Quasic Coordinates as Alternative Definition of Forces

Quasic Coordinates as Alternative Definition of Forces

L. Edgar Otto Words and numbers are living things their subtle breath in cycles the decimal floats and shifts, Mayan zero great arcana or origin for ice sickles... I guess I am done with the hoarfrost and rime ice in the poems, need new theme...
At the creative frontier where we touch the depths of the universe we sometimes find what seems concrete one day shifts and does not make sense the next. Words and numbers have these sorts of coordinates if we are aware of a greater continuum and its reality.

There is an alternative explanation for what we abstractly in physics regard as forces. Not only can be interpret the intrinsic curvature of space as a view that explains acceleration equivalence to gravity in a non-Euclidean manner, as far as the deeper ground of the subconscious in analog as logical we have the structures that flange or project down to some physical space and have dimensional mass defects as so relativistically above so quantumly below our awareness.

Language at the frontier of such creative depth in this sense is the same as what happens to numbers and how we view them or assign them to certain pictures or models.

The coordinates of say a 5-cell simplex (four space analog to the three space tetrahedron) are 0001 0010 0100 1000 and phi phi phi phy (tau or golden ratio). But it is not clear for these xyzw axes which one is the center so we can think of any one of them as the center. 256/81 in a sense some think of in the earlier days of mathematics as the value of pi. This sort of manipulation of the coordinates can be seen as a wider space of possibilities and the focusing down as a source of force with some of the dimensions of a different nature expressed outward. This is in effect an Euclidean space as if we can form the density of things in the normal way of momentum, moments of inertia and so on of normal space.

If phi or tau or some power of it is involved in the ratios- or for that matter the Lucas numbers and the like applied to a graphic design, we seem to be dealing with say triangles with no area, perhaps vectors as only a zero vector- but how many if we can convert them to some other triangle with zero area so to compare them?

My roommate is flirting with sacred geometry- in the traditional sense of the subject checking it on line I find it not a very scientific discussion if we want to get down to the nuts and bolts of these alternative geometries and its suggested existence via intuition or logic. Why do we deceive ourselves and others?