Cold Fission (Quasons Go Nova)

Cold Fission (Quasons Go Nova)

L. Edgar Otto    27 June, 2012

The quason as an atom that involves the ideal electron configuration shell structure varies according to the environs as to its heat.  But in general the lesser number of electrons in a shell occupy the outer most shells toward an ideal perspective center as the weight builds up to the maximum and observes on all levels a periodicity of light and shadow atoms.  Where each ideal shell or subshell is the surface of the real space and its mirror this directionality is observed and in a sense is a relation (a principle understood by Leo Vuyk on the neutrino-electron relationship on creative surfaces) that should the atom emit its contents as if a nova by neutrinos alone it analogously is like a star going nova.  This is a breaking (or building) of symmetry on the quason interval of all structural levels.

But even one electron can radiate in respect to this central perspective toward the singularity and in a sense can spin in relation to it, as these can flip, to establish the general magnetic field of an atom.  This is a mirror for a crude level theory I express here by the term cold fission in parallel to the supposed ideas of cold fusion, also a question of going beyond predictability as to the gain of energy differences in the expected as scientific replication by experiments.

The periodicity of the table of elements reflects these mirrors of shell and subshell structures in that as a finite or integral set of sets by the magic numbers so many atoms are eka-(some element of lighter weight) by the same set such that those on one side of such a mirror are radioactive- that is they tend to break down from the potential of their own symmetry.  There are apparent exceptions which can be better explained as the dark periodicity involved.  The ten elements from Actinium are radioactive as well as the six that precedes them (of which so many bear names by the Curies).  For the lanthanide series of 14 elements are radio active in this set manner and furthermore the six beyond 112 while radio active form a different set (perhaps these can be quason like atoms even to some elements unstable as they are ambiguously capable of combinations of identity within each other.  It may follow along these lines of modeling that the element 120 would be radioactive and tend to be in a state of going nova the instant it is said to be born as all such Higgs like particles that elude direct and fundamental observation so as to be clearly a particle (atom).

Let us not forget silver is the center of that curve wherein the power of fission seesaws against the power of fusion.  In the process real and virtual, or concrete and shadow, particles organize around the concept of a central abstract shell as if in the ideal case was a strict division as halving the periodic table.  But of course the issues of modern interest is the nature of isotopes and what the structures are as we explore that in the nucleus of atoms to which even the quasic theory and string theory are overly simple in the geometrical analogy.

* * * * *

Let us recall also that muons can be a catalyst for hot fusion but the chiral idea even metaphysically is not the most foundational model even when in light and dark matter this Weyl like affects the intermittent evolution of galaxies.  It is not just a matter of simple counting or noting some gross variation on structure as in the early crude concepts of string theory and quarks for science should not be a matter of racial or cultural worship and self delusion as to the worth of such groups.  Thus it is more than just shooting a neutron as a solid sphere into a group of them although the mechanism of this higher idea of symmetry is carried by the quason like nucleons themselves with their slight sub variations quite hidden as the standard idea of generations of say some number of quarks.  A nucleon can pass through but the spherical rim of the potential well of a nucleus unless the velocity is adjusted and not touch or interact with others.   In a sense then it is a catalyst itself as well the muon and it as if in a mirror of structure may be said to be an anti-catalyst.

* * * * *