QUASIC N-BODY PROBLEM

QUASIC N-BODY PROBLEM    August 20, 2014
L. Edgar Otto                                    Eau Claire, Wisconsin

* Three bodies xyz can share a spacious point of minimum bounded content at singularity.

* Three 'pixels' of separate xyz coordinates quantize the shared forces of pixel distances Qdx.

* Any three may be in adjacent dimensions.

* The pixel boundary mirrors each pixel, epsilon-delta equals unity.

* The epsilon-delta and delta-epsilon may affect the unity differently, unity to the nth.

* These may suggest disjoint reverse holographic principles where a string of three items two appear and a third hidden but uncertain which one, and it be relativistic.

* The patterns may move congruently or may intrinsically spin relative to spacious neutrality.

* Such forces may overlap, not overlap, or partially do so.

* Parallel implied centers of structure may shift (toward or away from a center) and be viable or equivalent unto the product of quasic dimensions.

* A pixel may vanish or arise from a set into its real or implied mirrors, or may exist unseen in the background.

* Observed effects from point or spacious singularity may restart emergent dimensions with Omnic measure and weights and even at rest as absolute successive superdetermined motion continue from initial pixel states.

* The pixel count of a totality may loop or complete a quasic structure as self-limiting and information may be lost or reduce to cycles of lower dimension containing double explosions of the whole.

Alternative Scaleless Symmetry

Alternative Scaleless Symmetry ( state of the vision between LHC experiments )  L. Edgar Otto ( The PeSla )

Alternative symmetries, now considered seriously although still in a confused way in regards to the math and conventional terminology. Welcome to the new physics, SUSYQ. It has been a long plateau to get here and a steep learning curve, yet there is more. Some of us wait patiently marginalized on the side, some of us do the work with results or not in a sense of higher duty. Some like Don have a sober view where even relativistic effects hold on our human scale.

L. Edgar Otto Don, and just what does Fermi Lab have to say about ghost particles, recently? Seems to me 'galatomic ' banded by the science philosophy chat forum, or others of the scaleless universe so threatened by the simple concept of a tablecloth fractal (like Lubos) and I see why - E=mc^2 is a local illusion right? Or my thoughts long on this issue or others like Robert Walker who predicts we vindicated.
http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140818-at-multiverse-impasse-a-new-theory-of-scale/
This general concept comes closer to foundational theory. The single multiverse as a 'ghost' particle is a metaphysical principle. (nothingness is created with all that is not a created muon - Rowlands, even without consideration of 'tachyons'.) 
But various ideas of physics is not that radically changed nor generations of researchers work and experiments pointless wasted time and effort. Symmetry is still a wildcard in between what Nature discerns or decides which is zombie, which is ghost in a nonnecessary manner.
Complex analysis can be independent of scale likewise as descriptions like fractal length measured expansion but dimensionless.
In three space where scaleless the 'Otto-Conway' matrices have a hierarchy of such matrices in spaces or masses of imagined higher dimension.
The universe appears 'extranormal' not strictly paranormal part predictible nor necessarily supernatural as unreachable in existing science including ideas of tachyons or zero and negative probabilities.

Standard physics regards as gazing at an atom from outside and toward the micro world direction can be reduced to symmetry as if a perfect sphere.

* * * * * 

Epiphany Lane (On Drill-bit Nano Physics)

Epiphany Lane (On Drill-bit Nano Physics)

More text and commentary may be added soon... here are some raw notes and a symbolic picture to be compared to a wave color dimension model of quasic shell electron configurations.  The deeper principle is the wildcard * which equals 0 or 1 and energetic physics in between, as if alph sub * at the foundation of singularity or color added as a spacious singularity dimension, are there informationally indistinguishable. This is to say we do not understand chirality deeply enough nor how it is expressed physically.  From my quasic view, comparable to neutral plasma pinching where there are longitudinal wave effective concepts the geometry seems to portray patterns, here four-fold symmetry, that tend to repeat or not across the linear aspect of information which is equivalent to that we imagine expanded in higher space.

Singularity or avoiding singularity are equal as the indiscernible discernible in the discontinuity over a geometric abstraction where 2=0 by division by zero the imaginary or missing elements of an energetic focusing toward a linear direction represents the wildcard point or line description which may pass thru the event horizons as if the rim of a 4D volcano potential well with increased speed.  Thus qm tunneling.  If for example the big bang started from a black hole in a sense the idea of inflation is not needed or part of the illusion of expansion for instead of eternal it is more a diffuse steady state... thus what then is the need for inflation theory to explain an already more steady state conception?

* * *

Spacious Singularity

Spacious Singularity  (comments on backreaction blogspot)


L. Edgar Otto said...
Sabine, the term singularity certainly needs to be better defined. I myself use the term "spacious singularity" which I now imagine makes little sense to readers. I need to follow your links to know what your take on it is as I do not find it apparent as in "No one these days imagines there is a singularity inside a black hole."
A simple analogy is the Earth with poles. To ask what came before the North Pole is a meaningless question. The archaic word Loxidrome where a map projection path never reaches it but spirals into it expresses one part of the problem. Do we not say the same thing for an ideal absolute zero? That a vague law as is what not that long ago the idea of Projective geometry was once thought the generalization of everything.
The Agyptians thought that one could go beyond the North pole into some idea of higher space, a spiritual journey to pass thru it at the top of the world. The built the architecture and aimed it to the North star, although those stars shifted in cycle. In the astrology it seemed as clear time of birth, position, and which star repeated like history between spirals set the word patterns from the fixed stars of the heavens.
The Greeks also knew the Earth as round and measured its curvature. Their careful technology concluded the stars were fixed, a false conclusion similar to Gauss who instruments of the time could not match the velocity of light with his concepts.
An ideal point in the landscape, regardless if there is spin and that corresponds to some classical radius speaks for an apparent or illusion of a difference in a limiting velocity or fixed light frame reference. Yes, the singularity if an isolated object may be outside the black hole or something of illusions if our universe stands outside it may seem reasonable.
It is especially not clear that we can compactify things or make them dense and that the only description of how we might move from A to B in space by the illusions or changes to the velocity of light. It could be a combination as in the speculation of code reading DNA with several genome functions.

 L. Edgar Otto said...
Zephir, one does not need to say high or low dimensions for the illusion of event horizons and singularies. It can be a shifting of adjacent dimensions in these matters of continuity and discreteness, for Newton defined continuity as continuous, contiguous, and consecutive. So things can be superimposed or totally separate or "touch" in a sense. Not all of the connections may be realized and all present of paths. I had a sailor friend who saw Star Trek as a sci fi analogy to a submarine under water where there is a wider freedom of motion as if gravity is not the main sense. Of course in earlier times crossing the equator was a big ritual deal for we discover the opposite change of seasons and do not fall off the flat earth.
Xerxes, to put GR+SM in the same bundle is not the only way to view possible overall structures of a vacuum which may have physical laws at some moving scale zero point. We can arrange a programming of matching dominoes but there are no equations that work unless we see a difference in the numbers. So condensing or expanding beyond a certain perceptual scale may not have a total end or omega point that tells us a difference in AI or something vaguely conscious as something else. Such programming may have diminishing return and the fire walls or boundaries if reached may begin again if transparent and neutral. The Omega concept has been used for spiritual eras predicted also, or for some end of knowing or for a state of the world in some ideological history. It is possible to orgainize the sub parts of a hypercube varying Euler's formula as to what adds up to get the numbers involved where we distinguish rest and motion abstractly as GR or SM.
This issue as the adjacent dimensions of surface and volume a holographic idea where the paths on the surface are fractal and all is seen more or less as linear (non-linear is a vague term as is uncertainty, especially if what emerges or is given of sentience matches the combinations and computations of intellect with what is applied singularity theory.)

12:44 AM, August 05, 2014

L. Edgar Otto said...
Zephir etc al,
perhaps a little humility is in order for scientists still learning, especially where physics comes to the frontier of issues we call non-linearity.
For me questions of arithmetic and visualization of geometries seem all important but even this may be too simple for new generalizations. Praise then to whom may stumble on new deep yet simple foundational principles by speculation.

Zephir, there are ideas and formulas that on water surfaces tending flat and ignoring parameters that fade exponentially into depths. If there is something to your aether vision it escapes me or is not conveyed clearly. Are you making an analogy to something like string tension in the sense "gravity waves " in there well measured circularity relate to "capillary " waves? Einstein remarked that physics in 4D is in a sense simpler than in 3D, but evidently he considered going beyond this case.
QM issues aside fluids and magnetism as in MHD have interesting zero points that fix the fields to the flow something pre-Maxwellian.

An old visualization analogy to a hypercube asks in effect does a half of a 4D hypersphere give us half a worm if we bite into it. For it would eat the volume of the 3D projected down apple, come fi the surface then eat as much volume again, then the surface itself.
Is there a central singularity, in which volume?

Complex analysis can be but part of a bigger picture. Boundaries can be quadratic at least. These 2D x 2D as in recent visualizing H bonds by microwaves.

We can simulate naked singularities as at the poles of a spinning star.

A 2D snapshot of equations of unity by powers of absolute values without a moving picture misses point exchanges between curves and isolated regions.

Sabine is right that initial and end points are essential to the big picture.

Best, humbly yours, this singular lifetime at least.

11:40 PM, August 05, 2014 Delete

L. Edgar Otto said...
Also the idea of chaos where the laws of algebraic operations break down. Where is the chaos in QM theory? Can we observe or explain plasma pinching when the helicity is neutral and successively circular.
MarkusM perhaps the ambiguous statement is not strong enough. Stars and planets have shell structures as if the crystalline structures have successive total phase changes.
A BH in a sense a hyperbolic crystal where the center is not a point as Newton for forces spacious or at a point for outside finite measuring, but a limit boundary of some hyperbolic grid like an incompressible liquid.
So what of the air above the water? Riemann 101 Removes thee singularity and the negative real axis that paths cannot cross over. Controversial.
Can a QM cat riding a wormhole path inside? A black hole notice no change or half alive vanishes into the singularity?

6:02 AM, August 06, 2014

Thesis and Theory

Thesis and Theory          L. Edgar Otto    (shared on facebook and represents a day in the life of my recreational physics and math where things seem to come together after thoughts and dreams)  I am sorry I have not kept up the blogs or the vague ideas for new poems and songs (broken toy road is coming along even though scientific concerns are more important a use of time, but not of we as people) In a sense nothing is lost in this issue of information or how we use our light in life, yet efforts are not always visible nor need they be in the miracle of life and what is unique in us and the universe.

* * *

Sometimes things seem to fit together but we cannot be sure if this is all we can know of a given model as our imagined totality. The ability to distinguish science and pseudo-science appears to be a phenomenon needing better explanation in itself. I think it helps that those who research are highly open minded but in general should be highly emotionally stable. Still, if somehow language and concepts are passed down in our genes which I feel strongly is the case just random or artificial arrangements of symbols as roots, for words or solutions of equations, are harder for humans to adapt to initially to understand. But there does seem quantum leaps after the fact of deep reflection. This strikes me as a direct but delayed result where what was intuitively vague yet correct may raise our awareness to the obvious then new questions. Yet it is not clear for any of us that we need to express this knowledge in a post alphanumeric age as numbers or words as we go about the business of living and living together.

Counterflow superconductivity as a thermodynamic micro concept would be equivalent to QM space issues of turning black holes into white holes as in LQG theory for hierarchical scale measure theses.
The "polyomnic" idea of space itself quantized over so many apparently irreducible sheets of atomic layers in successive but indefinite dualities on the middle or general scale beginning at five-fold symmetry.
QM issues relating to awareness (theory) can be imagined an artifact of language including its representation by formulae which may not properly distinguish linear or logirithmic symbols nor their certainty in establishing physical effects.
This is evident in what we call agglutinating or almalagmating confusions of evolving or fixed views of variations on roots.  Our theses then local or extended of matrix verses particle-wave duality in a range of perceptual phenomenal applications conceptually.
Otherwise we would not observe analogous phases questioning what effects we regard as natural or artificial as this applies especially to the informational complexities of biological systems as models.
"The root was a solitary monolith surrounded by concentric stone-circles of superfluous if exquisitely regular, flexions."  Loom of Language  Frederick Bodmer pg.464

http://phys.org/news/2014-07-superconductivity-high-temperatures-layered-2d.html
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/   July 25, 2014 article

* * * *
I have considered a project, more for fun, of representing language visually as a series of the international signal flags, colors and shapes, with the intrinsic issues of logic that to me these imply.  I think it may be important that on the beach before the great unknowns we as people have some time to play, perhaps draw equations in the sand without worry that it may be a waste of time or just something for us to do this day.

The Great Speculation

The Great Speculation        L. Edgar Otto  June 21, 2014

In this post I will comment on recent data and speculative models which seem to me if these are science we have gone directly to philosophic implications before even the science fiction aspects were developed as technology seems to rapidly evolve.

I usually associate quantum stuff with the metaphor of a hive and honey bee.  Relativistic stuff with hedgehogs, and quasic stuff with the many eyes of a peacock.

dS and Es universes seem to have some creative aspects which work jointly to predict what is observes or suggested recently on both sides of the profane and sacred geometry.

This has come from some recurring, yet comforting dreams.

Consider these news results:

1. the speed of light may be slower than thought as a standard of measure.

2. a model of galaxies where only so many, dark matter simulation wise, become star bearers.

3. two rings of star formation happen, one more elliptical near the vicinity of galactic black holes.

4. information wise, what is radiating if a black hole can radiate completely, and why when items fall or accelerate there is heat... how can this be if things are relative?  What of the angular momentum?

5. can a Dyson sphere literally isolate social systems or concepts like soul in reincarnation models? Is there in a sense a higher level of super-entanglement that inverts or appears isolated and internal - is this not in fact a fractal like form of inflation models.

6. in multicellular animals the source code seems intimate from the origins to life thus cancer but in the bonds of molecules while breaking they spontaneously tend to repair. Life is this focal point of living and death.

7, quantum computation does not necessarily work faster than classical computation.

*  *  *

Beyond the Calculus of Singularity

Toward a Journal of Quasic Physics                                   L. Edgar Otto    June 2014

The level of this vision became higher due to the indulgence of Sabine on her Backreaction.blogspot.com on these foundational issues.  And to Google.  The future is Android.

* * *
Some notes today for the missing section  A Calculus of Singularity... but it seems to be the background principles for the philosophy as a precursor to the applied physics.  I have to use every general principle I have assumed over the years.  Conceptually, can we exceed the cosmological closure of the model?  So I will offer it soon as a work of philosophy.

What we have on this level of quasical conception or speculations is that I have an abstract system that in fact may be represented by coordinates but these are each a 8 x 8 matrix notation.  I assume that the difference in the inside of an abstract lattice to the inside is at or near singularity not distinguishable .
lampion 1 - calc. of singularity (ng) . so with preferred initial conditions in an explicit order within or in the totality so determined... is there a way to modulate the space as some conceptions hint at if we try to average the ideas of expansion or density of energy.  Certainly symmetry breaking and phase shifting are not forbidden to be  distinct even with higher restrictions, as in the case of 32 clones in mammal cells possible before the totality becomes an individual.  We have the initiators within initiators and possible breaking from terminations on this higher "telescoping" level that would resolve current confusions or debates of the so called standard models of particles and cosmology.

* * * *

The tetris like shapes can be formed into polymer chains too in 2D.

The 64 four color chain code applies to genetic teleoscoping in quason 4space.

This is simply beautiful and each of the eight corners can be another such cube of six colors and so on.

The upper right is the center of 81 and the left column are the 16 hypercube points.

20 June 2014

I have the feeling that I am about as far along as physics in the 70's.  This is interesting because when I post in this century something like Rene Thom seems to still be relevant.  I did not know this but had kept the future of such intuitions in my arsenal of understanding - others evidently took the work much further.
So I was looking thru past drawings and realize I also understand better some directions or areas I did casually as in puzzle making which in retrospect I understand why I did it and how it fit into the overall scheme of things that apply to more modern issues.  My virality cubes contain a deeper general principle than I had the ability at the time to imagine. If by a calculus of philosophic singularity we can imagine two colors over 4 space pair combinations becoming grey or neutral we can also imagine them duplicating as in the coloring of the 32 hypercube edges with 6 colors.  This leads to a wide variety of eight 3d cube arrangements, but how save by usual formulas to enumerate them - hard to do solely intuitively.

So at cusp of a little wider vision I wrote a question to myself, or note to myself:

Do Singularity Optic Manifolds for Amplification (SOMA) allow for more than superfluid cosmology as defects (I need this more clearly defined) of apparent Lorentz violation efficiency in thermodynamic systems?   Or for that matter the possibility of warp or time travel and more rapid computations that is still ultimately an open question.

Perhaps I should put some of the earlier drawings in one place for recapitulation and ease of reference.  My intermittent internet access and lack of daily funds and using old once used coffee shop computers results in blocked methods of payment and password confusions so I was looking for a particular picture of which it is hard to find in my more than once copied methods of informal filing systems.

* * *

June 21, 2014

At general singularity we can imagine the foundations of mathematics, for example issues of Godel or the Axiom of choice can develop into different realms... or any one realm describe our perspective.  Lately, some articles are appearing on this on the net.  If the 3 and 4 dimensional problems with such ideas of the infinite or infinitesimal relate to how we see Maxwell  and issues of what is physical (the scientific phenomenology as a method despite the indistinguishable distinguishable including the deep structure of our minds as this non-necessary philosophy of metaphysics, logic, and epistemology) is this not the idea of what we find and so debate about higgs mass or Biceps ways to detect "gravitational waves"? No wonder one article asks if aliens could have a whole new mathematics (like time not needed as in some self evolving microchips)... will this picture aid us to find even better unity in how we interpret the universe?  Without this survey of philosophy most modern theories are at some limited depth founded only on philosophic speculation.
What then would determine if the philosophic symmetry is broken absolutely or not in the uncharacterizable indifferent universe?
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5358

http://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-that-an-alien-civilization-has-completely-different-mathematics-than-ours/answer/Robert-Walker-5?srid=ptwx&share=1

Godel-Cohen are not necessarily decidable with all the paradoxical exceptions in the widest sense.

I really have to get back to music, there is no end to this.  Yet the intuitive foundations enhance my playing only it seems to take time from the reasonable arrangement of lyrics, so many incomplete songs.  You cannot make a living with music anyway.  Today I sit over coffee with a man who played only for himself and a lot of Christians who have come to meet there of various ages and they talked about how things were in their neighborhood in the 60's in a small area in the west of eau claire.  I made them laugh and set the general conversation by simple questions like- well, were there bears there?


* * *