Between Mirrors

Between Mirrors L. Edgar Otto 03-31-11 / 04-01-11

Can we better ground the methods and philosophic implications of quantum theory? I go a little beyond the general thrust of my blog theories lately so this page of Creative Quantum Information Theory is to be looked at for now as metaphysics into which, as with all of the new theory zoo we strive for concreteness in our leaps of thinking.

*1 - Within two shells of different radii we have an integral and intelligibly behaved "crust" or "peel" in which, independently (and opaque to) of other crusts the laws of chirality (as handedness mainly) and momenta as the grounding of things like mass may apply.

*2 - Two or more such crusts may intersect.

*3 - Two 3D-Penrose quasicrystal sets may intersect. A crust (in four space) geometry is richer than natural dimensional non-Euclidean ideas and this includes such geometries withing the crust between mirrors.

*4 - A crust does not know, locally, if it is part of a negative or curved space, it and its subdivisions are a neutral contiguity.

*5 - Absolute value of |a|^|a|^... I tentatively assert |- as points (iota complex singularities, iotaplexes) may move between crusts as shells or as multi-verse over spacious presences. A creative jump in this respect is not necessarily the idea of a quantum jump.

*6 - n!! involves half dimension values in a series compared to n!, Also we may consider fractional dimensions of integer values as abstract groups.

*7 - A quasic region of a crust such as a polytope, may be contiguous in a quasic manner to other such regions, thus an extending seemingly or for all practical purposes at a distance yet touching.

*8 - Two parallel lines may quasically be coincident in this manner or intersect at a point iotaplex singularity.

*9 - A crust may encompass a range of integer-intelligible motions and dimensions in its universe of discourse.

*10 - Two dual polytopes may abstractly oscillate with its shadows or between crusts in which case exchange of discrete mediator particles may indeed ground the force connecting them provided crust theory is "metaphysically" and primarily distinct.

*11 - Consider the octahedron and cube so oscillating but in the binary count of component integral tetrahedra we consider also these as shadows of higher space representations. Two creative points or spacious singularities may intersect or exchange a context of polytopal mediators like mirrors.

*12 - A universe as unique and a totality, as if an illusion, embeds an implied multiverse and whatever shifts of its unity or constants that are observable, thus such quantum like grounds are there in the quasi-metaphysical indefinite structures of space, at least.

*13 - An indefinite (stable or not stable) magic square matrix may be a Portal to vanishing or creation of a totality (or seemingly so). Thus, for all practical purposes, a physical reality that may be random or quasi-random, both seemingly so.

*14 - The "totality" of an organism (brain) is in effect its own endowment of portal magic matrix quasi-centered evolution and transformation (or not). The mind-matter duality is solved only as such a portal in physicality.

* 15 - |- I assert a spinning cube across the diagonal and with a clear interior, will focus light passing through it. In the count of three or four space orthogons involved there is the idea or question that what is emitted must balance what is adsorbed or it decays into so many parts- the question being that within the crust and self-dual will it self focus?

* 16 - Teleoscoping: |b preceded by a can be followed by c| ^ |ditto| ^ |...| Unified point-singularity multiversal averaging and inter looping within and between crusts with the ground of paths expressible by quasic teleoscoping notation can be done intelligibly between absolute span and depths and to the same powers of this between mirrors or complexes of crusts- these can also be viewed as quasi-tachyonic in considerations of time. |iotaplex| ^ |iotaplex| ^ . . . that the universe or as totality is also the multiverse perhaps taken to some binary power and that mixed concept is not necessarily equal to some zero or to absolute zero.

* 17 - Teleoscoping is done between areas or brane like regions as it is not clear it can be done with the full information (although it can arise from there) by its factored linear components. Some areas that involve transcendental numbers by curves such as circles can be so equivalent to such squares and some cannot.

*18 - What is field and what is spinning iotaplex can be seen relatively in that if these absolute points are and ground the mediators that move between curves between or among mirrors, the singularity particles may be seen at rest and the context of the field itself exchanged as undergoing that which is in the abstract motion.

*19 - Of course outside the crusts or where such intersect we can assert in effect a quasi-information of virtual but scaled and very fine calculation of something like mass as particles- but the topology of it- a little beyond the idea of what is held as invariant explicitly, can contain an intelligible enumeration of mirrors as "holes". But these as creative quantized information set context may or may not relate intelligibly short of the powerful tool of vague statistics, to what can be distinguished as multiverse or universe- that is the universe is its own crust between opaque mirrors where the connections may not exceed its local totality save by theory.

* * *

*20 - Considering natural dimensions and that the boundary conditions as applied such as in Boson D-brane theory, the term "crust" might be taken literally as the earth's crust for those boggers and others consider such things as the earth expanding or poles shifting by what is outside moving independent from what is the mantle inside (Einstein). But the boundaries although limited are not as rigid as the formulas so arranged might make us believe. For one thing it is a matter of relative viewpoint even on the nuclear level for: If one reverses the direction of decay in an abstract sense the context or field adsorbing such leptons or particles may keep them scale invariant, space and time-wise, and yet the result is the apparent shrinking or expansion of the boundary envelop of the context of the field such that the crusts may shrink relative to existing theories like the boundaries of a proton innocuously bombarded with laser photons and interacting with the muon catalysts. Thus space can appear to contract with the inclusion of more mass and exclusion principles (more fundamentally explained) depends on the implied properties of super-spaces of so many interconnected dimensions. Such topological notions could have kept open the possibility that something like Saturn's rings were there from the creation of the solar system, as seems to be the case. (although of course being a relative notion reductionist dust particle accumulation can be made into an intelligible ongoing model.) The relativity itself involved applies in that one can imagine light a constant when it enters a depth region of higher dimensions so bounded that the region or context is that which undergoes changes.

It is interesting also that as if the peel of an orange compared to the general rings of fire, that considering triality these break generally into three regions.

* * *