INSEI VII: Calcified Fetus & Baby Talk

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gates_of_Hell Photo modified from my son Justin.

INSEI VII: Calcified Fetus & Baby Talk

The question is what happens when we enter Dante's Gates of Hell (and its inverse) do we find shells of things as if an atom, or some structure maybe in the entropy of a black hole? Or given one of these more Catholic mystical rather than Protestant materialist models of the epics of lost paradise. Calcified Fetus is the idea that the magic of words and alphabets and information can start our but be reabsorbed or left as a pearl in the host oyster for years. What can we speak to it for it is an empty reduction of a form, not even a dead language? Yet, if we speak to the new born, as I feel here with awareness of this alien skeleton inside me- this inorganic and artificial "perhaps Lubos' term Euclidenized fuzzball"- my words have to exponentially grow and so gain the meaning- I too with the raised ultraviolet catastrophe of age against my higher pitched voice, take baby steps with him of encouragement.

A quote today from Sultan Ratrout A low-level discourse finds its way as well as its audience. Don't worry about your high-level discourse for it also finds its way and audience even though the audience is limited in terms of number!

That is the issue also- and a metaphor for the logic of our era here of creative and speculative physics. If the creative is real, it may pass through us and we be unaware of it or invisible to it and it still be part of reality- or in the descent into the varieties of hell as dissolution drink of the reality of it and find steps to climb back thereof... perhaps, our gamble with the hereafter but a higher pleasure beyond the fore brain on which we first fell love.


* * *

Before today's posting I read this article from the reference frame blogspot, and the linguistic post ideas gave me the confidence to question the assessment of Lubos.

http://motls.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-there-are-no-classicalons-by-dvali.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29


Lubos,


This is a very interesting report. I feel very much in disagreement with you views on this while I am not supporting the specific way the authors cited say it. I doubt the concept of quantum gravity and I doubt the value of the Higgs field to do what it is said it can. Now these two things I do not say with certainty, but my more positive and classical space is not a fuzzy Euclidean ball. In fact it is not a ball at all anymore than it is a plane. Also the Planck distance may different in some exotic reference frames. Entropy certainly may have different forms and interpretations including ideas of decoherence, I imagine one myself but not sure if it is standard or not. I am not daunted by some idea of the exponential nor any of the disembodied ideas of complex spaces. On the other hand Matti Pitkanen seems to resonate with my ideas more when I struggle to read him with the p-adic ideas. What of the recent ideas on eternal black holes or even mini-holes that some authors use to explain inflation? What of the lifespan of a Proton? Why should something envisioned like a classicalon be observable anymore than some measure or differential of a hierarchy than Higgs like things in any exceptional dimension groups save by a sort of theoretical and logical if not experimental influence?


Of course the truth must somehow connect these poles of physics ideas- so thank you for this reality check of alternatives.


The PeSla

* * *

INSEI VII : The meteor has reached the seventh level of heaven, like Star Trek the search for Spock the carcass of old ideas lands without his consciousness (saved in the hard drive of Bones) on the planet of the Genesis Project- which while the Clingons think of it useful as a weapon and it is doomed for planet forming save to evolve Spocks body again...

I mapped one form, a very arbitrary form, as a code for space relations such as classical movement but not by coordinates but a higher level language as a word. Thus cvcvc for example kakak would be a question or input to which nonon was one of the possible answers, that is the compliment here in binary. As there are four consonants and four vowels there are 1024 words (the point being from the idea of efficiency if indeed that is not a burden in itself) I know all of those words and where they are in the quasic matrix if we assign meanings. I know multidimensional parallels of the c and v parts and laws of addition and so on, and paths that can navigate through the various orthogonal spaces of many dimensions, knots for example.
My familiarity with words, just as with ordered spectra of color, makes it much easier to envision the terrain of these spaces after initial but little study. If we invert the c and v vcvcv we have another thousand or so words. We can play with the models and meaning of words, or combine models with great freedom of what we regard as our shared or independent languages, and the validity of their formation.

Of course I do not speak a Semitic language. It would be interesting to take a survey of the words and map them into the grid, especially bits of rhyme. To measure these general ideas of abstract distances, fractal like and music like between them.

But in reducing things back to binary we can imagine what Leibniz did- there seems to be a good model of such a fixed symbol and mathematical language in the I Ching. To that end I reviewed it in a room mates book. I did this with a view to see how given basic metaphors (that is wood or water as elements are not to be taken literally) led to a higher language and the ground for such a language.

All of a sudden I could see in the discussion of meanings of the hexagrams that what seemed fancy readings with no bases in particular were quite understandable and of a universality which was not totally random in application to a situation. What I would have cast aside as entertainment had the features of religion and magic as well a model for government and commerce. However, part of the personal comments of the author seem very trite and simple propaganda of his view- that did not read as truth toward the youth it addressed- yet when praising the leadership or the idea of family his explanations had a ring of truth. Is it not said the casting of the yarrow sticks may be something one does not want to hear in its objective independence? Of course much depends on the calendar, if that is specific to earth.

Now just what does the DNA code do or encode anyway? Some form of the space in which molecules find themselves in - a blue print for structures? Maybe the recipe for a larger cake and the timing of the ways to bake it- maybe a way that the dust like an antenna can detect the wire and light of things beyond it.

We can encode the four (even 12 or 24) letters as N S E W compass points in a plane or better x y z w in space and the vowels as 0 1 2 3 spaces in that direction. So we set up a differnce in the N-dimensional or Q-dimensional ordering (Natural and Quasic). Doremefaso... music if we detect it also resonates as if we heed, obey the voices we hear aware of them or not... and each syllable maybe multifactorial.

So, just as things are smashed into the Spinozan and Dante like view, or lost in the freedom of dimensions in the Milton or Leibnizean view, between Plato and Aristotle falls the wormhole questions and portals in our mind to a living or fossil language and false or true thoughts and beliefs and ghosts we are an hear- an infinite grid composed of the gates to heaven and hell.

* * *

Later this day:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101018102239.htm

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101018074540.htm

These two ideas, one inorganic and the other organic, I feel will prove to be related as a mechanism of the languages involved.

Of course this too is connected where a generalization of fractal information and these questions of adaptation involve the on and off of hereditary encoding:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827821.000-the-chaos-theory-of-evolution.html

* * *

Also I took and overview at the Arabic and related languages.

Ootoo Alamin azra that is (a musician of the virgin multi-verse)
Literally "worlds", humankind, jinn, angels and all that exists

Quite a profound and detailed language with almost as many speakers as English. It can have the cvcvcvc form but it is rare. Is this not 3+1 as the physics concept?

* * * Here is one example of perhaps an over efficient or ideal encoding of symbols and hopefully general notions assigning values to the grid and rules to read it (as there are many rules usually involving ordering) that I mulled over last night: