Calyptic Mediator Particles

Calyptic Mediator Particles

Clearly if the gin is a mediator for the LHC's, and why not as the twistor determines the gravity that the twisting itself can determine the field (so organize say this calyptic difference in protein structure and the DNA code). Now, the mirror principle symmetry involves suggest that in such connections and their freedom of articulation at the foundations only half of the connections are possible (as three colors are not on the 20 cube mediator).

SOMA Axioms:

* Two colors either contiguously merge and attract or are non-connected, loosely

* Two opposite colors repel or don not connect loosely.

* The gin cubes act as mediators to orient the LCH class of cubes structurally globally and conversely.

* * *

Principles like these soma axioms are needed on a foundational level (perhaps general and deeper than ideas of proof and logical axiomatic design) to allow for the freedom and its compass of such interactions as well as the existential "motions" pointloop-like, to be deterministic.

* * *

Foundationalism justified as the Semitic invariance in linguistic symbols cvcvc, in general I use the c for the LHC class and v for the gin class (two dots over the letters)

* * *

It is the simplicity more than the complexity of my language I try here to apologize for.

This blog has not aimed for a large following or readership, nor has it established intimate dialog - in a sense those readers are human (not to mention I am a modest man who may let all this fall aside as the property of the world) characters whose work may be more careful, formal, and greater than themselves. So I still work in the loneliness of creativity and my peers in judgment is that higher character of our shared general wisdom as in all such peer evaluation aiming for a reasonable measure of balance for the measure of the realty of concepts and applied ideas.

But at the foundation the first ideas are of necessity at a vague distance with consequences. We have no guarantee of their value and these may be so simple as to discourage investigation. For the foundational enquiries I make no apologies and defend those who glean what they can from such enquiry cling to the gains on whatever level they may have reached in understanding such concepts. This is not to say that the intuitive simplicity without detail may be less than the complex developed truth as but vague potential alone, freedom as randomness can be a bottleneck which itself is evidence of this foundational principle of our x-ray mind's enquiring.

As Lubos said - an interesting depth of deeper enquiry than string theory would be interesting but unlikely. But what are the limits of empirical evidence even if it not found for evidence of supersymmetry?
* * *
Inflation cosmology applied as any theory in a unified system of such depths of simple principle of physis may not be the prime theory of the structure of the universe yet these grand and great ideas and my commentary here still speculate on the foundations more than on the subject of science in itself. (Clearly the new scientist com article of yesterday got around to the holes as a variation on a more centered inflation theory- and the background radiation as gamma from "dark matter" a hint at some creative process that for me involves the brane colliding scenario as well if not something more fundamental in the creation as well as laws of matter.) But inflation is roughly the transcontinuum in my old scheme of things in 68 to which this article suggest the greater concept I called ultranscontinuum. Yet it is the quasicontinuum that such structures are buildt up Penrose style but in a way I think the quasic idea are not something out of sync with the relativistic cosmology ideas of the continuous groups but those are the surprise to what is primary.
* * *
In some ways these ground up structuring of things (rather Penrose like really) suggest the idea of chirality and parity can be seen as the same mechanism from some viewpoint.
* * *
But this is all I can say for now, I leave the development of the n-nominoes with this sort of theory for now and for others interested. But I had to get the principle down which has come a long way since my observation that the Aegyptians had toy carts long before they had their use in techonolgy- and so I looked around and decided the study of such some cubes and n-nominos may be such for our times.