A Philosophy of Creative Science Frontiers Toward New Physics

L. Edgar Otto 15 April, 2012

I have read that the names of colors are fancy's of which there are so many it is hard to find a standard, the element of the subjective is still needed to sort them out and this of course depends on the lighting, the individual and to some extent the genes. I proposed as certain metaphor of grays and their inverses as redefined for the subtleties of neutral particles perhaps too the sterile and the self anti ones.

Or we have come full circle that in the virtual world some have standard but common names and of course some bit level of the compass, more a digital and finite view that faster than the eye aims for an analog continuum, for that is why among the hues for more precision the colloquial names were chosen in the first place.

Yet if we have an artists sense of proportions as to what is harmony or color matching discord at least on the lower dimensions of our synaethesia up from flatland, to write of it subjectively and Romantically like the other great genius, Goethe, nature seems to have such a sense of hues too. So we need not reduce our world to grays and even if there are higher colors we cannot see that go beyond even color then the hues here and now will do. So I offer you my first attempt, four colors which it seems by matching we find the bad and good , fair and strong of combinations. These too can describe aspects of the particles, Majorana, quasic, or where we think or hope they meet in a system unified.

I leave it still where it belongs in the mind's eye of the thinker to decide if from one view we find perfection or from another that is seen as blemish as we learn or run in place or time or fall in a sense of Biblical and astronomical proportions down some bottomless rabbit hole. I bid you good enquirey! and open eyes that our ghostly dreams is the transparent evidence on which we shall awaken to our greater dreams.

* * * * *

I see also that Lubos has the same sort of article on the 10 or 5 descriptions- nothing new here as some have speculated on early on at the foundations like Rowlands. It is clear moreover in these majorana issues, say for example sterile neutrinos and so on, and as for some sort of measurement of the various contexts and sorts of mass or simply for the understand of the spin of some object like the earth if we actually find a set value for some invariant like c and so on... that in principle we can reach these things perhaps, yet at what price to support the standard theory on firmer ground? Do the string theories not undermine the possibility beyond some cherished postulates or axioms? I mean so many work on the one simple thing and in the same direction whereupon they awaken to the same paradoxes again on a higher level. On the lower level one cannot have it both ways without contradiction- so which is it? Where in an atom is there a neutral sterile quark like relationship and are these not such mirrors in fact at least on the quantum level? Count the neutral colors for in that one finds at once the wisdom of the cosmos and the deeper understanding of our uncertain grasp of the real at the frontiers. Even the wide string landscape can be seen as a very bounded universe.

My roommate read a book and thinks sometimes I am a Paladian. In mixing the colors I wonder at what he sees and I dont- that is until I inversed the picture.

Also, as it involves natural four space in the color codes as well here is my simpler early vision again of these neutral flat things as grays.