Kochamic Symmetries and I-Thou Numbers

Kochamic Symmetries and I-Thou Numbers

Over the solstice I looked into this idea and wrote a page called Physis or Philosophical Physics and a page called ja> and ty> for these abstract quasipoints. I will post this later today if possible here or maybe just the photo of those pages.

* * * < ja | and | ty >

There exists a product of two real numbers the general informational holographic
interpretation of which can seem a topological distinction (discernible indiscernible's ) thus non-communitive from less generalized notions of numbers - numbers as such are thus quasi-communitive. It follows by the way that there is not a clearly defined line between say a muon that exists and all else in the universe that is not muon, but there can be an evolving change of materialization in the higher physis.

A kocham is an abstract indefinite, integral and yet a multiplicity, finite yet infinite in relavance that as holographical is | ja > as "alpha" and | ty > as "beta" as either priviledged in "alpha x beta" space is a quasic analog to bra and ket of the quantum formulism.

A squared plus B squared is true of irrational as well as rational numbers #'s. I(#) times R(#) or R(#) x I(#) are ambiguously privileged in design.

3 x 3 x (phi x phi) may be structurally imagined as 9 phi-square "regions" or as approximately 25 one-squared regions, which globally do not detour from the Pythagorean theorem necessarily n a given less general interpretation.

Notions more general beyond and independent of scientific physis are vague speculations that the quasi-certainty of physics is tempted to subsume into itself.
Clearly our thought processes to be said to be scientific is ultimately the ability to enter these fantasy worlds and eventually determine what and how something becomes real and concrete among our artificial dreams and material endowments including information.

Consider in flag logic (vexillogic) those few flags with a different obverse and reverse. Moldavia or the former USSR with no symbols on the reverse. A something and an nothingness symbolically. Paraguay as two distinct but similar symbols. Now in the currrent Saudi flag we maintain the religious saying (left to right) on both side but on the reverse the point of the sword below it is aimed toward the hoist.
As far as the saying itself in some translations it asserts God and his "messenger" which in information theory we can know the message or the messenger as authentic but not both at the same time.

The contiguous connectivity of finite orthogonal kochams are intelligible arithmetically. Consider two duplo lego blocks 2 by two and 2 by four counting the case where they are not connected there are 16 ways to do so or 31 top heavy (thus reducing the not connected value by a half.

The established positive Pythagorean theorem by such arithmetic of difference has a sort of cyclic closure for a given hierarchy of dimensions (that is subtraction over the rearrangement of equations.)

At infinte descent in an infinite matter (not finite) can the Pythagorean theorem be said to but only philosophically exist (see Kant on shortest distance between two points philosophic position)?