L. Edgar Otto 04 April, 2012
From the viewpoint of interpretations of quantum theory as part of the grounding for consciousness, the first thoughts that in the systems of the world extra-sensory phenomena are real, what is established in the most general case so far is that we establish position (an absolute or limit to it in space or time.)
This does not necessarily establish coordinate position for that is part of the methods intimate to our reasoning, the need for intelligibility to which we apply the focused but not necessarily reduced artful steps of proofs both in the abstract and the concrete of descriptions.
For over the infinity of count in a line segment, given a constant distance, we can connect them end on end to make structures like a convex polygon, say a triangle. If we break apart a point we can insert another such segment so as to make a square and so on. Once two segments are separated what does the idea of distance of any length amount to?
But as the Euclidean view is intelligible in the viewing of planes, the uniqueness we find generally in the laws of flatland, extended questions at the foundation in the formalism of quantum and other mathematical physics can just as well be the questions and results of the Euclidean plane as a central reference for more abstract concepts.
In the wider space or brane the string theory going a step further in both the abstraction and mysticism than the quantum in terms of complex plane vectors, Lorentz groups and so on, the universe itself a its wave equation, we find that divisions of thought and perceptions can be relative stances of intuitive error and our sense of intellectual beauty where the stances are tenable and of equally potentially true descriptions.
From one side of the absolute grounding of a stance that which is not the theory appears to the other side as mystical and as if a vision or epiphany in revelation that which is other but not a nothingness at a distance is often seen as a sacred mystery thus intellectual property of those who remotely view such abstract structures and systems. The supersymmetry ideas in particular is akin to a positive light on the sacred geometry in its God like totality as a sphere where what is not there perhaps is a core of concreteness to a consciousness as surely as with Rowlands description of muons and all else not muons, this something is created with the existence of the muon which defines his nilpotent point as the creation of a nothingness.
We can hold the nothingness likewise as the sense of the concrete real and this can be a disorienting concept for some and even seen as an attack on their being as beliefs.
In the flatland of dreams we can be on either side of them and the nature of consciousness, along with the extrasensory, within the limits of where segments virtual or absolute connect or dissolve we can debate as to if deeper into sleep or its analog for some a death what exists there meaningfully, meaningless, or meaning free is answerable and intelligible outside our practical experience and applications for a better world by the sciences.
In this sense, as some live only in the tendency toward only their dreams and nightmares, Jungian steam engine thermodynamic models where the unknowns of what can happen before a surface is complete but extended in the ideal sphere or modeling of a mind, within the realm of physics this space has concrete symmetries beyond the simple synchronicity of time. We can see to some extent into the future and dream it- but is this extrasensory or when our consciousness perceives another consciousness and we are in our wishful dreams we imagine things or conclude things of which the truth or clarity comes only upon awakening.
Were this the whole of it we would know the mechanisms or the relation between what amounts to mechanisms that is an understandable and for all practical purposes complete in that range of awareness we know as living existence. But what of the nothingness, the addressing in the striving and tendency to awareness toward some object that is not there? We do not know if there is a certain truth in that window of emptiness so imagined more than the abstract position which is more foundational in the uniqueness and privacy between minds occupying parallel or the same symmetries that shifts beyond perceptions and predictable yet intelligible connections or breaking apart. In the greater reach of symmetry as in the quantum theory respecting a grounding in the relativistic measure of say the proton diameter, distance and chirality so assumed measured and defined, that to the extent minds have encountered each other and shared this way in some range of the past they can so understand this reversal deep in the world and dream of what is the concrete and the consequences of the world view even if we cannot absolutely read each others minds or share a reality while in a dream- yet we can infer by a higher sense of things, most likely brain evolved, anothers thinking.
The source of neutron differences with anti-neutrons is not simply a matter of complexity or the life time of its interactions or decay nor even its averages, nor the question of what is unique where it is rare in the confluence where lines can be parallel or meet in a point- otherwise will describe a triangle and from these more modern views we know for example that in some cases an equilateral triangle will always be formed (a theorem we ask how it was overlooked all these centuries) for the plane itself has its overall patterns of unity, the laws of such a God like context equally the Islamic tiles as the Hebrew sphere and the Christian mechanisms supposed in mystery of the breaking and the profane inversions where negative and postive curvatures can found whole realms of manifolds as the Non-Euclidean to which we think the other side is mirrored as imaginary.
These foundations, at the heart of intelligible arithmetic and set theoretic or choice axioms still as independent and not integrated theory, live only in that space between our dreams and awakening of which we find clarity or our minds wakes up as contorted gargoyle garbled clowns making sense only to themselves in the moving if not wishful dreams which to all the world could be felt intuitively or seen as profound or outside the sane.
So many of the realization of profound ideas were made in the explanations, even awared prizes and praise, that work to so define the theoretical system should we look deeper at these mental symmetries of our existence. Can three points line on a line and we distinguish from the outside of these reduction paths of integrations many fold- which of the three quarks is the center begging for explanation. Is a casual observation that a arc of a perfect circle resolution of some orbit is the same as if a complete circle not something that sets a subtle proof as assumptions for future reasoning that tries to keep the questions mystery or dethrones some reasoning into the decoherence of the question that the ultimate world is in this question uniqueness as only random?
But it is easier to feel a sacred vision is real if it corresponds to the structures intimate and invisible in our head that so corresponds to the cosmos and physics, to go beyond without rules into our imaginations or to fall endlessly into a black hole we independent and not responsible for the sayings and the thoughts of others, Cantor dust not a problem that weighs our world down we who are swept along indirectly by the broom wind by those who with straw brooms seep their glassless front yards of rocks and stones and leaves as you see sometimes on the farms. Or one can pound the dirt into a find floor as in some dwellings in the Middle East until all such structures, compensated by the amount of suffering in this dream world to better rewards so to come as the Prophet tours both the onion shells of Dante heaven or with respect to the Greek geometrers takes it flat and stands it on end to this world, at right angles.
* * * * * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment