The Mystique of Multi-Dimensions

The Mystique of Multi-Dimensions

I hate to leave, with new readers, on a negative note. Thanks for the e-mails. I came back to the coffee shop rather bored checked with housing on a list, got to offers to move in awhile if waiting.

So, went to library to look up what is out there in parts made of various materials and tried so simplify what it was I needed on some level do deal with them. In the process I found rigid strips better to make the moulds that would make moulds as if to take from some existing form the needed accuracy.

I looked in shop windows, noted the Christian science shop with the outlined passages in the Key to Health and the Bible. This on my mind lately for it is an issue of struggle in that faith for one of my children. That and reading the link from the theoretician in Australia that emailed it to me, his name rings a bell somewhere in my encounters on the internet. He uses the world abstract maybe in an opposite way I have used it.

One idea of his is that, as if what he is talking about is to be seen concrete, a sort of action- reaction, is that things emit and receive radiation in a balance which is not abstract ideas of the conventional physics. (see my old poem, a congregation is chaos is a dissolution in cosmos- and all the logical variations of that boldly suggesting that might be seen as suggesting but one universe- hey, I was not that happy with the ending.)

But this reminds me of how Alicia Boole saw higher dimensions after playing with cubes used to memorize her Latin words. Oddly the mathematicians would consult her to verify some of their ideas in Euclidean four space and she proved right and saw things they did not. She suggested she used a process of expansion and contraction to visualize the connection of the figures.

Perhaps the Aussie has taken this as concrete as to what to us is an abstraction. I mean what is it telling us but the sense of the reality of higher dimensions or that some things can exceed our familiar reality. The process then of imagining an abstract system of physics as this one of a concrete awareness of higher spaces.

For what we hold, if indeed we can imagine all things as a Universal Mind as the only reality- that evil in this world and sickness amounts to a non-existent ground perhaps justified by our amount of faith in the principle, that these tendencies of our human mind have the force of truth by its relation to consciousness. One persons abstraction can seem to another as concrete. One mystical sense of things can be that projected from a state of mind into what is a concrete relation that draws into it a frame of reference for an extension into the wider and outside world what we experience of our own sense of awareness. We say that someone is dense. We say that someone feels their head is exploding.

Sometimes the realization of higher dimensions and the connection we so find that seems to fit an analogy fills us with a mystical vision on which that which is abstract only points to the possibility of the magic of higher space beyond the intelligible collection of relaxed and fixed objects we define for our spaces.

As Bergson pointed out... what happens when we put many peas in a ball and compress them- as far as mirrors go they form into diamond faced rhombidodecahedra. And that essential angle, now known by pressure alone and not a mystical intelligence of bees, to form the ground for their hexagonal honeycombs.

But for both the hexagonal prism and the rhombidodecahedron we note the finite symmetry compared with a sphere of such a volume. And this shows that such familiar crystal structures are really the shadows of the hypercube simply, to which we may compute the various degrees of space filling and compression. Of course it takes nine dimensions for the square things to completely fill the round things.

As far as the Aussie author goes, an attempt to try to evaluate what is explicitly a sort of creative process which he tries to put into the usual words- ideas like syzygy and the pendulum and the measure of such over distances as if gravity, (a point with the evidence of variable rates of radioactive decay the science forum seemed scandalized that I mentioned it and relegated it to philosophy) I find it amazing that another person on this earth considered "abstract" structures for the formation of solar systems which he states as 16 to my nodes of the planets- and that in the sense of all this, that is without a more modern understanding of the dimensions greater than the for- that someone else on earth suggests a limit to the elements as we know them - I myself in my free contemplation did wonder if somehow it went beyond the 120 from the 92 to come close to that idea of dimensionless constants. That is the old 137 or so.

But in the critique of others, even abstractly, we expand our own ability to see what is not fully formed in our own shared states of theory direction. Our concrete stance is like climbing a steep mountain and our footing is sufficient for our day.

As a practical thing, I have come more to see the process of candle making as not so much about the precision of surfaces working with the relaxed parts that adsorb error, nor about the holes or shadows that are like heat and time to a structure, but the soft wax itself to which we mould, and mold to our vision of space. Now all this is abstract and can be rather simple for its importance or depth of scholarship, but to take the next natural step and see the world at least as complex as she does, is not that great a leap into a little higher and useful generalizations.

There was an add on facebook today, send plans for Tesla for 47$, his secret let out as to free electricity. In such natural confusion, we evolving creatures, sometimes we sell just the hopeful wish or mystique, and that delays the better truths.

* * *

A couple of random links now that so many find this shared interest:

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45503/are-the-platonic-solids-shadows-of-4-polytopes

http://www.jstor.org/pss/2688637

I was thrilled to find there are some rather irregular polytopes of so many faces, one discovered as a space filler by someone working at the time with partial differential equations. I always meant to shore up some of the concepts of which I was perhaps too concrete in my concepts of angles and things to yet imagine.

Manifesto Depending

Manifesto Depending on the Drug Schedule of My So Called Schizophrenic Friends and Neighbors

L. Edgar Otto March 21, 2011

I may not have the leisure to continue as I have done here for awhile. In many ways I was better off living on the street. This could happen again. In any case I owe you a better quality of work if my minimal living circumstances permit and I can negotiate the new obstacles that affect most everyone who seem to not notice how real and tangible freedoms have been forgotten in our generation despite the lip service to our ideals

Law of the State of the State 1 - If an individual is unfortunate enough to have an accident requiring massive medical intervention, even if in the legal sense an amount of wealth is a settlement that insures the best of healing, that in the recovery time in a nursing home until the worth by working or settlement is used up so as to throw the financial burden on the state- that miraculously the stay in the nursing home lasts exactly long as the available windfall of money is exhausted.

Fundamental Physics Thoughts Today:

1. The creative processes in the universe are not remote but appear to some degree everywhere throughout the reality. The same goes for any apparent restrictions or constraints on such processes.

2. The universe is not technically distinguishable as finite or infinite, but quasi-finite and capable of the widest descriptions as if any remote and comprehensive theories of continuity or discreteness.

3. It is possible to view the totality from a higher perspective wherein despite the intelligibility of a theoretical explanation for why the universe is, that there is the ever present grounding by chaotic uncertainty. In such a possibility of freedom in virtual and vacuum structures also emerges from remote topologies the logical coherences and explanations in our thought that we and the world can be more than it seems. The restrictions as concrete everywhere are logically more so in that reality as a unity of sorts or a totality have this non-necessary paradox of space without restrictions. We gain nothing by imposing a principle of limitations to physical processes as mere assertion without a deeper understanding of their foundations.

Interrupted for a Political Rant as I have to Deal with a Chaotic Living Situation:

4. Society, the collective of individuals and traditions of notions, with such an underlying stratum of intelligible doubts and self-doubts and self-deceptions on some level appears as a mechanism for the general organization in a world of freer logic of the notions of others, restricting deep access to enquiry. These as core values of intelligence persist as the core of truth and guide to purpose. To base faith on remote threats of negative eternity is to neutralize both the intensity of living and the vague sense of chaos by which we walk a tightrope between what is false or unseen threats to our ability to thrived and survive, relate and adapt to the familiar states of our individual and collective reality. Science as betrayal from within with good intentions in the exclusion of chaotic notions asserted or defined for groups or individuals in effect control the evolution and behavior. The way this is done is simply in a world where one is surrounded by the addicted who do not have foresight enough to think for themselves, for all practical purposes these to are controlled by the addictions and chaotic notions not cured but managed as if we are attenuated as if a host to once lethal viruses.

5. The political process stagnates or escalates to addressing directly or behind the scenes issues taking advantage in adversity of parties unless they react but not aware in conspiracy to take away the rights and votes of those who are not in the established lobby's or once part of the official political system. As such they defend their rights to cry issues of class warfare by old tried and true slogans. But we cannot assume that our social world of evolving notions ultimately makes sense. It is not the flow of wealth that is the problem, nor that a certain threshold of leadership has to be sound and benevolent for the sake of the herd- but that in the hierarchy of power that suppresses rather than uplifts the masses the flow of cash and power is held fixed as absolute. No one cares really, on either party, if one votes or not, and even if a certain group is there with influence and power who otherwise may not be in an open and multiparty election there is no intrinsic logic that voting achieves its ends rather than not voting, Neutrals are a potential power yet by that very political stance they meet long established resistance.

6. It is an error to presume the inadequate and selfish interests of the people, in a given state of scarcity or false scarcity, that they will respond to be attractors to some pole of revolution. For some hold higher ideals and hopes, and some do this anyway even when they have enough. While we can trust the goodness of the people, a sufficient threshold of equality of opportunity, we may not trust the entrenched bureaucracy as a class of our overseers. Within the sea of lies and false judgments, or judgment before the fact of notions the positive soul will neither descend into nor avoid the responsibility of doing the right thing truly and directly to others, the bureaucrats know our limits better than we often do ourselves, there is no defense against the honest nor is there safety in the predictions of whom may be a danger to a free and open government.

7. If, from the good hearted who have lost everything and have nothing more to lose they respond with revolution it was not their actions against government but the result that wealth and political power is in a period where it has lost its meaning, so to the hope and promise of a stable life.

* * *

I had to walk thru the fog in the park yesterday, being it is spring. I almost wrote a poem about the fog flowing down over the river- It does not come on cat feet always, but as dragon or tiger paws, such is the tsunami of love and war. But it comes again although we half act as if we do not believe it and make superstitious sacrifices to the weather gods.

I had a brief vision of irregular 17 sided polygons but it was difficult in the circumstances to capture again or determine if anything was there- a Gaussohedron.

I bought aspirin and three pills were very powerful to stop an aching broken tooth. I got a letter in the mail explaining the privacy of medical things in the social security program none of which related to me and of which I imagine generates a lot of paper and mail delivery.

I must find a place of my own free from the second hand advice of social services to others who do not remain stable- including our projects together, particularly art, of which that seems to depend on the ability of the social services to proscribe and set doses as to its quality.

My state senator did not reply to my questions of ID and voting. The liberal state senator on the news after leaving the state was welcomed home but now says she has common things to work with the budget with the conservatives.

Apparently, the organizer for Veterans for Peace who was at the rally for union rights and was a worker at the employment office went further in making a news story that the veterans were in support of union rights in a rally. What has he done for times I asked for and needed jobs? Nothing, nor the state veterans who promoted homes for them even when there by their own drug use. What we need is an organization called Sane Veterans for Sane Government,

Happy Spring Break. But one thing for sure the bar scene in this college town is not what it used to be- only a few of the regulars left with there burning out lives and waiting for the dregs of once promising students. I can take or leave drink, I did get drunk a bit at my son's wedding- but I have no desire at all to go into the bars for I truly look back at all that second hand insanity touching my life one way or the other. It is the same everywhere for students in the USA. What a waste, but then I was under the illusion that academia was about research and learning. Who owns the public sector anyway when it comes to expensive television ads about rights? What have they done for any special group other than put up a front of lip service?

* * *

Mirror Symmetry

* * *

Mirror Symmetry

1. A wildcard or "star", depending on its value in a topological context with respect to having a central singularity or not, can be set to 1 or 0, sometimes dependent on how the notation finds the right value for formulas.

2. In a universe of one object in reference to itself, say a planet, does it "know" it is the only object? Can it know if it spins? Can it determine if it shrinks or expands or is of a fixed scale? Can it define its entropy or its being as isolated?

3. In a universe of two such objects, an observer at a pole facing the other one, and seeing that object spin in one direction or another, can the observer "know" if the object observed or the one he is on is the one spinning? Both together and the spin not observed?

4. Can we determine the spin by inertial or tidal forces measured within or upon the observer? If the direction of spin goes one way that it may shift or change for the observer can this be distinguished short of observing from a higher or lower dimension?

5. A constellation of objects, reduced abstractly to a Plane or Membrane, may reflect the structure of some prime number of symmetry in reflection upon itself.

6. Geometrical objects that seem to have mirrored forms like the "snub cube" may in fact from some general perspective be considered indistinguishable. Some objects that seem symmetrical and the same in a mirror may not in fact be so.

7. An abstract "particle" say the iota string-point on some scale or level in the universe, in a constellation, given a sufficient context of lower dimensions will exhibit a level where chiral symmetry exists and may have physical expression. This can occur also at some level of complexity of concrete particles.

8. Within the field or context of such interrelated dimensions, their concreteness and abstraction intelligible, a constellation will express internal force realization as a measure of the concept of close packing as if the units or particles are infinite polygons unto the dimension and as such the shift to so pack them results in the chirality or handedness of the constellation as if in a mirror.

9. The ground, abstract and real, for such geometry of a constellation and its intelligible arithmetic, also defines the mirror itself regardless of what is image and what is concrete and establishes the possibility of further symmetries which may or may not be doubled in and at both surface sides of such a grounding mirror. This can make a difference in concrete weights of what is at least locally mass and energy and philosophically a ground of intelligible gravity.

Possible Notations:

v^+- v^-+ -v^++ and so on where as in v^m (Kea) m = the logical possibilities of structures of abstract space or real space given sufficient comprehension of the topology and algebra of such virtual or opaque numerical structures.

[It occurs to me we might be able to take the neutrino chart Kea posted down a further step to the iota- and the variations of iota neutrinos and antineutrinos or maybe somehow varying the m values and anti-mirror values- I do not readily see how but suspect that if such "particles" are real and cannot be observed it is because in a wider topology these connect and cancel intelligibly. The concept of such mirror particles in the context of Kea's topology, if I understand it right, has to be also a great breakthrough in theoretical foundations.]

* * *

By "observer" I mean, in as much as we strive for a concept of metaphor, that from the macroscale what is perceived or is a physical fact of things that what is seen depends on the general situation the observer finds itself within. Or from the quantum view on the mircoscale, that which upon being observed is changed from the perceiving or physical fact (distinguishing this as a duality not solved by the simple unification of either ideas of observation in modern physics)... And in our general sense of the scale of things, we the observer central between these scales of observation so as to be considered mesoscale centered, that which can observe to some degree, be aware, of itself- its perceptions changing and changed by its state in being.

Clearly, we can almost invisibly accept the possibility that of these abstract descriptions one can show consciousness in the dynamic core of things and not just some artifact of a particular incomplete theory or vague unsubstantiated intuition.

If we so generalized the idea of chirality (be it some sort of geometric spin or an interpretation of something said fundamental like charge) does indeed ground the idea a little deeper of abstract geometric structrures and twistor formulations- which of course on the level of that theory has not asked a deeper reason it is.

Let us not detract from the evolution of these abstract thoughts concerning the ideas and expansion of dimension, be it the vision of string theories, or the inner connections of complex numbers, or in general any of the insights of Riemann on which we have built. Pitkanen has taken a leap in all the models of variance and any such ideas of slices or layers of fields that can be tied to intelligible numbers but of which these act in the jumps in a more fixed vision in Riemann's sense.

In the abstract algebra concerning general group ideas, those of compactified space and higher symmetry breaking, and of the relations of methods of surface to volume holographic and algebraic analogies (these too held in a fixed view of dimensions less than variance beyond continuity) describes useful possibilities of space structures which for me are a steppingstone to a little more intelligible vision of dimensions.

The concepts of connections of some abstract structures, ideas of wormholes, mouths and such, or in general such fixed topologies, to fit into a wider vision and a useful one, needs to understand the interactions of such brane like objects be they the actual substance or skeleton of a description of consciousness, at least life, itself and of course what in the concrete world such wider topology may represent. But nature too can treat these in some cases as intelligible simplified models for various purposes. Again, we have to determine an orbit around or default into some real or virtual centering of a singularity. The amazing thing is not that we can see whole numbers between angles mirrors but in the wide shifting of them we see partial objects as if a division of these transcendental spectra.

* * *



Thinking about the dimensions of 8 pt. star moulds last night.

I also got an interesting email thru of all places the sciencechatforum which sent me this interesting PDF on an alternative physics. Note- email is LoversOfWisdom@yahoo.com for those interested for direct communications.

See: Message saying:

Take a look at the article "The Universe beyond the Abstractionist Paradigm
of Physics", which is located at:
http://home.spin.net.au/paradigm/beyond.pdf

* * *

Space and Calculator Play

Space and Calculator Play

As I said some ideas in the back of our minds occur playfully which may or may not have any meaning for a future path of enquiry. Certainly at such a frontier we all appear quite the novice. So I looked at such states of mind in general and tried to make some sense of it as if trying to interpret an awakened dream. Such a process does seem to be an engaging with what can be in the real world, the physical world, even if ultimately it may be quite an uncertain and random unintelligible place. But in the search or rumors of some vague intuition we learn to ask new questions and shore up new methods- but I tell you nothing new here.

So, what is in the back of my mind informally that led me to consider these patterns of 13 and 7 ? Part of it is the haunting similarities of reading the conjectures of other minds and the sense that there is a wide scope of new problems to understand and solve. One such concept is, taken literally, for the Monster group and the we see such things in general, how in the heck can we visualize what (Tony Smith http://www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/TShome.html ) said was the natural representation of the "maximum symmetry" as 196884 dimensions? [some of his same numbers came out in my calculator play in fact the speculation here today may have some relationship to what is considered inside and outside the nucleus of an atom but this too a playful speculation as an alternative to my own areas of intuition's with this informal and bare post today. ]

Certainly a group of mathematicians working with this over a long time and with complicated calculations would know more than those not familiar with the terrain on the meaning of such trivial or seemingly magical coincidences of matching numbers- especially where they seem to have integer values.

But what was this exploration really but finding the ways in such a symmetry of how things move in normal three space? That assumes a lot about the structure of the cosmos and what laws of physics depends on our three space which so far it is said there is no good explanation as to why the world is three dimensional.

I can discuss this today at all because I took a look again at the making of a twelve pointed star mould. I even begin to think another attempt at the candle company as an actual business or art is not worth the effort and that what I learn from such designs in space, for its own reward, might in itself explain why the attempts only succeed so far. Nothing was wrong with the art or production. It is hard not to believe that the state of society is simply that to succeed one has to sell a lower form of crap to the masses. Truth is, that if I had just bought and sold raw wax I would have made more money than turning all into candles. And somewhere in the back of my mind I know we have light bulbs (save the day when the lights went out all over town and everything sold- and the fact that with my tapers once could read by candlelight with a steady burning over a long time.) Still, the selling of candles has a certain compensation, a romantic thing to do really. And it has mystery in that what may seem the same product sells better because a worker somehow puts his stamp of his sense of art on it.

Vaguely I imagine that when we slice a tetrahedron the section is a square. Or if we slice a cube the section is a hexagon. So what is the analogy really to the hypotenuse of a Pythagorean triangle in space, or the diagonal of a matrix. Apparently it is not just a slice of the next dimensional plane thru a solid.

So, in the complicated world of space in these super high dimensions, I thought there may be analogs. For if we slice a Soma Cube we get hexagons and triangles. In reading Kea I got a sense that what this slice amounts to on some real level is a fano plane. This sort of imagining things in space, on the particle level or deeper (of which I believe it has more general application) suggests to me a more general concept of symmetry breaking as presented to us in the various forms and related to the various concepts of number theory. That is to say, that given the same number of things in a pattern- here involving three prime numbers, 3^n, 7, and 13 and in a way that does not just suggest the division of the Monster group by the three highest primes when nothing after all can be said more for a simple group, That nature is expressing some numerological difference in square and hexagonal things. In fact they seem to be a sort of alternative lattice. What happens in general if we divide space into a set of overt and hidden dimensions? What after all brings them together again in a sort of global relation in a world where it is not clear that any such connection needs to loop back over a range of space to itself?

My question then is, in a world where I have conjectured at a certain (quasifinite) level we cannot distinguish the inside and outside of things other than arbitrarily, what makes it possible in general to so distinguish them on different levels of physical effects. Perhaps, this matching of patterns are sometimes separate realms or fields that work together when we choose, without explanation, just to see it one way or to merely assert there is an intrinsic asymmetry to things, even if this can be computed to some degree by ideas of complex number fields and asymmetric directions, even where they correspond to measures by statistics and averaging of weight values. The matrices at such an iota point are not so focused and rigid in the application to physical objects. Part of the problem, always the issue with if point exist or not that comes us, is how they relate to at each point or object that behaves as a continuum, or similar but subtly different object that behaves as if a singularity is that of at any such "point" we erect whole continua or multiples of them. Again, the old statement "we understand the infinite but the finite will take us a little while longer" what clever truth under that seems to apply.

So, in the simple pattern - one really that can break 13 into two squares, I find to color the (quasic or quanta like bundles of integer space points regardless of the thresholds, density, and energy patterns) one higher broken symmetry as if these bundles are dimensions require four colors and one three colors. Here again where we apply numbers to patterns and dimensions we make a ground of different interpretation as to what are in effect a three or four dimensional interactive view.

It is alright to reduce by considerations of symmetry (or from all this plethora of new conjectures playfully perhaps asserted for those to be the first with an idea in general for new physics such as deciding by Poincare what sort of point like things or singularities reduce to say hyperspheres as the general manifold. But in the freedom of nature to establish changes said to be say 2 space and continuous motions we can within so many levels of natural dimensions apply these matrices as if what is expressed is not that simply intelligible to the dimension in question or what broken symmetric patterns intelligibly occur.

But what is wax but a crude distillation of what mineral wealth we find on our small ball of light and dust- does the physical stuff matter or the patterns and processes? For after all we add time to the mix, and ideas of added value by the application of heat- and moreover half the methods involve different or empty spaces from what makes the excluded volumes of a mould, even wax itself its own mould or ice or water. Not to but mention the relation to exact lines for the partition of so many pieces for a mould that it be extracted easily... the parameters of heat and expansion or shrinkage with chemistry between materials part of the picture so as to have some modular control and standard for a product. Some stuff and the surprise when it becomes an object we can name even if it is a fleeting object as art only that in the end become just a matter of abstract geometry again as if that is stuff.

* * *

I must add that in a sense, in the more esoteric of these neoteric and playful speculations- that many of the ideas on Tony Smith's page have slowly come up somewhere in the net and on the literature. Again, the genome is more complicated than the simple six dimensional case and there is nothing really new in the glass bead game of applying binary I Ching to the genome. The problem in our world views as if our consciousness match the "outside" world when such shared senses of universal patterns are intelligible with the purposes and intuitions of our minds is always to determine if the model of our thinking is expressing what is "outside" as our own intuitions within ourselves. But as Kierkegaard observed in matters of group therapy- the purpose, when the strength of the group is measured ultimately by those who participate- is in matters of realistic ego that the unique individual finds himself again.

* * *




* * *

While I'm playfully speculating:

The doom and gloom comment made that the creation of a black hole in our colliders, even by my considerations, does not strike me as good science. Great, we have exo-planet geology showing the need for deeper theories- but what sort of creative object or black hole does such limited theories predict. Sure, ideas of things like how we do fusion, especially containing plasma in laser lattices, even those that hint of a useful cold fusion hold promise and it is good to hear.

It is possible then, that with newer topological understanding of how the dimensions work from a slightly more general view, that all the values do balance and that other than being on one side of some abstract structure there is a neutral or balanced symmetry of these things. Short of much deeper theories even the changes may have there natural compensations and the actual construction of such entities might be out of our reach, even by accident- but on a deeper level our current physics cannot say with assurance the possibilities are more than open questions. It is good to know that the mixing of neutrino mass generations for example gives us a reasonable certainty that our sun does not go nova tomorrow and there could be analogs to these ideas after the generalizations are worked out. This is not to say that, as some suggest, such objects may come from elsewhere to reek havoc but if they do would we see any implosion or explosion effects more than what the new data seems to be telling us about deeper structures of space? But what is science fiction but the suspension of some law of physics enough to give the idea credibility? Kea's quote as to our stance to new or conflicting data is right on whether it conforms to our theories or not.

Well, certainly the needs of this world is worth the search still as well the promise of some success- but the resource of our dreamers has value too for what we are especially if we share the same dream without it being a fallout of false fears. Someone has to do the vast work of ever more specialized exploration, let us not discourage such dreams of making our world a safer and better place. Science is not as post modern in this era that we are so powerful that like Foucault it is the script where we write ourselves out of the play.

* * *

The Self-organizing Universe

Matti,

When I google the term U-matrix it seems it concerns self organizing maps of neurons. Just as in string theory the "weights" are a problem.

Are you using the term this way?

The idea of a distance, based on colors and gray codes and so in has been considered solved for a long time- it comes up in the classification of music themes for instance. For me it has always been a "quasic" distance concept but that is not all of space any more than the more conventional ideas of dimensions and continuity.

Yes, there are higher concepts of broken symmetry with certain concepts of groups- but these are not always explicit in our usual notions of mathematics. What keeps say a 5th dimensional game from playing itself? Clearly particles are like abandoned ships mysteriously lost at sea and can be claimed for salvage- save on the generational levels in which things default to zero in surreal numbers then the structures reset.

Zero-point ideas are not clearly defined to treat action as you suspect in such broken symmetries and differences of particle mirrors -especially if you merely assert the concept of multi-Planck levels or values.

It may follow then that such descriptions merely outline the shallow surface of what consciousness is (and a hierarchy of theory at a few prime zeros at that. Quantum theory should not rest in its own limitations but we have to reach a little beyond that to get a better picture. In effect we should expand our consciousness along with new theories.

The PeSla

* * *


A sample of a lot of calculator play last night.

* * *
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9610043

Lubos has interesting posts today with links. While it is part of the picture I doubt the ultimate ground is only this conjecture:

"The membrane world volume is a noncommutative geometry embedded in a noncommutative spacetime."

How is it then, that in the overall picture matter and dark matter can at times be imagined to commute? Such symmetries or asymmetries of action and all of those things of which we are aware as yet unsolved in sting theory can have some theoretical scrutiny, especially if it is not clear our experimental technology can verify things yet or never.

These notions are deeper than string theory, and our concept of such limited relations between strict and few dimensions, or for that matter our understanding of topologies at singularity as if they are some sort of points or complicated spaces centered at some central but spacious singularity.

This is not to say that perhaps at a center still deeper than this or upon some principle even deeper than observed violations of cherished symmetries and holographic principles still more comprehensive physics is to be found- that or perhaps something in the mystery of it all of a spiritual seeming nature (yes, Matti if consciousness is real it is a part of reality). Can these be shown to be equivalent to superstring theory in a sense without superstrings?

So, someone begins to see that something may exist beyond that final property of commutativity- that can explain why things are integral and quantized in such a world of uncertainty as statistics. Would this not focus on the idea of an iota point as a grounding structure in some concept of strings? If the mediators of particle forces are heavier in a sense are they not more compact in space contrary to the idea that more raw matter takes up more space?

There should come a time for a young theoretician that he breaks away into new territory, even if reluctantly so... after all, the first compact discs cost a lot and are now obsolete and the machine to play them was rather large- and yet it came in two varieties of frequency derived by the Japanese from in integral equation.

* * *

Dimensions, Particles, and Shadows

Still in the later stages of recovery from flem and flu. Two parts of fitful sleep last night, one if I had the energy a more formal look into a sort of general algebra with the shadow symbols (the one in the illustration is only suggestive and basic) if I had the energy. The other old angers directed at those so full of right and left wing crapola in how they dealt we me and others in the pursuit of a job if not some idea of a career- It makes some sense, use the old to clear up the meltdown because they would die of old age before they would cancer... But such rants that really show up the true nature of power and enquiry, the old hierarchy of get mine first- hell, who needs a new education building with federal funds at the local university for the job they have done, and in general for the second tier of requirements for admission. That we make laws to limit the overdraft fees of debit cards the banks have to raise the cost of ATMs to make up for their God given right to profit? Well, it was my fault for assuming the world makes sense and that in general people have good hearts. (But a blog rant was not my intention, so I went back to bed, slept in, and decided not to call certain people to raise hell at our tech school and university.) Part of this is spending so much time on the design of moulds and processes with no access to say program the pieces. Part was the condescending attitude of an economics major talking with a professor outside the coffee shop and his buttons for the defending of bargaining rights when he asked me if I had a place to live. "We certainly will need someone in economics who knows what they are doing." I said as he said goodbye.

Anyway, some of the blogs statements are inspiring to me (if only I had more time or could have started out sooner, it is too late to be ruthless had I known what an effect on my life these bureaucrats had at the time- but what does it matter? Just, if your cause is just young people- be ruthless when it comes to the hard truths of health and science. But know if your stance is morally right. Above all else defend others, and of them, the children most. What sort of administrator to a tech school would say I was not ready to go and it was unlikely since I did not have a cell phone (and he did not know how to find the area of a circle!) It would have made a difference in the simple access to the machinery for the candle making before I lost so much- a routine thing of the auctioneers, the middle class has to assume that they are enlightened when they act as overseers or policemen to the poor. Alas, one reason I have written so much is the dread that when the music stops for the worthwhile of my ideas the bill comes due- and perhaps I must go back to those few who have harmed me and my children and awaken them to the life they imposed on others.

* * *

That ranted, the theme in the shadows today is the hint of most excellent ideas by our bloggers. I am impressed with some of the essential insights and at least to me they are the first, most likely, to realize them, despite the propaganda of those who think controlling the truth is the fact of truth in a science that should be honest and objective. Not all of us can they make mad before our downfall.

* * *

Well, you all can figure it out- no one comments on this documentation much anyway, and it is not as concise as Kea's wonderful post today. I may come back to it here or elsewhere. I see so many connections between you all. A little of one insight from one of you to another would speed things up a bit.

But once we have things like her particles connected to dimensions and the diamonds and hierarchy globally understood in its quasi-finite landscape- and while there is still magic in the world view refreshed-

I note that science has always been a core, or part of me that is a fort against the capriciousness of fellow man and nature- And that the core holds still, and that in it I find deep gratification simply standing by the bike trail and river aware at last that the universe does not fall apart but we can know why it holds together.

Each of us can feel to some degree such a core and world view- but as to how much is ultimately faith and how much the need to know some essential truth would then be the freedom of science as an open question. We can clothe ourselves in such wide and coherent theories- but our singular hearts even between birth and death can stand naked after all- save perhaps to the worthwhile interpretations of our dreams.

* * *

I did have some interesting times of contemplation- what if we made the factory, not so much by the standard architecture (although the headquarters based on phi designs and many educational arrangements of mirrors would conform to standards)- that the content and arrangement of the building would be the equivalent to the candle making processes- in effect a working sculpture of them. Panels that for example could be interchanged so as to make working mould designs (the u in mould in the USA and Canada, the u has the sense of moulding some object- or in the flow of the heating systems the ability to tap this in all the variations of a final product. Not so much a manufacturing but a place where on can do a casual experiment for some creative design or prototype.

* * * Interruption due to friend accused falsely.

* * * Perhaps it was thinking about moulding 8 pt stars again that made me think of some of these general algebra and math things. What do you do when algebra texts say there is no solution to the square root of minus 16 and some do. Obviously the whole circle of such complex numbers are complex numbers- but we can sort out nodes of them a the real from some context- the all important 8 which leads ultimately to ideas of the 240 and so on (or apparently higher considerations of the 256.) What I think this amounts to is in the ordinal numbers some have no beginning but an end and some begin and never end- and so on... but in a deeper sense such considerations of groups and dimensions do indeed have what may be considered as a sort of prime in that space of confusion of what is the finite and the infinite of groups. These of course act as if their primacy is too obvious to see as a direct effect. In a sense it asks the question of what is classically real in the quantum situation.

I know these considerations are very basic. But some abstract entity like the hypercube with a hierachy of such numbers can be seen as not necessarily persisting- that is, even our more solid seeming particles are limited someway as to their intrinsic stability depending on their apparent parts in some form of chance or shadow relations that after all is expressed in the phenomenal world as a sort of turbulance and yet across the extension in relation to such groups and dimensions the stability is intelligible and limited by hidden laws of physics globally. The problem as purel algebraic then asks of the sea of possible values and dimensions what globally or of so many integral (real) parts are these prime structral components as if treating the algebra as some sort of equivalent to fix point ideas. But if some of the particles were not in a sense tenative how would their specific decay be possible and more or less predictible? Why do real over virtual particles on the whole, quantumly, exist rather than equally exist and not exist? This is a deeper question than the nature of chirality, time, or shadow and antimatter ideas.

Clearly, the proximity of entities like planets even if we have no explicit description of the underlying math in our standard terms, has an effect on the gravitation of the system and the possible states of energy. Clearly when finding evidence of such influences we may decide anomalies exist- but these can after all be speaking of a more complete physics of it all. To say the dark force is waning for example may just be a relative thing on this level. To say such fundamental constants as indeed the grounding everywhere, in boosts or deeper structural boosts, may not tell us anything more than a matter of taste of our methods of interpretation, in particular no issue of such variation can have direct experimental evidence to undermine the lesser but incomplete view of things.

If in the idea of null for well formed logic of some form of arithmetic it can act as if we fundamentally prove certain thing for we are proving that intrinsically a non existence- then in a sense we can continue beyond the conventional -1 notation for a filled vaccum to some surreal mathematics of the infinite and infitesimal, a symbol I intuited as 00... but what stops this if it has hidden binary structure? Indeed, it is not we can introduce, confusingly without the careful statement of limits, such an inductive symbol as "(Potential)Infinity". We can just as well conceive of a double infinity sign. This state of notation is very much like the early days of establishing notations when the meaning of imaginary numbers were first considered. The first thing this suggests is that our ideas of the fundamental theorem of algebra is not sufficiently described by inclusion of the complex roots of unity and so on. Yet the power of complex numbers, in terms of imagined mirrors can solve unknowns not obvious to measurable vectors in the real. It is clear to that no changes in the description of coordinate systems, say the conventions in a sense of a fixed space to translate angles, are sufficient either to describe the physical dimensions of the systems.

Nature, like in the virtual world of video games, has a certain ability to reset the initial conditions to which our consideration of what ends or begins, or relates to some idea of null, is a persistent but lesser law of the dynamics of the cosmos. In this sense we may consider such things much as we do time and complex numbers as from outside the logic of the system in question and in a sense subjective.

We should understand the nature of dimensions better and why they can have certain natural restrictions of the laws of structure before we limit our structures to a certain averaged or false idea of correspondence with certain dimensions. Clearly one of the most powerful ideas in all this is to treat numbers and topological systems as matters of information- specifically the varieties of binary information.
To this end I have noticed so many who are not clearly on the frontier of such ideas evloving to the very things in one instance or the other foreseen by others.

But until we have shored up some progress in this sort of enquiry, the further questions and concerns will seems far fetched to contemplate beyond our innate intellectual and artistic couriosity. The sense of disconnect in our culture and technology goes a lot deeper than our obvious new awareness of the problem.

I do not need to point out who among you are on the right tract in all this. I suspect that will become known in retrospect, and for the masses some of you right here in this backwater of the replete and confusing cybersphere of information and meaning will become the new household words.

* * *

Dark Matter Engineering

Dark Matter Engineering L. Edgar Otto March 16, 2011

By the term "dark matter" I mean all notions and physical analogs associated with these essential or imagined anomalies within a unified physics of the observable and the "opaque" or transparent phenomena of symmetry, momenta, and energy in the search for new and standard methods of scientific enquiry.

A comment by Carl Brannen http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/ suggests that in speculations as to the surplus of energy apparently from the core of some planets as if they contained a nuclear reactor of sorts amounts to the existence or explanation of the presence of Tritium. See his comment and follow links placed here : http://riofriospacetime.blogspot.com/2011/03/phd-phobos-and-deimos.html

When, in raw quantum theory, some idea like cold fusion is not forbidden the presence of Tritium is considered evident of such process that seem to be free of radiation from the process.

From the beginning our physicists have questioned, on the subatomic level at least, if there can be exceptions to conservation of energy (and in general the concept of how intimate it is to our ideas of averaged and global systems of momenta.) This also led to the amazing concept of a neutrino as a sort of particle that is there to balance the equation. A particle that carries momentum.

We further expand our theories to relate these to physical processes with the understanding that they may assume different states of their generation (a concept in itself not yet fully understood as fundamental in nature). In the formulation of theories concerning them our concepts can imply confusion as to their nature in the usual terms of spin, chirality, and so on. Where this happens the overall theoretical foundation as paradox is trying to tell us something.

The idea of supersymmetry is a perfectly good view and explanation, but it seems that such systems may exist which are themselves opaque and not necessarily directly observable in nature. In this sense, especially for those interested in a more material and reductionist view, whatever the case of the reality of such particle physics and cosmology, one theory on some level may seem to comprehensively exclude the other or as in the case of the unification of the modern physics, there is a degree of exclusion, a complementarity.

The idea of pair production in the vicinity of a "black hole" suggest that in the process of "evaporation" one of the pair can be adsorbed into it and the other that of a certain observable glow, an excess of useful information and energy but not considered that which is created outside the scope of energy, space structure, and vacuum.

Considering "neutrinos" may undergo a similar process we could imagine that some of them, perhaps fundamentally everywhere and not as a core of some material object or pressure in the vacuum, that these can be adsorbed into the internal structure of black holes (or other creative like objects, quasars, Ylem, or any other concrete instance of some intelligible singularity.) In a deep sense the concept of "black hole" free from concepts of scale is a spacious singularity that may have a foundation a little deeper than our present convictions of such grounding- it questions if as such, as if it a model of something like a neutrino, that such particles can have sub-structures unseen in its real or mirror internal space and vacuum symmetries. Singularities locally may be seen or not from some view that these have no limit as a point, or that they can be so seen.

The process of transfer of momenta in the vicinity of black holes is not understood and ideas of magnetism seem the only standard explanation left to expand upon and explore.

Let us not forget those notions, be they our intuition even for the foundation of certain myths in our day as a golden age of science fiction, seem to raise doubts and polarize what is science and mythology in how they use or allow what after all can be in principle hidden to experiment and experience.

As some have posted, and with this natural idea of shell structures around some well ordered physical object, or for that matter those that assume things like hyperspheres can be mapped in totality by compression to a singular point. Or that we can define the global symmetries of space structures in regions that contain or not such points, or that in the complex case we derive those values of the real as the properties of numbers an the half zeta and so on... That the internal and mirror like structures of atoms have a certain evolving complexity- namely the great difference between Hydrogen and Helium and all other atoms.

In a sense this only goes part way or half way to the available structure of any atom under our attainment or grounding of dimensions. We should think of a solar system as not simply a large center object with clouds of things that accumulate around it (although this is a perfectly intelligible idea and one that as all such general ideas may make a system that forms that way- but not as often, and in theoretically a measurable way, than system heretofore.

The momentum in a sense can be seen as something, confused with teleportaion or mysterious quantum jumping as notions and so on, as that which is transferred seemingly at a distance and with intelligible measure, anywhere in the multiple system of such singularities. It is not that at a certain distance from the assumed center of a "creative" field in Hoyle's sense that we have planets and moons with similar atmospheres and mineral content. Rather what we explain more deeply here is the natural process which creates thru the momentum like transfer the higher metals- we know recently that metals beyond a certain point cannot be explained by the powerful supernovas for such synthesis.

In this age of speculation, in our notions of the looking for sources of free energy or ideas of something like the zero point, the intuition gives second thoughts as a moral question derived from our notions of a pure multiverse. Just as in the science fiction, Fringe, we may tap such energy but it takes from parallel worlds. Of course from near working models I have seen from such tinker scientist their real source of energy and product were investors. Again, these notions and the reason we imagine them need explanation and may be telling us something.

Of course, this critical difference in the ground of the structure of atoms which places the first stars and the hydrogen-helium differences in a separate geometry than the other atoms- and my suggestion this occurs again at element 119 and 120 (certainly if true this relates intimately to current and deeper theories of the application of group symmetries and so on. This may be a useful tool by which we can engineer whole new and natural processes of physics.

While, if possible, we can utilize the knowledge of such internal and opaque processes of synthesis of matter from some region of space- one that may not necessarily require the conservation of such energies from other places but one that does not in fact amount to a deep creation from absolute nothingness- the knowledge of this idea of momentum transfer not only can make a limited range of instantaneous transfer of energy but an actual creation of planets and stars.

But as I have emphasized, the boundary between the finite and infinite when it comes to organizing our notions of particles and fields is not always as clear as we try to make it to be- especially as to what is internal or external in the depths and span of our notions of symmetry.

* * *