Monday, January 23, 2012

The Dark Continuum






The Dark Continuum L. Edgar Otto Jan.23,2012 Did Einstein riding his ray of light reach the mountaintops inside his corpuscle faith, Phaeton wild his electrodynamic motorbike ride coming so close to the shift of Mercury and the irrelevant proof of relativity that we need more than Newton to explain black holes and the color shift of light in a gravitational field, roses and violets and doubled or half angles in some signs of times dilatation or reversals?

Lubos has an example, not with the modified formulas involved, of this debate that continues over the role of where the classical fits in- and this is a suggestion he sees for the need for a string level of new theories. I do not know how solid the ideas I put forth on this post are that has to creatively imagine still another sense of the vacuum beyond the absolute nothingness or some vibration virtual fields and the new physics views and more of super-symmetries also seen in this trivial sense of a third idea of a vacuum. I also suspect that our wildest speculations so far on the idea of Dark fluids, forces, energy, matter can also have this simple conceptual explanation that is at least refreshingly different even if above the physicality what there is of it of things like charged branes. We can dwell on all the views we want going so far, and choose from the totality what sort of group applies to some plane- and by brute intuition and analogy extend again into the freedom of a vertical direction.

Is it said that in the history of things part of the search in the background for the intelligibility of the world as physics or between the objective and subjective in philosophy (a place for souls or demons) some third thing which for Newton at least he felt it as if Spirit and who knows, maybe in the sober awakening to come when we have learned enough we may find something there beyond our little plane geometry games on the Hellas sand.

Newton, our last great astrologer and a humble man we think who did take up the thoughts of others to build upon and enhance, those who rode the higher gravity of heavens down to earth in the infinite speed of flight... also wanted to know about the prophesy as of any memory of causation grounded and guaranteed. Is this not a poetic way to find the bible codes hidden in the symbols, combination's and information stepchild now considered science?

But let me not lead you astray, this is the first germ or inoculation of a creative and new idea, and there is much to do, and the world and I need your help in the quest and the learning.

* * * * *




The Learning Machine (VI)

The spiraling moving code within us does not direct us as
all in all some selfish chance & fittest genes
Deep from some dance on an onion layer within
nor can we escape our view of worlds, of gods, not
Reduced to symmetries like its laws, a center of four winds

We find our way through the maze & catacomb's unwinding
a ball of fateful string cut then woven into cloth
Or we leave a trail through crossroads at the signposts made from
the endless basket of wisdom that gives us but breadcrumbs
Only too often gleaned by sniffing whiskered hungry eyes
or ourselves with no thought for the morrow already there.

But dreams are like this, the source & sink of warmth within
to which like the eighty styles of endlessly patterned
Snowflakes encompasses where drama's finite themes begin & end
always in such plays & twists & turns it where we came in.
Even in dreams rehearsals to train us for some reversals.

Have faith if we dedicate a net of nerves around our hearts
to some transmitter & antennae or lure that others exist
Or for that matter even some aggregate of worlds
where it is meaningful to decode symbols & hand prints
Painted in prayer, our story on cave walls.

That our story is copied, stolen, fading or enhanced
a record from our narrow stretch of time, written
In & for the dark, lost the thousand acorns &
forgotten the time capsules & who behind the names
On crumbling gravestones & as all, we observe lost
in thirst in an ascetic desert we are moved
To write our diaries in blood, a salty sea, all there is left.

* * *

The Learning Machine (VII)

The hat brim ring of Saturn subdued by needed near
living together the four generations, parents of the gods
Doubled coned & shaped like "M" rhino hair horns with a scorpion sting.

The ironwork that looks like a lizard hold up the
Singer sewing machine made in Occupied Japan, copied
Even to the nicks & casting errors seen a gargoyle wabi to perfection
we who karate chopped the flotilla in Manila soon to be outdone
That war for the West, the Pacific, Co-prosperity frontier.

A sixteen year old girl plays Magellan for a year not
intercepted, Spain & Lewis & Clark, her own Sacagawea, & vPocahontas,
Her legend gone to myth, sound barrier pilots now routine bus drivers.

Nature keeps the balance of betrayals out of sight &
never comes to mind, oppressive humid workdays for dreamers
Risking too much for encouragement, Olympic pipes, Guinness World Records
forgiveness for the rabbit 'backer & heroin, the Feast of
Saturn all the ambiance & style trumped by the heroine, the
timeless voice of Etta James still breaking through the silence.
Horses, autobahns; elephants & tanks; submarines ironclad,
the bob-wire fence of bayonets, fame undone in cattle calls,
You were so thin your diet of popcorn balls, my exotic model.

I walk along the river James, the shore near Hollywood
where presidents North & South are buried, where a
Stray workman's hammer falls breaking glass, their mummy's turn to dust.
or a necklace made of vertebrae & shivers up my spine.

But I did not want to write it this way, but only pure
images far into the surreal, deeper secrets to reveal.

* * *

The Learning Machine (VIII)


The firmament is self-defraging where odd loops of
photons meet. One who interacts with his own self-energy
does neither add nor subtract wisdom from his Book of Life
unless he encounters others.

Real or not their images nor how far extends the trees
in the gardens of Feynman, nor how deep into the
quarks inside the quarks no phantom Maxwell's demon
Breaks apart, converges to one integral whole number
Mysteriously that the wave trains dance in perpendicular planes
upon some simple schemes & signs, really no surprises.

Our messages of Love cycle & trade doubts & faith
alternating our spectrum's lines of colours & interferences
Combining or destroying each other in & out of
existence, some cap to the limits of our energy,
Some minimum entropy that togetherness persists.

There is little difference between the sky of stars
& the count, mahogany your flowering sunfed freckles
Or some stream we make way for the metaphor of milk
& its anodyne rush to sleep against life's pain
Why does the child of thrush bring a glove of bling
for the right hand of God, romancing a thriller, the Moon-walker?
A blanket from his loins, her thighs & for your Prince
& princess what an alloy azure amalgam of their eyes.

Too soon at the last hour recovering reborn fame, how in
this world's sweet non-necessity, the man self-shadowed
Shadow lost from Peter Pan made whole, to leave the game.

* * *

The Learning Machine (IX)


Can we ever enter or go beyond the Dark Continuum
perpendicular to everything its grasp like some philosophic dimension?

Infinitely divisible yet unity everywhere & when its span &
depths & self compliments distinguish the opaque, a Null.

Know ye not you have dwelt there often, some discovered
focus of perception, laughed at doctors caught still in distortions
Dismayed but telling little lies, covering up their actions think you do not know
unaware a prayer can change, recreate the world
So rare the power, perhaps beyond unique a mystic vision
you the creator or conduit for higher things or little things
cloud sculpture, painting sunsets

What beyond time travel or your dreaming can you make
new here on the rock & dirt on a roll but your self's intelligible design?
scry for lost things, induce tornadoes eating trailer parks only in your own now,
it matters not your actions as the author.

Such a fine line, falsely quarter drawn between the good &
evil, sanity discerned of skies likewise a confabulation
Their faith healing roles, even preachers lost from faith
pass the host & wine, mortal nature oft physician to herself
You told that you are the confused one, your demons &
angelic voices unreal as is the necessity of their commands
The declare, although your mind the final authority, testimony,
that you cannot distinguish good from evil, a danger even to
Yourself & out of sync, do not fit in to group standards,
in truth only your superstitious Beast made our of lost faith
in your art and intuitions

Perhaps that you just do not care or trust to listen,
so bearing others burdens who think someone can teach them how to live
That in your honesty & innocence you know you cannot
beat into them what must be lead out from their within
How then in your own style struggle with your art
can you as mentor teach art therapy class to others?

Of course our need, & world requires our gods as artists
not Jack the Dripper from His Big Dipper on the canvass of
Our soul in His own way, dismay six days of experiment a long while
as falls, appears by chance as if a miracle, Mona Lisa's smile.

* * * *

These are very relevant science articles today:

newscientist

"In the real world, vortices eventually disappear as their energy dissipates due to viscosity. But as this demo shows, they could continue indefinitely in ideal fluids. Although there are no existing fluids with these properties, simulations of the scenario are useful tools for simplifying complex fluid flow problems."

sciencedaily


"The reason for this perplexing behavior is subtle. Water forms chemical or hydrogen bonds with certain surfaces, while the attraction of water to other surfaces is dictated by non-bonding interactions called van der Waals forces. These non-bonding forces are not unlike a nanoscale version of gravity, Koratkar said. Similar to how gravity dictates the interaction between Earth and the sun, van der Waals forces dictate the interaction between atoms and molecules."


* * * * *

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Are Gravity and Matter Illusions








Are Gravity and Matter Illusions L. Edgar Otto Jan. 21/22, 2012

In the cover illustration to this post I realized the description of the zeros in the nilpotent algebra with a physical bias over the synthetic mathematical abstraction of Peter Rowland's philosophy- my quasic fulfilling his criteria but with a wider or different conclusion (before the fact of reading him or anyone- but I must admit it took awhile as he advised to understand his book in depth) that what he was describing about the zeros in the algebra was already described in the dimensions here involved as if the limit of cycles and ottonions for such grids in whatever form of symmetry breaking. Now, we can say this extends , as he says may even describe parallel universes in the idempotent model I imagine- but the issue of such philosophies of number certainly contrasts the more speculative theories of our time as to what is reasonably sound math or physics grounding and experimental reaches- for how can we not contrast the idea of inflation scenarios at odds with the idea of baby universe scenarios as a product of this level of human intuitive reasoning although not resolved. That mass or energy relates to the space or is not related, or related in a sort of organic but unified way over local and continuous if not imaginary time is still a question relating to light itself upon its still not quite explainable source. Light changes space and space the light as well the choice or recognition of charge in potentially time traveling spinning systems- but what of the idea of infinite velocity of spin and so on? One thing for sure, and I am not sure if he will be widely read or how one might really peer review his work and his allies in the net or other hard cover journal publications, is that in the casual learning I encountered those with ideas of the foundations of which they would do well to know about certain objections or enhancements to their theories before they assert what they seem to know of a system, their system, or the beauty we as learning creatures feel thereof. The again if the free speech of the world is not open and the birthright of all of us how can there be a world of free enquirey?

"Looking back, the SphereDream, fifth dimension of my Godhead, my soul integrating through time and that metaphor of the endless beach and the one central city of Far-Rock'a'bye in which Olney had is adventures parallel to this world, and to the eschatology of worlds, SpheresEnd."

"As a child in the back seat of the old two toned '53 Chevy at the square dog drive in- you see someone had the cleaver idea to slice hot dogs and put them between two slices of white bread, needless to say the Whooper at about the same time survived to this day- I was deep in thought and asked my father what is beauty, I just do not understand it. He dismissed it saying it will come to me as he was rather busy ordering and all. I felt like I had lost something and was lacking something I might never understand. Something important.

Once I asked my Dad what if I could finally explain magnetism- he an electronic engineer and all.
Nothing much he said- they would just put your name into a big obscure book - but it did not dampen my curiosity or that he was not excited as we can dream too much to present to him some thought or vision.

Yet in the looking back I would probably say to myself- you are a little young to understand that for theories and causes Beauty can be very seductive and lead you to her path."

The Learning Machine (III)


Together we are salt, neutral and equal,
interlaced our lattices, solid & square, my points &
your body centered, rare of Earth and coarse the savor on
our taste buds - compact to crystallization my body
your centered heart, of one unique yet disembodied soul
so close and set, once our distance of love is measured

So what does it matter to the gods, blind within ourselves
to Love's compliments if Love goes one way or is
mutual attraction, the same description really?

Not just the God-fer-sure copper warms our world, cracks &
polar shifts & bouts of island making lava.
But the chaffing of our surprises & let downs, vibrations
that can be dissolved & diluted taking passion's permanance
fore-granted as if the sins of love have sparks & room to be
passed to our offspring.

The crystalline abyss in the creative center of the Earth
builds in us as does the desire from hope amplified
beyond the source of light that time has its compensations
as a comforter. The gods prime the pumps, conserve the seed crop.

What can I say as we read all & none of the mind of
our lover, her orbit to enter from forever for there to leave
again - so close the dream on which requited love depends,
but one unique message in the Latte sky & blue, pretend
in peace that we knew, one passed this way, His message true,
who loved you.

* * *

The Learning Machine (IV)


What do you see beyond the intangible materiality
spirits of the air, echoes of the dead, a holy host?
Spacemen once the gods but now the gnome & gnats, gnarly
knot holes full of demons singing upward, conjuring Zeus's lightning?
Afraid as the world is pulled by good and evil spectres
your stumble or dive off the mountaintop, become the Beast?
Or that its you who create such songs lost into the
cold & oxygen thin wind, boiling at blood temperature?

Perhaps snow blind for it is you full of desire to speak
words unsaid or not spoken, nor a simple goodbye or
Good voyage, accepted closure in parting wakes aware
that will not let go finding his flesh dust less than a beast?
I say to you, shadow to shadow in reflections, each a
one way mirror of heavier weights of waves & circumstance,
Our fortunes tangled that my burden seems the worse
for those around me who survived to me as if
Vanishing in time & space while I still haunt this Earth.

No Beast or angelic soul can race Zeno down
the rabbit hole, nor jump all the way up or down
The shells of turtles holding up the worlds
meant or never meant to be, their time said come &
Filled complete after the fact & fall into the firmament.

At least we in our wounded stupor, no clock for our coma
in the light of day trading our summers until all
Winters gone, we at the anti-poles of anti-poles and so on...
know well but cannot make the leap that the truly
Departed feel joy & grief & dismay still by us beyond forlorn.

* * *

The Learning Machine (V)

Individuality & uniqueness do not always match,
be the same singularity where the universe unique is
That one & only moment & near miss as once you came
so close to the dream but we never passed a kiss.

Half dazed, amazed at how the bagpipes hum and hang
so many granite valley echoes beckoning in the
Landscape not all explored or dreamt about as stars
* dust age * merge inevitability incomplete given
Infinite time looking back & going back, you spinning Dervish.

If the wormhole of your gut, outside contained inside,
you thin is yours internalizing the universe is too long
To endure its coiled up folded snake which way
points out from the mouth of lies begins at the wrong end
Hungry for the truth, weapons of deceit, if that matters,
then over wings of time no hopeful monsters would
Be here to dream, feel secure awhile in the world.

Time and space, its gravities & energies, where everlasting
are neither conserved or not-conserved, the eternities
For as time and matter is illusion beyond the see-saw
between solidity & nothingness, all vibrations real &
Virtual, absolute, mass & time seem like that dream of a God,
although Heaven can seem solid, sure to gain by paths
Beyond the furnaces of liquid helium & lead & coal ash.

But even the Buddha returned again & again must find &
learn, reach the end of his enlightenment's, or the
Once & only Prophet, His single & unique echo must ride
his visions of a higher sky tinkering with his zen motorcycle.
Joseph too must teach the Vision with us, carpentry.

* * * * * *

And a reply from Lubos:


Lubos,

I wonder if in some sense string theory once grounded (say limiting the number of possible vacua) surpasses quantum theory or is another deeper variation. Maybe this is but a philosophic stance- do you think the physics is primary that directs our math or the mathematics is primary? But your statement that the variations are not incompatible is a great step in unification.

The PeSla



Lubos Motl
Dear The PeSla,

your question is an interesting one, and the answer is multidimensional. String theory is 1) fully mathematically equivalent to a quantum field theory in various superselection sectors, 2) string theory is another quantum field theory because it preserves various inequalities and analyticities that may be proven for a pretty generic QFT although ST is the only example where they are actually saturated, 3) string theory is a generalization of QFT.

ST may look "totally new" because unlike QFT in the bulk, it contains UV-complete quantum gravity; at the same moment, it is"as conservative an extension" of QFT as you can get because anything more "revolutionary" is probably guaranteed to be inconsistent.

I think that in the inner structure of things, maths is primary and physics is the most important and most universal "application" of some maths, the important one.

* * * *

I wonder if by generalizing Feymann diagrams some of us mean something different than my quasic view or say the application of groups as a secondary thing beyond a certain cycling? String theory by what Lubos says certainly would be such a generalization if it is already a generalization of the quantum theory.

But let us go a little deeper to make sense of the metaphysics of the above poems, I mean say the question of the observed force of the virtual contributions to the mass of a particle and the evidence of the Casmir force and the idea that the brane like objects of spheres and planes may have a direction as to the placement of charge and its sign- at least in an (Omnic) universe on the run. Now if a spinning ray of light also exhibits this phenomenon of time travel (not my idea but more like others and of course Godel, Einstein riding a frame dragged spinning ray of light like a cat that always falls on his feet but he is sandwiched between to slices of toast and the jelly side is up which of course always falls jelly side down. I do not know in the quantum world how conservative its extensions- but such a thing we should investigate if we can make the claim we can create matter from the raw and independent not able to have characterization non-necessary nothingness that may involve some natural restraint in itself and its unity. But here we should ask the obvious anyway- it appears in some theories at least that matter in some sense is here and could have been created or will end in the eschatology of the once or forever or the ultimate resolution of ideas of spin as well as complexity at endtimes or times that are real in any scenario of expanding ideas or baby universes and so on. Here we find the old anthropocentric argument as a concrete proof of reasoning or a cop out- as the questions remains still open and we cannot read while in it beyond the covers of our books.

As a crude first blush idea, revolutionary or revolting, could the nothingness before the breath of the universe's time become the absolute continuum and ground of mass after the universes deeper directed arrow of time? The again the quasic idea has this concept rather built in- it already addresses the dynamics of the aggregate and still wants to understand the spinning universe once stilled from some view and its dark matter-energy within. How can there be an universe if matter and time are illusions- how can we count on the momenta to make mathematical and physical sense of things when they are conserved or not, a universe of logic complete or not unto the level of things that we need to describe all we physically may know of this world?

* * * * *

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Triality, Simpler Times, Checky Shores, and Learning Machines





Triality, Simpler Times, Checky Shores, and Learning Machines L. Edgar Otto Jan. 20/21, 2012

Jesse Prinz has an article on Newscientist I cannot access: But systems of learning as philosophy and cosmology I have given a continuum all of its own called- Neotericontinuum . This is all I can see of the newscientist pre-comments to the link:

'Human beings are learning machines,' says philosopher
INTERVIEW: 12:00 20 January 2012
Prevailing wisdom holds that we are born with an innate understanding of the world. No, argues Jesse Prinz: we learn a lot of it for ourselves
This inspired parts of the first two of a planned series of poems called The Learning Machine as science sites often do- and Ron Kollman, a Christian in the coffee shop and the idea of Beasts and Monsters, and a deeper understanding of the philosophy of science of Peter Rowlands in regards to uniqueness and quantum theory where to him physics determines the mathematics. Also my struggles of my roommate Erik- the artist I illustrate here with often- in his struggle with internal Beasts caught between the Lutherans and the Buddhists in his attempts as self healing.

The Learning Machine (I) L. Edgar Otto 01-20-12

The woodland sunflowers thrive in their season
by the river in profusion on the old growth forest floor.

They vanish sometimes forever their reflection at one
with the world living & learning on the short & long
run their once and only allotted days unique their carefree
count of petals & hours, uprooting floods & withering droughts.

The discovery of the last woodland sunflower becomes my
obsession, for she is the first, born again with Love,
the one & only true center of our world. The outside, other parts
beyond us invisible, walled off, no threat in time or space
to the totality of our destiny & privacy.

Neither of us were fit, without wounds, & yet our
memories of them so remote in the past & we did
not think about how far our universe creating kisses
could ever be an end of worlds into the future. Only
the gods have a long memory, but they were so far away
to care or see our rapid heartbeats.

Such love colours our world, buttercup golden chins,
daisy chains & the double explosion of dandelions
before they go to seed & our whispering sweet nothing
breaths launch them too soon into the boundless wind.

We count the petals - She loves me, she loves me not-
to some uncertain end. Not satisfied with what
by chance we think or want of answers our timeless &
eternal bond not broken reaches for another flower
so the count begins anew again.

* * *

The Learning Machine (II)

Some of us cannot out run the Beast. We can only
leap out of the deeps of his dark waters only to
fall back again in an exhausting game of out of reach.

He slows us all down from our climbing to shore, makes us
choose the lesser evil so beaching us en masse, growing limbs
walking tall against the natural heavier weight of gravity
our struggle promises we can reach the moon & stars.

His the treacle, molasses slow, that gives us mass
in the spiral shelled diffuse flesh protected in
the greater freedom in all directions in the water &
to the four corners of the Ocean. We the scurriers &
self-determining choosers of our paths,
makers of light & warning colors to our own kind.

He, our self & unseen ever present center draws
us down indirectly into the maelstrom we
swim against to tack our fins and sails at right
angles taking from our strength and time as we
backtrack with no clues to which was time's currents flow,
lost in our taking chances, safety in circles on the waves,
trajectories in fountain cannon spewing jets or of water spouts &
our promiscous global cluster bonds save by numbers
in the parabolic herd.

Left alone we try to keep some balance, walk the sagging
tightrope in the strait line & while our freedom is boundless
it is empty in all but the fall in whose direction, like in dreams
we may wake up- or hope there is the safety net, we who spend so
much time lazy like the ancient lizards in the sun.

Into his locker realm at the bottoms of the sea &
center of the moral maze or mysterious labyrinth we
navigate by the sound if we lose one handed touch by
running into or beating our heads into a wall, seeing but
so far our lonely turns and twists.

We also consume the memories of others voraciously or
in ritual communions of sacrifice, so many flat worms taught
to seek & divine our livers. We reach too high in the Mercuric
effervescence of our comment Vulcan rise, blinded by the other Sun,
closer our flying fish wax wings.

* * * *

And a video of a primitive experiment called Triality or Quarks in a Spectral Field.

* * * * *

Lubos,


I wonder if in some sense string theory once grounded (say limiting the number of possible vacua) surpasses quantum theory or is another deeper variation. Maybe this is but a philosophic stance- do you think the physics is primary that directs our math or the mathematics is primary? But your statement that the variations are not incompatible is a great step in unification.


The PeSla

* *
To Riofrio's blog:

I am sorry to hear that our world is not safe for enquiry or that anyone would be excluded from our right to learn and know.

Why in a peaceful world would Iran or anyone need nukes that take away from the mouths of its people- the ancient states should know this better than the West.

And Carl, I get your point but there are no necessary realities beyond our common sense- I do not think we can leave Iran to its own isolated Korean state of hell and starvation if it threatens to promote proliferation to say Venezuela.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Exploring the 2592 Zeros of 25 Standard Particles







Exploring the 2592 Zeros of 25 Standard Particles L. Edgar Otto January 20, 2012

"We are not always aware of our creative and intuitive artistic accentuation's or when they connect over general time or when for the why of causality, that if lucky, our unique thoughts intelligibly and meaningfully cohere with the totality."

"A given dialog in its time reaches an entropy where nothing new can be said or resolved beyond blind shouting. A given theory system ages. It brought back from some hibernation or coma awhile and from a futuristic view all such systems decohere."
Quoting from myself while the writing...

The Source, Weight, & Uniqueness Problem Remains
(of thoughts on the Good or God, this equivalent question remains analogously also)

Emphasis is give to "symmetry breaking" over some more foundational aspects of the mathematics and physics, such as an emphasis (and say privileging- even the assumption that duplicated structures are presumed to be the field of gravity or certain coordinates at rest-) of groups and invariants over the physicality of substance, contents.

The source, weight & uniqueness may not always be part of one symmetrical problem, as a quasi-unfied total theory. Thus, in a sense this is a symmetry breaking within thought itself. Clearly consciousness as such is suggested, but not necessarily part of the same unity of descriptions, Love & gravity as haunting 5th elements.

So we infer or even place into our mathematics & logic, science and its philosophy, creatively, some obvious fact or statements of axiom that is the stable & unique case, the Being given, the convincing but doubted obvious even if by hidden reasons.

(in the informal mix up in dim light, useful errors and free hand sketching of the graphs and nearly illegible symbols, I had my doubts that the explorations found anything reliably useful although I have been know to appreciate the necessary abandonment in the short achievements of the Rubik's cube for later solutions.


Part of this, even in string theory, is the incorporation of ideas like symmetry into the subject of thermodynamics beyond its development of its first two laws.

It is the case, by natural or deep observation (some shadow thoughts are taken seriously as an explanation for the accounting of mass by conservation laws and methods- namely, that last one standing of energy.) experiment and its variations, with our without underlying laws, that particles exist, sources and patterns persist and obey some laws, and weight measured that can be "verified" unto the abilities and depths of observation, including principles of exchanges assumed always present and ubiquitous between entities, even the questioned conservation laws and minimums of mass-energy & vacua, and entropy is linked conceptually to passing time as source.

But the totality itself can be, ultimately, unproved such that it can independently be "falsified" - open and symmetrical as thermodynamic scientific systems, as well thought's mirror inversions.

We are free to assert a philosophy, even incomplete in general senses, within a context. Yet, even within irreducibility and complexity of our systems, what guarantee have we for a general unique theory of the Everything?

If such laws are exact we could create matter from a pure vacuum, worlds. Fields of pure vibration but a stepping stone this is perhaps another way to state the theme of zombies and faeries raised with this problem that remains.

* * *

I notice that in the realm of evolution and structures of inheritance that the assertion of Darwin as the fact (natural selection) is modified in wider contexts of information such that some totalities do influence the evolving patterns, as well the first but not only pattern from bean traits and how they are passed on.

Some laws are assumed too specific, like Bode's Law, specially created and improbable for solar system structures. Is ours the best of possibilities as the unique idea on which its matter finds the perfect centering. So it is like Kepler a scientific systems (if we take falsifiable as the benchmark even when the idea moves on and fades at least partly into mysticism. For such a law is after all conceived in three space and inverse square viriality considerations. If we imagine things like planets in pairs and laws for some of their orientation in concert we should at least stack the 4D polytopes as the underlying seemingly hidden geometry to which any system should resolve to the general case of system structure- conditions favorable to earth-like life for example. But it is clear also that even further generalizations of dimensions are needed- a third realm at least descending from the size of Pluto. Here we can imagine the need for discrete and continuous, closed and open views to find at least being partly resolved but applying throughout a stereonomic structural system.
Such theories may need to arise again with new hindsight as with any experiencing of time, subjective or objective.


I asked myself, as the doubts though lesser are periodic- why do we do this blogging of the promotion or understanding of ideas, sometimes only half aware of their uniqueness or originality- I usually find even the random jottings at least as an example of simple but expanded arithmetic or counting of grids- and the flying in the vastness of higher dimensions, having something to post worthwhile after all. But then openness is my game in the freedom of speech in a world that keeps its freedom of enquiry open and with due consideration for merit and mature uses of finances and distribution of resources for all peoples. But if I had known this blogging would continue so long- if monetized, I could have afforded pen and paper.

* * * * *

Of course the four generation case for particles (so called exotic hadrons) is the subject at hand for such levels of quasications. That the four implies in a sort of time direction as a fifth for a source like current or motion is a key point- that and we examine the 4th and 5th inter-dimensional groups and systems. But so far I have not in the playing with numbers found systems beyond the squaring of the 5 patterns (that is 5 x 5 x 5) that is encompassed by these higher generations (that is my symbols in my script of G sub n. On which ground we stand in these issues is the foundations of the foundations we begin to find with certainty of our physics systems.

* * *

From yesterdays post on Sudoku a comment from Scott on my facebook: I find Scott most interesting in that once a game is played he can recall the moves and show us possible variations- would this ability be as exacting going forward as well.


Scott Curler Mr Otto.... solving Sudoku is like trying to solve chess mathematically.... in many cases the numbers may work out, but there are exceptions to the "rule" that keep the mind entertained and the beauty/joy is in the blurring of the math/numbers of what should theoretically work and what actually does. Puts a different perspective on it though, thank you for posting


L. Edgar Otto Scott, very astute points- glad we discussed the psychology and mathematics of the chess game over the years- especially useful from our best chess player in the coffee shop.

* * *

Relevant from Sci Mags: neural-network-gets-an-idea-of-number-without-counting

Also: first-secure-quantum-computer-is-blind-to-its-own-bits

* * *

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Quasic Permutation and Sukodu Grid Projects











Quasic Permutation and Sukodu Grid Projects
L. Edgar Otto (The Pe Sla) January 19, 2012

Of all the related Sukodu solutions the final array I will regard as a standard for now, it does not contain diagonal solutions. The minimum clue can be 16 or less including what we may understand from the grid shape and number alone. Of all the zillions of related number solutions I follows those closely related even when they did not appear in two space as a solution to see what happens in their three space representation. There are many ways to explore this fundamental symmetry operation and apply it to things like particle physics. The notation suggests a much wider view of the influence of duality, three dimensionality, and viriality in the next low dimensions some try to confine space and its compliments within.

Perhaps it is time I finally got some of these methods computerized. I also need to enlarge the grid of 81 as writing in it was so very small and I had to up the lighting at night. But the graph papers helped and fortunately and intuitively they were designed for other purposes earlier on in this blog.

I note in the last "clue standard page" that we can have also diagonal planes that include the nine numbers.

This is a new way to see where the absolute chance and probability meets the absolute determinate cause and mechanism as a foundation for what seems to encompass our useful informational possibilities of physical dynamics including the biological structures.

The philosophy of this page may likewise integrate some ideas of consciousness or make the issue clearly besides the project- but it does not address the foundations or existence and our greater concept of uniqueness in the realm of the gods.

As to twistors resolving naturally or by default to the idea of gravity this needs a further generalization with the quasic permutations in mind and is after all an existence relation of inertial things such as what defines mass. What in fact decides the quasic weight between the generations? Complexity, numbers, coincidence?
I hope these view raise the bar for the theoretical calculations of our finite particles and infinite group matrices- after all, in matters of the dimensionless in both the concern of Eddington and Dirac this is the logical quasic generational state of the geometry of the universe... As things seem to more or less intelligibly match- or that they may appear to expand and accelerate upon some foundations generalized as to patterns and formuli, on the small and great scales of things, we should generalize both the finite number of particles in the universe (or as Eddington says the Uranoid) to the parameters of mass and gravity intelligibly connected (as Dirac intuits), or the issues of steady states or the universe arising from singularity, the philosophy should concern these symmetries, (the HyperUranoid).

* * * * *

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Natural and Deep Symmetry








Natural and Deep Symmetry L. Edgar Otto January 18, 2012

In the natural dimensions certain patterns persist regardless of the content of the numbers or sub-regions the Euclidean (plane) familiar n-space. I hoped that this approach, the natural dimensions on which we can fit the puzzles (Soma for example) into intelligible assemblies as a matter of local trial and error to which the artistic in us does not see that these may be in higher depths of mathematical connections globally, that this approach would give me the formulas for all the solutions by space theory of the 240 Soma sets where the "Jigsaw Sukodu" of several regions also across the plane as bilaterally symmetric, and in its representation in three space.

This came from a look again at the permutations of Sukodu (Extreme) in the form that has also two diagonals containing the nine numbers- and the symmetrical across the plane.

The classification from the inside or inversion- a deep Soma formula is not a matter of natural symmetry but of deep dimensional symmetry so far- I also suspect that 16 may have a solution (despite the exhaustive enumeration by computers) but this may be only a deep concept relating to deep symmetries- or a borderline or frontier intuition caused by unclear partial visions into the depths.

I also relate closer my recreations with the 30 color cube and deep permutation and dimensional theory such as that of Kea that goes beyond the natural or shallow symmetries albeit these the springboard for all of our intuitions.

I see that TGD posts today again on the generalization of Feymann diagrams as a proposal with promise (not from my view looking back from the actual implementation of this idea- I posted independently in previous blog posts- but it really shows the need for a generalization of the idea of matrices in general before we can be said to naturally use the group idea- such as the dihedral to operate on the matrix.

So such a generalization that we seem to be heading toward or dwelling in are all the same description:

1. The nature of symmetry in the quasic grid is or contains such a generalization if that is meant the symmetry of natural space and group theory involved.

2. The ideas of permutation and braiding of Kea in the intuition on the depths (as usual these debates go beyond the nature-nurture as that of instinct and intellect), as I show in the color cube theories, is or contains such a generalization. This is true for her use of the matrices as modeled by others as to what sort of main diagonals are involved.

3. In the use of number theory and ideas from modern physics (including the usual considerations of what is classical that falls from it if not that means natural) the aspirations of TGD seem to be leading to this sort of thing or converges to the intuitive idea of it, p-adics can also be such a generalization or leads to it.

4. This is not, as deep, a matter of metaphysics or philosophy only- for I can imagine in knot theory our ability to invoke matter from raw space- and that so far is in the realm of speculation only. There are generalizations beyond Feymann's reductions.

5. PeSla's and Kea's approaches emphasizes the informational aspects to ground the deep intuitions. This is not just a matter of debate for the objects we can be sure of as proposed (for example why do the neutrinos change flavors in the first place?) The Koide formula is an example as to which side of the depths and natural span we regard as solid science.

6. It is clear also that the planes, that is in general branes, and the polytopes generalized of Coxeter, are also the generalization again of Feymannian quantum ideas.

7. Ideas on partitions of space itself has to eventually merge the natural dimensional and the deep dimensional symmetry views.

* * * * *
Associated Associahedra I thought I would check the spelling on a google search and found my posting first on the images and also in the text this most interesting pdf paper:
posted 3:30 PM CST at library.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

On the Koide-Chrome Spectrum






On the Koide-Chrome Spectrum L. Edgar Otto July 17, 2012

So far my use of color in notations has not really been some problem of an extended spectrum even when these are ordered along those lines- but more like color wheels. So today I offer two "quasic grid" views of what happens when we shift the spectrum over various levels of the natural dimensions of abstract motions. As complicated as these diagrams appear it is only one such case within the three and four dimensions that involves the shifting of the point elements, other subcells and things like curves can be seen if the graphs are developed.

In my haste my notation may be seen to contain errors at the remote ends of the binominal expansion of these abstract motions. Note, the shift sign is from music, the C cleft. But that is where the subjective or intuitive issue is distracting, for we go beyond the simple idea of extending (as Newton did) Pascal's triangle to negative values to absolute zeros of rest for functions in the general space and more so the null polytope- that is conventionally Pi sub minus one in notation but it means that part of an expansion of a simplex that is the Null value (we can extend this to plus or minus 2 or 2pi for the usual reasons.) The effect is to have this concept apply to the orthogons which as powers seem to fill only positive space. Thus the simplex pattern generalized fills space with the simplex patterns which is a logical pattern and the basis of much context for patterns equal or greater than 4 for physics and even that intuited and embellished by the sister to numerology- that is sacred geometry.

Lubos does state in the ever adding to modify errors (as if the idea of a four perturbations I imagine as permutations of which he too sees as an advancement in physics does not evoke the divisions by 24) - I note also that post today by Pitkanen and Leo Vulk address this issue from some viewpoint on knots themselves) where Lubos points out that it amounts to we do not know the mass of the tau quark which is the issue at hand is it not? How can he use a hamburger as an example and not first reduce it to a perfect sphere where some theory would find the right poles in the Majorana phase shifts of information on some? But more importantly, did Euler not sum certain positive series to negative values of 1/3 in a way not understood and thought an error?

If 3/3 is seen as trivial over space (and in relation to Pitkanen with his comments today with hammed I did choose to show the first example and the numerology on the surface of 4 space motions in three space- that and I had the graph paper conveniently just printed out for other things.) It is clear that the symmetries involved in a 4 by 4 hypercube in this more integrated koidechrome space of so many cubes does not matter in which space direction we read the quasic ordering even if we do not have the first pixel (in cyan) at 0000 in which to compare them. More over of a physical constructable of 4 space into 3 space we again triple the possibilities at least or double those to achieve the 24 cell group numbers upon the division of the 1152 group of cells. The physicality of a complete description without the centered or the reference transitive identity local zero coordinate is for this reason that in a higher dimensional system the existence of these definite patterns can be physically tentative over some further approximations to time and probabilities after all.

Now, might this not relate to what some call the UV or IR problem in current theory or UV catastrophes in general? But in no case am I trying to challenge anyone's theories here, just trying to make things a little more clear. It is where we share ideas that intersect that can raise some confusions more than what is unknown and I find our bloggers at work very hard in the beautiful realms of math of physics.

* * * * *