The Blue Laws of the Dominion of New Haven

The Blue Laws of the Dominion of New Haven L. Edgar Otto 15 April, 2012

My theme today is a confluence of several ideas that meets at the Phoenix physics or park of muddy and clear waters. These concepts also concern our history of world civilization and asks major questions as to the intelligibility of balanced or Lockean enquring sytems to make sense of the current events of the political climate in that it relates to the facts or myths of our modern era of physics. In terms of the fermions as in Rowlands metaphysics, these hidden but transparent nilpotent formulations of quantum theory create our idea of the vacuum, the nothingness as all not muon with the center as the standard weak force. But this is not the only model of which in this theme suggests Wisconsin is a Majorana state.

Where we have struggled to reduce from the quantum and relativistic views some laws or place where the transition is to more classical scales and levels we face in further generalizations where an alternative, especially should these be experimentally found, where the Majorana physics reduce to the standard theory as the quantum world. These are questions of conservation as in the significant case of charge and of its relation to super symmetry concepts or beyond. On this level even the total laws where they differ in pairs but seem unified together may not stand as a strict concept in their relation to particle descriptions.

A Higgs or no Higgs explicitly observable considering it mirrors conceptual symmetry as ambiguous is perhaps the best outcome for progress of general understanding for this level of ambiguity mirrors that of the very question of existence of super symmetries. The Higgs mechanism is the supplier of mass, and physical Majorana particles exist then what is their role as suppliers of Majorana mass? What are laws but on the fundamental level a matter of action or appearances?

* * * * *

Here insert the actual blue laws and the illustration of overly dressed couples from a very old book that concerns a general education- as the tree is bent so goes the tree- that is what do we teach our children, especially of the recorded history of the civilization of the world as a whole and not have so many like bonsai, diminished but thriving in remote environs? I am convinced that the problem many people have in our times is not that they cannot handle the new complexities of their wider world of information in their minds but are fully whole if trained in these early steps, especially of geometry and steps of process in open and closed conceptions of the universe. This is of course on the level of ambiguity we dismiss as chance or chaos or non-linear complexity for it could still have a chemical basis of development in our most adaptable minds.

This question of action or default as a passive ease as an omnium model, I mean how is it we allow if a particle is neutral to dismiss all that could seem opposite or negative less than zero? If at the fundamental theorem we find the question of say one line of the I ching when it is a dualism of male and female do we choose to call it neutral or call it male and could such a distinction have an inverse as well of the dominance of action- what is the fundamental default gender of humans? Is neutral gender really an endless question of two identical particles in their sub parts only the origin of different reactions and variations? Can we say that beyond the saturation to gray directly some compliment of violet exists?

This is a question of the nature of color also. If the FT as I have called the fundamental theorem less formally is seen as this dialectic of action or rest then it is a guarantee of a perpetual motion state in the world but also this guarantees that as neutral the certainty or proof of such motion is also not one of a dynamic omnium concept- akin to the ideas of division by zero and all that implies. On the quantum level as this is mysterious enough where we make some choices as in partisan politics (Wisconsin does not require the party registration and as default insists some offices are non-partisan and here the judges are voted in by the people) beyond that level greater issues of such checks and balances are there where it may no longer be a question of intense meaning and emotion if we imagine our universe totally open or totally closed.

Here also we have a quasic issue of what is similarity or not, the quasic certainty although in use the term quasi-particle may seem to tell us something quite the opposite, ambiguously. Consider the issue here of even one identical copy of something ranging from a many-world instant of time to the Ship of Theseus and again where this as original or as a final summation at the wormhole mouth of an event some solving of the usual time paradoxes. Leonardo's Mona Lisa on the news today was said to have an authentic twin. It was suggested that a student may have copied stoke for stoke as a project of training. Or just as well Leonardo intuitively thought to experiment with two simultaneous paintings to learn something of a fundamental process. So the Mona Lisa authentic as a copy is ambiguous as to if it is also a copy made by Leonardo.

Surely the quasic view of how wormholes may describe this double quantization has to be a disambiguation on a foundational level. Is a majorana space, mouth or path, different and in some sense more general or are we missing some limitation in general (see Pitkanen for pragmatic speculations on that level of generalization of theory as topology and numbers.)

* * * * *

In arming our children with some world view and relation to civilized law from wherever the cultural origin, what is relevant and significant for their times yet add to their adaptability and some control over their own paths and development, we might ask, as this is a question of how we see space and of open or closed spectra, is there such a thing as an Architectural Clock? Is it natural that pyramids arise in diverse parts of the world, or that history may have had forgotten but more advanced eras, or even some myth we were trained by parallel aliens or entities, or we see into the future as well as the past to some degree or as ongoing this changes as we so traverse the higher paradoxes of time, or were there better communications between people including the possible mysterious ones grounded in the genes, and so on...?

Surely after the Greek era the Romans took up many hours of such a clock and as much was the domination of the Christian era although when states of civilization so fundamentally change things like the largest of churches come to the mature end of a style or is less raw and folksy than at the beginning- only to meet in the spiral again the Greek view to unleash the Renaissance. We have what we imagine a space perhaps off the calendar of counted days as a modern or postmodern part of our recent era. I find it significant that the roman build bridges of stone some of them still standing. But the art slept through the Christian era. (let me remark here that in a sense the ideas of architecture or government, civilization, is not necessarily the province of any given region or group of arising people or culture. The Mahal after all was not designed by Indians but stands as one of its great structures. Nor did the museum as a director or repose of history in Japan come from their own designers but from Wright. These symbols of ideas as well as stances toward space and time have had historical consequences contributing to things like the break down of our global environs into war.

In Wisconsin the castle doctrine is now the law, is there a clock of ideologies as well. What good are such laws if there are no castles to defend? Do we arm ourselves against our neighbors; against the rouge imaginations and license of a state that as it gains power arms itself against its own people? Against the slaves and barbarian invaders? No one to be the best leader of a nation who flaunts his wealth? Politics the art of the pragmatic- no one likes the negative ads but they win elections, the small newspaper ads and old radio reached more of the people and now all find the raising of money through the social media virgin territory as a cash cow.

On such new bridges soon the toll is taken as if the right of the few or the many to divert is voted for purposes declared. The building or blowing up of bridges can change the outcome of a war undermine unto spring again the world revolutions in the name of liberty universal and long forgotten in the clock of inevitable repeal and return to days before the law. At least we can fix our breaking bridges should we not as hopefully our civilization leaps higher this time around.

Does it matter how many of me there are or how many behind some great and armed wall I count my equivalent in China men? Nor what rapture steals us away from some might have been other world and time that we left are all that exists or in the greatest calendar wrought from the cycles of the stars and different styles of zero we divine some worlds end or a new beginning? Laws are but scraps of paper and ideas so as Milton to evade some warrant but in the spectrum and the warpaint of many colors it is the paper that counts if open or closed a symbol into some catastrophe ultraviolet or endless explosion all returning past the infrared as we imagine we can make sense of at least the voice in the reality of universe, we here to hear it or not as we so will.

In the new physics, beyond the mysterious quantum leap I imagine the wormholes as for example in Pitkanen's attempt at unification is in the higher sense of laws of symmetry a statement just as real as the building of bridges- and these if we look closely enough are also the issue of how things in what some think is rather than appears and intelligent but mechanical system a question of what is ambiguously connected in the virtual world. Then again where is it clear that physics cannot state by such connections it is not sentient as a model or that what we call consciousness is at least something on these fundamental or greater levels. Consciousness and he look for even deeper physical structures or reasons for it speaks for the higher levels of symmetry. Now while it may or may not be a sort of substance invisible or not is does seem fundamental. But to maintain certain truly metaphysical effects of things that can connect between people, if these exist, would have to be still greater in the conceptual generalization. In which case the intelligence of a universe might be less than that of a God.

But here it is clear that the intellect of some who are on some mirror of beliefs for example to reverse things as in the reversal of the old French saying that a man without a women is half a man but a woman without a man is nothing at all is a lesser question as foundational. In Freud's sense we can reverse the first impression of the cave man that upon seeing a man one want to kill him and a woman to have her as a man would so see. The same for the ambiguities of the possible political views or ideologies. But to informally attack the conventions of language is a rather illogical and closed enterprise that avoids fundamental and useful questions... such is a closed or open proof as a related issue of Riemann's zeta function of the half real part and closely with him the closed view of manifolds into structural loops and points of Poincare. But open or closed the wider world of physics in issues of symmetry is more general and ambiguous and either way can evoke in us the extension of how we react emotionally one way or the other while it is not clear how fundamental is our sensationalism or if the gods weep their tears are in a greater sense authentic.

These higher generalizations and models of theory are also on the level of the reality and philosophy of color as if there is an intelligible uniformity of color space. In this sense it is clear that the issue between Newton and Goethe on the nature of color has its advocates as if the description of what can be something fundamental to artistic sensibilities as well something clearly physical inside that dreamland boarder between matter and antimatter and possibilities beyond. But who wants to remain while the living a creator of art that we imagine can only be secondhand no matter how original or mature but dated for any era or trivially new or fresh return in direction that our lifework is ended in its completion as all things seem to loose their luster if recalled another time around its true love as the dream of once and only- or that after the achievement and effort it makes sense to the world and man or God that it is not recorded, amounted to little, and has no direct or indirect influence on lives to come?

If we so take upon us the forbidden fruit of knowledge of the good and evil will we not then go after the tree of life? While in our own way- as all laws are artificial and community standards a paradox of ignorance and ideology that forgets basic simple human courtesy and fairness and civil discourse, a world safe for enquiry with no need to hide from our projected wrath of masters, and for speech as perhaps the art and wealth of which we are free to choose or pretense of our wisdom that is cannot along the way stand naked and equal to the world as with ends and beginnings.

There may or may not be some higher purpose to our lives and the universe but surely in this world we can do better than this.

In the great sea what designs keeps us in wonder as to where did Majorana go? We can almost see the groves of olives of creative science and philosophy and taste them of their salty balm such good superconductors as we decorate the vases and fill them with their oil.

* * * * * * * *