Muon Sociobiology & Desosynthelation

* * * atiempology, detics
Muon Sociobiology L. Edgar Otto 11-12-10

*
0 - Three dice add up to 18, a 666 not 21 a 777, thus we regard an extension beyond structural limits of our notions of design that by continued order symbols are to be imagined otherworldly as if in right angles to the worldly directed everywhere. Nor can they sum less that three.

*
1 - The size of an individual ant depends on the hive's population.

*
2 - There is always ten percent in caste poverty even with individuals shift into different castes.

*
3 - Ten percent of humans have certain attributes like being left handed.

*
4 - In nature, occasionally, the spiral shells of molluscs exhibit the mirror symmetry of handed growth, one that at the foundation imposes sexual and natural selection.

*
5 - At a greater number of pips the flow of winner a greater than b greater than c greater than a can have a preferred direction. This the minus one or null law of thermodynamics.

*
6 - If the preferred amount of matter over non-matter by the spin of particles, as in muon chirality differences, in this organic analogy, light matter is a tenth of the dark substance. (but the explanation of this I have offered alternatives elsewhere).

*
7 - In a positive space with quasic teleoscoping shifts we can form an order of linear waves or braids, natures preference for energy transmission and structures by helices.

*
8 - On a plane before extending into powers, dimensions, series, the number of curves is an infinity greater than the number of lines (aleph 2). Such curves can match curvo-linearly such powers. Yet the difference in the transcendentals so mapped into a number line is more general and constrained such that the coordinates and limit points do not vanish as a matter of probabilities but have a sociobiological and open hierarchy.

*
9 - There are other curves,values and positions for differentiation at an instantaneous Zeno point of derivative motion.

*
10 - The excess logical space a tenth of the Teleoscoping upon transposing the base note key is the concrete substance left. The inverse of binary powers that as extended space is the principle of the last face of construction of cubes, or counting of the appearance in space of a cube of a hypercube.

*
11 - These can be further subdivided for counting effects and equations, a grid... thous the opaque matter to matter difference (also considering n-1 between the grid lines of surfaces beyond their contiguity.) Not just variance or other continuum motion averaging methods over a relaxed interval in the calculus.

*
12 - Dark matter/energy can be seen as an illusion from some perspective because it is quasi-substance (no DM particles as such necessarily)- thus matter even as quasi-virtual from such vacua can have quasi-substance involved with quasi-application of fixed and changing universal laws. In a sense quasics ground our reality and expericence (consciousness included) in a quasi-theory-of-everything, the Omnium.

* * *

We sometimes gaze into the Gray Box of ideas. I recall the intellectual shock early on of my first theories falling (hey I was only in high school one summer for algebra) that of the theory of Atiempology that became Detics. But in general these are the two forms of seeing the world. In a way I make a new word which combines them (the references in this post should be obvious including original ideas of fellow bloggers) an old word rather- Desosynthelation... a science of detics as in geodetic or geodesic, that is a return to topology in the sense of how it contains the idea of discrete yet continua of higher quasi-dimensions.

In the abstract plane a cubic for example may have two solutions (not counting the imaginary or negative ones as distinct) which more or less convert the linear into circular and vise versa in view of conversion of the continuous into discrete or vise versa.

I begin to understand, a little more deeply, things like the crystal groups and why there are a thousand or so NMR groups- and see the beauty of say series as not just an elementary function, and what I have said I have come to realize some of my ideas have implications that would challenge even the elementary functions- so it is a questioning of my or the worlds view on this

From the discrete view even the partial integration is intelligible but not quite enough so I will look into this some more- but I see the use now of elliptic curves to attempt proofs of Fermat's last theorem but in a simple and very elementary form of which I feel this now even more strongly and so make a picture- or find it may be easy after all to visualize hyperbolic space if we find he right picture.

* * *

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap101110.html

Need I say more? About time Fermi lab took a look at God's cyclotron.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19712-is-this-evidence-that-we-can-see-the-future.html

Was Jung right in his thermodynamic model of the mind, dreaming of the future at least for a few days- what a coincidence in details of one dream I had a year before in Madison then changed the reality (that when the fog horn warned of weather for small craft on lake Mendota and I walked around the corner of the bridge which when it really happened looks so familiar a little girl fishing with a cane pole did not fall into the canal- I stopped then carefully walked around not surprised I saw her then till later- but the intense rest of the dream there is no point in telling now)

Does this not give us pause to look at these teleological models- or at least to realize beyond the debate our scientists cannot really determine the truth of this article decisively in a world with time direction and dark matter mysteries, experiments like this quasi-replicable? Perhaps in the z axis to the disc of our chiral interactive brains the flow and dark flow are super-entangled but delayed and from some perspective there are real and virtual tricks of time.

* * *

DESOSYNTHELATION:

Roughly, a connection of functions (relevant series) which I see as(what I sense is the topological view of Pitkanen from a pure four space formulation) in more of a continuity view of whatever contiguous and consecutive forms of dimension act as if a constraint on the totality of shell like regions of which (my older term flagelation or rim) connects to higher dimensional effects in some natural dimension in that as a hidden background and finite view of an information surface as everywhere. A continuous contiguity and a diffuse transitive quasi-focused field which varies over an indefinite region of topology or finite sub-regions such that we more clearly define ideas of density and those related to it as physics terms; a rim or flagelation that as a foundation are steps higher than the linear such as surfaces with variable group centers not dependent on asserted ideas of dimensions.
Such a conception, here trying to describe it as best I can, fits better with the general idea of particles and their functions than over-restricted standard theory. Akin to the perception or not of velocity, acceleration and other similar ideas of physics we call gravity, dark energy proposed without that as a substantial or virtual field or particle. The key to this is the idea of a screw symmetry of Cartesian axes like in space of only the positive octant such that it makes braids and extends to the z direction crystal groups- and that I can imagine similar things from the more finite quasic space view. The difference as theories of space each a compass wide enough to claim as a theory of everything or unified field theory from a more general view (just as unified fields have to deal with the idea and fact of more types of forces beyond Einstein's program) in itself has an illusion of some sort of expanse of density (thus dark fluid at the beginning) but as relativistic at the orign we observe the information quasi-compactification as if over cosine angles as that essential informational difference of a relaxed sense of what is real in our space given functions, fields, and algebras of coordinate choices as relatively naturally preferred roughly and from a finite view of group arithmetic the doubling in particular of 4 dimensions embedded in the 8, that of the differences between the octonians and quaternions essentially free to occur or calculate or perceive some way the logical differences of arithmetic concerning the operations of multiplication where it is distinct and even ad hoc to addition. The analog and digital differences. Our problem not so much the nature of physics and its notions in itself but of the mathematics incomplete underlying it and perhaps the symbolism if we desire a possible unified view. With the new physics we also find new philosophy, and most likely a new philosophy of science.

But what guarantees that over the Omnium that we can assert a center of things (or other dimensional grounding) especially if such is outside of the great idea of time and the great idea of uncertainty of which this can still be a world view only this century's is that idea on steroids.

* * *

I toyed with the calculator last night and think it worthwhile to explore some of the simple patterns going a little farther in our listings of figurate and other finite numbers. Envision a literal set of cubes for example for analogs or meaningful residues of the Phythagorean theorem which in the quasic sense of space is a quasi-theorem even expressed in a single point or linear term so not a place to reduce a region too on the micro-scale where more than that grounding may hold. But the calculations are rather simple to include in this more difficult of postings. So many of our theorems are in fact quasi-theorems, grey or clear hole or boxes of consideration where some descriptions of reality while intelligible, even in this world, are still open to debate.