In retrospect we should forgive the errors and consequences of theory in that it strives for some sense of what is the real. Dirac knew the limits of what we know of things inside the nucleus and Feynman likewise tried to extend the ideas of quantum theory and relativity into it as if the description was tangible and not a paradox of remote view. While such ideas are self-fulfilling prophesies they can be part of the general design and with a little thought in such systems the explanation can also ground what is intelligible where we as observed and observers strive to invent higher abstractions from the principles of symmetry.
For example, the question of scale as a measure relative or absolute as if the principle of web design in its development of content and management logic- some idea of a plane, of boxes in boxes can overlap as if some stance to ideas of simultaneity or superposition. Feynman in the interchange of space and time-like mathematics that upon unity and its core of conservation for the photon at rest mass, the invariant vanishing yet still there accessible to the equations, the perpetual motion of the energy is stated to be more real.
In this sense in the middle of scales should we take at least the energetic process of the world as more real than what the design and structures seem left behind in some stance of time, we are also in the middle of how we should relate to these higher symmetries that we see a little more of the totality so to explain the one sided asymmetric views or that we are in a sense outside surfaces on but half shells. In effect when we gaze into the physics of the nucleus the analogy to these quantum effects of photons as contained by analogous particle like entities, perhaps gluons, in the middle view on the balanced mirror of things the yet unexplained idea of quark containment is obvious in our comprehension and faith in that method and system. Is it the reality found by chance or by design?
The intuitive difference if we can be as honest in theory as in our objective toward experiments not to pick and choose what supports a particular system, the rest is fancy or at best wrong- it is not good to use that word imprecisely and call it science. But the physics of energy certain has more real effects of which living things should heed. For me the idea is the difference between the compactification ideas and the condensing (that is flangelation not the idea of say condensates which is something on the way to remote systems that resolve when the information there or transferred but of partial capacities and mixed paradoxes.)
In the general view of things one might ask, as there seems all there is this side of possible heaven and supersymmetries, is this middle position that makes life possible worth the experience if we had an ultimate choice to be within or weigh the call into the life as force and ephemeral of our existence? But the conpactification side of things, born mainly from those schooled in what we know of mathematical analysis that applies to the world intelligibly from the view of the continuous (had I gone to school would I have not been an advocate of this view?) it certainly seems something like a six dimensional manifold is in a sense more real as far as capacity or energy even if poetically the term has some magical resolution in the spacious now. But we should expect it is not all the vision.
In the boxes within boxes of a style sheet somewhere in line or off line internal or accessing another vague page or plane, cascading from the outermost layers we find that by design or default where things connect under some language or title, in a range that is the head unto a body, that things may overlap by the accepting of relative or absolute values we find indistinct ranges of color and the frontier outward as transparent. It is a useful metaphor that in the end does not detract from the art of some content although once understanding the management one does not need the restrictions of discipline or even the hardware save to share the labor and effort between the virtual and so called real world.
On our scale of things, phoenix like, we dwell in the small bandwidth between Good Friday and the Sunday resurrection in the spacious tightrope of Saturday wherein our incarnation holds disintegration and resolution of rebirth that the world continues if not the individual far from the conservations and symmetries as things imagined paradoxically greater vanish into integral or transcendental unknown and unseen places- for it is thought that the algebraic view of mirrors can be wrong to the wider view of symmetries that involve adjustments to unity in days of exact numbers or say variations on the interplay of pi both as a description of force or as randomness.
A similar division of our intuitions is that of how we cascade through the relative and absolute layers, surface and shell models where the sensed greater reality of energy is of course a question of the ground of the less understood ideas as a general idea of rest mass. Here it is quite obvious we can invoke both the multiplicity and nilpotency of some contiguous value as constant or even dimensionless so to imagine layers or shells of things and the arrow vectors of time. {paragraphs lost there when the computer reached a glitch so I reconstruct as best I can the content:} By default or design the outermost layer at the frontier is transparent.
In particular the idea of intrinsic curvature as real or virtual for the life force is that question of if there can be a many-world or multi-verse view of the fundamental constants as to what is the capacity or the more real of physical energy. These a result of the higher symmetry of the conservation of momenta so viewed and again we should heed the influences real or effectively real as if to ask if the experience of life as all there is worth the effort if we as thinking beings would have such a choice of ultimate design.
At such foundations the alternative views are intelligible wherein we can imagine layers connected or not of analogs to the constants such as that of action either as the idempotent or the nilpotent formulations. In this sense it is reasonable in the middle that the weak force will inhereit the world as an explanation for possble analogs or contiguity in the quasifinite, an extension of relativity as general in its analogs also (I call exxene).
But from this in quasic space in relation to dimension, and to what is moving or not in some grounding half shell dialectic as to what generates what along the way to a wider field of information to some limit or idea, that so transferred in the spacious now, by consideration of the insights of natural dimensions we find a more general space where the idea of what is at rest relative to the interactions of these dimensions as if absolute- how then do we regard the more tangible of the time like or even the maximally compactified foundations of what we call in its expression as energy? One thing for sure the distinction between types of black hole like objects and their radiation can be made on many scale levels, that sense of the creative is also intelligible to contemplate.
In general we have the division as to what is the more real in the fundamentals where corresponds at least our initial concerns of the math and physics, and the issues of how we know or perceive so to interpret the geometry, stereonometry of the plane (brane). For in the quasifinite world how things may cyclically reduce in the interplay of paths, forces, manifold and gauges does invoke as well what beyond the transcending or descending states as intrinsic curvature or of some scale as the assumed and intelligible actuality we invoke not only the general dimensionless intuitive view of the finite but also the relative view that resolves, paradoxically, into the hierarchy of transfinite numbers to which it is also possible in the generalizations to reorganize our ideas of group theory as a moving as well as fixed scale of natural measures and transparent dialectics of unity. In these invisible realms to some free associations of middle levels the transfinite idea expands as well its gauges founded on cardinality resolving in the creative singularity complexes beyond such regions within regions is also a higher general operation of intelligible things such as geometry and number. The transfinite as the abstract grounding of compact or condensed manifold gauge ideas and energetic differences over the Omnium at the frontier of wisdom also break, resolve, and exhibits creative intelligible design as with any comprehensive transcendental or algebraic and integral description of which we still need the philosophy to better grasp the realities of our existence.
It is a matter of what we bring of our artistic sense to our symbols on the cave wall more than what is just inside or outside the cave, thus there is still some certainty in the logic and the formalism of views as our curiosity is driven on in whatever hidden measure or illusions of inertia there may be- but should it not be a matter of easy deductions for you with theory to adjust the notations and formulas to the wider vision? How far beyond the continental shelf can our theories explore and exclude we of a complex structure of mind in the universe and not fall off deep into what we wonder in the end is some bottomless pit or ground of our being?
No comments:
Post a Comment