Developmental Spectra

Here is a comment I posted (subject to moderation) on the blog I follow The Reference Frame which I hold in high regard and seems to relate to the subject I was thinking about today. I would urge any would be scientists to read this article carefully. It is odd to me that in my manuscript this morning I found stating the obvious excruciating to present even as a clear publication (if we can call a blog that) but clearly as with this article it is equally frustrating that some obvious things fade and are not understood perhaps in a poetic sense. It remains to be seen if this is a good development.


Nice clear article (I wish I could be as clear).

I am not sure I agree with the conclusion because I feel things have to be a little deeper than the current paradigm of irreversibility in some sense the entropy as time or any other disordering.

But I certainly understand your frustrations with those who with some position do not really understand the significance of the principles they are expert in using. Perhaps the decoherence on some deep level of consciousness does border on incoherence in some sort of flux.

I think the next thing to fall in your sense and maybe for the better is the idea of space as a form of dimensional measure. Of course it is still much a question of our unifying what is finite or not in both directions of groups and their reducibility. In short physics, including string theory, has not caught up to the underlying mathematics.

* * *

The Developmental Spectrum and the Implications for Science and Philosophy of Quasic Theory L. Otto 02-04-10

On some level, reasonably and logically, it seems uncertain if a design context drives implications or these drive the design. What then may we say for explanations and causation in physical or mental states of relaxed intelligibility?

Certainly, our diagnostic tool, numbers and language, are close to the foundation of symbol systems and physicality. This we intuitively sense, evaluate, debate and apply. Science then among its methods and politics can default to its role in general as developmental learning and other problems of communication.

The last posted article on the quasic notation, the structural information it may suggest in a way of null space or less in design development, if something is gained concretely from apparent randomness or flux, certainly seems an explanation for mental and embryo development.

One case in point which I heard discussed this morning on Public radio concerned the retraction of a paper that linked autism to children's shots (and speculated on other possible causes such as arsenic or insecticide- or the same old nature or nurture issues as to environment or heredity) The paper apparently did not have a wide sample nor a control for some statistical population research so after the storm of controversy it was declared bad science. Yet, we still do not know the causation or design context of this disease or diseases. It is hard to prove a negative- was stated as the usual dogma of the current logical and scientific paradigm. But for such things as perhaps existing, metaphysical at least, do we not clearly see that it is logically hard to disprove a negative also (Godel?)?

While guesses and measure as such is a powerful tool it can be a bottleneck for deeper research. As the child may be too sensitive in the spectrum of autism in some relation to immune disorder or expression- and usually more creative so withdrawn some suggest if not stimulated to develop- what drives the differentiation which can be described beyond the linear matrices as the geometrical models of change of space? Can the purely scientific method of chance and sampling- an appeal to what sort of work can be gained in some context of entropy or developing order for that matter- is inadequate to make the diagnosis and its cause, even inadequate to logically show there is no diagnosis to be had.

Is it that we are too clean, one caller suggests? Paul gives us a lesson where apparently God had supplied unclean meat- in the new testament then some look for justification for eating pork. But the message is that we are not to treat the gentile as being unclean. Diversity in sharing scientific knowledge is good but tolerance of each other as if the overall design is we are worthy as God's children or perhaps equally so-so a more intelligible model of the laws of nature and mind.

The idea in the accompanying drawing above - the rigid cuboctahedron as if the wall of a plant cell- and the micro degrees of freedom of a mammal cell at that point where if divided into thirty two there can be that many and not one (dying)individual (and I do not exactly mean see the 5 power here as a fate dimension) that the quasic model at least shows the immediate renewed path of possible embryo development- so too the notation for styles of mind. In that picture I include the glia and other nerve cell models as one brain group of them seems to monitor the other as if the baleen to polarize light quantumly or the classical field idea of forces whose dimensions are a mass defect in whole numbers of various groups I use the metaphor of the two types of whales. Indeed, we know their relation to us has changed and that dolphins for example seem to have positive effects on autistic kids swimming with them. But can I poetically suggest that they are our glia and we the busy physical nervous activity of the concrete world? What does this say for our vague coherence of mind and belief in otherworldly entities?