Still in the later stages of recovery from flem and flu. Two parts of fitful sleep last night, one if I had the energy a more formal look into a sort of general algebra with the shadow symbols (the one in the illustration is only suggestive and basic) if I had the energy. The other old angers directed at those so full of right and left wing crapola in how they dealt we me and others in the pursuit of a job if not some idea of a career- It makes some sense, use the old to clear up the meltdown because they would die of old age before they would cancer... But such rants that really show up the true nature of power and enquiry, the old hierarchy of get mine first- hell, who needs a new education building with federal funds at the local university for the job they have done, and in general for the second tier of requirements for admission. That we make laws to limit the overdraft fees of debit cards the banks have to raise the cost of ATMs to make up for their God given right to profit? Well, it was my fault for assuming the world makes sense and that in general people have good hearts. (But a blog rant was not my intention, so I went back to bed, slept in, and decided not to call certain people to raise hell at our tech school and university.) Part of this is spending so much time on the design of moulds and processes with no access to say program the pieces. Part was the condescending attitude of an economics major talking with a professor outside the coffee shop and his buttons for the defending of bargaining rights when he asked me if I had a place to live. "We certainly will need someone in economics who knows what they are doing." I said as he said goodbye.
Anyway, some of the blogs statements are inspiring to me (if only I had more time or could have started out sooner, it is too late to be ruthless had I known what an effect on my life these bureaucrats had at the time- but what does it matter? Just, if your cause is just young people- be ruthless when it comes to the hard truths of health and science. But know if your stance is morally right. Above all else defend others, and of them, the children most. What sort of administrator to a tech school would say I was not ready to go and it was unlikely since I did not have a cell phone (and he did not know how to find the area of a circle!) It would have made a difference in the simple access to the machinery for the candle making before I lost so much- a routine thing of the auctioneers, the middle class has to assume that they are enlightened when they act as overseers or policemen to the poor. Alas, one reason I have written so much is the dread that when the music stops for the worthwhile of my ideas the bill comes due- and perhaps I must go back to those few who have harmed me and my children and awaken them to the life they imposed on others.
* * *
That ranted, the theme in the shadows today is the hint of most excellent ideas by our bloggers. I am impressed with some of the essential insights and at least to me they are the first, most likely, to realize them, despite the propaganda of those who think controlling the truth is the fact of truth in a science that should be honest and objective. Not all of us can they make mad before our downfall.
* * *
Well, you all can figure it out- no one comments on this documentation much anyway, and it is not as concise as Kea's wonderful post today. I may come back to it here or elsewhere. I see so many connections between you all. A little of one insight from one of you to another would speed things up a bit.
But once we have things like her particles connected to dimensions and the diamonds and hierarchy globally understood in its quasi-finite landscape- and while there is still magic in the world view refreshed-
I note that science has always been a core, or part of me that is a fort against the capriciousness of fellow man and nature- And that the core holds still, and that in it I find deep gratification simply standing by the bike trail and river aware at last that the universe does not fall apart but we can know why it holds together.
Each of us can feel to some degree such a core and world view- but as to how much is ultimately faith and how much the need to know some essential truth would then be the freedom of science as an open question. We can clothe ourselves in such wide and coherent theories- but our singular hearts even between birth and death can stand naked after all- save perhaps to the worthwhile interpretations of our dreams.
* * *
I did have some interesting times of contemplation- what if we made the factory, not so much by the standard architecture (although the headquarters based on phi designs and many educational arrangements of mirrors would conform to standards)- that the content and arrangement of the building would be the equivalent to the candle making processes- in effect a working sculpture of them. Panels that for example could be interchanged so as to make working mould designs (the u in mould in the USA and Canada, the u has the sense of moulding some object- or in the flow of the heating systems the ability to tap this in all the variations of a final product. Not so much a manufacturing but a place where on can do a casual experiment for some creative design or prototype.
* * * Interruption due to friend accused falsely.
* * * Perhaps it was thinking about moulding 8 pt stars again that made me think of some of these general algebra and math things. What do you do when algebra texts say there is no solution to the square root of minus 16 and some do. Obviously the whole circle of such complex numbers are complex numbers- but we can sort out nodes of them a the real from some context- the all important 8 which leads ultimately to ideas of the 240 and so on (or apparently higher considerations of the 256.) What I think this amounts to is in the ordinal numbers some have no beginning but an end and some begin and never end- and so on... but in a deeper sense such considerations of groups and dimensions do indeed have what may be considered as a sort of prime in that space of confusion of what is the finite and the infinite of groups. These of course act as if their primacy is too obvious to see as a direct effect. In a sense it asks the question of what is classically real in the quantum situation.
I know these considerations are very basic. But some abstract entity like the hypercube with a hierachy of such numbers can be seen as not necessarily persisting- that is, even our more solid seeming particles are limited someway as to their intrinsic stability depending on their apparent parts in some form of chance or shadow relations that after all is expressed in the phenomenal world as a sort of turbulance and yet across the extension in relation to such groups and dimensions the stability is intelligible and limited by hidden laws of physics globally. The problem as purel algebraic then asks of the sea of possible values and dimensions what globally or of so many integral (real) parts are these prime structral components as if treating the algebra as some sort of equivalent to fix point ideas. But if some of the particles were not in a sense tenative how would their specific decay be possible and more or less predictible? Why do real over virtual particles on the whole, quantumly, exist rather than equally exist and not exist? This is a deeper question than the nature of chirality, time, or shadow and antimatter ideas.
Clearly, the proximity of entities like planets even if we have no explicit description of the underlying math in our standard terms, has an effect on the gravitation of the system and the possible states of energy. Clearly when finding evidence of such influences we may decide anomalies exist- but these can after all be speaking of a more complete physics of it all. To say the dark force is waning for example may just be a relative thing on this level. To say such fundamental constants as indeed the grounding everywhere, in boosts or deeper structural boosts, may not tell us anything more than a matter of taste of our methods of interpretation, in particular no issue of such variation can have direct experimental evidence to undermine the lesser but incomplete view of things.
If in the idea of null for well formed logic of some form of arithmetic it can act as if we fundamentally prove certain thing for we are proving that intrinsically a non existence- then in a sense we can continue beyond the conventional -1 notation for a filled vaccum to some surreal mathematics of the infinite and infitesimal, a symbol I intuited as 00... but what stops this if it has hidden binary structure? Indeed, it is not we can introduce, confusingly without the careful statement of limits, such an inductive symbol as "(Potential)Infinity". We can just as well conceive of a double infinity sign. This state of notation is very much like the early days of establishing notations when the meaning of imaginary numbers were first considered. The first thing this suggests is that our ideas of the fundamental theorem of algebra is not sufficiently described by inclusion of the complex roots of unity and so on. Yet the power of complex numbers, in terms of imagined mirrors can solve unknowns not obvious to measurable vectors in the real. It is clear to that no changes in the description of coordinate systems, say the conventions in a sense of a fixed space to translate angles, are sufficient either to describe the physical dimensions of the systems.
Nature, like in the virtual world of video games, has a certain ability to reset the initial conditions to which our consideration of what ends or begins, or relates to some idea of null, is a persistent but lesser law of the dynamics of the cosmos. In this sense we may consider such things much as we do time and complex numbers as from outside the logic of the system in question and in a sense subjective.
We should understand the nature of dimensions better and why they can have certain natural restrictions of the laws of structure before we limit our structures to a certain averaged or false idea of correspondence with certain dimensions. Clearly one of the most powerful ideas in all this is to treat numbers and topological systems as matters of information- specifically the varieties of binary information.
To this end I have noticed so many who are not clearly on the frontier of such ideas evloving to the very things in one instance or the other foreseen by others.
But until we have shored up some progress in this sort of enquiry, the further questions and concerns will seems far fetched to contemplate beyond our innate intellectual and artistic couriosity. The sense of disconnect in our culture and technology goes a lot deeper than our obvious new awareness of the problem.
I do not need to point out who among you are on the right tract in all this. I suspect that will become known in retrospect, and for the masses some of you right here in this backwater of the replete and confusing cybersphere of information and meaning will become the new household words.
* * *
No comments:
Post a Comment