Physicality of Intrinsic Linearity in Superconductive Stereometries

Physicality of Intrinsic Linearity in
Superconductive Stereometries

L. Edgar Otto     10 October, 2013

In the maximal bonding of carbon, linearly, between atoms with 2+2 or 3+1 bonds, we should pose the question:  In what respects can it relate to superconductivity?

This I imagine intimately relates to the issues of artificial magnetism induced in graphene that considers the Bose condensates by virtue of holes in broken congruence field overlapping flat orthogonal structures that depends on the local (quasic) proximity of isotopes in the Bell assumptions of non-locality, thus thermodynamic symmetries.

In the principles of symmetry breaking, or conservation in the widest field of identities at a given dimension,  our models should be compared as to the grounding of matter with these more general principles of stereometry in mind.

In disconnects between with bridges between the generations and fundamental forces, we may have even higher exclusions such as magnetism where the combinations of generational hierarchies inter-relate across the given physical dimensions of standard forces.  But in matters of gravity or monopoles as ultimate these higher force considerations my analogously be ultimate exclusions to which we cannot explain by magnetism the evaporation of black holes even if that the last mechanism left to model.

This so mirrored implies at an entity of singularity or a sea of singularities, that which is superdetermined so looped and measured intelligibly as part of the teleology, dark matter and energy ideas, if substance in theory as well as physicality, as an analogy of the Fermi and Bose distinction at a higher level, are reasonably explained.

If this is not close or the Omnium as a theory of everything in the spirit of partial models half seen or half-hearted in our quest... what more can it be?

* * * * *

For a future project-
art adapted from recent Hubble data on Pluto... note a small circle at the top of a larger circle is one of the symbols for this planetary object. Generational spinning taken literally with 8 logical possibilities.

* * *

New terminology to consider in the hierarchy of Philosophic Continua  (Omnia):

Leo V.  This one I mentioned for your view...

L. Edgar Otto on fb status  Oct.10 :

I found a scrabble tile on the sidewalk today with the letter 'S' on it. I can turn it up and down or lazy horizontal... but I can turn it over as it has two sides. But if we were not sure it was mirrored on the other side which way would it be turned? Can all the abstract physics be this simple for those of us who for some reason (geeks, seekers?) think about such basic things? I mean, one or two sides the same thing or some group in between? What are the chances of tossing one like a die. What is quantum mechanics but that episode of the Twilight Zone where a guy buys a newspaper tosses in a coin that stands on edge all day and he can hear thoughts in other minds?

* * * *
Leo, am I wrong to reach so far into simplicity as well as a distant wider vision... it seems at the foundations we do dance between the simple geometry and the simple arithmetic of things.  We share in your model that in between sate I call quasi-finite and you imagine the raspberry principles of unity and multiplicity of universe?

In the quasic physics integers (not just from an intuitionist's view as they are in a sense classes) have elemental matrices of separated singularities... the issue (Leo see the scientific american with the conference in Vienna and the idea of superdeterminism deeper than quantum theory recently)  interview with 't Hooft sees the issues and the problem... except the quasic principle, a quasi discreteness as if a dimensionless possibility of scaleless superposition is suggested as a priori thus ideas of inflation for example are optional.   In the last illustration here we an also draw the four group down... it revolves around the observation that 24 25 26 27 28 where a square  is close to a cube... 26 in between... that is the level where the Pythagorean theorem is flatland.  Imagine  we can walk on the surface of the earth to reach the surface of the moon or any other sphere to which we may do so in the atomic world as if fluid layers and what we mirror or count in them.  Then ask is there or is there not ultimately something in between?  The extra count of singularities is like what is missing the the momentum of particle decay products... in the positive sense these are ghostly inferred neutrinos for example.

***

The great beauty in math for me, the fun stuff beyond the calculus that gets us back to the fertile soil of physical reality, was the grueling hopefully without errors thru long pages of eye straining hours with the faith to find connections then find one. It is most gratifying to do something someone said could not be done like solve the queens problem with no queen in a corner and it turns out to be overlooked before then. I am not much of a fan of doing puzzles of the kind that just passes time save that one piece can determine the whole or the last piece with a hole in the context can sometimes determine the piece- especially if the shapes are the same and we supply the needed difference. The Platonic solids were my great inspiration for my interest in math. Caught between teachers who did not agree with each other was instructive , for it turns out that Nature is a little dyslexic herself, not just how we turn and see the matrices around. In a sense the mathematical world and the physical world are both separate and one as a matter of taste- most controversies today are a misuse and dependence on the span and depth of statistics only when some things are facts to be discovered. Sooner or later despite proofs the most abstract of math finds it applications. While we are only limited by our imaginations anything we can imagine we can invent or discover, make and do in the physical world. It takes time too, the poet in me longs for more that I can seek the more, but the philosopher in me asks if there is more beyond our imaginations. Between the paper and the pen now falls the dark energy shadows to end a paper or presentation as today's epilogue as authors do in their last chapters so to inspire new students- and yes, lend them a hand. Not all things have to vanish into the cloud.   L. Edgar Otto  responding to link on math