L. Edgar Otto 18 October, 2012
I am not sure I can
be a good engineer, that seems to skip every other generation as if a balance
of the poetry and mechanical ability to creatively or intuitively tinker. But it is just as likely that theory precedes
the applications once theory is established as suggestions arise from
discoveries and verifications in experiments.
I reach to some
rather intuitive but questionable concepts I considered, perhaps in dealing with
the ideas unsupervised that results in questionable methods and interpretations
as misinformation. Yet something may be
gained from these unresolved childhood dreams as well the maturity over a
lifetime that awakens a clear understanding of key ideas and dreams such as the
simple square grids that I almost saw as if to delineate the primes in early
adulthood after massive hours of rediscovery of the first few centuries of
number theory and the computation of all connected discs of eight groves (sold
as bloopers) as trees visualized in my mind to the point it seemed to fill up
all my mind leaving a protest of the viewpoint of consciousness calculations
kept at a distance until significantly the looping seem to precipitate out and
the mind quiet again as if crystals of snow blanketing a solid ground.
So I offer this
speculation, hopefully those with better training can see through what
principles of physics may be violated in the imaginative sense of some law that
grounds a science fiction. Take this
then as a looking back at those moments of enquiry taken from normal day to day
life and recalled with interest of how some ideas develop as we live and if
these are written down or recalled, our exploration of creativity and our
shared, improbable it seems that we survived the chain of generations with
miraculous mechanisms of mind and body as if each of us millions won some great
precious lottery.
It seems to me today
that useful technology can be developed quite besides the complete knowing of
unresolved issues in the quantum theory such as the role of factoring or the
foundations and mechanism of enduring coherence. To a great extent the issues of
superimposition unresolved also is a technical matter quite besides the need
for further theory in order to develop some instruments.
I can image with
laser theory of the transmission of energy in the several ways, the helix ubiquitous, and the sphere and disk quite as important as the branches, explosions and waves, at the foundations anyway. In this case the differences in color serve
to define some things holographically so as to distinguish and compute such
that in the pattern and structure of microwaves in the medium and the
amplification something like a CD could do all or the bulk of computing alone
with machines to so read them. And in
this virtual stereonometry it is not necessarily so we need to develop things
too far down in scale to observe the logic of it or the utility of such devices.
There are then
analogs to what I have called the Otto-Conway matrix of the 36 space
permutations of six colors so imagine an eight fold arrangement like a Sudoku
grid of the intelligible 81 four space subcells. The fifth dimension and ideas of the five
fold may involve 11, but of this I do not presume it follows mere odd numbers
as we encounter wider numbers and dimensions- here theory would benefit from
what certainty there is in proof in our partial understandings.
Certainly this
involves superposition of one of 16 things or the resultant calculation of 60
things and so on... it also has to deal with asymmetry as worked out at least
in the quantum theory.
But space needs not
be (while it is in a sense solid) a passive stage for physical laws. Nor those
illusions as in the difference of perception events that appear to exceed the
light velocity in context needs not be passive either.
Of course on the
familiar scale we may encounter what seems certain of some physical law as a
limitation to the technology as well imagine things quite improbable and
fanciful of new laws- how then does nature distinguish the difference? The universe of physical laws are grounded at
least in the quasicity of space as the frame or firmament for actions within
it.
Gyroscopes were
interesting to me in their physics and naively I tried to orient them so as to
cancel out right angles implied if these were limited by the four-space around
the apparatus. Eventually the experiment
would not resolve but I understood clearly the role of the law of conservation
of momentum.
I tried, with more
success than those around me to make minimum quantization antennas from the
base ball curves and so I thought of these today as a sort of continuous
description of the spin as so defined in quantum theory to which in finite or
node structures these could be embedded in them that might do some fundamental things (no I doubt it
would be anti-gravity or even neutralize it save perhaps by a very small range
of balances against that equilibrium, nor of time things any such balance
overt and obvious- but the geometry involved may act quasifintitely together.
The result would be a device that can in a sense , perhaps inductively, be a quasic antenna and
transmitter as well its innate ability to be a detector and amplifier. This should be true of explicitly material
objects too.
How else do we
explain, if beyond or to the limit of our understanding of magnetism as all
left to perhaps supply a theory, the black hole objects transfer momentum? How in the general scheme thermodynamics is
involved as in the measure also of that science arising on the surface ratios.?
Now the idea of a
part of space in the small scale as composed of ever more vibrations is a
viable one but only part of the picture, so too the idea of a zero flatness as
absolute one part of the unified representation. If in a real situation, such as the
perpendicularity of fields presumed within the center of black holes do we not
in a sense reach this limit and reflect outward again in jets? Do we not find these as rays or
bidirectional? At this place what of the
topology and change of handedness and where and when? What of field reversals
in the suns and planets? In this respect
do we not need a further unified knot theory?
For that matter it is
not clear to me why the earth spins let alone that the universe may do so or
certainly any such creative dark hole objects?
Something more foundations needs to be considered when all other
variables are so explained. A field
cannot just be assumed to vibrate and that the cause of such motions yet
motions in a wide quasic space as well as their relative rest can be so
presumed as if a final quasifinite idea of what inertia is after all.
Such a spin complex
that may also be a transmitter or a mechanism on the small scale that can tame
some of our ides of quantum computation in our manufactured artificial devices-
moreover one not limited in property rights as it has been reported such is the
case with three dimensional printing, but these as with electrical parts are
after all designed to those sorts of technical laws to specification so are in
a sense a finite or at least a wave packet treatment of design.
Are there flat or
disc lasers? What is this difference
where the bulge of a galaxy related to the size of its black hole and yet we
have a disc involved- these not necessarily in sync or location it seems? But in these dimensions where finite, the
nodes in consideration of orbits for example, see Kepler, the compass code of
four bases as I used to locate along a loop the codons, these rings may act
independently or so be arranged to work together implying a more controlled
spin field in the totality than simply one spinning quantum object. To understand this we do need to understand
better the idea of dimensions... in some ways this Condenser rather than
compactification physics can be quite besides, technically the simple idea of
plasma free yet a condensed physics as would be a unification of all such
statistics so distinguished.
* * * * * * *
NOTE: I was not sure the frontier of my speculations were of the best scientific quality so I did consider delaying the post, wondering if anyone really read this meant only for archiving as a record- and yet it seems there was not much to lose or gain in the call for open dialog. I did have a more recent dream to decipher if it is significant but it relates to the issues of the moment so perhaps I will ponder that, a dream very much like the vague intuitions of the early days I talk about here. A subtle difference really in a fixed and moving picture that evolves over a brane or screen, the reality in this difference that like the spin quantum idea, and as in the illustration is there a physics that build the roof we can construct that allows the wire or transmissions from one place to another? On the other hand this may be an awaken to a vast new but what we ordinarily share as scientist I have to explore and learn- if only we had the time, if only our pictures breathed between the fixed emptiness and the always new lost in the colors of the animation. L. Edgar Otto Eau Claire Library...
No comments:
Post a Comment