Zen and Zeno (part
II)
Philosophy
Review (The Koan is the Kaon)
L. Edgar Otto 22 January, 2013
While we do not
necessarily present a monism as mediated by an 'airy" spirit or any
unified view of the stances of dualism without such a spirit, a third way is
suggested in such ways out or resolution of the philosophy as being or
interpretation. Yet, a generalization as
if a unity by a nonnecesity is a stance that in the concrete form allows both
cases of space that is the total structure of a given geometry representation
in physic or one that depends upon the distinction of matter within space.
In this sense the
spirit in the form of nonnecessity (thus its contexts of exceptions) is an
abstract mediator that is at once the existental syntax and the semantics. If we associate the pattern or pictoral
nature of the script of chinese and have a good sense of its development with
sufficient data, the semantic structure of the language itself is capable of
being analysized and applies to a sentient being if they choose to so analyze
in the so called Chinese room.
The uncertainty in
equivalent relations defined in different translations of what is the Zeno
invariant or interval where beyond the zero point we add the restictions of
geometry that takes time or add to it as if action at a distance- in general a
suggestion of the three geometries, we find both the action at a distance and
the focus to a coordinate the key to the source problem regarding particle or
photons and the field (as well as questions of information sinks). But the
reality is in the evolving as distinct and a matter of computation of degree,
of probabilities in sufficient or necessary representations, half mirrors of
not considered or seen unknowns in experience or perception to which our
purposes or uses if the development have a span of relavance of which we may
decide within a formal theory. This is suspected much more interrelated when we
consider the possible worlds beyond our
reasoning as physics in the new idea of the replete realm of dark
matter.
In the analysis of
the universe as physic, again, in the problems of Zeno where we imagine the
resolution as that of limits or constant distances (that question of if we
really do understand the foundations of distance in the first place) our ideas
may be as limited as the Chinese room thought experiment wherein the
unification of the two physics- even if not in terms of the unification of
forces to include gravity, preposes from time to time a minimum (or maximum,
saddle or so on) idea of minimum distance or as if in a simple classical way by
division by c, a minimum duration, when in the spirit of it all it is not
necessary that simple nor the simplicity (parsimony) of a theory a
foundationally sound principle as scientific method including the vague area
where we may questions, as seems done lately, the isotropy of the laws assumed
in the universe.
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment