Quasic Field Condensing & Hierarchical Mass

Quasic Field Condensing & Hierarchical Mass L. Edgar Otto Sept. 18, 2011

We can take a view of the world as if matter is an illusion. We can take a view of the world as if the abstract motion, or any motion is an illusion. Physics today seems to be a development within the emphasis of views like this. If we only find the existence of a concrete or tangible entity, the duplication or dispersion over a general field (once a certain threshold is reached informationally via quantanglement notions) We can say that there are only real solutions to any computational problem as the other possibilities only exist as illusions. Such non-existent's depend, metaphysically, on the concrete existences for their being and perhaps physicality. Thus the need for NP hard solutions may be too narrow a question or one that is intimate to the metaphysical structure of a general universe.

In a sense then, the hierarchical problem of computation of masses, the generational differences, (note the reasons why the third generation is hard to see beyond the standard theory- the quasic information view and condensing flangelation as an influence of four space and beyond explain this.) If quasic motion can seem and illusion as distance in the first place, that is a distance between quasic singularity entities so to the substance or illusion of inertial entities in the various interpretations of what is a continuum- that directionality and reaction depends upon.

We cannot simply draw a three dimensional object from four space and treat it as acting as if it is a surface barrier thus a solid object if we could do it. This is true to some extent but the bulk of such ideas of non-linearity depends on the physicality of some point-linear objects. The debate, even in the biochemistry of life cannot be simply the holographic surface of molecules or the fractal contents- a scientific theory will have to balance both concepts.

What of the bananas, Gore, and peanut butter sandwiches? Bananas have a mold now that may destroy most of the crop, peanuts due to the bad weather will cost 30% more in the USA by next November. Our soy bean crops are small compared to China and Latin America while we debate, knowing full well enough science of plant inheritance especially on the epi-genome, that the weeds can become immune to the herbicide that we will use to the last effectiveness apparently. Yet it is not quite as bad as we could imagine to fix things- save maybe politically. I am not sure that Gore, interviewed by the BBC yesterday understands the issue of the Tipping Points involved that makes my peanut butter and banana sandwiches unlikely. That tipping point in the second half of his book, the angles and the grain of sand on the sand pile. What is different for climate theory as either way on one hand we see the carbon tax in Australia a matter of debate but the claims of Gore the oil and coal companies with political donations buy the power to work not just pseudo science from both ends of the spectrum but disinformation. Of course this descent to some downward doom as far as parties go now seems a four way chaos of positions. Someone should have warned us about the Military, Industrial, Pharmaceutical Complex.

Back to what seems science, or at least good science fiction:

Kea, after a time of no posting, has a relevant article today on these issues quoting the ideas of Tony Smith (of which he seems to take my position but more from the continuous point of view, say Lie Groups and so on). I like her assessment that she understands that Smith's system points toward an underlying informational system, that is she does speak the language of notions of what is the quasic resolution of today's anomalies of physics. Furthermore, evidence of this is her pointing toward the ideas of Rio Frio where in a world where factious fields are not the correct path for higher physics, super-symmetry there but not that sort of Higgs, Kea pleads for this case of a deeper role for the Black Hole concepts- which of course points toward the language of quasics as the creative field ( a sort of super-steady state of Hoyle's such field ) in which case of course the issues of the speed of light may be seen to be paradoxically timeless or change- as all such formulas of the exponential notations in matrices to begin to explain things like superconductivity- here the reasons for the notion cosmic strings if they exist would be superconductive- or why such phenomena are found in some organic carbon states.

But the bigger issue then is one of the nature of distance and quasic space itself. What is the deep concept of a "wormhole" really? Can Ulla's idea of the mouths of wormholes as she understands them make sense? Perhaps, if we somehow regard the wave as at least physicality by default- that lightning does not diffuse through the ground but even there in subspace takes certain directionality of paths. Yet is this idea needed for the concrete physicality or is it in a sense the existent's illusion mentioned above- this is like asking if aliens are real and universally seen in that UFO literature.

For one thing it seems that the charges inside an atom directly or at a distance can influence the charges outside an atom (an iota is like a crazy gluon that does not have resonances in deeper space but is in a sense and absolute irreducible state.)

We can imagine, from the primitive quasic abstract motion function of "punch" and "slice" as in all 4D concepts that object A can jump to place B, as well as be considered vanished or in both states (places). Or we can say it can take a time or there is a path between A or B instantaneous or not. In a sense we make 4D jumps around 3D places. So we can have a mirror notion of 3 things taken 4 at a time as far as the inversions of dimensions go and the grounding choice of probabilities. But this is in richer space a four way dialectic- that is there are four ways to consider what plane or sphere is the imaginary one relative to each other.

But the quasic condensing of the shadow higher space fields we establish that objects or entities can have nuclei. These general differences do seem to have solved the hierarchy problem so related to the generations- but as much as I have counted things or discounted some notions of vague mixing of phase vectors, I am still not clear that all can be reduced to mass in rest or motion as if it only is a sort of colorless quasi-discrete arithmetic- even when we are cognitive of its simplicity and scope and yes of what is its grounding of physicality, as far as the measure of mass goes- perhaps, not so with this sort of topological understanding and measure of charge.

* * *

Note to Kea et al - you now may wonder at the obvious simplicity of it all if I have anything to say worth learning the language and notation- I wonder this myself sometimes and ask if any of us actually have original contributions in depth- I also wonder about the question of who discovered what in relation to what historical development seen as a private issue and yes one of political funding the sciences. For insofar as the article today on Kea's blog linking to the same synchronous theme, what is the 90's but yesterday compared to my first application of a ten year theory to the genome in 1974? Who knows if any of it came before me, or like words some near meanings in the struggle our tribal issues and idioms?

But know this, being born earlier in more favorable times for enquiry (in this age it seems in the USA and Europe schooling is a costly and wasteful economic undertaking) is not always an advantage- individually, socially, and emotionally. For you were spared the last few decades of the way they did the string and quark theories which around 1980 was really beginning to piss me off- especially being excluded directly from the academic world. I have lived long enough to see these new students and researchers find their expectations crumble or become fanciful to the world- or politically undermined by the facts of science their political expectations.

* * *

Of course the radical part of quasic distance is that all surfaces are connected together from one view- that or that all such surfaces remain absolutely apart.

* * *

Sometimes we see patterns in things and here I find one rather humorous in reference to Lubos's article:
http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/09/dutch-plan-to-build-mountain.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

Oddly before the hurricanes I dreamed of the state of Massachusetts being flat with only one large artificial industrial plant and that it would be vulnerable to flooding and that the debate between republican centrist and deniers on the climate change would shift from the man from Massachusetts.



:-) Hope such humor is taken well- lately I have been aware some of my jokes are a little too hard on the overly sensitive in this postmodern culture and political entrenchment of party lines of people in the coffee shop- but it is hard to understand their negative response if they do not tell me what in particular has peeved them off- so, I write it off to no sense of humor. Hey, it is said that Einstein was a master punner.

* * *

Physics through Rose Colored Glasses

Physics through Rose Colored Glasses L. Edgar Otto Sept. 17, 2011
or
(Beyond the Virtual World into the Post Alphanumeric Age)

There was a lot to post from last night. So I just gave it all a general illustration and title which for physics makes a point on our cognition.

It begins with the alphabetizing and general symmetric structure of the 20 cubes of three colors...BDK GIN and so on and what does this mean? For one thing it means that the idea of a rigid or empty center of connectivity also benefits from a more relaxed view of what and where singularities are in space- this leads to a more general concept of quasi-uniqueness as an issue rather than the paradoxes of uniqueness. Of course these views where rigid in a theory or in cognition have their place and intelligibly tend to work together as do organic physicality systems.

It ends in the chaotic and jumbled notes (which I may post but in no particular ordering) with the ideas of Edward Hallowell and other programs like Science Friday and The People's Pharmacy and such shows that are about our tangible technological future on the BBC (see their website BBC.com/click). In this creative mood with similar thoughts on the myth of disability or the emphasis of seeing things positive for intervention for those creative people labeled as slow for whatever fancy name of a psychology theory- a rose colored glasses that might not be the key to how future human children will best learn and for what interventions work. The issue was based around what is now called dyslexia which of course is the theme here lately of symbol substitution- the colors of our mind so to speak. Again, we need the objectivity of science even if the funding is the drive for the certainty of double blind studies (the host remarks) and he too sees the drug solution as perhaps over emphasized for such beautiful minds.

Another area is that of the consequences of 4D printing. A few, especially in the military, are interested in printing organic tissues with the objective of not needing to have organ transplants but engineer one's own.

Science cannot make fundamental progress technically if it does not intelligibly understand a more general Quasic topology or geometry defined not just on touch and sight related as other senses and perceptions organic or inorganic or otherwise. It is also to be integrated with the idea of consciousness and possibly a higher analog of soul for its definition.

This in a sense is the swan songs of the beginning of the post alphanumeric age since the discovery of writing, thus history so documented and observed over time. For we have to define the integration and differentiation of these natural codes, decoding them by a general theory for the organic models of the world and physicality in general. (Some internet innovator should make a better spell checker as the design of it is more dyslexic than artificial intelligence like.)

Of course in this world of tomorrow we may not want a world based on such technology. We may want to print organs for transplant, as we now can print food by such 3D printing, but should we print a human in totality? Would the program in a sense bring a sort of immortality if also it can clone the unique at the time body of what makes a mind?

A paradox of such insightful people who become poets as dyslexic as Yeats (whom the prize winning poet admired and felt a kinship with) is that they are wounded in the obstacles of creativity these exceptions (and perhaps future humans) need to compensate to overcome. This being that they may see this sensitivity as a hidden secret in others but do not suspect they themselves see only one overcoming world view for the state- that is they cannot but doubt their ability and general picture and often make the disability or social handicap the focus of all other issues.

The virtual world is also headed for the use of touch for typing on the screen in a way that the relative position of the key board of each letter evokes other letters as if these form some sort of neural network (which of course does much of the work the cognitive guest said can be achieved by the links to reading in the autonomous functions of the cerebellum (of which it made his son able and desire to read). This is called a "liquid keyboard" in development and it reminds me of the possibly cloned or printed gray aliens with a few fingers and some exotic symbols that seems to control the spaceship in that tradition of science fiction- could they not have an ongoing device inside that is an organ of printing and self-repair of other organs including the dispensing of food from other sources? Such science fiction is to me a fresh look as speculative fiction that has grown stale on quantum wormholes and such that seems a little more real slowly evolving in the background.

Also on the shows were the collective hacker (not the usual use of the term) groups where individuals may build new things or art they could not do individually- like access to plasma cutters and a place to do their work and well, 3D printers.

I may post those three pages of very dense notes- for this was a rapid and very dense connecting of so many ideas in a chance confluence of time. A key idea is that we can read the gene code as if it involved six colors rather than four as the usual method and thus have a better grasp of the paths and symmetries involved and why some of it related to the icosahedral symmetries (as always partial equations of the fifth degree). This explains the general structure of the DNA helix also from a structural viewpoint rather than from abstract considerations of other forms of physics and mathematics alone- more of a finer x-ray of the depth of the systems. It may also show where gene engineering may be not so good to do blindly like the application to growth hormone of bovines or the new strain of soy beans. There seems to be a theory with firmer basis (and thus firmer solutions) for what say such codes are like a virus of 14 bases or in general how bases extend and are read in a chromosome. But more than this it intelligibly relates the reason why in the first place things are dominate or sub-dominant and so double, merge or replicate.

* * * This posted for my own reference only... see the TGD diary blog:

Ulla,
I do not think we are that far off topic of what atoms are and why the ratios of them in the universe.

Now, in the words of the Novelist and Heraclitean philosopher, John Fowles:

"Of what do you drink, the water or the wave?"

I suppose if as Hawking says the universe has a wave function then in a sense it is also a particle we can touch. But I am not sure the math of all the complex numbers for time tells us much- and that these are the same way, wave-particle to describe the same thing- but matrices tend to narrow things down to the physical.

Such cosmic codes also relate to the gene codes in fluid ways we can see but not read- of course what the mind is is much more fluid I imagine. One might call this super-symmetry like thing dark, perhaps it is outside of quantum physics- but my periodic chart on the metals was rather explicit on the general geometry, finite that is of things.

Nice creative questions here Ulla. Illusions seem to interact with illusions in any case- and I ask you when we dream what sort of light is that if we look up at the sun- can we not ride that too?

None of the current theories can explain the source of the higher metals- nor recent ones that would claim live can be made from metal alone. The world is also plastic and ceramic.

The PeSla

* * *

If we cannot distinguish up and down, then will strange ideas get by on charm and can they ever beat the generation of higher truths and beauty?


Knocking on Heaven's Door or Where is the Wall at the End of this 3D Universe?


This link of a review comes from The Reference Frame blog recently- I do not think that physics is really science as a matter of linguistic spin. This is a pretty good statement of the position of those who hope for the simplicity and beauty of the standard theory. Apparently Lubos has respect for woman of science if they agree with his general philosophy of science. In any case the theory as presented I find overly simple and certainly not as beautiful as things can be seen from a bigger perspective- as the atheist steady-statesman Fred Hoyle wrote- why would we accept such an ugly theory of the universe that apparently God made if we can conceive of one more beautiful than say those based on the Big Bang?

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/knocking-on-heavens-door-by-lisa-randall-2355268.html

Nature should not be more complicated than it has to be, they tell themselves. Or so some like Einstein has said we should make things simple but not more than necessary beyond a certain point. This limited view and a popularization (not the astute evaluation of theories by Einstein in his private contemplations) may be the goal too for the apparent simplicity that overly hides the wider information in say the Feynman diagrams. It works, it requires less vision of laborious thought as if mechanical and automatic our experiencing and creating the music of the spheres, but it has limited beauty and even truth in itself.

The Higgs boson is a crucial part of what's called the Standard Model of particle physics. It's a construction made out of 24 fundamental building-blocks of matter: 18 of these particles are six types of quarks that come in three varieties. The remaining six are called "leptons", a family that includes electrons.

This seems to me the start and things can be there beyond 25. In any case anyone who cannot transcend their own set of general systems is not psychologically or even culturally capable of higher cognitive functions for a so called theory of everything. As such some theories are limited but integratable in the TGD sense and the general relation to say octonions are right on in the relationships to say Dirac and the connection touching the classical physics. But this is also but only part of the picture that is yet more beautiful than those we now have and thus leaves too much to the mystery we vaguely push into some mathematical thought about what we still do not know of space and dimensions into "non-linearity".

Arithmetic itself, the raw counting frame as the 24 or so model of particles, is richer than the way we apply our methods of mathematics which simplifies to that particular view of discovery that seems to be the promised holy grail yet is limited to the less than creative new ways of mathematics.


http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2011/09/could-tgd-be-integrable-theory.html

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/09/lisa-randall-on-charlie-rose-tonight.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

and consider this:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-is-there-energy-and-what-it-isnt.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29

This is of course a well written and informative post by Lubos, the reflection of the state of the art in our era of physics- and yet it discusses energy as if the depth to which it is poetically equivalent to what is as if a God of Spinoza as the universe or God that is mysteriously deeper and disembodied in some way. I have written on this in several places about this last century world view to which we have been narrowly trapped in in the West for some time now and for which the best part of these Judaeo-Greek concepts have vanished from the theoretical plush speculation with what some say is good riddance for appearances sake. God has not given them the string landscape to occupy even if given the flag but not the oil.

Was not Spinoza excommunicated and called atheist in his day? Physics can evoke a sense of the spiritual and ultimate. That too, poetically can evoke new and objective physics.

* * *

It should be clear by now to the more sensitive reader that the general theory of quasics applies to the life code as much as the nature or cosmic code, as well the other perspectives of intelligible theories.

Where do we stand in the ongoing but shot in the dark research- perhaps the methylation of the epigenome code (something I read about locally in Wisconsin from 1995 or so as a possibility and hints of it in relation to memory and Planaria in 69 or so before that. But it is certainly more than this, the reading itself- and while I have objected to most of the view Lubos concisely presents as far as science is concerned, I must agree that the world needs a much richer time of enquiry and speculation. Perhaps, the sense of the soundness of this is that the technology has for awhile made our best science fiction shows a little dated now just like the idea of shooting cannons to the moon in old 30's movies.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110916152401.htm

Of course we can continue this false distinction in some cases of what is the natural and artificial states of things- what is integration or differentiation of organic systems and what is the utility for society of the sciences where in humility we explore things and not just accept our god-given-place (as I've said, to quote my father asking if God would be mad if I thought certain things, "if God had not given us brains if he did not want us to use them." my Dad replied.)

But in the end we are so much the lesser God, yet we are great like the Lens Grinder, that emulator or imitator of Euclid, Spinoza the complement to Leibniz as still the two deepest of our world's philosophers, some dealing with authentic roles or position etching some career or survival from the world we are born into (Einstein's personal thoughts on that matter too)- that we can so focus our given light.

Left or Right or center does it matter, we who don the one way mirrors in stealth or in denial of the right to existence and humanness in others, or vulnerable one who love everyone meeting someone loved by everyone, our soul or hearts a little too pink for objectivity even if it as a rule to live together peacefully and cooperatively and diplomatically our do unto others- our glasses.

* * *

ACG AEI AFB BCJ BDK BEL CAG CMD DAH DOE ECN FIL FJD GIN GHM HOI HFK JLN JMK KOL

[ Sept. 18 : Correction the next day (hard to juggle the colors and letters in the varying light of the television screen at night- but can imagine or doubt ourselves instead of this sort higher dyslexia and innumeracy- but is that not also a problem with how nature functions and develops, sees things? So here is the correct alphabet with three colors dihedrally opposite of the three other of the six. These twenty with the 15 or thirty cube labels can make a structure of 20 on the points and edges of a cube which gets to the heart of how we count things and the nature of creative or field space at this level of physicality:

ACG-KOL AEI-JMK AFB-MON BCJ-HOI BEL-GHM BKD-GIN CMD-FIL DAH-LJN DOE-FJD ECN-HFK for the 20 cubes... and ANK BHN CLH DGL EKG FME GBO HEJ IJD JOA KCI LAM MIB NDF OFC for the 15 or 30 cubes. From any one of the 15 letters in the Conway matrix we can read the six other labels that form three axes made of say ANK AOJ BGO ... and in the 30 cubes we observe that each of the 15 letters is found 4 times. Each of these exclude two of the colors to that of the letter as if in a center to leave a surface of the 24 or 48 operations on the cube. ]



Of which we imagine A = red orange centered or diffuse everywhere as a singularity leaving the four axes of the corners of a cube of the colors left, yellow, blue, green and violet in the permutations. There thus are 15 of these (or 30) of which we have these 20 made of the 12 and 15 - a neuro-network of touch and simple counting that is the beginning of whatever distinctions of super-symmetric like ideas for physicality.

"Yet there are other, even bigger, problems in particle physics that the LHC should help to solve. One is the hierarchy problem. The Higgs mechanism addresses the question of why fundamental particles have mass. The hierarchy problem asks the question, why those masses are what they are." see the (interview with Lisa link above) By quasics and by TGD we begin to see also a hierarchy answer to which normal science today tends to keep at bey instinctively as a threat or as a curiosity and not an anomaly, but a recreation and busy work, in the distance.

Yet despite this, even with some acceptance of the faery fields of the "God Particle" as part of a quasi-intelligible reality. I begin each day to search the frontiers for anything comprehensive, and refreshingly new - that too part of the work of science if it holds to the idea of intellectual honesty.

Alas, there are still some questions no one is yet capable to answer good enough that I can see- forgive them they know not what they do, if they don't blow up the world first by accident- life is precious but its vanishing even in the individual case, even when the scope and value of the world is a very small place like this planet with a blink in time of its awareness in history, is not ultimately its glorification but in the end a wasteful futile and proof of a pointless act.

* * *

Symmetrical Color Label Systems

Symmetrical Color Label Systems L. Edgar Otto September 16, 2011

I went a little further after the better understanding of these alphanumeric color labels to make the 3 x 3 x 5 representation and found some more deep connections. Among these is the matching of color faces of cubes such that in the icosahedral group such that the order of the five things shifts from the rigid rotations of a dodecahedron to more of the pentagonal order for any face of it- Of course Conway's matching of pentagons in three solutions is intelligible too. But is it the case or is it known that we can shift between some groups we now hold separate and irreducible in a topological dynamic fashion?

* * *

Riding the Light

Riding the Light L. Edgar Otto September 16, 2011

Poetry is as fragile as our coming back from walking into the light or in the dark, that theme of Ferlinghetti that all poetry is about the cosmos. While in our confused perceptions we also find Bly, that all poetry is about the tragic loss of Love.

Einstein dreamed he rode the light and looked outward, constant his tightrope in his casual walks in contemplation.

We can dream of riding the light, or ride the light of our dreams.

He, perched on that frozen time he judged the thoughts, in his spacious now did not see the further sunrise or sunset confused- that in the multiverse he was there too or in his centered world did not believe the copies of himself or that we could jump through time, nor that inside the dust and himself some flow concrete with history nor the primacy of chaos in the microworld.

The dust just falls free as does the light into the wells of warp space. For he did not believe the moon not there when he was not seeing it- nor from afar in light outside his lonely milky way some things were seen or not- trapped in his race or in his God.

The equations of energy replaced special creation in a blur of fixed reason falling back into poetry the stuff of work, of slaves and the revolt of slaves and others who were outside the pale vanished beyond simultaneity.

So nothing is really conserved in the outreaches, the remote cosmos and beginnings short of the chaos in cosmology that we finding a lack infer the dust must be there.

We are artist using our palette of our choice of colors, encountered and perceived and we do not ride the light as much as ride the colors. Although black and gold make green, to add black and white, mix them for brighter or darker hues is to risk irreversible murky milkiness.

There are colors I can but almost see so sense a loss, the bee violet catastrophes and fleeting time I cannot measure or grasp even in the times of growing, aging pains that find and contains me. My life earthbound more while the stars grow further from my reach.

We can be color blind for the light is invisible save in reflection riding the black and white itself seen in the dust likewise invisible.

Meanwhile, Feymann dreams he is a small electron grounded in his quantum lattice and in the main taking cubit measure of the micro holy New Jerusalem of hidden variables within, doubting whats beneath the four corners inside pearlescent portals, gates. He floats like a germ dancing as I try to focus my microscope bombarded by the dancing molecules of water in his Brownian motion diffusing his quasi-determinate paths at the square root of the time.

We ride the chirality this side of nothingness or some Heaven where God unlike my mortal self has more than right and left of hands.

* * *




* * *

There seems to be no end of novel ways at looking at these structures, color coded or not - that is we can expand on them or simplify them as if there were no gray groups or coloration while color helps to enumerate and imagine combinatorial possibilities and global space structures I feel this does more efficiently than the long search by other methods. The above is busy work really in the diagrams- I did not include the interesting and promising ones of an edge centered projection of the tesseract. It seems that on one hand the exploring of such spaces is not as complex as some may think facing something like how many ways can you color the edges of a cube with 12 colors, we can see much further into such complications than some have seemed to feel it a hopeless and time consuming thing to do. It is hard also to take the very poetic stances, intuitive productive naive attempts with likely dead ends when we have resolved our views more formally of the cosmos.

I had the thought, scribbled on the back of a previous page- that some of these shadow thoughts of things beyond the unfolded or enfolded hypercubes as if real entities that somehow relate to our ideas of a unique perspective centering and of the fact of the flow of time, the metaphysics of it, the soul in the capacity to do work where for many God begins with the idea of gravity or energy as the deepest concept (see Lubos recent posts and my comments on TGD diary to Ulla lately, the Lithium post this not repeated here but influential on the above narrative poem)- that such ideas of structure, momentum, attempt to measure mass or energy, return perhaps to the idea of heat as some sort of substance and that conserved- (it would be more instructive by the way for Lubos to have shown the work on which we interpret the basis for any such conservation laws, but this too repeats rather advance general knowledge.) In these problems of time over a certain finite range it is clear that in the world of probability that Bayesian ideas, as advocated by Lubos who does evaluate and can modify his stances, has its solid grounding.

Also on my mind for this poem was the square of two aperture as the leakage of a black body sphere of radiation- the fact that metabolism is the 4th root of the volume of an organism- that Brownian motion expands at the square root of the time- simple things looked at foundation-ally again- and if from a general view we ride the light (one might conclude it has to have a certain minuscule mass, all leptons) then the square root of zero is zero in the hierarchy of action so it squared would of course suggest the differences energetically, temporally, and thus with frequency of the mass- energy ratio - quite besides the n-differentials and complex number twists and turns.

I come again to my spinning spiral and he great short wave radio magnet that wound up, thinking it comes from the motion of atoms itself- or what happens when we reach absolute zero can the electrons slow down- or does the light get white and hotter? (early childhood thoughts of which we first see the world and think about it and are interested to recall I suppose) But on the sci mags today they are trying to take the energy from small vibrations such as walking or cars on a bridge- or in the case of my spiral no doubt it came from the stray electric waves all around me.

My view of late has seen the applying of geometry in a way that I think many have seen it all along- and it takes time outside of the formal pursuit in academia to know there was something there useful and I needed and maybe still need if I am to continue such explorations. Certainly these formalisms invoke the forms Kea has promoted when I see the color cubes arise say as 14 or 7. I need to internalize better what her concepts are. For now it seems the skeleton of the mathematics of physics in general is but a suggestion for the wider muscles and nerves in an intelligible and still mysterious and poetic cloud that surrounds our theory's as but outlines, pointers, indicators changed by the indicating, to that we are not sure in the anomalies left in the physics of our day, we can obtain that pointed to.

But whatever the nature of the cloud, field, or what we move in of our notions, be it mechanical and material or poetic and mystery of an unspeakable names in a world of creation by names- that is the bulk of what makes up our own ultimate and absolutely existing physicality.

* * *



Here is where I grew tired of the drawing by hand- the idea is to find the inversions in some order so that a better relation of the colors and cubes in alphanumeric three space of the many possibilities would be more useful for those who may memorize the notation. I did not include the exotic symbols used to pair them regardless of what color in various permutations is substituted for which- and this arrangement of cubes or jacks as physical models could be useful in the solving of the best arrangements of connecting the same color faces. Maybe a computer program could make short work of this.

I also thought that if the slice of a cube is a valid analog (the black and white and he six colors in three space for four space) these would make an interesting set of transparent cubes of which we imagine the unfolding as more generally of the 8 objects that can take on all he shapes of some adjacent cubes- keeping in mind the idea of pairs and the inversions between them (duality) it seems to me that these can form a 2 x 2 x 2 cube in three space that no slice color touches another- still, we may want to investigate what happens if we use the diagonal slices.

Of all the arrangements we have to start somewhere, choose the better notations, and what sort of color spectrum we may want to apply- perhaps it would be better to base the colors more on those now recognized by the computer use of colors. In the darker light it was still hard not to confuse orange and red or cyan and green as we feel we know of such things. Let me also say we should keep in mind for artistic purposes Goethe's observation of the relative balance of primary subtractive colors such that about even the orange and blue while say a lot of violet balances the lesser yellow. And of course the search for intelligible compliments and the saturation and middle values of the hues if we can sort thru the spectrum and the dimensions and find we can have a uniform color space at least for our compass of perception.

* * *

Informational Foundations of Physical Theories

Informational Foundations of Physical Theories L. Edgar Otto September 16, 2011

Basically, we use metaphors such as a rather loose pattern of color labels to intelligibly describe the underlying arithmetical information. In some ways it is easier to explore notions in a relaxed way, perhaps subconsciously. But it is that we do need, like nature herself, a global picture or more informed counting and sorting decision process- ones that do not always show us more than one solution or path to a problem.

I will post here this realization of the structure as different, as are the duals of polyhedra are different, these along the lines of Kea's combinatorial studies which I for a while designated as Arquasic, compared to the quasic. I seems that my evolution totally miss the underlying informational structure of this view as I had concentrated on the orthogons (not the anti-cubes) which seems to me the rest of humanity has so missed explicitly.

These are after all problems of potential and kinetics, energy and matter, touch and sight, abstract and shadow motions and substance. Two iota singularities can form a string view or a point view in indefinite dimensions. So the iota landscape is much richer than the string landscape or the description of all things in finite points. So as with my friend K. Martin and his "Regulus Space" I apply what if I saw even an edge in a certain way for condensing or duplication of the given entity? From the idea of information as a basic binary these iota points, two of them may act as the end of strings and they can have no directed connection, be joined as if two rays become one. This joining can be neutral, one sided, multiple, and may describe the attractive or repulsive "forces" involved in such carriers of the idea of mass or other forms of inertia.

In duality as it seems the binary information involved is 0 v 1, then 00 11 10 01 in the lower symmetries that interplay between the arquasic and quasic lattices of space we immediately see we have a four way structure as well the difficult grasping of the structures algebraically only or from some arbritary but not necessarily global placing elements in a matrix such as a Karnaugh graph or adjacency matrices and even these without deep understanding generalized to higher "topological method" space. But this Regulusian viriality (duplication and halving) of iota point strings can go well beyond the idea of duality even when our initial experiments suggest on the higher levels where the chaos arises and the symmetry is only partially influential (say where the icosahedral symmetry breaks down) may nevertheless extend intelligibly into higher regions of n-ality and information systems.

One blogger today has taken a second look at nano devices on the molecular level as to these can make a small engine. But is the principle not one of a difference of surfaces like the simple experiment of randomly bouncing sphere hitting a fan with differences on each side leading to spin motion? Martin is skeptical too of the arising of such spin or motions although limited on this difference of centrifugal and centripetal devices that in effect allow high impact one way and free floating the other way. I understand Martin's argument in the global picture of what happens in a gravitational field- that as with many scientists today limited within some system of imagination (who unlike Martin are not creative writers or poets and whom we have not finished with this argument) that there is really no centripetal force as such).

I went on, casually, to look at a couple of other ideas still not redone or resolved where I posted them on this blog- one is the alphabetizing of the 30 color cubes. My original method was rather labourous- how can some intuitively do it with ease like two ladies who helped solve and play with my puzzles. Yet with these recent awakenings to some other side of the geometry I can find a systems from a truly internalized system view- of which I wish things were less difficult for solving a few minor other system problems.





So one alphabetic arrangement is ANK BHN CLH DGL EKG FME GBO HEJ IJD JOA KCI LAM MIB NDF OFC , of which we can now easily by geometry see that global relation and the number of such solutions considered as combinatorial possibilities. We are not necessarily seeing further but clearer. Of these I chose the ANK cube which stands alone in the center of pairs of the others arranged on the edges of a cube and obviously determined for a face by the choices of colors. So there are the 7 axes and one fertile center that is the portal to many structural things which may result in forms of replication on a foundational physics level, and the social level of thought and life, and a certain resoluteness for physical law that endures despite the chaos and chance that in lesser integrated systems is not sure the rebooted memory of the organism as a new individual among the 256 or so, will take. I thus chose the symbol ANKh for that ancient symbol which reminds us also of our female sign, Venus.


(Egad, it is a strange story really if all of this is in the books in some form- and somehow I carry on the journey and when encountering other turtles find we have very close ideas and sign language. And I am glad I am of an age where my IQ is not lowered as God made so we can get into and adsorbed by the business of reproduction- that is the three ladies last night seeming to behave in some sort of universal law as if not concerned this is a common behavior- well, this stuff gets old and I was nevertheless able to concentrate on my work. I think it is a seasonal thing really. Some are so bloated they only show their full frontal's, some are so thin they only present their Dairy Aire, but the key is in there somewhere although the drive to show differences in the vessel is overcome by the desire to replicate even if the lady does not know why her instincts are this way- the power of ANK or Life Force.)

The illustration today is such a vibration theory along the lines of Wolfe's that involves the NH3 and NH4 geometrical arrangements. I eventually reached a level where I was considering still higher quasi-symmetries and just where these foundations really meet the foundations we generally hold as quantum theory. It is clear to me that in 9 dimensions there is a quasitope containing 1024 eight dimensional simplexes. As nine points, three in the center of three face attached tetrahedra, these form a unit of the tetrahelix so important for DNA structure but it also, on that level of dimensional complexity, is the beginning of chiral possibilities in spin and directions.

Then I had a stay but relevant linguistics thought that my description of time beyond a concrete and recalled point-loop history as if a 9th or center singularity to an orthogon of the right dimension, that most languages likewise are confused and do not always obey the textbook rules of verbs of tense.

And after my realization of better drawing of certain ball and stick cubes on paint I realized perhaps a better and easier way to diagram the symmetries of these cubes in general as if they are unfolded with the possibilities of color pairs if not the alphanumeric labels for the eye. I may post examples today here. And I may add some of these things to my working graph paper blog of July 2011.

One more thing, the analog to these better geometric labels put into four space is rather beautiful and a strong statement about raw global symmetry in higher spaces.

Lastly, on the way to the coffee shop to post I took photos of the building next door I passed a thousand times and never noticed the brick architecture which now seemed appropriate to the color cube space theories in question. But I thought, wow the old guys really put art into the decoration of these early century brick works but who notices it - well, I am sure the brick layers saw such beauty back when.

I also found some interesting sequences or squares of numbers such as 1 5 10 10 5 1 that in a square the diagonals make 1 10 45 120 210 252 210 120 45 10 1 = 1024 and an odd sequence: 319 subtract 1 and divide by 2 = 159 (do he same)= 79, (same), = 39
(do same) = 19, (repeat) = 9. There must be a known simple formula for such things. This encountered from the 1024 + 252 where if possible divide by two first. But this still highly intuitive direction needs further exploring in the general multiplication and divison within even higher matrices of said dimensions. In any case again in the two player 4D chessgame 1024 or 8x8x4x4 seems a justified intuition where I imagine the 32cell quasitope...

* * *

Before all this on September 15, and with nothing new to say so I thought, I was in the poetic mood and wrote this poem:

A Teacher Laments the Hollow Shell of the Blind and Deaf Young Soul L. Edgar Otto

You cannot see, how wonderful your world
of tomorrow could be
For you have saved the bodies, survived
stood tall, passed the germ seed along
Ready for a thousand generations to grow
nourish the mind, build awareness in your soul

We cannot forever be content, in knowing things
to dwell imprisoned in a clockwork sky, your own heartbeats
But dreams, real or imagined, draw you beyond seasons to some end
beyond a fitful start, and chances of the draw
That strong be your heart as you ride the chaos
nothing can take back your touch on the cosmos

Your soul is for now only as absolute as you hold it
Or care for that of others along the way.

* * *

Tangible Shadows

Tangible Shadows L. Edgar Otto September 15, 2011

Perhaps we need not invoke a remote super-symmetry in order to understand what is concrete in our concept of mass and what is hidden in the depths of span of higher dimensional shadows.

This principle of the rim (my flangelation word which I still use and is as good as any for now) is perhaps the human centered claim that in visualizing dimensions and having to compress them down- this is how nature sees things and in the tangible background will effect the physics from the higher space. But of course these shadow polytope ideas of dimensions that could exist in a higher cloud of things beyond our perception may be the case- or we can imagine it the case and usually keep that idea in the back of our minds for the fundamental foundations of our theories. The truth may be that nature and is changes and phenomena may be somewhere between the beauty of shadows where things can be more symmetric and not so in our familiar space, or vise versa, and this idea of tangible flangelation. In general we have to reach a point, in the shadows and in what we can hold physically near them as if to actually touch to some degree of focus their ball and stick like skeletons- this difference in the clouds as well as observed in organic forms that use the symmetry could be the source of such structural and energetic physics. In this world we then have quasi-symmetry conditions (that is quasi-symmetry and asymmetry in relation to tangible and minimum energy or quantization possibilities.)

As far as the new topology is concerned (for the goal of the atom smasher is perhaps to understand the skeleton under the particles as much as the types and interactions of the particles themselves) this amounts to the application of mathematics as a quasi-reality on par with the physicality or at least a quasi-illusion. There are many such theories that claim for example that time is an illusion, or some other way to be on some side of the mirror of shadows that other things are illusions such as matter itself. Such questions may ask, and this is not necessarily a question that would survive a higher generalization that does not dismiss it as a notion, "What is the ultimate underlying stuff of the universe and can we know it? Would it really matter if it were say- clown noses?"

But what is that question but a notion like because of the properties lost and those that remain into black holes (of which some can suggest we live in one like in a higher dimensional bubble, the universe itself) the information, the quantum information in particular, that can come back (evaporate out?) as anything. Can we then know after all what is the underlying substance of the general universe? It is not forbidden by quantum theory for example to say that cold fusion is possible and will not cause neutron radiation as with fission- but what of the energy in and out and such differences- and the question of the tangible or not gain of such a process of the energy out compared to that primed in?

If such fusion is possible, and resolved from our idea of false vacua as forces as well as clearing up the role of what in the quantum realm we call zero point energy, and that we do adjust our ideas of the calculus to better reflect the physics, then perhaps we can better relate to the physics and sciences in general of nature.

Hans sent me an article on the nanotechnology level where we make our artifacts and thus what is objectively in effect artificial in our normal view of the laws of nature or of God and so on... that these devices on the micro level may determine our perception of the world, even control it, as well as say chance evolved chemical hormones. But if the artificial is divorced from the natural too far can we so understand the ultimate stuff that our human emotions and consciousness is made of? It is not that we have runny clown noses as much as beneath the masks something is unique yet universal and centered there by which we try to communicate to others and in the mirror with our happy and tragic clown faces.

* * *



So, my coloring of the edges of the hypercube in four colors (in the six space the orange and violet or my letter "I" would be missing or implied that the permutations then describe the motions and orientation of axes) this ball and stick figure can be misleading or fail to fully communicate the depth of the idea. This coloring is really a simplified notation as if we can see through objects- but for the cube of twelve edges itself of four colors the whole surface of the cube is colored. So too the edges of the condensed or flanged hypercube. It is thus a complete and regular solid of 32 cells and these are the 5-cell four dimension simplex analogs of a three space tetrahedron. I do not know if such an idea of higher space objects already exist in the literature. The idea here was to place such objects of four colors in an array where they to not touch the other colors.

On the other hand we can imagine a color cube representation such that we have only these four colors diagonally each the same in the opposite 8 corners. This would give the 24 possibilities (and in a sense there are geometric transformations where the inversion symmetries turns out to be the same as the mirror symmetries- in a sense I almost feel this represents some aspects of what happens with charge.) Yet we can with flanged ball and stick cube (a square within a square) represent an analog to these higher shadow symmetries in two space that we have what appears different laws of what is the negative and positive of the outside or all other things part of the lattice symmetry. One that seems to be a mirror dual but in effect from some view depending on if there is the higher or lower dimension slice that these are the same as the 8 cube corner coloration- but such a cube with the inside of the 5-cell one of the four colors hidden and three exposed on the six triangles as if two tetrahedra face to face, the colors of these faces are skew in the order of the reading of three objects. The result of all this is that we get the full 480 values needed for particle and other equations from the physics of the geometry seen as the "anticube" or octahedral-tetrahedral lattice view.

Some decades ago I visited an crystallographer in the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee with a suggestion I manufacture models of crystals like their wooden ones made in Germany no longer. "We don't want ball and stick models." he said and I replied these would be solid models- the wooden ones the department laments are worn down and some of them lost or stolen- maybe the need to touch. Despite the abstraction and grasping of the concepts many chemists do feel comfort in having a model of some sort on their desk to hold in their hands." He replied that the angles would be way too difficult to get correctly so did not believe we could do it. But we were not as advanced then in the computer visualization of such models and the programming- and we still have not resolved the philosophic and practical nature of touch in the virtual world.

I found it interesting also last night to take the unfolding of a cubes to see what happens if we think of the third color as central.

I also made a set of such cubes of which there is of course 15 where the flat hexagonal sliced them into two regions to "see inside the whistle or double face to face tetrahedral 5-cell 4 simplex" (not sure why I wanted to name it that but it has stuck for awhile as already we are into too many confusing technical names).

Of course in the case of a normal cube with this 4 coloring we imagine making a circuit around four of the faces. In which case we do not have a situation where the next cube projected out assumes a negative value to the world and the others within- but this is true in a sense in the flanged or tangible cube representation. Otherwise we would only have spin contained and no concept of translation in the geometry at all physically. Still we can imagine in a normal cube up into the three space cloud or shadow we do make a translation between two opposite faces- in which case we in effect have a vibration between two (iotas? pre-iotas?) objects as if flattened a square into an edge and not the space cycle of the roots of i as right angles. Need we extend from this two space principle the multiple pi rotations we need in the development of the identity states of string theory and say quaternions?

Furthermore, we can see a deeper answer to the question of cloning from the first division of the egg of mammals wherein after 2^5 it cannot be done to make 32 individuals as the embryo is now one entity. That vaguely suggest the 5th dimension is somehow involved tangibly. Yet it should be clear by now we are not simply talking about a binary power analog to continuous or finite five space- rather we are talking about alternative structures and mirror symmetries such as the 32 5-cell "quasipolytope". From here we should find a rather complex development of flanged bilateral and other creatures into integration and differentiation of cells.

In general the question of a diagonal as in a matrix - does it contain information equal to the boundary or is there information gained or lost- or do some things such as time exist only in one place or the other as somehow a quasi-illusion? It is clear to me that the differences in say the semi-regular and vertical polygons must from a fundamental relationship of numbers and physical properties (as if nature herself wants to hold things in her slippery hands not content with the thorny prickly feel of the ball and stick one fractal or string only cosmology.)

As such it is clear that the matrix involving the information between the totality and the main diagonal represents not only abstract multiplication of things but an abstract division of things (a difference not simply one of multiple addition or subtraction but a fundamental process of geometrical change in nature).

This in terms of the creativity and the differences or focusing of light as if in a lens, and beyond the idea of objects from higher space such as hyperspheres and cones entering or leaving our flat local brane space (well it seem clear to me also that the axiom involved with the whistles is that three branes may intersect in a line just as an edge in four space has well, rather three half planes with half the square root of two the apparent real distance measure.) This extends the two branes intersect at a point axiom of higher space a bit. So it is that at a point in the plane (just as we sum 32 and 30 in the numbers involved in the counting of polytope nodes to equal twice 31, the 2 to make 64 the unit generators of a binomial expansion as if the orthogon a simplex). That such a plane or membrane can be seen as a lens with creative singularity points that relates to what we imagine as the underlying substance and the perception illusions of the mix of what we sum up as holographic or intersecting fractal path differentiations and integrations of what is not quite in the tangible things of this world all shadow as a singularity. For those who want to dream a little and it lead to some concrete ideas- imagine then the slice or membrane as if an indefinite and flat dark hole like plane.

* * *

From the Popular Sci Mags today:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110913090835.htm

* * *

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20910-multiple-dwarf-strikes-gave-milky-way-its-spirals.html

Compare to this- which all amounts to the confusion of fundamental philosophic views on the influences of mechanism, teleology, and chance...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110913195555.htm

* * *

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110822121727.htm

"The fact that the system generally doesn't devolve into chaos might mean that embryos have developed additional mechanisms that we don't know about. It would be interesting to know what those mechanisms are," Wieschaus said.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20906-lifelike-cells-are-made-of-metal.html again, the new ideas applied as metals as tangible and perceptive (and ultimately what contains, frees or guides replication mechanisms) such as the waves of calcium models in the next link above.

* * *
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2011/09/rewriting-the-stories-we-tell-ourselves.html

Still a little vague here, as usual with the frontiers of linguistics and psychology, let us ask this question about what we hold as the narrative we relate to of our systems of physics and cosmology.

* * *

This was an especially relevant constellation of science thought, observations, and research that for me seems to come closer to a more creative and unified view of the cosmos- and in each separate area the sciences are achieving thing alive and well.

* * *

Social Gravity (Rereading the US Constitution):

Generation of Vipers then the Generation of Sheep
by L. Edgar Otto on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 2:40pm

I reread the US constitution the other day. Its language was straightforward and simple yet it is very clear to me how far we are from what we were asked to defend. Your generation does not realize what rights you have lost and what responsibility you have in our guaranteed republican government.

So much of it concerns finances- yet in that area as with many others it presents contradictions on just what are our shared laws. It is clear to me that for those powers not enumerated these revert to the people. A new and better and developing form of our government of equal weight and opportunity can be seen as legal and not forbidden under the constitution. To the State and Federal Courts it is quite possible to form a new spring of the people's courts to defend those sections of national and state statutes that have become locked into a do nothing congress and ineffective executive caught between last era's ideologies.

If it is all about money then it is clear that any entity that passes on to the people the inability to repay debts as sovereign in the government is a violation of the ideals of the constitution as to the good faith and credit of the united states and the states severally- and the error is the fault and responsibility of the governing. For me those people who have violated my rights to even personal and intellectual property and made it so in some cases I could not pay back those who helped me beyond the entanglement with the state- a peoples court would certainly do what the elected officials and bureaucrats would not do- namely the right thing to defend the guarantees of good weight within our economic community and for such parasites on the public wealth a just compensation, public censure, or punishment could be done by a respectful people's court as an alternative to false due process.

It is clear also that for one state to forbid suing by other states without permission of the other fifty, questions the very sovereignty of the people as well the federal union. That state is Virginia which in effect has legally armed herself and declared war illegally on the rest of our people. Such independence has resulted in kidnapping of the children especially for those marriages from foreign cultures against the rights of uniform relations between the states. Also, by birthright, it is clear that there is no appeal for our veterans to sue as a veteran the federal government- but it should be a crime to lie to the people to keep an army that would otherwise not be there save when the praise is there to fulfill the acts of war beyond the calling up of our militia which after all were needed for natural disasters. A crime if in the youthful ignorance of this generation with mockery of their ideals for defense and the state once set in the system of service are denied ever more the promises to them and the proven social benefits of previous generations from those wars.

I tend to believe that the requirement to return to the poll tax in effect is a desire of the more conservative of our parties, that and right to work laws against collective bargaining- paradoxically by the public sector who in general do not take seriously or even have read the statutes of our state. In my case I will need an ID, considered if free not a tax- but I have already paid for an ID and may not be able to vote so it is worse than a tax. It is the taking away of rights (and both parties are guilty)- perhaps they do not want to maintain the post office if they could change that who cannot seem to deliver mail unless I prove identity since we have moved more into a national security state.

This generation does not know what power it has still- no matter what side of an issue a voter is on - I suspect the state is only all to aware of it. So do you want a republican form of government and one that matters and is worth keeping if we can especially if certain treaties in history are but scraps of paper is the law of the land?


But between nations what is this ideal that hopes to emulate rather than imitate our social example?


PRO REPUBLICA L. Edgar Otto (having served honorably and feels like a second class citizen, receives no help but impediments from the Veteran's administration for decades). It is not constitutional to have the same jurisdiction tell you different things nor that those elected are not to represent all the people. The American experiment is not a dead end unless you allow it to be- for in theory you are the deciders of how we live together in one jurisdiction.


What if they held an election that was very far from what the social community decided to the extent that a new spring of government and faith in our system was a real awakening of a world safe for authentic enquiry?

* * *

Visualizing Tesseract Constellations

Visualizing Tesseract Constellations

Figure 1. is the coloring in four colors of the 8 cubes or 24 faces of the hypercube. If we imagine going through such an object the faces, 4 of them in cycle, will appear to rotate 90 degrees as if describing a finite helix. This is true also if we make a circle around the center of this torus of 4 cubes. These I designate with the 24 letters times two aspects for 48 labels. We can represent them as the three axes times the i, 1, -i, -1 right angle rotations. Let us not also that the same coloring of the six faces of a cube into 24 regions applies inside this figure for 7 of the cubes and the outside eighth cube is the inverse of these.

Figure 2. is the statement that we can slice the hypercube in the 1 4 6 4 1 arrangement, as if a simplex. But in 4D so condensed into three space as with other physical effects of this way nature views higher space, we find the six more of a staggered hexagon as we do with organic carbon compounds.

Figure 3 & 4. Represent the idea if we color two "quasi-iota points or strings" that is, if two nodes are of the same color we make the edges the same color in a loose statement of charge attraction or repelling grounding and exclusions. In this case we find if all nodes are different between two colors no iota stings exist as such, or that if we have the eight of each color we can arrange them as if a cube within a cube thus with 24 iota strings 12 describing a cube the maximal number per color.

Figure 5 & 6. here we see that the coloring of the edges and nodes of the hypercube of two color constellation may be symmetric in patterns or may be asymmetric. This property of higher spaces should be held in mind when considering symmetry and energy questions in inversion depth of dimensions or over hyper-surfaces.

* * *

I note today Leo V's post on ball lightning- this metaphor reminds me of my consideration in 64 of such intuitive structures. For the very concept of condensed space as in Fig. 1 is the structure or compass of a free ball lightening. Only I do not think the metaphor strong enough (although these are intelligible theories too) to pin down concretely the physics if we use such vague notions and terms as "zero point energy" or "Big Bang cosmology" But it would be worth looking at the physics proposed for the accessing of energy via the vague "black hole" concept, at least experimentally. But in all such theories and devices I have encountered the only thing they seem to generate is hope and investors. Then again it may be there is some other way other than the very slow to go beyond the break even point of hot fusion (using lasers as proposed in '72 in Titusville to contain "things beyond the leaking Torus magnetic bottle.") But where would the wisdom and fun in the physics be if we could not express our speculations and react emotionally to them and how others see them? The right angle formulation as in figure 1. is a time mechanism concept also. If there is zero point energy as so described by bloggers here (or something like the Higgs field Leo suggests can be tapped) it certainly cannot be grounded in a finite world any more than the Higgs particle- we do not derive from such metaphorical fields the most foundational and infinite source of energy, at least in a routine fashion- gamma bursts are a byproduct and not the creator of the low metal stars- the structure of creative entities like the ball lightning or "tesseractions" of black holes are and on as Leo suggests and TGD knows there are levels of membranes- and perhaps as of my post of yesterday, super-wormholes.

* * *

Footnote: In the coloring of the nodes or points of the hypercube by some number of colors we need not assume these numbers are equal but can allow for a range of possibilities (in fact this can be extended to the computation of the probabilites thus represent entropy of an ensemble of the nodes as sub-cubes in a sky (Himmel) of the constellations.

In my color notation of six colors we find red yellow green and blue used in the tesseract of four colors above- so it is that orange and violet are excluded which is the letter "I" in the notation. So if we label the connections of the faces of the hypercube with the bicolor notations (each node ambigously orange or violet) we have the permutations in the rotations around or translations thru the axes in this three space representation. CIK IKC KCI BIM IMB MBI IDJ DJI JID and the reverse labels. Also we may think of these as the points of an octahedron or faces and the 12 edges of a cube, so labels in sets of four for the 24 orientations.

* * *



* * *

Ulla, Ulla


At 1:43 AM, Blogger Ulla said...

PeSla,
I dislike your way to post your comments only, on your blog.

And Matti has no time, how hard we ever wish he had. He is the Emperor. I know of nobody that work so hard.

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510

* * *

There is no time?

* * *

Ulla,

I desired that the readers if any would go to Matti's original postings- the point was not to read our commentary as much as the original contribution. I am not so sure we need to duplicate or mirror things that much.

Time is like solving problems as the entropy slows down- the more you solve the faster it goes and the closer you get to the answer.

I am not sure that link you threw at me again is technically cold fusion- and in any case if there are free electrons as the catalyst of these kinks in the field possibilities these involve geometry of structures such as the truncated octahedron.

I understand it will take a lot of work to catch up to me from where I was 20 years ago. But why will you not see the beauty in these ideas applying to carbon chemistry and the genetics?

It is not about dependence on the emotional aspect for the hard and raw objective science- there is no need to be in each others heads short of canine or love bonding or a role of healer. In my world I am described as an inoffensive centrist democracy in the nation state game, But I can see the empire in a grain of sand.

I will now post this for my own personal reference as my intention was not to promote the blog.

Must the mare maid find the love of another to gain her own soul?

The PeSla

* * *

Maybe I now know where the Lithium should have gone :-)~

* * *



"I was the sole emperor of a grain of sand but conquered a might beach. My castles endured rough waves and storms - with a sea gull's jawbone I reached to the moon..."

* * *