Composite Representations

Composite Representations L. Edgar Otto May 24, 2011

Condenser Spaces and the Extremal Geometry of (Celesticontinuum) Symplex Physics and the Role of External Observation and Grounding Observation of Dream Systems Between the Extremes In Discrete Concrete Physicality Topologies and Thermodynamics.

Lampion 1 - The holographic principle in terms of information as observed from a higher plane or in the dynamics of a lower plane of process is not a complete idea when different representations (arrangement between "matter" pieces in a grid of "space" cells obeying simple Logical coherences) contain the same information expressed in different (Quasic) laws of motion.
(Thus If only from the view of holography as the main emphasis the remote equations of physics of infinity reach a point of breakdown or a ground of emptiness which is the usual formulation of Boolean and arithmetical axioms) We also need the considerations of Fractal like positive spaces and the relation to holograms to which some may indeed imagine as the stuff of consciousness and unity possible in some states with the physical.)

Lampion 2 - In the transition from one representation to another the connections (such as braids or TGD wormholes) carries with it a grounding that is not necessarily non-linear, empty, or replete with transcendental and transfinite notions of sets and numbers and spaces.
(Nature thus expresses intelligibly or coherently and logically herself in the idea of generations, of say particles. But these have a certain perpendicularity in which the dimensions of motion also distinguish the styles of particles.

Lampion 3 - Kepler's third law is an example of the virial principle of this change of representations (which is also a change in the content of meaning and information) which lead after his intense observations to Newton and the inverse square law to establish that a^2 in some sense equals B^3, specifically that 8^2 = 4^3 = 64 which begins to think about numbers in four and eight dimensions of symmetry. (and for me the discovery one can play on a 4 x 4 x 4 board the 8 x 8 chess which is a sort of holographic principle, the Odo64 discovered long after the Higher chess games in the attempt to explain such divisions and restrictions where in a normal space one might think it is a matter of N^n cells of dimensions.
(Yet there are ways to see certain composite representations where one might get a different background or systems of backgrounds to make certain binary numbers primary. This Feymann or Dirac way of considering information or the way by notation where it is obvious for a coordinate system the octonion-quaterion differences. In a sense TXD and TGD differ only on such a primary emphasis. In the explanation of TGD wormholes, even as braids of braids, and in the work of Kea which senses the differences (quasic) of this condensing theories, say between 4 or 5 natural dimensions. Both theoreticians sense the asymmetric and quantum uncertainties that may be in the dynamic background of dark and fractal like theories.)

Lampion 4 - I suggest or assert the representations 2^6 (simplex connectivity where for me all simplexes reduce to a Celesticontinuum, Cscm, and others try to base things primarily on this continuum say in a hierarchy of triangle structures that describe as incompletely as holograms the structure of space.) 4^3 and 8^2 correspond to the neutrino generations. 16^1 and iota as if a null state or a point ^n as a singularity not a complex on the observational extremes in four dimensions.
But in five natural dimensions in ways Kea abstractly has shown in the matrices which corresponds to the quarks where in effect, and rather holograph-like actually
we have four generations from iota to 256.

Lampion 5 - However, just as the natural number sequence has composites this ideally extended levels of representations has them for the divisions of the algebra and the way in which ideas of symmetry are generalized and not as prime irreducible as some would have us believe is the only limiting case of our concepts in physics for group theory. I fact here we have in 5 space of a third generation, and hard to put into my usual factoring binary notation, the case of 8^2 x 2^2 = 256 objects. This of course fits well with Eddington's Uranoid ideas in his quantum relativity of 1929 as to how we may relate the 2^2 of those representational coordinates and his idea of the simple derivation of the fine structure constant at this 256 level. Thus one sees the reason in composite representations I form the series Odo256 Odo1024 and so on for 3 and 4 dimensional chess games of two players. It is worth noting in the things in plain view hidden (like my trying to grasp space and numbers this way) that if we continue this representation 8x8x8x2x2x2 we find the 512 or 8^4 case.

Lampion 6 - It is not enough to see powers in the continuum sets 2^N as a sort of Clifford finite dimensionality. There can be certain integrations and differentiations, partial and total, of these generative powers such that we do derive the special relations of matrices like 2^9 x 2^6 or 36^2 or by addition in the quasic definition or view of dimensions the role of say 4D x 3D as where the number 12 fits into all this.

Lampion 7 - Lastly, I tend to agree with TGD that certain particles (both the three and four dimensional ones present) in the composite representation are composite particles or what some bloggers have suggested are Higgs impostors.

[Well, I have failed to make it so simple anyone can read it but had to get some form of the information down in these insights into my my own intuitive decisions and why I had made them long ago. The page was really just half a page long in the manuscript. If anyone needs or wants to question me or add to the ideas email me at LoversOfWisdom@yahoo.com Upon awakening and with seeing Pitkanen's post and after Lubos explanations and privileging the holographic idea yesterday I found again that I did have more to post. But, Justin who reads occasionally my "esoteric" physics, the theme really is here how we grab hold of simple but complicated notions, especially for your suggestion a few years ago in my poetry to take up the theme of consciousness.]


* * *

Comment posted to Matti Today on http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/05/p-adic-physics-as-correlate-for-boolean.html

Matti,

I am posting what I hope will be the passing of a clear but abstract concept among other concepts.

It is difficult because there are other concepts that are as powerful like the holographic principle.

As far as I can understand your post today it relates, and is a surprise to me as part of your area of research, that I see it as such a difficult concept in which I tend to agree with the structures if not the exact implications say for consciousness.

We should always be ready to question our ideas especially if they seem to restrain some theory or physical process and we assert it to be so.

Composite Representations on pesla.blogspot is the title to see and before reading your post was meant to be a terse note to try to convey what is really a simple idea of space and get input on what I myself want to assert about it.

ThePeSla

* * *

Footnote: My illustration today has a Cartesian grid background of the window screen and on that raindrops which distort and magnify the grid as if bits of the so called compactified dimensions. With that I added a turret from a turn of the century house with a "lightening rod" for the relation to electricity and a structure of simple geometric forms with my obsession for arrangement of overlooked connections, with rays from coffee stirrers to make the higher symbol of perpendicularity of our notions, focusing on the apex of a light cone or diamond as it were. The symbolic orthogonal plastic pieces here uses again for issues of technology.

* * *

Stray Thought Left Out: Lampion M - the paper Lubos referred to yesterday where the description of a and a sub zero, things were left out- that is nothing inside something like a black hole in his graph of such spaces- I can understand this as a basis for wider freedoms of the dynamics- but how does it explain what accelerates the spin of black holes over time? To see space as hologram only is thus a comprehensive but incomplete picture that the process or notion itself has deeper explanations- it is odd that when asked why there were tornadoes for example as a child I questioned the explanation of the mixing of the cold and heat.

* * *

It should be clear, eventually, to anyone that such abstract ideas and ideals of quasic motions within and between representations not only show the reason for natures generations from many viewpoints but as far as their application to particle physics actually ground the describe the possibilities of their differences in being and structures.

* * *
An interesting question on newscientist about turtles (whom in theory may respond to five space orientations with five receptors- in relation to heat direction:


Yesterday morning I had a talk with the artist of the dioramas on his use of mirrors and what projects he wanted to do with them. I told him some things to expect in some cases of curved mirrors and tried to explain how it relates say Escher and perception and Escher's study of such symmetries, formally and accurately in his drawings (confirmed by Coxeter) and as inversions with the butterflies his discovery of a new crystal group.

But I learned something too, someone has made an expensive mirror, two at 45 degrees in a way that reverses left from right. The artist wanted to purchase one. He said that when people view it, because there is no seam dividing them- the achievement of the mirror maker, that they experience a sense of vertigo and nausea.

Thus I think of Pinker who tried to explain, in evolutionary terms mostly, how it is we can see or relate to the directions and dimensions, and how at the borderlines of such perceptible space the flat places are very fuzzy as they outline the volume to at least our ability to see and orient things in three space. This borderland is the issue here talked about as to the role of holographic ideas. But it occurs to me that by eliminating the ideal line where the mirrors meet that the origin of this nausea is that remote sense of turns and twist at the breakdown of nothingness and infinity wherein we center ourselves and orient our perceptions, confuse the left and right at least that still less developed and open to confusion at some ideal point or line of projection on such planes replete with condensed dimensions. In other words it seems to or almost directly touches our ability to perceive and relate to our-self in perception as if we went to infinity and back and merged the volumes with the surfaces and the inside out of gloves in superposition.

Then again I always thought, with practice, we can see and orient things in more than three dimensions provided we see it as Nature herself does. The source of art as well those lone stars left in the twilight is that we on the beach where life arose by watery shores is the ground, shifting sand or not, and the gaze into some greater and endless infinity. We but a blip in spin that can go what seems so far at the time as if we a skipping stone.

* * *

Debris Ball and Polar Bare Charges

Debris Ball and Polar Bare Charges L. Edgar Otto May 23, 2011

* * *
Interesting Matti that our humble theoretician posted on this after you have and I will post on it after Lubos. And Ulla, your reference also is part of the picture. But clearly what Lubos proposes is very much TGD-ish and even reminds me of what math puter programs may draw in my quasic plane. Holography as a principle is not quite everything.

Anyway the formula on the illustration as a generalization of the inverse square law (why things are round, Ulla, and why space is three dimensional mostly)is but a vague suggestion for the dark matter, depth and span of space and time, and the inverse very much TGD-like but I added the dark energy here as plus or minus unity. :-)

No wonder it is hard to understand global warming without at least the TGD in the new physics!

ThePeSla


* * *

http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/05/mond-and-tgd.html

(and from Ulla there): http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1528

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/05/mond-and-hond-theories-without-dark.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

Actually, it looks like Lubos is coming around to a wider theory- as all such theories said to need modification and tweaking of our experiments cannot be one that is fundamental.



A flag should Lubos find original and fundamental knowledge in the evidence. The inner sphere is Kepler's law but fixed on a circle of smashed ellipse and it does involve at least the fourth power or root as the segments at right angles superimposed. Now does the breakdown of information in a hologram at a certain point such that the whole cannot be described by the curvature of a fragment mean that in a deeper sense we need to fundamentally modify gravity as in Einstein too and generally relate it to quantum laws if not some Thermodynamic models?

* * *

If it seems as we distinguish climate from weather the data seems to say that things like earthquakes come in clusters. This in itself is a principle of nature if we look at the foundations and are not politically biased in the paradoxes of the right and left. But because of this natural quasi-disordering it seems to me it would be difficult to establish a certain theory modeled beyond the scale in real time by any of the quantum statistical models that does not have a deeper foundation. That said, which was the last thought of this philosophic posting I continue with extreme speculation as to possible explanations and technologies and the relationship to our ideas of consciousness from a transgenerative perspective, TXD.

*0 - Consciousness Cn directs structure Sr that directs Matter Mr and conversely.

*1 - the depth and span of space, time, and spacetime times CnMr equals the Sr.

*2 - Can God be considered unto Mr the absolute "otherness" on some XD level where in general reality even each absolute point may be seen as a Cn ? [comment: historically a new concept of God or debates on that leads to new physics] This considered a noetic point or node in a TXD particle field.

*3 - A range of Spirit (St) as Cn divided by a singularity complex or a singularity may ask what is the last general iota particle transformation- evaporation? Is the singularity as un-Mr a form of active or passive transgenerative over time memory?

*4 The more aware (longivity) the greater the span of concrete consciousness over time (mostly in the past direction in depth of Cw^0 (Conway) and other branes or sheets or braided vector orthogonal planes and so on to at least infinite power of potential infinity.

*5 TECH: p-adic sphere shells (capital lambda, and Casimir not just cyclicly in loops) to detect Cw^n relations such as gravity or neutrino generation changes and mass, over netural or inert material structures (plates, spheres, nano second scaled,
to make a sub-space difference viewer of such. Consider the 5 or 6 mirror arrangement with holographic reflections or ideal fractal ones in the "infinity box" also as a simple first mechanism. Show that such abstract structures arise in proton or parton shell structure.

*6 Is there degrees of singularity x Sprit x Consciousness accessible by *5 Cw^Cw^... partonics and will this temporally thus entropic-ally ameliorate chaotic probability?

*7 Why is i9t difficult (if possble) to store energy in lightning? Use *5 as condensers (Capacitor-like Hyperarks)... Endless but cool light bulbs? Neutrino bulbs?

*8 Across Xgenerative self-Galois dynamic observation looping feedback and driection in the depth-span may define Cn. or Grounded over 1 and 0 (existent and not, possible and not) over Xgen time... Are we like St there in our subspaces and this way self awake as emergent but static creativity and creation fields?

*9 In GR there is a conjugate relation of space and time and spacetime. We imagine then, if something congruent and centered in space with no time, then something can be so in time without space, philosophically.

*10 Herein, in the depth and span, we begin to consider the realm of these objects in abstract force translations and rotations transgeneratively. We thus consider one roughly particle like, the other energy like (note that in some realms the idea of subjective and objective may reverse or mix, coexist or alternate, or half exist.

*11 These natures under a flat background (a DM fractal or Gravity holographic one for non-differentiation and the other as a variable (even modified) dimensionless scale, with the idea of discrete time also, is a generalization of the wave particle duality that also may be quasi-discretely alternating. [I added the bold after reading links on Lubos post: it is clear that, "hyperdimensional" or not, where does the unobservable part of the universe go in flat space? You see, if holographics were the only principle in such a world full of black holes then no ideal fractal differences would be needed where it is dark matter... A bold and grandiose claim perhaps... that we are limited in some ways like this.]

*12 This abstract state of such abstract motions and rests is the force or source of substance and sustained consciousness wherein it can be self-aware and imagined self-creative.

*13 As if a subjective space or dreaming space, the remote view is possible yet the concentric and collapses while awakened in actuality restrains.

*14 A pure iota pint as an end to a pure string, a pure ray, may be at times irrational (transcendental) imagining as well as concrete - locally or universally or alternatively, thus it becomes deterministic as if freely willed (QM theory is paralleled here in matters of indeterminacy) as the creative force and field (Hoyle).

*15 A psyche with frailty possibly could not be aware of its reasoning and actions (behaviors, purposes) nor be derivatively conscious of them in feedback loops which themselves may bind awareness- and one can be aware of his reasons and actions yet not influence them as if possessed, even irrationally directed by them.

*16 The unmetaphysical control of behaviors, in actuality but not directly in a virtual schematic, may exist and be implemented or interfered with on higher Xgenerative levels by a global state, some frequency and those stable enough or innocuously unstable can wage such as subjective war.

*17 To consciously influence a physical object mentally depletes the range and amount of the mental entity and its subjective force or it can accrue globally and with perpendicularity to Cw^n... as a substance or grounding of memory.

further margin thoughts:

*Not all things but some things said are obvious from self experience and some theories by the observation and interpretation of the actions and consciousness of others are likewise.

*Consider in one's theory the challenge of a richer model with its inner logic or universal truth as if such a theory.

*The depth-span is not necessarily fixed as a quasic pixel coordinate but is quasi so in space, time, and spacetime.

*Global warming (source and sink) is a TXD issue if the facts are to be understood.

* * *

In the illustration, the omnic background as more general than the arithmetical- topological models, we may consider the whole analog formula (a hint from the days where Einstein and Dirac did not include nuclear forces in their unification and where magnetism and electrostatics were so unified) the formula there may itself require like a mirror the addition or subtraction of the Cosmic Constant Lambda. But in any case we are dealing here with some form of even higher multidimensional spaces and the reduction to some sort of absolute ideas in regards to what exists or may exist.

* * *

Transgenerative Consciousness

Transgenerative Consciousness L. Edgar Otto May 22, 2011

The following is perhaps not as deep as some of my ideas on the physics, but I present it informally as it perhaps contains the germ of future worthwhile ideas. I am not sure there is much original in it de novo. It is more a consideration of the consequences of the new physics so intimately connected to topology and number theory but the underlying logic, the generative thesis in general, would explain why on one hand, and for higher symmetries and dimensions, that are seems to be in our human consciousness a sense of some true idea in which some cannot understand why others cannot see the obvious truth of such theories. Lubos said as much today in his post on Greene in which he questions a whole panorama of speculations as without evidence. Pitkanen posts what seems to me a very obvious theory as true but maybe because we touch base on the vision with a few minor exceptions and for all I know some major global differences. Consciousness still seems to me wider than references including Penrose of a quantum theory alone.

It is difficult then to actualize the awareness of ones consciousness, to try to see it as a direct object of study. I awake this morning and the world is still here and it will not help that I am in a different time frame to yesterday or that one cannot in reality live in day tight compartments. These sorts of questions seem to me to be open to at least a partial description by physics- while I am awake that is - but if there is anything to the consciousness of our dreaming then I have reached the limit of my ability to so understand them myself- that or in some sense the terrain is now exhausted and craves rest or other inputs from the external reality. Only the vaguest patterns and calculations in a world of patterned partitioned dots meaninglessly replicated and debated in a conference with others held little meaning upon awakening or if we did throughly understand all was simple and perhaps a waste where it happens in the greater world to our use of life.

Is it a surprise that, as in the social networks, that freedom to access anything will reach a cycle where the pendulum is monitored and pushed in the virtual bubble- that even in the recommendation of music we are isolated in our styles from those who might awaken us to other styles- our poetry saturated in an incestious relationship where we all, sharing our common bonds for survival, now are blind to the herd together. Such unstable things strive to impose its organization on others and so cover the world with its point of view. But the general consciousness cannot so be contained although we seem to make money by the community we access and what is so restricted in the flow of information is more power than its forms of politics or power or even numbers.

Two tornados were a few counties away today, twice I had to close the windows, the neighbors seemed to be intimate all day as the clouds dimmed the sky- or those who took a day off did what they usually do, read the Sunday paper, watch the media for hours on end. There is a lot to be said for a place just to be alone with windows to keep out the rain or candles that what one does- and who does not wonder what others do- can be safely seen. Why is it that in larger cities people tend to keep their immediate neighbors at a distance? There is a new strong light on the porch fire escape- it discourges the weekend drinkers with cushion chairs from being outside or watching the fights and dancers, climbing the roof, thinking that to a point such a loss of control is a better state of consciousness. But this was getting more dangerous toward the mornings when they would half slip trying to climb up on the roof. It seems to me not a friendly act to watch in stealth from the dark.

Oh, the world did not end- or it did and the true belivers inverted the truth of their believing passing to some explanation where if the prophesy failed they are on a higher plane where it seems even more true. It ended at 6 they say so before I came home I went to the convience store and came up to the worker saying Hi again, you know about the end of the world- yes, she said, we always talk about school stuff and poetry and so forth- her boyfriend makes mathematical puzzles- Well, we only have a half hour to cuddle! She turned red and smiled- that one was pretty good she said. But how many hours have I spent working on the cash register myself and wondering at the closed off place to be and routine that really was going nowhere and if not for ringing up the whole shopping basket in scambled order I think my intellegence would have gone way down punching the numbers. Anyway, these human activities are not the distraction they used to be - but I cannot say that the reason we write for example, the art for arts sake, is that we are building something immortal to which in hard times it is essential so many of us make the plays.

*1 Awareness of the novelty of something saturates, declines, and strives to look beyond itself unto transcendence or tranquility- that or a greater equilibrium in the relationship of both.

*2 In that I in physicality exist, I am an entity, a Being. In that I do not exist in relation to Being-in-context, I am.
(yes, I know, the old Cartesian claptrap, perhaps Sartreanly reversed.)

*3 My existence is everywhere an uncertainty of *2 in all relations. (sometimes I wish Xithul in philosophychatforum would be there on this level to sort out the logic of it and its traditional limits of grounding for these are philosophic issues to address such that we can then design a scientific system as a model at least true to its own logic design implimentations)

*4 The relation *3 does not necessarily relate intelligibly and coherently save it too has a certain "unmetaphysical" physicality.

*5 Any totality reaching rock bottom, decays, or decline is also indistinguishible from unphysical possibilities.

*6 By virtue of this unity, stable on transcendental surfaces of the virial principle (the inverse square law and stable orbits) of reduced three space we can imagine a general, possibly orderings, symmetrical or not necessarily so, of a thermodynamic transgenerative dynamics (TXD)

*7 TXD finds a concrete or scientific reduction to TGD which in the realm of the unmetaphysical is itself a comprehensive theory.

*8 The notions and logic in views of physicallity cannot be defeated as with the several traditional proofs of God by any less comprehensive theory. Same for our vague descriptions of consciousness so far.

*9 But it does secure the possibility, the scope and existence of a comprehensive theory declines into physicality as if there is an indistinguishible paradox of the consciousness of consciousness explained by an anthropic principle of the here now is. That whe should distinguish existential and universal powers of Being as a fact of being, universally, existentially, and generatively. (the use of the word generative essentially comes from particle generation ideas and unity as the generator in Pascal's triangle, aslo my earlier suffix -gene where applies. The poet in me ignores the parallel sound that trangenerative sounds a little like transgenderative although some species propagate by such methods:-)

*10 Poetic Consciousness; Ascetic Consciousness; Consciousness as Mechanical Indifference, that Functionally Unaware; That fourth and grounding category of
the Glorification, Reversals, and Destructive chaos by Evil- a sort of anti-poetry.

*11 A pro-poetry is not necessarily anti-science, and conversely.

*12 What is stated in simplicity [see end of post for a related example in counting the subcells of a simplex] may appear or be empty of either meaning, content in general, or information in no necessary realtion but at unity and scale by default they mix these philosophies in a nonnecessary alternating or dialicatical way - that is a pure anarchy of order may also be part of the preceptive background.

*13 Life (a passing thought here) is started cosmically by x-rays after an earlier stage of gamma bursts- this sequence times three or more and with quasi-analogs, biocode degeneracies, with the background of cosmic coding's. Life can grow and replicate by the storage of visible light.

*14 Inward or outwardly, three fold generative accrued relations as above - and as a mirror in quasi-reality, to physical reality, these same relations at ground yet more generally a possibility and sense of creative (generative) identity, consciousness arises in structure and difference of the mediator count. But some mediators are only shadows, as we can be, so consciousness may be seen transgeneratively. (Thus as some now see, gravitons and mass inducing particles).

*15 Can our consciousness imagine, subjective scenarios or as a technology, a model of the universe beyond traditional and speculative fiction, or religion, now?

*16 Evidence of a transcendent model is the sense of self or change in behavior which may appear to be a decling model, or both such cases present (a failed universe from a failed multiverse over some generative state or compass).

*17 Death, consciousness then as not necessarily local, nor dimensioned even if a radically different and more complicated universe, even for the totality of a species, is not necessarily an instruction or meme that by default can make more than a difference in the near past and future whr natures (un)physicality is conserved.

* * *

I do not have it in my notes, a slight doodling on a scrap of paper thrown away as it was interesting because I had not considered it before, but seemed uninteresting and an all to obvious matter of counting or describing counts and structures. But from a global view- what if such a view of numbers and space was the most that most people can realize when they undertake to envision such things?

I may look at it again. Note, my presentation today seems to read to me a little more worthy to post than it did last night when I casually wrote it down.

Ok consider the count of points on a tetrahedron as if the stacking number, here in three space, is contained between the 4 points n0. Now we have points lines and faces and volume to consider there.

(BTW in TGD Diary today I read an idea in which I imagine Pitkanen is coming closer to the idea of an iota particle in relation to such things like strings and such and endpoints relate to a number line- and also I am wondering if his Galois ideas relate in his theory in a discrete manner- I do not see what I share with another link here- not so much the invariance but the structural quasi-fixed idea of primes that require our theories to take note of composites in the modular sea- that is a special place for the twin primes as a sequence for structural effects.-)

Now, as the count progresses after 4, and in the sequence 1, 4, 10, 20, 35 ... we note in the n3 or volume it is the first time that has a value, 1 point. But in the total count it seems at first glance the formula is merely adding 21 to the last number after 4. But this constructive spaces seems very simple to me in what for most people it is hard to envision three space in the first place.


* * *

Generative Space and General Stereonometry

Generative Space (The General Stereonometry of)
L. Edgar Otto May 21, 2011

The Unmetaphysical Principle: (A Physical Principle) - Over a certain range or compass of general space what is cannot be said to not-exist or be metaphysically part of the non-existence it creates as other, if a neutral place, currents, expelled or interactive symmetry where only it is real and not remote or vaguely multiversal, or in theories of broken symmetry and compactification- that as to what is as physicality is a range of thermodynamic space quite besides the speculation as to what is the non-physical nature of the cosmos. Energy, space, entropy and light as thermodynamics is roughly local and thus we have a separation possible of space and light.

In matters of synchronicity, and thermodynamic morphogenesis as if an action at a distance, the "Transgenerative epigenesis of the Transgenerational Genome is a physicality as quasi nonlocality over the quasic hierarchies of depths and field. This of course the concrete realization of organic things and possibly brain and consciousness as a nucleation of cephalizations. Such "memory" extends beyond the genome of one generation and most likely the freedom of RNA differences is the mediator. This narrows the definition of what is the qualitative state of higher life. Clearly, the reading of such genomes and genome complexes is akin to the three generations involved with the concept of particle expression.

*1 Combine continuous and Discrete Fourier forms into an intelligible algebra.

*2 umu (Pitkanenn): entities that only distinctly mix of a greater set , e and mu for example includes "electrohadrons" of partial subset combinotorics.

*3 Apply Kea's methods (braidy bunch) to Qs-TGD and convert into matrices

*4 Holographic x Fractal; x Conway matrix hierarchy, iota as point like is equivalent to General Relativity or as string like is the quantum theory and analogs- There are tori ^tori^... umu^umu also as fractal quasic context. Holograph-fractal^2 x Kea ^umu all divided by Qs, I almost assert. in this multi-brane dimension set, umu^Qs

*5 "*" = product x summation signs, wild card= circle plus or circle x

*6 there is a variable discrete Fourier field (as if a density) over and of nodes considered.

*7 the interchange of signs to n dimensions of the Conway hierarchy is a jump or bridge between the continuum^continuum and the discrete^discrete.

*8 what happens to the e mu tau lengths and subsets as energy and partial generative change of energy and photons in say novas?

*9 there is an ambiguity over three gen space thus light and gravity in a grounded relation and Lambda and space also grounded thus.

*10 phi^n connectivity also determines the connection and independence of trans-generational effects expressed across generation space in combination's as far as physical structures go unto the dimension. The idea is that we define invariants better such that something like the spacious paradox of two photons in opposite directions have a net speed as the velocity of light and not a more classical view of adding such velocities or which is at rest or not, which accelerates or is understood as outside the question of general acceleration and so on to show that such a thing or question arises in the freedom of physical reality and our notions in the first place to which we may try to solve or propose as evidence against some theory, much like the brilliant and controversial work of Zeno.


* * *
It occurs to me as I am writing this that this may be a case where the original notes and its special symbolism may be help or even be more easily decode the notions herein (if anyone ever strives to do so):



Clearly there is a side issue there beyond the physicality as the Reality Principle or a side theorem-notion. It amounts to the concept that a symbol cannot just contain meaning and information in the Shannon sense as conjugate. That is, that some codes may contain a lot of information or little information to which we are expected to be skeptical of any direction of interpretation or to infer some meaning when in fact there is no clear meaning in the theory there. Moreover, we may be asked to rely on a pattern of reduced but complete and simplified information that limited in itself does not convey or may obscure the hidden information and even its resolution to a unity.

This illustration-photo says it a little more clearly a more fractal view of photons in general space... The goddess in he corner was already there but I made it expanded in detail as a reminder (a sort of anti-gargoyle for cathedrals, that of life there is a limit in the living in the light to soul if only humble.)

Ulla sends me a link and the information of the numbers certainly add up there, with simple models like the classical radius and so on of the electron in simple space. I do not know what she wants me to defend or infer from the link. To the extent the theory is informative is also has totally missed the meaning on the qualitative level I expect us to try to understand. In the comment to that forum link from Ulla terse comment link on my last post (she most likely knows I would find it interesting and is really objective on what we should read into the data) again, the simplicity obscures the deeper notions of what is the real-especially in the organic realm- the model of which I speak as transgenerative (and of which TGD strives to model and make natural conclusions) is best thought of as what happens and why when amoeba divide, normally, one of the pair vanishes with the errors, or the errors are shared until the whole line of daughters are too weak to survive- or perhaps as in anthropology this explains cases where human species vanished- certainly the Neanderthals had a much higher burden of the need for fuel for their metabolism.

It is clear also that what is written here may not be distinguished from incoherence- but to that I hold up some informative posts of our Lubos which from my view are fragmented and incoherent beneath the apparent unity of the issues- and this takes the form of what if scrutinized amounts to at least contradictions at the end of the eclectic world views without scientific and objective judgment as if a trial where the case is made from the beginning of jury selection. It not clear to me this carries over into the reality of our political world- especially the gains and loses of the last industrial century (where to stand tall is not seen as much the power of evolving as violence but a general inheritances gain over a few generations- the sins of the father and so on...) Are the 67 borders of Israel indefensible? What right did the socialist Czech democracy have to keep a minority of Germans in the Sudetenland in the name of defensive borders? Does Israel have that right to control borders or in this example Lubos shows do we expect if we take the road of peace and appeasement that those who would claim such a minority, like Israel, take the rest as surely as did the aggressive first strike Nazi Germany?



* * *
In this photo-illustration from the diorama series by the owner of the Joynt bar whom I made a photo sketch record- art for arts sake! - he mentioned the Escher like one that with a mirror behind it adding to the difficulty of the photo that in viewing it one finds themselves in the center- and Lo, I fond myself in the center taking the picture... in flatland water flows uphill and we call it an illusion but it is really a part of perceptive and physical space as if an illusion thereby it seems as simple as two three dimensions superimposed on a six dimensional space. Can we not imagine this notion for time, and in perhaps a more complex fractal like way?

http://zone-reflex.blogspot.com/2011/05/death-and-loosening-of-consciousness.html
Ulla has a most interesting post on her blog today on consciousness. A quote from Penrose and one that in a qualitative way relates, albeit vaguely, the connection between the physicality of something consciousness and the processes or decline of it at dying. These may be a little beyond the science of it all in some senses but the science when we look closely handles the relationship of meaning an information hardly any better- save perhaps where these universal notions, our biology and our minds the essential reality to which reductionist physics are but the laws of grains of sand in free fall to our intricate spirals, houses and boundaries, depth and endless beach, role of the wheel of fortune clinging to a narrow bandwidth of salt and light on the littoral of a wider sea to which we may navigate and return or fall off somewhere as we sailors do crochet and knots or give in to such falling dreams.
* * *

Maybe tomorrow I will write on our multiverse of consciousness, perpendicular everywhere to the unmetaphysical her higher radiations and halves and doubling as if the creature in the half-shell, Antares (anti-ares or Mars) is the blossoming and source of divine proportions of which the shell is but her image.



* * *

Super Hyper-Multiverse

Super Hyper-Multiverse L. Edgar Otto May 20, 2011

The Bousso-Susskind hypermultiverse at this link seems relevant today:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/05/bousso-susskind-hypermultiverse.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

Lubos refers to the same sort of theme I briefly thought about last night. From my view his evaluation of such speculations seem contradictory or ambiguous in a way that is blind to any freedoms that may objectively find the case. His, like Einstein's stumbling view and black hole of his dreams plays both ends of a debate and comes out the other side thinking they smell like roses. In a way, although Lubos states and understands the principle, denies any solid objective influence to the nature of uncertainty while denying any ultimate changes of a well behaved reference frame and what principles do seem to apply somewhere. While he is right to curb some of the children in their enthusiasm, these are not children to which he applies his static world critique, such children should be seen and not heard. They are annoying and not from the old traditions blessed by the one and distant God.

What, when you think about it, did Einstein ever do that was original in itself?

OK it seems obvious does it not- that matter is intimate to gravity and ultimately space- a sort of Machian background principle. Genius recognized this. OK we say that light takes time to get from A to B even if the time is not an absolute accounting independent of space.

If there are analogs to such a general relativistic background that combines these principles at least, would light not take time to be adsorbed or emitted when we consider the subatomic level of things?

The universe itself, as if structured as a Proton, perhaps an immortal proton even when some may think the mass varies, would have generations of such velocity that could be seen invariant on each level of generation. But we know these can at least in theory mix, and we know there may be more generations or that at some point like singularity there is a certain distance or coordinate measure, a beginning from one view, an absolute, an Einsteinian Aether.

How else would particles in the main decay as if Nature does an experiment that repeats?

The super hyper-multivese is more like a pulsar or a nucleon with vibrational directions but the coherent orientations are not clear, not the basic rules that determine perturbations, combination's, and especially that heart of algebra, distribution. It is still not the widest conception there is of such multiverses- even when you exclude all concepts of consciousness and subjectivity.

Essentially, it appears the Dark Energy pulls the galaxies apart and gravity is not the great changing reference frame that describes everything. Yet, in the generational view we could say that the attractive or repulsive force of that holographic and fractal difference of tidal and opaque forces alternate across the generations even if extended beyond three. Matter itself, relative or fixed in any one state of the structures of universe generations, is the ground of gravity which is the ground of the dark force until this reverses again in such order and excesses or deficits in such order. Dark energy may become attractive if we find a more unified theory or philosophic underpinning of physics in ways that are intelligible.

* * *

Well, let me just leave with a less of a rant wondering if I will ever not have the risk of being homeless if I ever could return to the land of milk and honey with the boundaries of 67 in a world now framed and referenced to three of the Great Western religions at the source. But my world, then in relative peace in Europe, could not remain static nor the truth of what was happening in it transparent to me again after leaving the service. (I have to stay low on Memorial Day again before I raise too much hell and get in trouble.) I was in intelligence for Christ's sake.

* * *

(96^3 x 4)/ 1152 = 3072; 3072/8 = 384; 2x384 x 3x384 = 1920; 3a x 5a, Fibonacci and so on... 1920 = 1/2 x 2^5 x 5! ...

* * *



http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive_2011/today11-05-13.html

Today I saw a discussion thru links on Kea's blog on the idea that there could be 5 Higgs particles, two of which are charged and three not observed yet as neutral if this involves super-symmetry. Now I do not know how they deduced these things but I do understand that some dimensions in their model of broken symmetry are not directly observed if at all. Now there is also the idea of impostor particles. And the various interpretations of what these can be if not the Higgs- Pikanen's idea, Wu's, and as far as mass goes I understood Lubos made some predictions.

Of course the quasic idea permits something like super symmetry and in a structural way it too seems related to the Fibonacci ratios. But if this is the case we can say that to some higher level or super hypermultiverse like particles of which we relate these ideas of mass, dark and so on, in a simple intelligible counting manner, that beyond this 5 idea of some things we could say that some Higgs-like objects or particles would be there in higher rations of Fibonacci numbers, say we may see 5 then 8 of them and so on... dark generational levels can have wide freedoms to ground some concrete structures of the world and what stable limits there are is to be determined- perhaps in the simple mathematics of such generational ideas- to which its idea of space itself, and sign determines the older and new concepts of what we call as physics the idea of mass- and this needs not be confused with simply an idea of some exotic and unreachable parallel universe.

Again, the theoreticians as usual seem to skirt around the simple and obvious.

* * *

What Empty Words Echo in an Empty Heart and Mind?

"Obama's proposals will either quickly die, showing that Obama is just a loser and crazy kibitzer who is disconnected from reality and whose big words don't mean anything; or they will not quickly die and Obama will work to realize them. In that case, I would find it pretty natural for Israel to try to assassinate Obama and any other future U.S. president who will threaten Israel's existence in a similar way."

Is Lubos suggesting that the Israelis whom wanted more than the 67 boundaries the USA helped establish in the first place and they pushed us closer to global nuclear war would threaten our president? A pox on both your houses then!

* * *



http://altdevblogaday.org/2011/05/17/understanding-the-fourier-transform/

This from sciencechatforum.com thru xcthulhu
Forum Moderator whom I have always admired his scope of wisdom

http://altdevblogaday.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Spin3CenterNoEnergy.png

Of course, with variations, I have posted some things along these lines and where the rotations and translations seem to mix in the generations of things we do seem to see nodes as in the picture when we consider the holograms of sheets and surfaces and so on.

* * *

QsTGD (Quasic and Other Systems and TGD)

QsTGD (Quasic and Other Systems and TGD)

Is it really that hard to take a step beyond the ideas of Riemann in his mapping a sphere to the complex plane, that we map spherical hyperspace into a quasic plane such that one result of low numbers and the simple intelligibility of counting is the generational way nature works with her dimensions and particles?

In the concrete and real creation of material things, such as stars and planets, we have a shell like analog- not all stars need be part of a galaxy of which we imagine them flung out, nor for that matter the moons and planets part of a solar system (again under such general topological views we can arrange the interpretations in some modified form of our choices of physics. (see recent astronomy article on planets as isolated, or as the stars.)

So, it follows that in terms of raw distance (and perhaps in this super or dark realm the multi but limited Plancks action idea makes sense, including the shift of the distance state or action states and from the validities of higher views the idea of what we mean by charge involved (as Pitkanen imagines) in the octonian state.

Let me refer to the idea of Croft yesterday on http://www.primesdemystified.com/ which is an example of trying to relate to the prime numbers and abstract spaces, particularly those involving E8- (We all seem to almost arrive at the general picture part true in one system or the other.)

Abstractly the dark-like or creative structures too can have this Riemannian analog that can reach perhaps even beyond the octonion idea. In a sense the properties of the sum of three cubes as in the cubes of the digits of 153 are intimately involved in the what I call the "Eddington Principle" wherein we adjust the Euler counting of subcell objects to the nature of 1 or 0 things in addition and subtraction as a representation of what is a deficit or surplus as if a mass defect. The count then occurs as in the non-locality of the quantum theory excluding but on at least three levels (the fourth generation idea now becomes something we can see more clearly to investigate or even assert for some reason it may not be there) the 000 v 111 generational unities of combination's of which things are to be considered for these states of evidence of such a quantum effect that extends or is beyond quantum theory.

The count also involves in the mass defect the condensing of structures and the vanishing or not when two of the subcubes merge their adjacency. It also suggests another way we can interpret symmetry breaking that still involves Fibonacci numbers. Also when we have a doubling of points from some view of a polytope we can add or subtract the independent superimposition to the count of things of which the all important 30 and 32 and so on apply on all possible generational shadows of how we arrange the sub elements. df n means the difference or deficit of subcell count:

16 df0 28 df4 16 df2 3 df3 1 df 4 = 0 4 8 5 0 for 64 + 17

24 df0 44 df1 26 df2 5 df3 1 df4 = -8 -12 -2 -3 for 100 - 81 = 19

In the case of three of 8 cubes in a hypercube then in 5 of them

Or we can imagine these as 4 and 4 cubes but the analog into surface space may not be as clear as to such symmetry breaking as intelligible save its root factoring.

* * *

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028136.400-weird-unparticle-boosted-by-tevatron-signal.html

Pay attention to the comment on fractals and scale and perception of matter.

"Georgi suggested that a property known as scale invariance - seen in fractal-like patterns that remain unchanged even when you zoom in and out to different scales, like the branching of redwood trees and the jagged edges of coastlines - could apply to individual particles too. The charge and spin of unparticles would be fixed but, counter-intuitively, their mass would somehow vary depending on the scale at which an observer viewed the particle."

* * *

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110519113152.htm

Hmmm, Einstein wrong about gravity but right about "the greatest mistake of his theories--- the cosmological constant.

Yet, would this not point toward a fractal and hologram difference along the lines discovered in the above link?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110519113152.htm keep in mind.

* * *

Quasics and the New Algorithm for Complex Networks

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110512104220.htm
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v473/n7346/full/nature10011.html
http://www.philosophychatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=FORUM_ID&t=18770

Quasics and the New Algorithm for Complex Networks L. Edgar Otto 05-17-11

As far as I can tell from the links above, and the diagrams supplied- this is the same sort of methods which are considerations on this blog as to some fundamental mathematical methods. It is the concern of other bloggers that use ideas of the new physics. We see the quasic diagonal for example, and the simple arrangement of cubes and vectors in four space. I doubt this is new when there are so many other discoveries such as those in music- other than of course the details.

Well, Biowizard- after calling my ideas whacky and banishing me and others to the philosophy part of the chat forum you cant wait to apply this to your research? Well, if you look closely from early on what you expected from that research as merely a chance occurrence of the amino acids will one day have to deal with what I tried to discuss with you when you asked me to join- the applications of the Conway matrix. So, did your experiment every confirm your expectations? What are you doing these days?

* * *

The news today showed a doubling of retiring professors at the local university probably because of the new conservative government in the state of Wisconsin. Across the nation, as now student loans cannot be put into bankruptcy it seems that many students are not going to seek higher education for all it gets them is a rather large burdensome debt and no prospect of jobs. Just as the banks own the houses worth less than what some could sell them for... this is a bad time to try to do art for arts sake or even seek credentials or job training. Now if the veterans will not solve my problem and they acknowledge the impact on my life any attempt to gain such credentials as I talked about here recently is pointless. All that are left now are corporate mercenaries and not patriots and no citizen army.

Foreign students can take the jobs and I can be bumped because of space for drug dealers and those from countries who are not friends of these United States who actually have plotted and done damage to our civilian population. So you can go back to those countries if you have any character or moral backbone- if we educate you and give you work- are you going to abandon your state and people? That strikes me as immoral if character means anything.

* * *

I hand no deep thoughts but some rather uncomfortable insights so basic it could be embarrassing to admit- well, obviously our schools have been going down hill a very long time so it is not all my fault.

It concerns numbers and measurements- distance in particular and how we might be putting over some system too general the laws of the logic of it say for abstract algebra or group theory- the heart of the way we do arithmetic other than the simple count on our abacus and fingers for the simple commerce and check writing.

Some of such abstractions seem to vanish globally if not as in Feynman's simplification of particles be so limited as to hide deeper patterns.

A value and its inverse (where we assert it has an inverse) multiplied is unity.

But is this the case where we divide them? All such roots and divisions will tend toward unity from one set value. But in the process of where this dimensionless and scaleless unity rises on some invariant it seems to approach a pure unity of value as so does its inverse. These must be some sort of abstract algebra concepts.

The problem is nevertheless to figure the weights and distances in something like strings across such unities- even a hierarchy of values of physical constants that are not set to unity.

Thus the nth root of an nth root is not the sum but the product that resolves to the concept of n^2 and so on. Here again the concept of sum and product are somewhere to be one concept or confused.

On the other hand, on such simple concepts whatever their formulation, we have erected some rather fancy and complicated systems of mathematics that seems very far removed from the foundations but not really of more original and new substance.

The metalanguage, if we can call it that, of the metalanguage is abstracted here.

* * *

Perhaps, in the excitement of the physics of the early last century before it bogged down, where the great new idea was the uncertainty principle before other dimensions as in the string theories were taken seriously- before that bogged down- the real problems in objective advancement in the sciences was one of subjectivity- that is a new math where the metalanguage was more important and expected to convey knowledge and learning better with what is more or less a social agenda like the old "New Math" ideas.

Lubos has an interesting post which refers to questions about Einstein and the relation to reality from perhaps a quantum view. Of course he said that he did not believe the moon was not there when he was not looking at it. But in the PDF linked there the quotes concern such subjective things as "spooky action at a distance".

In the first place the experimental proof of such non-locality is based on combinotorics of the turning on of colors of light and that is as far as the theory chooses to go in the explanations- it does not get at the foundations save as a matter of an indifferent tool to organize a probability theory of sorts. Even here it avoids the possible new physics of infinity and singularity in space structure.

That is, unless the experiment is done there are no results- it is in some sort of vague probability space as the interpretation of which Bohr and others have made their case which can be seen as but a matter of philosophy. In other words, if the experiment is not done the color is not chosen and not there to be seen. Physics said to concern itself with just what is seen. The moon is observed then even when we do not perceive it by the implied cold reductions of matter and space as if that replaces the concept of the guarantee of God as observer in the paradoxes of extreme idealism. So, the unnamed God... it is easy to understand that in theory as well as how we limit or see or even influence the experiments, as a subjective thing saying this is what science is and how we can trust its results- that relative to the view of say Lubos- from his perspective and its background some other theories do not exist- in fact, one is hard pressed to even view what some see as experimental evidence. After all, supposedly there is in the eschatology of Christianity a deceptive Messiah or anti-Christ which woos the world with Miracles. Yet what is a miracle that from a scientific view and logical view can be shown to have explanations or may have them such that it only seems magical and not slight of hand by an illusionist? Is the alternative just to keep with blind faith that also denies the artistic sense of what may truly be a miracle- namely life and the universe where at least on earth we can live better with its poetic values?

Lubos knows not what he does, evidently. The rest of us have a hard time believing what we know ourselves. So let us cross the T's and dot the I's and count on the spell checker for some arbitrary symbols to guide our presentations and thinking.

If the prevailing philosophy and religion is the general historical coherence of the traditions and race- these intimate and no longer said to be confused or used so as to play one view against the other in a debate- is it science to deny that perhaps such philosophy and religion strives to survive and endure and so color what we claim as science but it really a deceptively racist view that beats us over the head in the name of diversity and cultural relativism, a democratic philosophy of science?

Or is it objective for we can in the main predict the behavior of such people and species. There is not much room in our universities for both the feminists and the great books of mostly the great Jewish men of science and philosophy. In this plague of post modern shallow relativism the pink is indeed the new black and this diversion really allows in the background more of us to become slaves.

Looks like I will not be safe in the arms of Golda Meyer (at UWM) again, that library where I read at night homeless for so long in the Wisconsin winter while the years slipped away and none of the bureaucrats did the right thing- for we are all guilty or insane, again the gods declaring us mad by the evidence of circumstance while the other inmates who think they are sane abuse and oversee us in the schools and prisons that amount eventually to the same thing.

* * *

So, John Baez article is out in Scientific American (I just googled it and found an interesting comment on primes that led to this website:

http://www.primesdemystified.com/

* * *

Well, I looked at nature.com and found this interesting quantum article:

http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nphys1996.html


"Quantum entanglement1, 2 plays a vital role in many quantum-information and communication tasks3. Entangled states of higher-dimensional systems are of great interest owing to the extended possibilities they provide. For example, they enable the realization of new types of quantum information scheme that can offer higher-information-density coding and greater resilience to errors than can be achieved with entangled two-dimensional systems (see ref. 4 and references therein). Closing the detection loophole in Bell test experiments is also more experimentally feasible when higher-dimensional entangled systems are used5. We have measured previously untested correlations between two photons to experimentally demonstrate high-dimensional entangled states. We obtain violations of Bell-type inequalities generalized to d-dimensional systems6 up to d=12. Furthermore, the violations are strong enough to indicate genuine 11-dimensional entanglement. Our experiments use photons entangled in orbital angular momentum7, generated through spontaneous parametric down-conversion8, 9, and manipulated using computer-controlled holograms."