L. Edgar Otto 02 April, 2012
It should not be an abstract mystery as to why there are exceptions, the fundamental asymmetry in the concrete foundational metaphysics of the weak force, as Rowlands points out and as Penrose imagines at some point of a state of entropy of the moment as to what in the symmetry of time we may regard its historical and future states.
Why then would we insist over time, what mechanism for it, that we imagine beginning conditions of which there is a descent from regions of entropy. The Omnium gives us a hint if we are intuitively aware of the super symmetric views of the world and its dimensions. For the center of all things cannot be placed in a particular time. It exists a least on the super duper level, the jokers of the tendency and resolution to energy and preference for handedness, the subtle form of mass that is the gravity and in this level of local space the direction of all diffuse motion to the great grand joker.
We here at the balance of the sentience perceiving the invariants of the changing world beyond the idea of the maximum diameter of a boundless finite universe, as well the existence only of negative energy, and probabilities as a relative state of things often in vibrational balance, temperatures where three things obey the reduction of the zeroth thermodynamic law- or entropy as an idea as a measure of time, the centripetial forces also relative and determining the direction in the main of atoms compared to the stars.
For at the foundations and from our centered view of the moment and within a range of its quasic dimensions of motion, minimum distance is not simply that even as a line or string because it has its own intrinsic tendency to the right or left or the absolute, or that they combine to break or vanish... such constants may in the main reflect a minimum but they are intrinsically quasifinite even if their effects act remotely as too the maximum of things not a simple idea but one our formulas have need for generalization.
This fifth direction goes beyond the simple symmetry concept of distance and in a fundamental geometric consideration or principle of physics it is the resolutions and the chase of the tortoise by Achilles from all the view of the world that what seems to persist as the real, once resolved these random orbits close to the circles of Newtons ideal laws, the creation once as some general idea of distance and duration in its balance of the cosmic mirror acts as to conserve the reality of the omnium as the same.
In our dreams within dreams we can discern what is real and what is moral and ultimately what is truth which cannot remain a chaotic matter of probabilities.
When mathematical models are applied intuitively before the evidence by theoretical insights or experiments support the first attempts, clearly the models such as for DNA code by Gammow can intelligibly have its combinatorial approach along with our encoding from a more physical evolving approach, for these two theories combine in the symmetries of a little more general space- these involving greater symmetries than our current philosophy as science dreams. If some old ideas are to remain valuable as the idea of say gravity as curvature the modification cannot be just of the math or the theory, but of the stance toward the intuitive grounding of a more open stance- the rumors of the theory of everything should not be closed so soon if we want wider awakening.
* * * * *
{I'm not sure what I am doing with this computer off line but it began a chk disk for files and I lost a few paragraphs, I hope I can recover the depths of the further concepts on this I add this morning} :
*philosophy of falsification suggests Feynman despite the immensity and depths of scale and numbers and the accuracy level of the quantum theory that in this sense it in his words is "wrong" as scientific methods progress as the theoretical systems are so modified.
*what can Pitkanen, I and others mean by a generalization of Feynman diagrams if not a rising toward or at some general unity of reality or the frontier face of it as if to recover the aether idea as if the absolute of the generalization of the day? To generalize the Feynman diagram is to go beyond the relevance of its use as we explore new levels of the world and its physics- so too its historical accident of methods where it was a self fulfilling prophesy. We do not want to ask what as teacher we want the students to know, our world of entertainment all there is if they are awakened to the world despite its hardships so it works to direct their drama like lasers directing the lightning, but also to lead out what they have within in the universal world of all humans of equally potential intuition.
*Does it not ask the same of the idea of a string in its uncertain path and boundaries limited by the complex number space where beyond that we can imagine things not in our perception or vision only by mathematical formalism as algebra? The string where we add dimensions in an ideal system ad hoc that these may vibrate or move yet contain no volume.
*Materialization from the nothingness down from the mystery of recovering the older physics from the newer continues to be a matter of debate in the practical world even where the results and history of experiments among all possible worlds persists as to how it might be possible to charactarize it on any scale of accuracy or place in space and time of this debate.
*The idea of distance then requires a wider interpretation- not that there can be no negative distance even relative an in asymmetric proportions at some state of the omnium, but the idea of distance itself is to be questioned before we make theories based on maximum diameters of an energetic universe or of the concept of minimum distance. This occurs in the faculty of human consciousness where an answer does not meet nor arrive in the questioning or the questions every moved on even in accident to where they may encounter an answer, this as the substance or possibility of that which can exist as living.
*From a wider view of physics the reduction to and information from the simplicity of Feynman diagrams only works so far despite the determinism in the uncertain paths and integrations of all possible worlds and physic has to proceed as if any mirrors beyond what we regard as ultimate conservation laws are beyond our perceptions as if a moving virtual image as I said we limit ourselves to the limitation to the generalization of the intelligible mathematics of complex space, it too intelligible mathematically but understood in our limited algebraic formalism even for structures shown there but said impossible to draw or see.
* If it cannot be so drawn then the existence of something like a gauge or any such manifold as a possible buried or compactified landscape may not exist as a real object outside the endless pursuit of accuracy as if a theory is only reasonable and not of reasons and may only be a side view as real as we desire to maintain it as an alternate faith.
*Distance and the contiguous quasifinite possible connections within and among its depths and spans, if it is in a sense maximum or minimum, has the ultimate logical and philosophic property it is a non-necessary quantity or quality, and this the quasicity also in our state and grounding of consciousness as we explore that world between the phoenix energetic and the totality of the omnic physics disembodied from the pretensions of arbitrary knots of the manifolds of the gauge models that require a lot of exclusivity to maintain in our perceptual reality if our training or endowment of disposition were not born to resonate with the lesser ideas of science as complete.
* * * * *
I added another view of the wideness of refection symmetry mirrors (here as a modification of the I Ching) which as with Leibniz represents information. The general structure is in the binary letter algebra and much of the mathematical mechanism is obvious when it comes to dealing with the finite values and models. I hope this is helpful for visualizing the problems involved and that those who still cling to a limited geometry and quantum vagueness will adjust their research to more progressive views.
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment