Metaphysics of the
Foundations (Iotas and the Point-like or
Spacious Now)
L. Edgar Otto Sunday, December 09, 2012
The quasic view of
space formalizes a mathematical basis of field description and abstract motion
and rest involving absolute value changes in binary coordinates.
The natural familiar
level of understanding motion in the world is to treat entities as positive in
the numbering. But as the physics and
mathematics has a general intelligible consistently unified laws in processes
and pattern structure t we can imagine or extend the formalism to our concepts
of the negative and existence concepts dealt with of zero or the nothingness.
In the history of
science and philosophy from the beginnings of the Greeks, for example, and
heated debates since then on how different generations see the world core yet
vague ideas of zero or infinity has allowed deep conflicts and between
people.
In this vagueness we
imagine the unknown and some make the distinction this in not science in the
practical sense, but a metaphysics of questionable reality for a theory of the
universe's grounding. We can fear the unknown
and it may freeze us into a dream state without fight or flight from our real
or imaginary trains that transfixes us in hesitation as our minds take stock of
the landscape or compute at rapid speed avenues of time differentiation for
escape.
As we have extended
numbers to negative values of Pascal's triangle so too we have to extend them
to our concepts of zero, furthermore our concepts of duality or 2^R power
continuum, where R can take on various formulas of value.
In general the
absolute change between coordinates in a quasic space that changes all of them
results in what we call a linear motion thus the vaguely defined sense of it as
a grounding that is simple in subjective reductions but not necessarily as
simple if this reduction is extended into systems of more general dimensions as
if linear reductions.
There is no point as
such, point like in the focusing. What
then can we mean by our quasi-metaphysical idea of zero point energy beyond
that of possible quantum formalism at some vague frontier of observation?
There is no only
string like object either which at some ideal ground of reduction has zero
dimensions as a linear or looping entity.
Such an idea is deeper than the punch and slice of dynamics that ground
energy and biases our understanding of the source, and sink, of light if we
maintain there is only a point-like object which is a string-like object
(including such a brane-like object) outside linear or ray like motion as if a
dimensionless thus quasi-metaphysical entity.
This general
singularity we can assign some conceptual position as in the now, that too
expressible as a point and line, or as dualities between them in higher
space. In the replication gender
property of number we can ground a physics system on the now, deny the now, or
with a little more certainty assert, depending on what we imagine as the
general field or an existential point of the now, that a ray "all
tomorrows and this day" persists and the point the source toward and indefinite future while the past does not exist time as a vacuum full or only
imagined as a direction.
Alternatively, we
imagine the now as a sum of all past histories left behind as if a vacuum and
the vague shift into the future that which will exist but now is phantom
"today is yesterdays tomorrow".
These are core beliefs and some things thought metaphysical in one view
is concrete in the other. Theoreticians
are aware of this and sometimes declare further reduction into theory a mystery
or beyond the scope of practical science, indeed, beyond the ability of
mathematics to have the power to apply its formalism for solutions. Science very cautiously faces the problems of
the paradoxes of the frontiers of ignorance absolute in the all too real
awakening of the properties of singularities.
The charm of relativity seems that such ideas of the now is what is
relative "It is always morning in the world somewhere." So to the ideas of entanglement beyond the
ideas of what in imaginary space happens outside these light cone ideas is a
similiar problem of stance that also is the source of our desire as
theoreticians and thinking creatures for unification.
If the two physics
can be unified in terms of what is physics or metaphysical in the conceptions
and we can define them in the core mathematics, the arithmetic and geometry of
order and patterns, is it not obvious this formalism is what the quasic
description does, and on many levels of generalization, and on many dimensions
of representation?
Metaphysical
questions as truly metaphysical not to be addressed at this stage at least by
science is in principle grater than the narrow and spacious sense of now and
the question if an iota is a source that does not necessarily address the
methods and physics of matter and science. It remains arrogant to dismiss
lesser concepts of metaphysics as outside the influences of what we then design
as a program of science.
Science looses its
reality and the wide field of magic becomes the more real, science a ritual of irrelevance. But the source and being
are the same thing in an ultimate reduction in the moment or now we rely on as
the foundation and awakening with nature's own restraints upon us that we hold
up at least as an ideal of science.
These lesser sciences so defined as dogma are not foundational yet that
which remains, everything not science, does seem basic and fundamental as empty
terms describing the reality as science at the foundations. Such is the specter we can now conceptually
formulate as vaguely opaque or dark matter.
But the tinkers with faith and arts in magic also fail in their program
to escape the absolute expression as reality when faced with the
intelligibility of mathematics and physics.
But I do not mean to
set up contrasts or dialectics although that is a valid form of enquiry
logically among others for the sake of keys to unlock the mysteries of
singularities (iota point-like or as a structured spacious singularity complex)
and such inverses are beloved and dramatic for the flirting of mathematicians
with inverses and compliments leading perhaps to wider freedom of thought or
unifying syntheses impressive in their own right regardless of descent to the
materialism or accent to reason or where at the fulcrum of a singularity wild
card empiricism and reason turn in their own dimensions upside down.
* * * * * * *
In the idea of knots,
links, loops and so on in the vague but physical idea of matter as knots of
space the idea is for me now quasi-metaphysical as a realistic view also in
these abstract considerations involving contiguity, adjacency, limits and the
absolutes and so on... I understand what
some may investigate this area for the extending of say string theory. Somewhere between the continuous and the discrete there is the general but nonnecessary space of the Quasifinite- in the
second illustration this is represented from both views with the saddle shape
background of Pitkanen's TGD geometry and iota ray actualization (massivation
of such abstract particles?) meeting in the quasic grid... a sort of null-adic
vagueness that seems the business of modern science as independent from such
mysticism.
But this is
nevertheless not a pure metaphysics even as not existing nor all encompassing. For those cleaver enough in their pursuit of
sacred geometry to imagine the extension of Pascal's triangle (the complex and
negative numbers left out of the details of the computations) they understandably
err to fill in the blanks not with an idea of full or empty vacuum, but the
face of potential infinity for the generating elements. Even a classical model of God as in the Jewish Mystical view
or his reduction into but 11 dimensional half viewed face would not be as
potentially complicated as such a higher being or even just a higher cosmology
concern that would have attributes and properties to which our theories may
reach as we share the universe's creativity and intelligible design.
* * * * *
Interestingly,
testing my CD drive, I have the local artist Mary Lou Richards song on in the
background, Track two of Ruby Red
Shoes. It is called Space and speaks
about that also as relationships that also give us our sense of isolation. I would have included it in the post but am
not sure of the privacy and intellectual property concerns here even for
academic reasons. So look her up if you
will... From Eau Claire, WI
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment