Metaphysical Symmetry and Shadow Decoders

Metaphysical Symmetry and Shadow Decoders

L. Edgar Otto   Saturday, 04 May, 2013

Californium and Spherical Lasing in the sun, the harmonics of the grid of latitude and longitude, vector as if from a center
the surface heat and ringing sound is stronger, multidimensional between the shift of gravomagentic poles and the prime meridian.

This is the onion smashed to flatness of an atom like shell structure where between the sub-shells we find the lightening   Or the spirals of the loxidrome, in chiral forms replace the orthogonal map that contains independent oceans and land-forms, pock or sunspots, jets and the motion of time left behind.

We can number the bits over all the number line, divide the surface of the shells, orient them with respect to each other even in the cycles of honeycombs, space self vibrating.

The metaphysics of the absolute, expanded the destination beyond all poles, Einstein's shared shift of techonic plates over the mantle of uncertain matching and outside the description of the aether of fixed points.

I find it frustrating enough, in the lag taking time or in the illusion beyond my perception of infinitely fast bandwidth that in the plane where the matrix is simple we erect the stratospheres of the breath of atmosphere so to arrange them as if intelligible this breaking symmetry of dimensions made flesh in the scale of our high and low observations.

As if something depends upon a tether, a life line, an umbilical of stem cells along a path that we chose a thousand times on arbitrary levels what the pink or blue pills of reduced matrices.  The castles are defended between these motes, the technicians as engineers add as much to winning wars as the powder underground at Petersburg- as the bypassing of the bayoneted bob-wire trench.  The bastions for wider view and the castle walls inside walls or here and there the killing holes tunnel thru invaders broken in maze and paths.

This app and smart phone world is such labryinth to navigate as we keep up with the styles of connector wires, lose the old data because of old forms, predict the demise of the CD save as a stand alone separate device as perhaps too soon we integrate the airwaves, phones, chasing the technology of pre-driver forerunners for such lightning bolts, often open and not grounded as we debate Franklin's rods and keys our cone of protection.  What I write and draw explicitly off line needs too many steps to speak to the old PC...frustratingly worse is that composed in dreams upon awakening the dawn that all the work may as well be never done or lost for I cannot pass it from there to even the PC... save perhaps the spirit of it, the reduced architecture of it hard to imagine or describe in the awakened world...unless I draw it on some screen, effort and energy that can access our virtual memory.

So, let us see information described on the ball, the sphere that contains parts and bits still not diverged or divided, that which from a small metaphysical stance of transmission of some few binary numbers will describe or access the whole of all numbers and perhaps the solidity of some time and space.  Does not our DNA do this by its compass circles and rings?

The symmetry or asymmetry of the bra and kets of the quantum world as if to re-normalize or be lost in infinity as if that the ground of all being real and virtual, sacred or profane, can be contained within the spherical onion branes as a matter of abduction or concern with the remote of absolutes.  Can a meaningful organization of our knowledge be far behind, the constants unity or moving, possible or impossible as existing on the ground, subject to cloudy yet external half seen parallel space?  Our cherished C in capital or h with mysterious time what we intuit as action and drink as energy?  |Ch| then in all its varieties and colors, mirrors outside and inside the bra-c-ket of our notations.  Quantum mechanics fails to probe the scope of nature's wild cards.

* * * * * * *

Causal, Casual, and Quasal Antigravomagnetic Symmetry

Causal, Casual, and Quasal Antigravomagnetic Symmetry

L. Edgar Otto    Sunday, 05 May, 2013

On the level of the continuum as the primary view of physicality, the third physics is concerned with symmetry as that at nonnecessary contiguity as quasicity between our continuous and discontinuous relations of quality and quantity mirrored in the dark space relates causal and casual phenomena of creative laws of existence in that it is a weight or energy by geometric structural stereonometry.  While we may imagine a spiritual element not necessarily the reality the extension into higher physics, its generation and dimensions, evokes levels of supersymmetry and superduper symmetry--- thus philosophic or metaphysical symmetry.

It is hoped that the notation for quasic abstract motion and rest, being distinguished and at least four fold in the continuous description by the same symbols makes clear the general utility and clarity of these long time quasic and omnic physics descriptions and that such a notation will make it easier to determine the solidity of what is happening beyond the metaphysics into the third philosophy of general stereonometry.

There are many technical innovations and biological links at hand including better organization of our computational environs and the control of extreme behavior and disease. Our linking as superorganism is not necessarily virtual only and out of reach between the shells of systems- but as in n-dimensional printing the structures evolve the access as if memory principles, and a quasal sense of the need for embodied material entities as wider thermodynamic laws.

* * * * *

Marianne Talks to the Quantum Cat

Marianne Talks to the Quantum Cat

L. Edgar Otto  04 May, 2013  May the 4th be with you...

This post is mainly for the art's sake.  How quasic concepts may influence or guide our attention interacting our interpretations of information expressed as a wide visual concept.  I do not suggest this is a method of doing things.  One has to be familiar with certain references such as the work of Louis Carrol who also explored that difference between ravens and writing desks of his time.

But the question asked here does have a formal theme- as our imaginations seem true to its inner laws what might this have in store for our future if we share either way our choice of any pill in a matrix?  Is there a purple pill between them?  One effect I now notice, the television on in the background, is that in my exploration of science and philosophy certain shows long past as to if they can inspire me can do so again as I comprehend more what was behind such visions and that they were as advanced as what we expect of entertainment in our day in some respects.

Tonight an old Out of Limits show came on about transmission to a nitrogen based life thru the three dimensional microwave seen from our sister galaxy.  Of course in the usual alien tradition, the same dramatic thems underneath them a constant to which we either understand what is a true belief or have to suspend our belief to enjoy what may be in the stratosphere of dreams.

The question also relates to certain new age like and self help shows such as coast to coast where apparently those with a good and positive metaphysical rap have followers that seems to help people.  It is not clear, in the "laser like" focusing this issue of collective prayer works, for example, we have all seen the results of lack of explicitness in the wishing upon some genie.  What physics or mathematics may be the grounding reality underneath such speculations?  Do these waste our time as some thing anything does and is a sort of tranquilizer for social discontent?

I say this, that if the institutions have agendas only there for ideological ends they may be in for a surprise: that wisdom, knowledge, is the true wealth and power after all and events in this world suggests someone or something higher knows this.  Your efforts as if just art for its own sake are not lost in the unfolding of the world- we have heard ourselves and some from each other such a high state of knowing although one may not be sure such reflected messages were heard- I imagine if you need assurance the gods would say you have done well, my creative scientist and philosophers... It cannot be helped or maybe it not in the scheme of things to worry that some cannot envision a true and better life for everyone.

One thing about this generation that seems still caught up in pointless conflicts and imposed cooperation is that the computer era makes the reality and abstract issues stand out in bold relief.  No one should hold to the idea that there can be nothing new in the world or that the enumeration of vibrations of isolated tori smoke rings closes the story of the old and past.  At equifinality none dares steal your dreams if they are really of a higher order and purpose for our togetherness...if they are themselves worthy of the positions and that is how you may know them.

* * * * * * *

Superduper Symmetry in Minimum Omnium Quasic Gravity

Superduper  Symmetry in Minimum Omnium

Quasic Gravity as Super-Organism up to Teleology

L. Edgar Otto   Friday, 03 May, 2013

Metaphorically the ultranscontinuum as a philosophic universe, the Omnium as the simplest case, is also part of an ultranscontinuum.  One can say the raspberry universe in Leo Vuyk's terms is part of a raspberry multiverse.

The interactive rest and motion frames various branes of a span of various representational dimensions in matters of what is considered the ends or beginnings of sequences such as a deterministic (Plutomnium) or directed (Teleomnium) in the quasifinite super-totality, the bulk of physical phenomena being in a mirror intelligibility of multiplicity in the potential infinity over the spacious now in stance of reduced abstract rest, the fractal era before the observed formation of alpha particles in space if part of the grounding foundations of reality as real or mirrored or in a sense of linear inertial and non-inertial phenomena, exists as an intelligible physical phenomenon in the present over all omnic time and space descriptions.  These may evolve differently with respect to some relations of measure.

Four or in some cases the materialization of an implied fifth color is thus the minimum for such quasication and quantization in the continuous methods describing quadrapoles (thus octapoles and so on).  This as quasi-inflation like ideas may assert that a raspberry multiverse may give birth to baby raspberry multiverses.  Or as if the vibration or radiation, or evaporation effects, decay in the rates measurable and observed,  we imagine punctuated layers as in the new age intuitions of speculative anthropology in which, as in the Coast to Coast program last night, the next suggested conclusion that in a unique and one and olny universe there emerges (the Omnium of Omnia, or the Omnicontinuum) a growth of "awareness" as an independent aspect of our soul like mind from the physical. 

To the guests credit he relates this to the surface capacity of cell membranes as we build from the bacteria containing viruses, to the amoeba containing bacteria, to the human form with such a quasic natural dimensional (Newtonian) relativity that the ideas of such separate but similar classical radii (say of particles) may form into higher superorganisms.  But what is the idea of a Riemann sphere, ideally, save it as a structure is as much a measure of "energy" as it expressed by other physical constants such as h or c or m and so on... For such a presumed spherical reference frame may be said to have a maximum or minimum extent in the universe, one in which moreover from the mathematics things may seem to oscillate and time and space effects do not necessarily exhibit the properties as if one space-time manifold that in a sense we reach ideas of rotation where expansion of a universe may be considered as an illusion.

 We may imagine the possibility of this happening on a higher subjective plane or the result upon a certain threshold of exchanges of information... to this idea the guest cites the complexity of levels of the epi-genome, he further imagines the early cognitive development can be set in an individual, a programming wherein this influences our behavior and identity as if (Plutomnium era) the molding and belief in our subconscious (or perhaps in such contemplations we attribute this to external subjective beings of which we do not seem to disprove or prove the case).

We tend to suspect that these structural based laws give us barriers so as to take a stance thought solved by broken symmetry or looping where such a collection of four things with possible implied or internal connection for those logically hidden that four things is the beginning of exotic spaces beyond it, a minimum to the confused mirror where the barrier seems an impassible maximum... for even in the idea a model may allow something explicit to survive or its absence to carry over from the supposed big bang or crunch and so on as if merely quantum physics not to forbid it we still reach the paradox where statistical descriptions do not apply over some range or interval of rest and motion time save perhaps in the absolute sense of equal chances that something over all being could come into being.

So from the physical, regardless of the idea of what in the angle values or quantization of spin or momentum- the unity or the doubling of spin values for say photons or gravons in these issues of general topological geometries as zero, one or two  the absolute or ideal as if a physical wall of our observation of the sphere or flatland brane equivalent to which we may probe by theory the view of the background maps of the universe.  But this suggests to me the hidden clue as Orwin sees there as a possibility for normal supersymmetry of atom as shock structures is on this reality of the four fold in the now and in the middle scale.  We with quasic physics may thus consider the instant or existential moment of the physical as spacious independent "atoms" in the original sense.  So as physical our height in the dimensions of this world has a structural limit of a four space nature as if a unit cell of a quasic lattice (not the lesser idea the guest assumed was very much real as in the move "matrix" where the physical is irrelevant materially. 

This isolation of crystal unit cells is also a problem in quasic physics as to how it meaningfully allows connections between such spacetime cells.  Theory seems to skirt around the sense of this problem.  But could we short of becoming one physical organism actually by sharing physical things like meaningful and patterned data develop a physical emergence of a greater awareness- this is still on the level of paradox or contradiction in our partial truths or dreams.  The physical cloud based data of shared computers or that of quantum computation may not reach the complexity of consciousness in any threshold short of the organic level being its components for itself.

In the parallels that may exist in these anthropological like  worlds it is conceivable that given enough improvement in our technology some level of fractal or holographic scale can indeed be an awakening to a higher awareness between them...but that we may vaguely call God, or some mirror aliens, or ourselves- in the sense we are what we are in the nil or flatland ultimate scales and can say that much... there is more to the genome than epigenes by the way. 

The technology would benefit from miniaturization just as at some level we might replicate enough of the environs of the early universe to confirm what we think is how it works... but in the four object division on any vague dimensionless scale as a quasic gravity superduper symmetric complexity system would explain at least the lack of observation, save possibly in the laboratory, of wimps and direct observation of real but hidden gravity waves or for that matter the structural recreation or retro-engineering in experiments of totally unobservable but totally imaginable in our familiar environs of super particles In this sense we can extend our ideas of uncertainty, or relativity and whole areas of evolving mathematics to a higher level of relations that we can comprehend.

But it is all too easy to confuse issues that appear physical ones yet remain in this higher complexity as only a virtual space.  The thought experiment is a novel way to isolate and control the limits of the debate or to ignore the structures of data gained or lost as we reach the point of full understanding of physics or it devolves at times regardless of Jungian like shared wisdom, concepts and ideas.

It still is not clear something of higher intelligence of the pentacle of design is said to exist or not in the usual sense, but that is beyond the scope of these difficult yet meaningful poetically condensed essay of which that is always somehow and somewhere in back burner to which as a possible science as well as intuition  of such things may be explicitly clear,  we introduce  and reserve the term for this as the "Theotericontinuum". 

But can the implementation of shared physical technologies guarantee save developments as we learn "Neotericontinuum" without some sort of monitoring of many possible paths from an overview or guidance be that only the possible self creation of the fact of being of the universe itself?  But without higher theory critical questions remain as to how in our personal and social development things are affected by the way we raise and teach our children- what makes the early heart fixed or from the wellspring of possible organic forms possession or daemons of self design from within explode in chains of mindless or desired destruction even if it recurs toward more developed times?

The gender principles of ongoing asymmetry of descriptions and entities over the quasic brane guarantees a direction in mirror shadow inertial time over the idea of balance and symmetry even for the thermodynamic considerations- or what is the same description, finite, continuous, or as a question of unintelligibly and nonnecessary contiguity of quasi unified theory lattice elements,  the flow as circular or open puts in relief our ideas of time and entropy as the higher levels of brane and singularity complexes diverging or converging thru designs and higher uniform laws in all the symmetric space aspects including the complication of higher ideas of consciousness with it subjective time and probabilities, as well its narrow existential vision.  Reality as such in supersymmetry or more to the extent it exists is conserved or intelligibly established as differences to intercept the grounding of energy near the nil singularity fields and points.  But this idea of this as the grounding explanation of time flow is not fundamental in matters of mass or physicality this side of the Theocontinuum so to speak. 

The flow is not symmetric in the higher levels and that grounds the idea that time and the coherence of phenomena rather than the timeless symmetry noninertial, linear or curved, nonlocal or entangled at a distance explains time itself as structural laws of physicality.  Nature does seem to design as well its round rivers and somewhere in the rope that holds up the moon yet is nowhere tied I can pluck to hear the music, see the colors of my six string circular guitar, but maybe gravity holds it up, as is Apollo's Lyre.

* * * * * * *

On the proposed quantum gravity or quantum relativity level of physics generalization singularity (iota) structural bits of information for both the integer reduction from the transcendental and transfinite path or trace numbers views as if empty or absolute, generally the term 'aether-like', seems to be of use with such abstract frames of intelligible balances applying both to translation and spin boundary information as abstract motion, the tachyonic yet preseved and conserved information idea can extend instantaneously over vast measures of time in a superbrane flat Euclidean representation just as Godel envisioned some sort of a spiraling or folding of space by which one could travel back into the past as in the sphere representation, perhaps quantized in virtual distance via the taking time stance as if a wormhole... in theory where such "too weird to be true remark by Einstein to him" is somewhere a physical reality and non locality a well the possible travel may occur anywhere form some future to some other spacious now linear like algorithm of time or at least as an observational half contiguity if a location can be physically enfolded over some directional space- or at least very small bits of physical objects may loop back mirroring the dilation of scale reversed balanced with the (38 degree approximately) polar angle with mass like but atmospheric or skin surface differences from the orthogonal aleph 1 or 0 continuum ground. 

Such a process may be instantaneous and contain zero distance and time as if a universe could oscillate back into itself as the prime explanation that suggested to some theorists some principle of cosmic sensor as well the haunting questioning of invisible uncertainty in the proof of theories by the favorable universe for sentience as the anthropic principles. 

The mouth of such wormholes of indefinite surfaces and branching on either end tend to be ultimately the same place- so it may not mean something clear that the universe as a game plays itself or from a higher view the moving asymmetry state is one with a location at rest... yet, the higher view would tend to suggest that if this is the reality of things then bits from the future as symmetric entities, subjective or not, in a general higher space at rest may move between functions as a sort of mediator but hidden particle like object in such superduper space,  with vast stability over long periods of space and time, and as a reverse flow of unwinding background expansion that they gain mass and energy in discrete cases while the span of gravity effects have a higher uniformity as law.  I style these entities as trans-ecotoms in honor from ecotom, that term chosen by my alternative physics friend on the philosophychatforum.com , galatomic.

But if this hints of a further generalization of future physics way beyond the 5 and greater I indicated as Phoenix physics, energy at the center of cyclic birth and death recurrence or the information in a branching tree the same bits in the trunks and branches as view a the canopy, then we would need to push the concept even higher of what we mean by God as the ultimate concern or inertial system which again would raise issues on the Theotericontinuum level.  The logic of all such theories in our imagination seems to go thru these conceptual cycles, in that sense some things are new even in a static finite universe- or given such self creation with fortunate grounding in our inelegant use of recursion there are many new technologies and phenomena we may so imagine and create with at least the third physics of quasic gravity.  The ecotomic plasma can both pinch discretely or is conserved for where can such absolutes leak?  In that sense our world is open, and subjectively or with objects can be modified with our creative philosophies and sciences as if our thoughts were so structured yet the ultimate accelerations of accelerations synchronized to the physics of the shadow structures of creative black hole like objects, ylem or quasar and so on.

 * * * * *

Shock Waves and the Split Personality of Self-Referential Mathematical Physics

Shock Waves and the Split Personality of
Self-Referential Mathematical Physics

L. Edgar Otto   02 May, 2013

My thanks to Orwin for bringing back to the books for things I missed in the historical development or discoveries concerning the Bessel functions and the alternative solutions other than the unity of a dimensional flatland akin to wave harmonics.  This raises or confirms my concerns with notation procedures that in retrospect seems trivial compared to the conclusion of Witten in that arXiv paper.  My objection being that from my more intuitive view (as opposed to the mirrors of Platonism and Formalism) that the assertion of unity in the brane conception is perhaps unoriginal to those who speculate things beyond our shown abilities to reach a total theory at the foundations raises many questions as to how far we may probe these highly abstract realms of number and on what they are grounded in philosophic logic.

It is obvious that brane theory is evolving and those like Witten have fundamental concerns which needs to be elaborated on as it relates to the containment or unity of narrow catastrophic events in physics or the diversity of directions physics may go to be developed alternatively.  After all where wave equations are used we already go into what some think an alien world of quantum laws that for some is as uncertain as it remains a mystery - these in effect mere identities of our trigonometry equations.


If there is a general unity of the world as physics from the start we may integrate a totality or do so partially, thus describe the nature of entropy.  Complex spaces are not powerful enough to explain self referential by certainties or uncertainties what is the more general picture of thermodynamics even if applied to concepts of black hole surfaces.  Schizophrenics, that diagnosis that is usually given when other diagnoses escape the doctors (despite the slow progress made by cognitive and physical neurology observations) applies as much to our states of mind in which we entertain a stance or belief to some theory.

While the foundations suggest, in the method of such functions and dimensionless constants of indefinite range in some wider picture, some remarkable generation of integer values and orthogonality from some perspective, this assumption of things being cyclic...obviously the skeleton of a theory such as the Ekpyrotic universe without the division (after all in their own presentations we realize a split mind can appear and be exceptionally rational) of an atom or atomic region as if an onion like, Bohr like ensemble of series of shock waves.  Can there be in the sense of it a multi-ekpyrotic universe to ask this vaguely and is not this search for a higher unified theory explored a bit in the death bed equations of Einstein?

I think it is clear that for all its useful technology at the foundations the dividing of the imaginary and real spaces as Fourier did should still be questioned beyond its utility for it is something on the frontier of concerns and the mind of the designer that should evoke the shocks they explain in our middle scale in the universe as living beings from the start prone to self referential concepts standing on a razor edge.  His guess may be just a lucky one to something more ultimate, but this is as much a question of physics itself as well as some sort of grounding needed at the foundations.  Can the universe in its ice and fire do Fourier analysis without Fourier or is such intuition that which is conserved between the analog and digital, tricks of natures mirrors?

In particular what sort of guess is it that feels some certainty or unity in the higher reaches of group and dimension theory that in that higher space we may decide that things are consistent after all more than just intelligible to some sentient beings?  Can these problems in string (and brane) theory merely be extensions of our methods in dealing with what an seem a reduction yet a mystical procedure.  In particular how can we simply say a string needs some extra dimension to vibrate in without having a loss of information even if a deeper world can be probed?  What does it actually mean in a wider view to define degrees of freedom and how far can this hold together intelligibly?  Could such a string not have an absolute but intrinsic effect like curvature in a linear reduction?  The distinctions, a split in itself without better explanation yet one that extends and simplifies our prejudices of interpretation and procedures, of the plane horizontal or vertical of Feynman diagrams is not deep enough to describe this sensed higher realm of some sort of newer levels of physics.

Even as a matter of quadratics, it is clear that, in this rising or descent into higher space so coming back again as if it a mystery as such remaining unknown and computing in the dark and multiply its force of histories  but a^2 + b^2 = c if we use as information the self referential binary patterns of the golden section ( a key length in four space even with its possible four fold dialectics and restrictions in the physical world to what ghosts of departed quantities we jettison beyond our deep understanding of acceleration).  Moreover, there certainly are simpler equations involving at least half value substitutions than the quadratic equation.  This merely translates into the unlikely familiar world more like the intuition view.

By things not split I fancy Witten means, like Descartes, we are only concerned with positive quadrants for the negatives are but a conventional way to simplify our equations and in a sense is useful in a world we we exclude transit across zero and negative axes.  And of course the diagonals of matrices are not a simple description for some such as Marni explore patterns a little beyond them.  So is there a positive only sense of things like the table cloth fractals... Leo Vuyk certainly suggests this explains a lot if we consider what happens before the dust forms of the first hydrogen we apparently are surprised not there in our deep observations.  Yet nature seems to be there despite our speculations and dealing with evolked feelings or equal descriptions usually of a statistical nature that pushes away the shadow question of creative origins in the first of primitive senses.  Not all the believers are to be so casually dismissed nor the presence of logic at least in philosophy, nor art as viewed as a product of ideology only useful in the service of a state to which without it an individual is in effect thought to be nothing. Let us not repress our humanity.

What childish poem of violets and blues if alive and exists at all can be measured compared to an absolute emptiness?   What  repeated purulence as dramatic form of a pulp romance novel fulfills some minds their imaginations with blessed short term memory only that they buy the same book the marketers cover with a new cover and title?The red shifts go deep into what is the possibilities and certainties, and adaptability of our genes.  What inside us, child like, longs for the same story over and over or if but once we grow tired of a song?

I read once, an Israeli study, that orgasm is a short range frequency modulation.  Do we not project, Plato like the ancient unity desired in return our split from one soul?  Why can science not explain we do not laugh in the self reference of tickling.  But do the experiment yourself and you may discover at the peak the strenght is half again as strong for we feel that of our lover.  Is it so far fetched to think that somehow, with innate fire walls and hopeful transparent messages into the unknown that we cannot share the dreams of our lovers or the thoughts of our fellow inquirers? Perhaps it can be simplified to harmonics given wide enough scope and generality yet not reduce the experience.  The technological consequences if you think a little about it can be quite humorous as well as giving us more control over our lives and futures.

I recall going to the gallery in London viewing the collection of Dali, DeKooning, and pop art... how apt the name of surrealistic calculus. I mean pointillism cannot be captured by a camera or a print (possibly in these times) nor the effect where in the hills and valleys and stay fibers on of the canvass the colors flow as if over a mountain range.  What then but the great theme understood by a young man full of homesickness yankee go home show me the way and yet too long not to love the vanished empire, too respectful of the royal line to not be offended if a brain drain British professor dismissed him as a product of flagship universities only preserving the elite and yet that has and will never change- but what of pure research and learning?

Time goes on in succession of the artist work on the wall, the melting clocks and strange mature themes of the surrealists began with their precise renditions of still lifes then beyond that what they imagined or saw, a little self indulgence suggested to the viewers but not a post modern theme nor abstract reflection of minute arts. But as the brain of Dekooning grew more tangled did he not paint true what he saw, one sided, skewed her face, the mirror girl of his dreams whole and everything as with most anything at the germ and core and drive our truths or illusions of unity again, beyond perhaps the bicameral many poles of our branes, the faculty of putting things, even the stray hints of Pitkaen in p-adic space inside the higher object horizons.

But we all choose somewhat how to spend our light, how to organize the world with our minds inspired or not to transit the shells of heaven and hell of some early polyhedral model with its music of the spheres- the universe between man and the gods inspiring us by our special belief in our Beatrice.

* * * * *

The Quantum Gravity Egg Far from Equinox and Mono-culture Co-dependency of Complimentary Theories

The Quantum Gravity Egg Far from Equinox
and Mono-culture Co-dependency of Complimentary Theories
 
L. Edgar Otto  01 May, 2013 07:17:59 PM

In the metric over the manifold of the finite but boundless continuum the sense of gravity, the structure of it, leads to the thought that by some principle or scale gravity is quantized.  Time on the surface of a river flows to seek its own level as the totality too can be a reference frame of fall.
Far from equilibrium like an egg that we in our self belief of magician's choice stands on its end at equinox or that somewhere equidistant from the poles the constellations lay parallel to some discernible spin against the stardust or that is unequal lag or symmetrical reverse where things enhance and multiply the information in vortices of dark and light, potential wells, subtle fluctuations of ringing discs, if time in its abstract rest must take time to sense, reach out, probe the unknown, convey a message even long after the messenger has vanished... time that is the oxbow or the river meandering, or the bend that the villagers only know as their world and nothing distant known before or after it is their concern... even if the river comes back around.

What is left downstream at some end time?  Rusty broken parts that we fancy strays not far from the fuller triangles on the egg... parts that is full of cracks and vanishingly small welding .. rusty ones that seem to go on forever yet keeps some smooth infinitely divisible unity of form in its motion and descent until the world is mostly cracks beyond divisions were they the only stuff of space and time, a blurring holographic image phase and shift of spectral light to which only ideally can we recover from the chaos the image of the whole... and yet the fractal trees that reduced to strings with dimensions zero or branes, concrete and unique or shadows of growing multiplicity perhaps in some higher motion to leave a space of dreams become like a skeleton in the separate space felt but illusion as if the corals in a shallow sea long ago rose to the the tops of mountains that now only show the past in eroding slices where they have mostly worn away.

Does it really matter to the philosopher that he thought the great engines of learning, those private or by the state, was about research and a little learning, a competition that is the measure of the elite and this conserved over time, this the constant lie access will take a hundred years to make the equal opportunity the reality, to afford for our new immigrants  our children from the future some rise that survives the trap that is security if the choice abolishment or revolution of those who teach, who sell the lie there is hope for the masses, that the poor not always with us as surely as remains a cast irrespective of individuals that enter or leave it, a tenth of them the substance of wrong way spin giving mass, the backbone tolerable as long as the obligated generation is wise enough not to squander the worlds hard worked for capital by the forefathers...some make a choice outside the mainstream, spiritual like, that if of all such choices a world free for inquiry is preferable, a compensation hard to understand, we a thorn, a laughing stock to have such illusions in our hearts, foolish expectations, to which they cannot take back and rarely dare because there is more to the world of what might be... a treasure the thieves will not corrupt nor undermine for long the freedom found in Love.

Love with the last of conditions yet without obstacles to question as if of prudent fear its fragmentation of permanent passion by the darkness not enhanced... I recall vividly the first time as a child safe on the town with my shawled lady how indulgent of those who are one with the rhythm of life- my first strawberry milkshake...but like time since that immortal then too fast the electricity passed thru the straw to fill my being... for it was in a paper cone, time and life going faster to an end from sweet wide disc promised beginnings and forgotten icy brain freeze headaches, two thirds of time lost as the hours and light revealed eaten like wormwood.

I resolved one day I would order all the milkshakes I could drink... and that day came... yet it would not do for there is a saturation reached that we cannot hold more of a dream.  That is if as in love you have to fight the world that poisoned your lover by those who on the face of it believe in marriage and family, and children no matter how modern or diverse, those falsely promised respect for their privacy as individuals if only lucky for a little while, priming the pump of deeper waters where that really want to destroy all that's sound in such institutions.

Woe to those who put all their dreams in one basket yet build grandly the mono-culture not sure when the tritical goes critical for the lack of wisdom say let the buyers beware and smile at the scammers their sin not the sin itself but getting caught.  Do we have to accept this in a world of complimentary physics persisting unresolved that divides the world into exploring powers, is the dark side forever needed as we grow and learn...this the natural state of man?  What matters in eternal struggle if the blackbirds win great flocks of them to tax the corn- they too in simple configuration space are trapped in lack of foresight so equally doomed unto the new birth of worlds we imagine fills the cone again.

Let us drink of nature first so not that rationed to us by those who would steal your prayers and dreams and power to think on your own before you were born that your children are marginalized and demonized in simple faiths the power of nature within them too strong, too fearfully strong they state which will vanish in the distance itself so dependent cannot allow some final act of mutual assured destruction- let us make sense of false theories of priority and equal opportunity that will not allow things to change or truly believe- and if we cannot balance the rights of our people let us not by some narrow weapons of morality mock them, create scarcity and guilt or let us close the borders until we can make a better world for all as does living things ever more retreating into the confinements of their hearts, their precious souls the luck of the draw, their development finding us unworthy of such risk and benefit excuses that they withdraw 

Even the armored roll into a ball Texas ground diggers can suspend gestation until better times- would our lady's have that knack of true control of their own bodies.  Only with such wisdom might the seed she abandon and reject before a new soul finds its little universe of uniqueness and autonomy.  Nature abhors the excesses of we as nameless clones.  But then she is nature with many secrets hidden, and personal scars and wounds.  The minimum distance or duration is best measured as that trace that is you.  Outside of that we are just specters and philosophers, angels there as well as daemons   We should learn to live with artificial limbs and know the scope of life changes before we undertake to learn to live with artificial minds.  But then, for whatever reason they may sacrifice or volunteer  since Socrates and the example of his hemlock, the state never honors well, fulfills its obligations, to its living soldiers. Our schools can outgrow their said purposes of wisdom and enlightenment for man save in the threats of expediency can that spark of science reach for the stars.

* * * * *

Bridge over Infinity (Quasifinite Principles in Search of the Next Big Idea)

Bridge over Infinity (Quasifinite Principles in Search of the Next Big Idea)

L. Edgar Otto   01 May, 2013

As Sabine Hossenfelder reports in her paper there is a long history of the ideas of a finite distance at some level in our description of physics including that gained from some standpoint lost in the grounding methods of another viewpoint.  What strikes me as an outsider, a poet or philosopher who starts that way with speculations is that this human approach has tugged at the reasoning of our earlier inquirers and that in thier formal methods and papers the language and notations they used, at the risk of not finding some new direction as is proper in objective science for even a disproof of results sufficient unto the climate of the day, these were of the highest order, as good as any in these times.

But if to me these issues seem in the way and a foregone conclusion as to how the world, the Omnium, works. It must mean something very subtle is lacking in the notations and language to which even logic seems not to be a power enough bridge to reconsider how well we understand the infinite.  Some finite steps I have used to build my own understanding that I intuitively feel corrects so apply thou running in the background as part of thought processes and experiments have gone a long way to sort out the subtle assumptions that limit the power of our current notations- but it is also true that certain principles even with the evidence they work enshrined by modern or novel theoreticians or that where they do not work at some extreme place that does not undermine the design in the scope of intelligible and practical conversation, still inelegantly free as hard numbers founded on recursion thru uncertain or indefinite vagueness of which we may not by infinite methods necessarily shore up our physics of the infinite.

As it was said it will take longer to comprehend the finite- well, it has been much too long and such principles although rational and seemingly intuitive - who can decide this?- are an ongoing bottleneck to the imagined needed breakthroughs such as understanding gravity, or quantum gravity grounding regimes and phenomenology in the possibly false distinction in that debate between the loopers and the stringers.  For me these ideas also forbid even higher generalizations and totally new big ideas at the present more than our wildest imaginations.  But some of us have a scale of what we consider the scope of science or the relevance of a particular method or principle and all feel from their own reality check that their intuitions are as sound.  About all that strikes me as truly new is the role we all are playing as part of such deep and important human and honest inquiry 

The future may well look back on bits of ideas, hidden in the explicit equations, where one theoretician dismissed part of another's efforts which shows that in the end they agreed with their opponent even if it only from a hint that the opponent may have a sound idea that comes only by a rare beginning as but a single instance of which we did not look deeply enough to show its strength and soundness from a higher intuitive view in the details and the general vision ahead of its time or way behind the growth of theory seen from times to come.

To quote Bob Dylan... "If you are not busy being born you  are dying."  This is from a poet and a tradition of thought of which some of the deepest issues may be raised as we deal with our pretensions of infinite power or our fragile insignificance in philosophy, and in science, physics, as we are coming to see now.  Who is the creative entity behind the you being born and to what extent is it transcendentally human?

I meant to write the details of such principles that apply especially with our ideas of minimum distance (duration) as Sabine points out some in the spirit of it if the concerns are only of the fundamental physical values and nothing metaphysical or more foundational as I and Rowlands point out- but those can be gleaned from my earlier posts where they endure in the drama of theory, particle physics, and cosmology in these new times.  As Lubos points out some of the principles (and theory or symmetries, conservation ideas, and so on) seem to be more of a fixed nature as are all our ideas that may be shared or arise in that ideological debate even where the genes and clouds are private and public property.  I am inspired by his link to Witten that thru my eyes speaks of the beginning of climbing on to the wider shore or diving into the sea before him Newton mentioned in a poetic moment, perhaps such principles but only a beginning is a key to raise the level of our comprehension and the needed next little idea of a new physics constrained only by the sanity where it exists in our great speculation.

* * * * * * *