Abstract (Quasized) Inertial Frames L. Edgar Otto January 1st & 2nd, 2012
This post also inspired by the Judaeo-Christian dynamic when we interpret and sting together words and numbers into a story or model of existence as our core ideas reinforce each other or clash.
The Creation : As the spoken word rhea in Genesis and word in Hebrews as the Logos
Genesis 1
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Hebrews 11
1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
2 For by it the elders obtained a good report.
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
* * * *
The spirt of Gell-Mann on the quarks in this CERN talk on Lubos page could have made a lot deeper distinction based on that sort of quark grounding theory, that the underlying family of phenemes and phonomes has this three fold grounding- not just the spaces of depth and span. For three sub things describe the overt unity of change shifts in language as if to decide if there are fractional charges- we also should mention Lubos in his next post as to the so called mistakes of Bose etc...
We have to see some unities also that occurs among diverse languages in the same regions such as pronunciations along Western Europe.
* * *
I see that Kea is still deep into the theory and doing quite well- I thought to ask myself if there is but one associahedron per dimension what would this abstract inertia idea posted today mean for it- but we certainly should investigate approaches and restrictions to theories. We begin the new year synchronously on the same concerns of codes and such and it seems to me to be a very good direction for progress in unifying the concepts of physics. In a sense philosophy and science in the view of new results seems to have changed places a bit- perhaps because when the reality gets confusing (as from our experimental evidence, the reality) humans wax metaphysical.
* * *
My last post (disregarding the idea that general space on one level may be more relaxed and connected over various groups and dimensions of space and ambiguous directions of time) suggests to me that Leo Vuyk has a good approach to abstract knots in such abstract spaces. Of course once we ground his vision more concretely upon some background of reality.
* * *
This morning Pitkanen TGD is considering possible objections and perhaps connections within his own theory. I will not look deeply into this today other than noting that my post today could be of some help- perhaps the idea of a hierarchy of Planck values, or see Lubos for that concept of something not to exceed the Planck energy level in his Bose post. Or in general the absurdity that may be the case if we try to force things down into a minimum theory of a dimensionless string. But it is hoped that one of us finds something startlingly and refreshingly original and new. We who seem to be close to the universe to be seen within us.
* * * * *
The New Years Question one reply on facebook:
Ld Kristoffer J Martin 23 and some odd minutes.
Friday at 11:22pm
Now where one day changes to another that is a moving meridian? I did keep watch across the world and on my cell phone world clock- but it remained confusing - and well, I could not reach for a globe. What, no one else dared an answer?
My message on facebook today:
L. Edgar Otto
Let us begin our greatest year in a long while. Let each of us have a say and place in the joint decisions to be made and not impose upon another an unreasonable view to decide for them. We enter a time of an age of individuals again but let us not in the boom have a narrow view of our manufacturing nor think that the technology of our time if superior will remain so for long. Good Innovation and Good Society to you all... And try to build new truth so forget old lies...
*
****
01-03-12
I thought about a lighter project- My Virtual Room of which there would of course be a library... I note on this blog today a resource: Here
Herakleitos, the great philosopher of Logos, dismissed Pythgoras as a mere imitator, and wrote:
ReplyDeleteThey do not understand how it agrees
by disagreeing:
The counterposing tenions
of bow and lyre.
The string of a bow is inelastic, and there you have it:
*No workable string theory short of
confronting the elastic/inelastic contrast
*The physics/mathematics divide from
2 500 years ago!
But another loner amongst us has found the way here:
http://www.science20.com/profile/vladimir_kalitvianski
Orwin,
ReplyDeleteA most interesting theoretician (and in his abilities I see above my head in the use of equations and symbols). The lyre and bow metaphor is a great one! Ah, it applies to his concerns with renormalization.
Thanks for the link. Durn, I may have to change my symbols of r with two dots over it as symbol for the firmament... (= element and filament with two dots...)
All this probably goes back way before the dawn of written history and the alphanumeric age, to coin a phrase. We try like the ancient Chinese to divine things from the charred bark and I Ching logs of the fire or cracks in a tortoise shells...our look for hidden things. Or we do our experiments asking for a sign...(signs that perhaps cancel out (the here and now electronium as Vladimir/s common sense thinking?)waiting for intervention of wisdom from beyond this made by the gods imperfect world. But I speak of modern physics of course.
None of us are alone, just we leave and enter the scene and sometimes bundle in the night as if naked singularities.
The PeSla