Hierarchical Systems
Mirror Sign Duality
(The True Absolute
Unity Foundation)
L. Edgar Otto 27 December, 2012
I hope my last dozen
of post or so will be sorted out, but not as posted in time save the dates
submitted. So I continue parts of the
lampion post and new contemplations from today.
It seems to me that
at our core philosophy's in relation to mathematics the consequences of the
logic of it, the stance toward sign (the idea of negativity as inverses in
relation to nothingness) is the source of our emotional stance and conflicts, a
sort of fight or flight, in the idea of the necessity as principle to ground our
logic as the reality. A is A or A is not
A for example or for some who have an idea of the mirror worlds a claim as to
assert some sort of mirror logic condition.
But in the quasifinite world of non necessity it is clear that while
ultimately logic can be defeated by "it is not the case" or
"what is true at one place in time may not be the case at a different
moment in time"- in a certain sense there is a core unity or
intelligibility in the reality of all cases.
This is the
independece of the sign across abstract or absolute mirrors to which in
counting things, as if a sequence of numbers or functions, we have a choice at
each existential point as to the nature of the operations upon branching points
in trees, rooted or not as the privileging may be, or unitary operations. 0! = 1 v 0 depending on how it makes the
equations work (that is the logical choice of sign a the reality basis or if
the direction of time can only be in a sense only zero or positive. We note also that where phi from the quadratic
equation the inverse 1/phi I have called
k as part of the absolute stance, is considered negative for the equations of
unity to work. We see the Fibonacci
sequences beginning with unity, of which we can imagine for the solutions to
exclude that the unity that starts things can be zero or even in a sense
negative unity such as the convention
capital Pi sub minus one for the so called Null Polytope.
Thus there is some
constructible and concrete quasi-sufficient logic to the idea of the quasic
brane. As a brane, as two dimensional
initially, we note that in its n-dimensionality we can easily accommodate the
linear string landscape that moreover describes the states of matter possible
as well as more general symmetry systems and why in their consistency (of
numerical functions across some plane map) this hierarchical structure (with
all forms of the idea of particle generations) allows the general structure of
mass into time and by creativity as at least the generalization of the Omnium,
the twists perhaps of gravity or other intertia considerations, and in general
the idea of vacuua or dark hidden matter...
It is clear that
Penrose tiling as an interest by many in the mathematical and physics
theoretical field the playing with the quasic plane is more than just a four
fold or eight fold consideration of its abstract dimensional
representations. It is also the deeper
look into the nature of quasic ideas in relation to the mystery of unity and
sign.
From the earliest archeological evidence to date (another PBS show) the Phoenician alphabet as the
source for many others derived from the Aegyptian hieroglyphs as a stage of
language development finds the original letters such as A drawn in an order (up
down left right immaterial) in four directions- this eventually develops in one
direction. This is the looking into a
tablet as if it were the quasic brane in search of deeper symmetries even
beyond the ghostly uses of how we define complex number planes.
Newton as one of the
developers of calculus looked at this issure of order, that is the search for
possible meaning in codes, in the Bible code in his case, He considered the deeper nature of Gravity as
to the direction of the planets having perhaps some outside designer, but in
any case as above so below in the magical axiom his was a search for the cosmic
idea despite able to argue for the mass of the earth without some greater lever
his interest also touch on astrology. As
some have said, he was our last great astrologer. But in our day whence gravity?
The hierarchical
systems with sub group inheritance and distinctions of the quasifinite fit well
into our observations of how language changes as if the sounds in shifting and
meanings of the sounds and symbols are less like protons as fundamental but at least
subatomic ideas on some level as influencing the higher level system subtly.
Lampions 12 12
continued:
A) A polyhedron and its dual may oscillate
between each other's dual state, alternatively.
B) An ensemble of
edges meeting at a (directed or not)
simplex corner point (although generally the number of regular connected points
is the higher simplex itself as a totality grouping) may exhibit one state and
the next level down the opposite state (of duality) not necessarily
alternating.
C) The concept of
mediator particles or field conditions environs between these states may be
determined by omnic physics as a general mirrored and generational (in depth or
span) quasifinite paradox of necessity and nonnecessity at a singularity and in
the Becoming.
D) Subcell ensembles
may form field-particle round as self dual polytopes- likewise the global
coherence of a field. Including doubling (unfolding) and half mirroring
dihedronally (and n-hedrally explaining magic atom numbers). These may be as singularities the first thing
of Rowlands principle where they persist and exist creatively (notably in
Hoyle's intelligent design sense from the vacuum also).
E) This formalizes
ideas of Rene Thom, Ted Cloak Jr., Rowlands, Marina Shephard (Kea) of braid interchange,
Pitkanen, and my Quasic systems.
F) galatomic systems
while concrete in complexity exceeds the generalization of the omnium in the
wider complication of consciousness added and so defined. It does unify the
general stances of Gamow and Hoyle as core cosmologies.
G) The hierarchical
concept is ultimately non necessary as a principle as scale and the dimensions
(physical or geometrical) can be in a sense relative in ends, middles and
origins or direction of time-like sequences.
H) There can be over hierarchical depths and spans minimum and maximum ensembles possible, concretely constructable and as hidden influence forces creatively.
I) The potential
infinity Omnium law, 0xInfinity=unity, is an actual reality in the hierarchical
detail of ontology (as quasi-metaphysical abstract functions), that is
deduction vs induction, and abduction vs anti-abduction, plus singularity. Singularity is equal to one or zero, that is
a "wild card"
J) The sub-shadow
hierarchy (Hr) of monopoles are transitive |sing> quantum notation function
generating shadow fractal like grounding by principles preceding.
K) The intuitive but
accumulating hints of mechanics yet a hidden cosmic code as well as idea of
unity in the cosmic gravity (inertia) as tp be explained philosophically as if
the idea of totality is beyond both Newton and Leibniz as quasibrane flatlands
in perception and reality of the phaneron, background.
* * * * *
The science daily
article, the only one I saw yesterday on the states of matter seems to confirm
the general idea of symmetry and states of matter as if an absolute or positive
stance to the quasic brane (this links string theories).
And Nova Now, with
the show on long term memory- the memorization on the hippocampus larger (in
fact an actual map there some sci mag articles have reported within the last
year or so) a neurologist from Ghana in the search for the permanence of long
term memory and his grounding of the self- has moral reservations that a
certain enzyme can erase memory in rats.
It seems to me
intuitively clear that there are structures, quasically, that could recover, at
least in life processes and the reality or wish there is more to that sense of
"human" than the neurology and chemistry of the self.
The host (the new
Carl Sagan of this era I would say) brings this home in the question of the
origin of life as perhaps the deepest question. He suggests that we have only
the earth with which to compare what might seem a clear answer if we
encountered things beyond our one self involved sample. He goes further to say the origin just after
but not at or before the universe as the Big Bang is also a question of origin
(that we are comfortable with) but there is only one universe to which to compare, Quasically we may compare these things in the
shadows. But the experiments do go on
where they work, especially as we start to see what happens when our artificial
constructs integrate with the natural organic.
This comparison is a
matter as if modeling self-dual polytopes and mirror or shadow phenomena. Although the question, so reduced on this
side of the mirror of such singularity may not by such experience and our reaction
to it define us, this question of uniqueness and the nonnecessity of experience
should it like the sun somehow vanish keeps the frontier question open. For we can imagine parallels and hierarchies
in the unities of things that at least the general cosmos, the Omnium and what
is or may seem beyond, can have a mechanism that in a sense can save memories
for a very long term.
The complexity of an
ensemble of particles in some geometric continuous or finite structure in the
core logic and physical consistency even in the short term and with a wider
concept of the dynamics of real or philosophic time has to deal with these
questions of shadows and hints of supersymmetry- so I add the span of the
hypercuble into three cubed cubes with innate directionality (that we cannot
assume is there or not in any case it a looping or not, The deeper level of
triality implied at least four fold in the abstract brane adds to the mix
higher levels of shadow particles as well those so color coded in relative
tempered quasifinite spectra over algebras like that of Dirac (seen at least as
grounded in a general sense of origins as nilpotent,)
* * * * * * *