel the levels of heaven and its anti-pole, build from them our ships of stars, try to contain that light within.  Its ever more accelerating chariots, its rhythm half predicted of the breaking rings of fire.

There is no necessary end to these wars, each in a way part of the totality and in some ways essential, or of ideas of self creation and survival, for self interest or altruism in a paradox of sacrifice, heroes chosen or unknown, closed loops of blind hopes and promises that we must necessarily choose or be chosen whom our master, who cannot remain if not part of some closed minded system, those beyond reason who would even destroy the branches of wisdom, the hard fought for libraries of science, and harm their own people. 

But what is lost may not be that different from a better place in our myths if our place in the universe is more wisely known seen truly and hedged against what we should not find as surprise, as if this in itself as our edifices of theory build only to crumble, our home to which even the homeless long for escape beyond our own imagination for novelty as release, chains of our satiated addictions.  Far from equilibrium our cabin fever thankful for a lonely light against the vertigo, snow blind or sand filled skies, as dust falls in the spontaneity of quiet, the stillness, the asylum, the prison, the ice bridge ladders to what in this world we try to make like heaven until the herring spawn again in the Baltic frozen over as we learn to read our tally marks and better fill up the world after a plague with stained glass windows.

A little girl says to her mother in Market Square in Cambridge the booth selling bowls and goldfish that she would like one either very large, or very small, not one in between.  Of that before the symmetries and asymmetries of this world, its breaking or coming together again, recurrence and too much redundancy in time, the information meeting complexity is not finished so is .closed its human sense of meaning. 

For all things in its own images and greater grand speculations to conjure or conjecture self perplexed, self creative, self righteous, deluded and inauthentic, the first poems and first psalms of the chaff and wheat and wish for justified judgement, or of forgiveness that takes time to become real yet wounds us with scars and baggage, our awakening in the shock wave of doubled being begins these deeper models that in the main like that of vibrant space the dust remains, most often comes too late. But the scope of this is still outside the theme of creative science and philosophy save nothing is lost as all arises or is the same in totality, from a single spark of dusty light.

* * * * * * *

Holomnium Addenum

Holomnium Addenum

L. Edgar Otto    01 February, 2013

I refer to a remark in the Bit and the Pendulum that introduces with information the idea of complexity to which we simply cannot so point to in a particular place, the complexity issue of course considered a unifying principle or theory of everything.

Could this impression by the inquirer not be from Penrose's picture of the wide range of states of entropy to which a metaphorical God is pointing to an original place that starts the states of complexity?

With hidden unification's or symmetries or not this metaphor is still not a general as the description above- including the possible greater depth of what we call consciousness beyond its analysis or a given.  Yet from the informational view we clearly see the advantage of labeling the zero and infinity, loxidromes or not, of the Riemann sphere as if one point contains the mathematical structure of the whole and results in orientations of that sphere to the mapping on a complex plane.  In this view Penrose with his "quantanglement" idea of bits that are to be exchanged after the time to establish ways to link two places is of course a quasifinite question- four bits say to find the one location among the infinity of real numbers.  Yet, while this shows the problem at least part of the quantum picture we can imagine in this normal level of space of at least 8 bits required to which we suspect or assert it involves the complexity of the octonions.  Yet in the quasic plane, view quasifinitely in its wide generalization the information as expressed in binary has the same places translated into different base systems from the same quasic ordering of pixels in the plane.

Again it is a simple matter to represent a two dimensional game of two players as to be played in a three space with consistent description of the quasic bit count.  What the linear factoring of such bits are, the square root edge boundaries is mathematically consistent.  Yet in the quasic ordering not all points as the grid of them may be covered as if to leave certain squared nodes left out as holes- still these may form places where the general transitive shifting of information frames make symmetry possible as well beyond the chaos of symmetric development the attractor, like Langdon's ant artificial highway building attractor suggests as if a dynamic diagonal in some direction within growing or converging binary infinity (and geometrically at least a meaningful division of the infinite as if say half of it, or some binary multiple of it that being the essential difference in the effect on star light in a gravitational field of Newton's and Einstein's). 

Entropy as a measure of temperature is what if it is not a three way (the zeroth law) of an object if in equilibrium between two by one those two are in equilibrium?

What then may add to this law some complexity is that from some stance or view, the real number line not as simple in its internal ordering and looping, even a segment of it in its transfinite number, that locally asymmetric relations may seem to or actually arise, or on the general case.  In which case if matter is the enfolding of certain knots of space part of the general fixity of topological structures it makes some sense to describe such a focusing and continuation past symmetrical chaos to the balances of the universe as a whole to which the issues of its parts, real or virtual, contribute.  In this sense the many world and one world distinction amounts to the same null concept as singularity.

Of course to some degree, as if  looping with time considerations or extensions into the teleology we may refere to some things as self creative and self referential and this relates to the stance of what can be the observer and the process or theory to which he so learns and observes.

Given such symmetrical possibilities that may extend in all directions continuously even if there are certain points or pixels left out these can be filled in as if present but of no general consequence or proof as to the nature of continuity where truly the idea of zero times zero is clearly zero, yet not in a chaotic world zero times something reduces to nothingness. In that sense some sort of point idea can still be part of the picture of our conceptions of geometry as well how something, like a string with zero volume may be generalized in asymmetric or greater balances of context.

The square root, nth roots, of a quasic brane to not have the clarity of a unified theory the power itself has of a brane. It is not enough to imagine a partial higher unity where at a certain transition the asymmetry of time say to absolute zero becomes hotter again as the most general picture to apply to our local reality of space with our without real parallels.  I hope to find this teleoscoping theory again as numbers can and do default into its vanishing loops (or mirrors of these created as if the pair production of objects in brane context). But for generalized space in the Omnium we may find that in this invariant sense of what is conserved as reality, linear, the question of the continuum hypothesis is both open and closed as to what may or may not be levels between them from a lose discrete or continuous view.

We can just as well say about the holographic principle that part of the information is lost into black holes as the natural dimension is generalized to the higher volume, rather than that new things within this concept may emerge.  Yet in a sense such space of information, we infer behaves to new states as if a quasic quantization in the generational sense if we may believe the limit of mathematical operations is an end to the pattern or story if we also know why explicitly,  does preserve the information into general (and quasic) space in the rest and motion functions lost- this beyond the idea of lesser generalized energetic or virtual and thermodynamic ideas of laws.  The alpha and mu omnium as well to mirror that of an ideal omega omnium in geometry or in computation, and as a direction unto or at that teleological.

Symmetry in this sense is the conserved quality more than our ideas that action is conserved by the symmetry for while nature may condense or compact things computation wise with our without an expenditure of energy- gravity in itself seeming to continue or add to say each step of a domino falling, a regular solid to behave as if shifting or shirking or turning a certain directed way under the general indifferent  null space and its derived properties as if a wide continuous naturally extended totality of dimension.  Nature herself not forbidden to see things this way as we imagine she can but we cannot see, and as I imagine nature can see these reduced or flanged spaces as we actually seem to do that what we see is evidence nature can see this way too.

We are very much influenced by our training within a given system and the novel method is compelling and close to evoking in the general population fears and creative awakenings.  Our previous stances may to a new generation of inquirers seem wrong in its possible truth or at best confining of the innate sense and balance of the freedom to find by the not best of possible inquiring systems taking balances such as the Lockean inquiring way, whether the result is to be seen as return to the old or endless exploration... for at null these things remain the state of things regardless of how we may relate or try to confine our ideas of them.  Perhaps this is a more mystical or metaphysical idea than what we use to say as above so below or some small part the description of the whole yet put it into secular and scientific form, even from the nature of motion and rest considered as being in the expanding sphere of our existence as a brane flatland.  In my view the playing of a normal two space chessgame in a board of three dimensions is much harder to play than the logical extension of the two player game into n-dimensions.

It takes constant vigilance if one is to think as best they can originally and independently if possible not to be influenced by the parallels and concerns of his time...while I do not acknowledge more than a fad that declares someone as genus with ill defined intelligence and sanity, as Nietzsche said history to follow the great men then yes to get around them... we can hardly fail to notice that the special inquirers or the lucky amateurs find their names again as meaningfully to the masses that from the scientific humanist view socially are the forefront of new discoveries then collected usually by one or a few men.  But such men or women as individuals with the desire for such questions and inquiry do the bulk of such work from the periphery, these as if connected in the images they are to the universe as the great image of the highest generalization no matter if distant or near, personal or impersonal as the source of our being, a last infinity where at the same time we realize all the while there is no such last.

For me, more of a discovery and an informal search at that, not a project to pursue, as we live in this three space and think of it as physicality, it takes three physics if we want to come close to unifying the first two...

A lot can be said for any idea in number theory that deals with the relations involving squares as if square branes or dimensions to which we have not considered in these new unified theories and of which the inquirers of old built so much ability to explore the mathematics.  Again I find it amazing that I read that Diophantine equations are still an intense area for research- and that I did not suspect was the frontier of our trying to understand our mere three dimensions.  But we should do more than point to or realize what we do not know if in the wide variety of the world of shapes and space itself as energy we can solve such real and imagined complexity of our puzzles.  Our great prophets point the way but like Moses we may not always enter into the promised land- still, he was not without great influence.

* * * * * * *

The Holographic Principle in a Quasic Brane

The Holographic Principle in a Quasic Brane

Holomnium Informational Representations

L. Edgar Otto    01 February, 2013

I have a vague idea of what I was going to discuss here formally and technically, but after reading the state of the various approaches to unified theories, the standard ones and with gravity... all the explorations into the possibilities of black hole concepts... the camps with views in conflict like the branches of an olive tree (Romans 11) grafting and gratings redeemed, the enemy yet loved for the Father's sake as from the beginning of the world a direction chosen, I merely offer metaphors of the foundations yet not to hide the higher paradoxes that still are open questions

Those descended in research from Newton and Einstein, primary physics meet somewhere at hints of points with those descended from the quantum world...the Great Penrose so classified or dismissed as seeing what is off in a world of its own to some outside of physics in the questions of consciousness, for example, the stance of the world as geometry, or other branches that hope for some unique solution or praise of the mainstream of genius as to the claims of truths unique to be found or to receding mysteries...Liebinz open to all inputs of inquiry and from a binary view that which in flatland of the quasic brane begins if not resolves all the methods of calculus beginning with Riemann and to those little known who made a little further advances in our day, this matter of what may be some idea of an absolutely emptiness in the vacuum between objects, objects that moreover reflect the idea of monads, of whole and parts as if subjectivity reaches with a more general idea of what is the indifferent object between the mirror of time-space and spacetime.

If at the foundations, substance to use a general word, we have this phenomenon or view of dark matter, light matter, and pre-Pythagorean or its ultimate refined extension as at least post Einstein or Heisenberg our metaphors are a trinity to begin on the metaphysical level to treat as if some idea of dimensions and functions in our ideas of frontier space, then we may take the simplicity and such generalizations seriously if only a tentative phase of our growing data and contemplation's.  What is mind, or even what is computation from both the not necessarily connected continuous or discrete, somewhere between the decisions free on what are the branches and the whole, the transfinite or some ultimate touchstone as if a final omega in the heights or the count that such metaphors for philosophy all around describe the mind.  Free will and determinism remain the ongoing test beyond what we may imagine or enshrine as significant steps to learn and develop as truth or science in our inquiry.

* * * * *

These simple suggestions of the nature of such a general space to convey a vision may not amount to a formal theory so I have to try to explain with a metaphorical model the scope of wider generalizations, here something to do with numbers, primes in particular, to which all the issues and names of them listed in the comprehensive book of Darling shout at me to work out and show the obvious links if nothing else to widen our view of the role of this view of arithmetic in relation to our mind and physics.  I realize this may tell us nothing new in the communication- so consider this:

Imagine a space where the crystallization of particles as the crystal grows is a measure of the entropy, geometrically.  We note that in the general idea of reflections as if a box with the interior walls full of mirrors, we only really need five... in a sense we can have six (just like Riemann did not use four in the more advanced applications later to physics as his space- but his ground was Pythagorean and he explicitly did not regard the quintic as that relevant either). 

But a sixth exist- in a sense it exists as if a transparent object or face at right angles to the sum of the totality, or in a sense we can describe the "temperature of the black hole surface or conjecture the value between generations of quarks as right angles or quarter dimensionless values.  The tauon in a sense is a transparent particle with respect to some space and thus we apply our ideas of complex numbers and at least from a finite view equations of the fifth degree.

I am some intrigued by the idea of a larger, say a millimeter, of some of the (absurd in general) idea of rolled up extra dimensions in any string evolution or enumeration of possibilities as containing a sort of parallel dimensions- but the D-brane idea in relation to gravity is a very weak concept as well the holographic principle where it boils down to how we can rotate things in so many angles for unexpected complications of identities- thus the string theory direction.  It is weak because it does not directly address the unification with gravity although what else is there to try to explain it.  In any case the idea of a gravon is questionable, at least observation wise directly.  Information in relation to such substances is the paradox of local and nonlocal phenomena in both space and time.  In particular this level of metaphor predicts some of the so called dark matter observations to do with galaxies where such "substances" diverge or do not necessarily connect in some region.

If in such a box, in the real world at least, we light a candle the replication to a cloudy infinity of one flame is breath taking to view.  Forget for the moment that we may not be able to distinguish the inside or outside in a finite count of objects as if so quantized even down to the microscopic level with the ideas of uncertainty and h for distance and action although we need not assert space is discrete only at a certain place for that is but part of the view of the whole.

Let us imagine then that the universe is like this in its replication of images and objects.  In particular at a given location we may replicate, from the inside presumably over the totality of a universe the issues of that darn quantum cat. Or we may apply encoding and information, the data in a logical and mathematical way to what we imagine the dynamics and limits of the total system, and what in it is a decoherence or branching as if a causal tree or not that begins to consider questions of the relation to runaway entropy or particles.  That these schemes work when we have pairs of things either of some idea of a black hole or a particle is after all a topological question in the context of what is actually the nature of unique freedom or physicality of all such worlds as if they contain a theory of everything.

But for those who imagine structure as more dominant to the view and real as explanation, Penrose and his desire to face the grounding or nature of consciousness, something transcendent and emergent over some material bullet or particle that connects to describe space that then describes its motion as massless or with effective mass we can assume that these issues of consciousness even with awareness, a tachyonic but not necessary phase state of the space, has this sort of fractal replication that may or may not make a finite count of particles globally possible uniquely, nor that in given indefinite and space time we may reassemble the coordinates of matter to in effect replicate an earlier time to which any state no matter how improbable may return again, even those slightly different in one instance of the totality.  If a sentient being, considering itself unique in all possible worlds recurs thus, so to the circumstances of the awareness of which the past so forgotten then is forgotten at the new time as such superposition's are in theory accumulating or asymmetrically decomposed.  These are our paradoxes of what amounts to the question, seen as science or philosophy or not- where does the meaning go to which we tend to ignore as science save by the interpretation by later inquirers of what the author actually said as if in a sense something more implied.

So it is that just as a point on the surface of an ellipsoid in relativity may infer the shape of the finite whole from a part, or in the phase space one photon of light may represent even recall the state of the whole if that could be taken in by some observer greater than the state of things observed and who had the ability to see it all in detail, to see it at a distance so as not to disturb it as if such seeing is absolutely invisibile as a process to which mechanical things would have such a process vanish as the real anyway if we are to know it as a state of physical reality,  we can imagine then that at each image of the single candle flame (without gravity or as weightless but a pale warm sphere) a whole other set of such flames come from a single image to which we consider this process continues indefinitely  and on this we say these can have influence on different levels of such fractal like space.

So in the merging of these three substances or metaphors we do of course imagine supersymmetry as super-matter  that is this way of seeing or defining a higher form of matter or if we will to declare it , outside of the tidal forces that relate to 3-space representations and dynamics of the general brane the inside of black holes may harbour deeper entities as with our use of it in describing the history of particles and stars (but for some reason the galaxy evolution seems much more complicated than this).  

Or we may say the information applies here also within a black hole structurally as to suggest places the information is returned to the whole, even the micro time (and time traveling) wormholes of some metric to the vague idea of some singularity sea to which it may also be a form of evaporation- or the idea that such information and structures may somehow go creatively to other places beyond, beyond even the idea somewhere else as if a white hole in this universe rather than say in the more general view of one universe with more or less consistent and uniform laws that can be seen as absolute into some parallel one to this one.

But if we add ideas like consciousness still ill defined but not necessarily wrong as part of the information of things, of the necessity or not of space to contain observers, if size or the question of what twists and turns in a fundamental manifold (as that of holes in the six dimensional formulation becomes again but thousand of geometries shifted into each other just at the earlier sting theories did in their unification) that at such an image of the flame so taken as real (although it should become clear, perhaps to the point were we may doubt in the explanation that, well as a metaphor, there can be no God or such a god is the best said of the mystery of nature) we have the possibility of a sentient being not myself who lights the candle and places the experiment who then conceives of the other universes where such experiments are sooner or later taking place.  What he sees then or imagines is more than the generalization of the many images as the core structure of space.  He imagines then there there are such things as clear holes in these questions as if some limit or intuitively finite aspect of flatland branes to which we imagine elaborate gaps of evolving size dimensions hidden somewhat or compactified, broken in evolving space, in such a way that if we decide at each branching point a whole new and relatively sufficiently energetic universe may so evolve endlessly.

To this novel idea of super-particle super-matter he may conjecture super fractal objects and their superpositions as if the relation between objects, transcendentally creative or not. A black hole or quasar or even ylem creative super-object may itself be composed actually or potentiality of super matter, or from the linear real evolving direction, higher dimensional matter than that of our familiar space- and the views are not to be easily unified as the same phenomenon nor can we simply say there are also one sided and not oriented spaces we understand as stars or black holes.

But having reached its grand speculation of the reality of space, the question also of the simple fact that somewhere and beyond our present equations or schemes to extend them beyond the problems of resolving singularities (which if we believe mathematical induction are proven there and not hoped by some as not possible, in our computer simulations) we further generalize this problem of matching a line, if in a sense finite, to a sphere and so on- thus the dateline that locally we may have a closer measure of date and clock time, what is the horizon of our place and context of events can imagine size differences that this whole metaphor may also be imagined descending as well as ascending from our point of vision.

* * * * * * * * *