Quantum Metaphysics- Depth and Span

Quantum Metaphysics- Depth and Span
A Grounding in the Omnium, and The Emperor and No-Clothes (a Story).

Today I was going not to post for awhile and what I will is mostly creative philosophy that suggests but does not deeply answer such questions. It perhaps takes a little courage always to put our ideas into words or symbols, as Faulkner said- who also said of Hemingway that that writer lacked courage never writing a word that someone would need to go to a dictionary to look up. It is not clear to me either, as a personality over time, that these notions are new beyond the context or are the same tired old first impressions of existence and those along the way.

So, there are two underlying themes... one is the hope that some of these fundamental thoughts sheds some light on our thinking processes that some theoreticians dare to expand or simplify in their contemplations. The other is that such concerns even when we do not understand why we think them- that the metaphysics supplies is with notions that when we do find useful in abstractions in the concrete world as physics these have given us an easy transition by cultural traditions.

Integrating Depth of Span Quantum Metaphysics

*0 - Over a path integral where the squaring of values ultimately introduces probability and the suggestion of a quantum level realm we should distinguish the uniqueness of distinct discrete path choices as existentially those may allow all possibilities of a constellation of the physicality of objects.

*1 - Feynman, who developed and simplified diagrams and methods, interpretations say of particles and time directions, did not postulate such a dialectic between certainties and restrictions topologically we imagine by squared universal systems. He maintained his insight not an assertion of some state of the universal physical.

*2 For our time this would amount to philosophy, a quantum metaphysics in even further generalizations a such. In pure quasic topological models there are limited integral states an organic system may achieve based on parallels possible in cell differentiation. Thus an organism is constantly a synthesis between locally limited but existentially unlimited potential universal configuration in its depth and expression.

*3 Just as a local region in time and space, with energy, may be subject to a maze that expresses its coherence in matters of probability - the open question of a relative lifespan or open span, living things seem quasi-local or quasi-isolated systems.

*4 We cannot decode all path possibilities, even before or after the existential fact without the complexity of its quasi-isolate set theory. (after all, "history" in this sense on our current level of understanding is open to controversy and interpretations) This item 4 assertion may open up possible new directions for the persistence of unique system encoded that could result in a more general metaphysics.
Such decoding as in private "inside jokes: contexts ultimately make reductionist solutions a matter of probability.

*5 There exists a certain entity, geometrical, between these ideas as if a unity scale or dimensionless one, as if these constitute in actuality or relatively, a grounding for low or high scales of this depth and span dialectics. This in a sense is quasi-physicality in which at least our models of them, their processes, seem on the whole to be intelligibly balanced.

*6 The assumption the universe expanding accounts for the red shift while energy (mass) remains constant over the path of a photon is equivalent to their velocity slowing down (see sister blogs here including sciencechatforum recently)- in fact we could observe such photons gaining mass to say become particles (like cosmic rays). This expansion only a "local" result of the omnic universal model. Why are there neutrinos to be so distinguished in the matters of energy and structural transfers?
Perhaps this is an artifact of our theory system only when we reach a higher view.

*n Gravity toward a singularity center is in a sense a reduction of energy, work, even as an equivalence principle at zero grounding. Yet so is the path integral of the centering of a particle systems to the quantum description by gravity through the Brownian orientations in depth also involving the square root of the time.

A Grounding of Metaphysics as the Omnium

*7 Of distinct realms, say that of the continuum of material (not necessarily to be distinguished as discrete as in Rowlands system) and that of gravity if it is radically different, either one separately may be mapped onto the omnic principle as the background, but this can be a haunting error even in our ideal extension of space structures themselves as comprehensive infinite directions, promising but a set as incomplete as a theory... This applies as well to non-euclidean ideas and renormalization.

*8 The origin of some philosophic, even religious notions can be explained intelligibly in part by the still open omnic view if not the metaphysical actualities. Also, what interpretations of the quantum realm that perhaps vaguely, if not physically relate to consciousness.

*9 This would include traditional ideas of moral law withing (Kant) as a phenomenon of conscience. It would include models of karma debt and transfer across multiple systems or lifetimes with a conceivable mechanism. It would imply at least a scaleless value to all levels of living things. Our unique configuration of experience may have a certain uniqueness invariant in all such global changes. It would show the frailty present in our human character and the "red in tooth and claw" nature of an organism. It does not clearly answer the political question as to if humanity is fundamentally good or evil but does suggests in collective survival and cooperation is it ultimately good in the main. It would suggest that new paths and states of the worlds may exist and have existed in a sense before, an idea not quite resolved by teleology, as well the transfiguration of the living memory in a notion like soul. Where perhaps the vague majority of such, here and now seem analogous to virtual particles with independent choices or lack of them past the integrating paths of unified physicality. This allows psychological rejection of the metaphysics as well psychological explanations.

*10 Our concrete thoughts and actions, when intuitively felt, may relate and interpret higher messages, shared purposes, and discernment or lack of it for deceptions a the heart of the world.

*11 The question of spirit or materiality for the grounding of a radical region or new state of the world can be a spurious diminishing distinction as a question and not ultimately the same substance, non-existence may resolve by notions of time there where even an ideal irreducible particle is greater than even an everlasting permanence. A reductionist model of protons come to mind.

* * *

The Emperor and No-Clothes L. Edgar Otto 01-15-11

The warrior-emperor had other things on his mind, establishing a dynasty by a great public ceremony to wed the kingdoms as much as to claim the princess.

The realm was long at peace anyway so when the scientist advisers for war machines came to him suggesting a detailed survey and analysis of his new realms he approved and dismissed them right away whispering to his minister to give them funds. The donned there white coats right away.

"What shall we do? The Emperor did not ask nor read the stars,. We can study anything."

"Let us seek out that naked Jain who stopped him in his tracks from crossing the Indus. Our emperor would not question how valuable the results of those observation, that or fear to look."

"That Jain has such respect for living things he is careful not to even harm the lice on his head."

"Good," he looked at the scribe," It is settled, so begin the records. We will go unto the Jain and carefully collect the varieties of nits and lice and other denizens of his body and classify all the species."

* * *

Other Projects Attempted Last Night:

I tried to modify or adjust, expand my quasic motion notations but it proved rather difficult- basically, the structures of these relative dimensions as complexes may move thru the standard and grounding ones- the content for a specific motion can have a baggage of too many representationalNA and dimensionalNA (N for content subcells and A for Alephs, and i also for iotas or iotaplexes )subscripts. It evokes both the simpler ways to write number theory relations and the idea of perhaps a super-adjacency matrix. I also thought of looking at Ramsey theory again in relation to the ambiguity of crossover in braid theory and topological structures.

*m Can the positive view of new world states reverse? The virtual presence of "spirits" is equivalent to the time reversal down from the fact of a new state. But most generally such bubbles of time may average all so to be invariant across all time directions. This sort of tachyonic teleological view may be an anomaly on the horizon of all such speculative systems, here ending as decidedly creative philosophy.

* * *



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theorem_on_friends_and_strangers

http://www.mathnature.com/nature11/projects/individual-projects.htm

In 1928 Frank Ramsey, an English mathematician, showed that there are patterns implicit in any large structure. The accompanying diagram (which resembles the aestheometric design of Projects 7.3 and 7.4) typifies the problems that Ramsey theory addresses.

"How many people does it take to form a group that always contains either four mutual acquaintances or four mutual strangers?" In the diagram, points represent people. A red edge connects people who are mutual acquaintances, and a blue edge joins people who are mutual strangers. In the group of 17 points shown, there are not four points whose network of edges are either completely red or completely blue. Therefore, it takes more than 17 people to guarantee that there will always be four people who are either acquaintances or strangers."

* * *

Ahhh, in this classroom suggestion of projects links to the young students how much the role of 17 here rings my quasic bells... I talked about applications of Ramsey theory to the young professor on sciencechatforum who at the time told me Ramsey theory had nothing to do with it for some speculation I posted. I do recall that the upper reaches of these sorts of theories are almost beyond our ability to give the answers even if our planet depended on it. I abandoned the line of study when the library printer could not do color and the simpler maps in gray were too confusing to sort out. So, are there closed games of no draws at some level of complexity apparently way beyond the realm of our present new physics applications? Does anyone else feel overwhelmed at the explosion of such information available changing rapidly for speculation, at least until we catch our breaths?

Today the science mags have interesting articles- one on the mapping of the brain and the expression there of most of the genetic endowment. One on the graphene that divides the magnetic field in the spin electron science of the plane. But did I know read recently on some of the surprises involving Buckyball carbons? The old sphere and plane again, the absolute or the filled vacuum and so on.

The illustration above (not sure where it is from but I have of late seen it everywhere) represents the complexities of duality and perhaps the notions of good and evil as metaphors. The tree of life and its string like dimensions 11, and the Metatron cube of Plato arising again taken seriously by modern theoreticians. And on which side of the linear or loop halos do the parts within fall for their signs and number? Into the order that emerges or a return at some frontier to the chaos again. What will of the gods says the day is sufficient unto itself and it was someone's time to move on- or that in a relative way a lifetime has is real and proper length and unity- that in a sense the parent and child and his parents are part of the procession that often seems the same integration of paths in different styles and times of expression- not that all electrons are one or that the idea of monopoles may not exist.

I had an other stray concept perhaps worthy of writing down as I deemed it perhaps worthy of memory as I tried to sort the rather low complexity of further notations:

Lampion 04-15-11 - In the normal quasic space of abstract motions where the change of all coordinate binary numbers results in a diagonal motion in the dimensions in question or of no change in such dimensions, the result is a default into a ground inertial state of motion or in rest. But extending the notions a little further we see it not as simple of the skeleton of such coordinates for within such motions and interactive laws or perceptions of dimensions something may move with such abstract motion that are more or less a complex or particle unit with its self identity quasi-physical in the context. These alas, have an either greater depth of how we may apply what we now imagine of natures variations on her simple laws applies to theory.
But at one time or the other many have played the jazz without a unifying theory and are aware of some riff- and it seems also they have mapped it all even without the final overriding theory to enumerate things and new things.

Yet, here, relatively safe in our first toes in the waters of a greater sea, it is clear that relating mathematical physics to the abstract motion diagonal is a useful and fruitful procedure even when the gauge or field it so described within may be a little more complex in its grounding- as philosophy suggests- than of our current applications.

* * *