Quasic Non-Necessity
and The Great Grand Knight Jokers
L. Edgar Otto Sunday, 02 December, 2012
I present now a
sketch of the Euclidean and other tables of Multiplication of labeled
quasifinite entities. I do not know if
they are there in some form in the standard literature but it seems the
concepts behind it is the stuff of theoreticians. What we really mean when we discuss at the
foundations the various applications of combinations, permutations, dimensions,
and group theory, of mathematical physics.
The tables suggest
the completion in my exploration in 1985 or so at a time I was inventing games
based on geometry in a very fertile period of mathematical recreations. Some of these in less complete forms have
appeared since then in the market place.
But in the manuscripts if ever I can look them over the theory was
complete but at the time the purpose of this set of dice based on the 11 and
the 22 of the tarot cards was to arrange the shapes or color of the faces such
that in a small set of dice for each player all the possible cards can come up
in the casting.
The idea of the
knight moves describing the linear motions of the natural dimensions with a
general focus but lack of bias of some of the expressed directions as logically
opposed to the Higher Queen problem move Great Grand Jokers, here in ten or 5
dimensional space is fortuitous in both the logical conception and the notation.
For these types of singularities I use the IPA alphabet to merge the j or
reverse j and n. In the set of the 11
dimensions which technically include the gluon like neutral color in the
dimension itself, seven colors describing natural three space, the baton (also
represented as wine or blood in the illustration of the more ancient suites) is
that problem quasi-holographic between dimensions that is there when the go to
sequences loops upon the singularity itself.
Yesterday, after the
post I noticed a small article in the science magazines about the pancake
phenomenon possibly observed in the LHC which seems to give some quantum
entanglement direction to what we imagine should be a diffuse quark-gluon
plasma. As Kea said once in the general
excitement of turning on this fine instrument of the results "How long do
we wait while the anomalies pile up?" I would add to that in this question
of supersymmetry (yes, and how we interpret the directionality of a system of
abstract algebra or systems of geometry as a given dynamic or a result of
position as if fictitious forces and fairy fields in the grounding of the world
by asymmetry as well and what this does in a total theory beyond commutativity
and so on) that "How long in our search for supersymmetry do we wait as
the evidence of its real and experimental analogies pile up?"
In the symmetry of the 10, 11, 12... dimensional brane the count has many halves and doubles as well the 11+1/11 across some mirrors.
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment