Camera Obscura
L. Edgar Otto 21 March, 2013
Learning, the
neoteric as what is actuality as unique but a nonnecessary pattern for
establishing choices of systems and local detection for perceptive recognition,
allows variation and adaptation of a sentient and at least in the initial
opening that gives to the black box of the walls of our wisdom and reality the
awakening and experience of light, establishes a history more than
computational logic without a more unified system of possible depths as if in
its appearance or quasi-reality as intelligence the history so extended and
established over some intelligible span is the poetic metaphor tissue of the
subtle variations in our symbols and the idioms of our language.
In more recent terms,
sentience is both a discrete or digital process as well as analog in the
focusing of light- logic itself as necessity may describe a unified system and
function while not necessarily being self aware or as if the hole that allows
the incoming or escaping light of the universe as a structured singularity over
time, a sense of the now and locality in the sea of general singularity in
wider superfractal, holographic, and quasic space that reflects the patterns of
numbers and iterations, mirrors and illusions in the shadows so described at
such foundations the question of sentience may vanish as to what over
mechanical substance is distinguishable as such.
The nature of proof
or evidence for certain higher speculations for our existence will have to be
even more complex or transcend our reasoning as can these things thought about
and hinted at in our imagination. For now this is outside the scope of the
discussion, or forever out of the reach of such limitations as science- in the
details at least. At this point the concept of faith, as in mathematics, has
its place in the front and horizon of theory an ultimate or ideal metaphor of
nonnecessity. But from a more concrete
view the lifetime of a sentient soul or spirit, being, is to the mollusk body
of our higher paths and being as our present living and knowing as if the
universe as learning like a renewing or decaying skeleton on which its pathways
stand.
For in unique
patterns opened or closed what is concrete in the dust can seem all important
or lost in its success of replication and hegemony of an ensemble of living
things that what is a unique thinking being can be itself a pattern of such
nonnecessary uniqueness of its depth of subparts or its highest copy of itself
as a unified and quasi-isolated entity.
The light or picture that comes from some higher source or empty
process, as with a conscious being, is more complicated than what it appears in
the dioramas and illusions of depth on the screen. The self determining characters in a pay are
as important as the special effects and magic of what we expect or explore of
light and animation.
Our isolation and
necessary self focus is not the most significant scandal to philosophic systems
for in the separation of our ideas of chance and fate, from the concrete view
of natural or scientific stances the anomalities or exceptions to the plots or
trends of data can contain false or true points of the necessary in
nonnecessity is the scandal that compliments such learning into the unknowns
with inelegant and nearly convincing proofs by evolving recursions for such
anomalies as with paradox or some forms of the idea of singularities may be
resolved.
This, if the world
does not harbor contradictions as absolute and without meaning somewhere at the
foundations, speaks for a quasi-faith and perhaps a higher form of uniqueness as
if all is the aperture at some part inside or outside the black box and its
radiation- its natural form of the irrational nth roots beginning in its
evaporation's as that of the square root of two where mathematics and physics
for example match descriptions of the world.
The structured sea of
singularities, sometimes described in terms of the deeper insights
of Euclid as the relations of points and parts, of lines and parallels, of
infinitesimal divisions of them as linear or branching Cantor dust, hidden angles
and ratios, quadratic and cubic forms...is also the such a sea of apertures of
which all we record now over time and call inflation or the big bang is but
such an aperture caught between the within and beyond in a world with
quasifinite nonnecessity of that distinction save in the concrete local cases
we observe.
* * * * *
*We could define
gravity (as if in linear rather than nonlinear terms) as if it exists only in
an ensemble of superfractal nodes... sort of (exxene and regulus) or the
perception and sensing of falling force trans-Euclidean and trans-Relativity
that leaves the standard forces picture infinitesimally touching yet out of reach
at the less than surreal calculus view of how particles behave in influence
from levels of acceleration or differentiation from the intelligibly balanced
macro down to the mirco world over at least conceptual depths and spans. There
is a higher form of relativity, and a higher form of such quantum principles as
if a multiplicity or super positioning of such general singularities.
*Two points, and as
if conceptual mirror two parts that hath such points or unto an interval of
parts which hath no points, or particles may intersect in ways that dynamically
are seen in such logical paths while other such pathways and superposition's are
not. This metaglossa as language is
the global reduction of potential systems and nonnecessary facticity in not yet
determined anomalies states. These are
questions from the macro view down as to what is the minimum size of compressed
universe (Hawking) and how within such celestial sphere horizons we may find
the influenced of a singularity as if end or creative point, the aperture eye
or closed window of a black hole.
*The distinction
between polar forms in the development of the usual description of Cartesian
line or circle definitions of the standard Euclidean plane allows the shorter
paths to be available over such a Western perspective as checkered orthogonal
grids... light in an obscura camera drawing seeming to come from another point
in the horizon of the perspective (and in the wider quasic case from any ideal
point at the infinity of an absolute or structured singularity). Clearly in this relationship as a unity of
physics and the various plane or brane representational geometries the standard
forces do integrate to the mathematics of the geometry of space with that of
what ongoing gravity. Across parallel lines the transverse angles are not
necessarily complimentary.
It may not need the
idea directly of some mediator particle as with the gluon, these in a sense
linear rather than of a higher and higher than pink noise logarithmic
description in the convergences or divergences built into such equations. For what do we mean in relative measure that
to take the shorter curved path requires more energy- what indeed the path of
falling faster by geometry alone, the chain curve for example?
*In the quasic sense
of energetic confluence spaces of fractal and superfractal pathways, in
principle subjective and physical states of potential energy, in this abstract
system of nodes can be other such dimensionless projective paths of the same
unified holofractal of analogous patterns in the same system of general
dimensions overall congruent over similar division measurements or angle scales...in
this sense what points not described in say a 2D z-quasic code do not exist in
the 3D case so in a sense does not exist in the 2D case. In the cross eyed view the simple 2D
perspective does not, in repetition of the same orientation of objects in an
array, give us the illusion of different columns as if standing out in space.
We can think of these higher physical path and biological pathway nodes in the
sense of what we mean by time like dimensions.
*Clearly such
concepts as to the nature of singularity gives some intelligibility to the idea
of a single Higgs like particle as the origin idea of the so called big bang
and for what would naturally creatively follow (as in Kakus careful comment
mentioned in Gibbs blog yesterday). But
that while applying the intuitionist sensitivities of Weyl to something useful
in concept that may apply to physics of reality, is a suggestion and not
clearly in whole or part a theory of everything where wholes and parts are more
nonnecessary and quasifinite in concept.
*In the search for a
better world thru open communication and inquiry, in the actual experiments of
combining computer systems, as if a search for "artificial
intelligence" the superfractal model if interpreted right can hint that at
least some of what is real in such theory and experiments does begin with the
algebra, geometry, arithmetic of these patterns of numbers - but no evidently
in isolation from a wider theory of our evolving and learning universe.
The crude question or
idea of a mix of such human and machine patterns with all the problems each
may fundamentally have if built to resemble or even recognize such patterns in
the general nonnecessary necessity paradox like with the general unique or
multiple superpositions of particle or point-like singularities will not
establish if these are identical or something that transcends them both in the
evolving pattern of things under the Omnium.
Nor can the logic of
it be unique yet total in its span and aspects as if to program short of echoes
and firmament of the onion models suggest printing or merely quantum technology
for computation upon one object such as an electron without at least a wider
theory- we may not in principle clearly say we can learn anything about if
there are other parallel multiverses say by the earths or and electrons wobble
or its wider sense of shifts as we observe in the finer scales the unique yet
random variations thru the grand appature of the WMAP- nor perhaps establish
that as unique as we imagine and experience it.
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment