Odatum in the Overworld View

Odatum in the Overworld View Odatum Group Informational Factored Q by Q Q Times Reduced Euclidean Power Set Partition's L. Edgar Otto 12 April, 2012

Odatum - Overworld Particle-like data flavor shifting quasicontinuum (QQcm)

Inter-dimensional Postulate Principles:

1. Given n point like odata in any dimensional representation of spaces by binary factors the scope of the odatum field as flat is intelligibly a binary existence number and sums of combinations of the subspaces as power integers.

2. In the simplex group every odatum is connected to every other odatum the number of them being equivalent to a zero point reduction to the natural dimensions of their count as number.

3. In the sum of sub-generations as a reduced line-like path with restricted abstract motions in a subspace representation only takes one of the axes in a given representation.

4.(***Addendum A:) The odatum over all these representational dimensions can be represented as a numerical direction toward ever expanding binary powers unto the compass of the odata possibilities or toward the decimal. This number can be quasically factored as if to mirror or reverse the properties of such a directed numerical notation and in the general case of indefinite dimensional, yet flat space, can be subdivided into sub-odata or sub-odatum and that beyond these ends and beginnings of factors is a translational shift of a relative scale over a wide but neutral and not necessarily directional dimension or number as a grounded yet relative scale of which the maximum expanded direction power number may exist only as a mirror or echo of the concrete state of existence reduced at the zeroth power before the decimal. (***Addendum B:)

***A:(and obviously a few other concepts that could be put more formally into an unordered list of relatively independent axioms, postulates, and theorems - but is this not the quasi-subjective method under description here once one has developed intelligible references and evolved language or notations?)

***B:(But in the simplicity and field of information on this scaffolding of notions and notations, for what it is worth and with intrinsic decoding of meaning in the poetry and logic of it made overly elaborated in the ease of the emergence of new terms we find not only the complexity on this scaffolding but also its content a mass like resistance taking time and effort for communicating- but with my own personal limitations as a finite and organic being and in an effort for continuity of thought this post is there to get down the essential meaning even if the direction is in a sense an inertia of purpose where it persists not always questioned in self reflection doubts and loops as if such an odatanmation of quasifinite expression of this model of mental data as that of the ultimately simple and reduced stereonometry here so described. I do not know to what extent the essential ideas are already in the literature or touch as similar systems and methods.)

5. Footnote on the threshold of awareness of systems then extended intuitive concerns: Given a complete compass of the laws of the Odata in these lower dimensional and group representations as a power continuum do they completely describe the span of general space as if a totality or possible sums of such totalities real and virtual over possible spacetimes? Again, are we at the frontier of the Overworld view or is there no such thing outside this logically complicated but linear like description? Could some say six dimensional compactification space be generalized further in its own approach and tems or views? And as an overworld view what of the Overworld view of an overworld if so contained and reduced into some complete span of such described space with observed and inferred intelligible and persistent laws including a spacious uncertainty if we view one end or the other of a factor-able binary algebraic number.

6. Clearly the axial and surface directions in an ordered but shifting quasic field can be a state of possible multiplications that is not simply a reference to a Cartesian grid of some dimensional representation and the greater combinations remain from the viewpoint of a cell as an odatum or upon its motions or parts of a discrete circular motion (momentum) it is still Cartesian and intelligible that way as long as the power continuum is composed of 1 or 0 that touch or are indifferent and independent to transcendental number aspects. In this respect ideas of tunneling, wormholes, hyperbolic spaces, some actions at a distance, are intelligible as if a continuous group theory less than the conceptual and actual limits of the space thesis of this paper. (yet it remains a factor of the general reduced Overworld as if absolute here so described and in the open paradox of existence beyond the omnium as if the overworld may paradoxically have overworlds.

7. For example: the binary number 100001011011 Q^Q and its inverse mirror all not shifted in a wider encryption is factored into 100001 by 011011, the group-like unique linear sum of the powers of the 1's unto 12 dimensions is the binary trivial adding of groups that may in a vague sense contribute to our mass-like value concepts. These factors have a certain uncertainty over their own span of possible paths wherein we can generalize over the length of the number as the substitution of 1s to 0s or the wild cards as uncertain (*) for what is a further nonlinear-like but flat space concept. Again do these loop back into self intelligible systems or do the remain quasi open systems? Such a way to see groups and numbers puts restrictions on the possible sum or products and division of numbers rather than of a vast and vague landscape where things are physical as described by mathematics the geometrical span so puts the restrictions- but clearly there is not current method to demonstrate these possible choices from either approach. (as far as I know, or as far as some or all of it may be currently expressed here, but in the connection of ideas or intuitions the extremes of number beginnings and ends is as ever new as it has always been in the initial origin as we live and integrate our states of what we were and are over this vague idea of time as existing, living.)

8. A Speculation for the Nature and Substance-like Meaningful Information Transfer between n-Minds: To be clearer here, where the poem is grounded on a myth that grounds a science, where geometry is defined beyond the description of touch and sight; that the paradoxes of the involved be it an extension of quantum theory as matter or as mind and these being in some senses real or illusions; we suggest that the mediator between two minds is a particle-like vacuum in a field of default of all possible fields, Odatum.

To the actual and our familiar world the replication of experiments is an interment thing at such a foundational absolute and consequently the system over its own sub-space of Overworld is intelligible with the methods of probability as intrinsic uncertainty in the quantum theory as part of the description. But such implied evidence of things perhaps outside the pale of that attached originally on the dust or emerging in the mathematical absurdity but physical reality as focusing to depths at but short of absolute reduction the general stereonometry is one of quasifinite non-necessity intelligible but illusions in its intrinsic parts even while intelligible. It follows that in a sense, from beyond considerations of forcing frequencies or effort that a mind brain in its structure can be like a transceiver in a chaotic and static world on which the thermodynamic properties are dissipative yet creative on its omnic default field in error-like codes.

We sometimes communicate sweet nothings to each other after all and these need no language of translation nor can the metalanguage implied be accessed by one individual alone, or two can miss the others points or respond in the actual world opposite to what they are and perceive in their own minds and hearts. We can attribute false paths or extensions of their grounding reduced overworld of perceptions. We can loop into our own tangled tangential perceptions.

In any case although by analogy of default the purpose arising from the depths of underworld space does not determine the behavior of an individual in the depths with certainty, nor can an actual behavior always be analyzed as evidence of predictions because of proximity or possible futures in a defining of sanity and intellect in an environment situation. It follows that memes (instructions or recipes by Cloak) are not necessarily determined by lower levels especially of a reduced and unitary encoding of genes, these just define the tendency of our continuous paths of possibility and what is by count and integration and conservation restricted as the whole system develops.

To this extent the physics of the Overworld is illusion-like where such ideas appear in remote considerations. I picture but a variation on abstract quasic and grid with scale motions on the Euclidean multidimensional and logical chess game in all its simplicity. Its holographic senses between adjacent dimensions or its fractal limits and origins in complex planes in the general substance as conservation symmetries is also that consciousness endures but is founded in the partial motion restrictions of its substance through directionality as the reflective wake of illusions as vacua which may intelligibly encode and map in the various dualisms such as wave-particle what in space is at least our spacious but shared actuality.

Yet we can imagine a pure space beyond, for the manifolds of compactifaction or the natural extension of axial dimensions without restrictions that may at some time or place over or beyond the omnium be more of our reality than myth and illusion. By this I still mean something between the totality of here and God or Heaven of which the math and geometry in this post started the direction of ideas where the concept of God was the catalyst if not the parallel but at a distance author of our sentience and its purposes.

* * * * *

The Physics Implied by the Overworld View (up from Metaphysics in the n-Dimensional Stereonometry) 10. I add this thought that the abstract trajectory or path of the described Odatums can have influences on that level of an Overworld-like layer of generalization. This in principle goes beyond the quantum theory and is foundational not in the nilpotency of descriptions nor even in the parallel quasic issues of idempotent similarity. It is not the wake of a relative or absolute created vacuum (on this level surely to be seen as metaphysical in Rowlands sense but from a higher view a ground for the hinted reality of a wider and hidden level of physics of the real). It is the choices in the wider cloud or field, or gauge that is left as an influential wake that surpasses the more solid seeming limits of maximum symmetry or continuous regions of minimum scale.

For our choices not made, or in the quantum like solution faster in some space of many possibilities faster than when the problem is put to the machine if turned off to compute in the abstract wake of created the vacuum trajectory ( I mean in what sense can we subjectively or as a matter of materiality can we say with whatever level of certainty, say a sort of super-uncertainty at the frontier layer of layers in a cloud, if the vacuum determines the physicality of process or such a process determines the vacuum?) This what I do not watch, it has been said, on a television may have some influence on the choices someone else will make, but in a sense at a disembodied distance.

But such things are real then, if the connection to the subjective can be made to the physical hardware that supports expected behavior for quantum computation as in its hints in a diamond lattice lately, the quantum bit issues somewhat set aside in such general theories where in fact signals containing no information in the vacuum or actual space have no such useful information to decode. I quite imagine if the ultimate nature of the brain is a form or simulation of quantum computation we would have access directly to it in principle with the usual models of how we might so mask privacy and access to things even in an open field of search and enquirey.

But in quasics, as we are after all working with the complexity of a biological model here, such access would be the general case anyway in the so called real world. For the everywhere present but misunderstood bacterial cells do learn on their level and do work together at least to the coincidence if not the intellect of the geometry of space upon a certain threshold to act as one organism. Where this the case many frontier hinted effects as biological beings may be explained and even from an anthropocentric view beyond the surface weather models or when there is a pollution known physical that affects the organism.

So indirectly or directly the paths and flows of information, the hidden odata perhaps operating thru a physical structure or medium a global effect might in reality exist such that the state of actual transfer of general information can have a direct collective effect on the learning or even the management of compensation say as to the weight of individuals after a major war or that they grow shorter or taller in changes of climate adapting to the latitudes and ice ages. Perhaps in this age some as seemingly mysterious as our so called epidemic of the spectrum of autism could conceivably have such adaptive but then unmetaphysical cause of the simple threshold effect of the greater transfer of various qualities and amounts of information perhaps mediated by the physical choices made by individuals.

In this sense we come back again to an idea, albeit not reduced to quantum physics extended into say a string landscape with feedback progressive but not always contained or expanding loops, an effect as if there is a continuum of learning and quasi-conserved unique memory in general that the origin at quantum effects can have room for us to imagine beyond the standard physics a room of humans as the cause of global warming after all.

So goes the argument, absurd or not, which of course in the casual remark of Einstein to a student that "economics is harder than physics," and despite the recurrence of economy's based or not on consensus of subjective value or on standards of gold- even the information may or not be enduring despite it a virtual form of the management of wealth and unrestrained application of the true protection of reasonable insurance that to some extent a social system endures or wealth of individuals during tenure has real security. No wonder these issues are not understood well for long without the inevitable evolving as a philosophy of stable economics. There is no set reason to develop as some governments did against the possibility of fundamental surprises something like a science of remote viewing or for that matter intermittent but quantumly possible ideas of say cold fusion (and yes hot fusion is still far away by the usual physics involved as compressive and limited to the costly evolving technology ahead of diminishing returns or inflating beyond governors of the engines who try to manage things by subjective political means.

This is not a case where there is a clear difference between society and an individual, for in the overworld one individual can pollute several soul or can open up and idea as if original which like photos on the web essentially are no longer (short of new international and observed laws) a question of privacy and property for other theoreticians or innovators in the cloud find themselves thinking along the same lines as an essential individual or a product of the general collective trend. Such a puzzle piece that so describes the greater symmetry and measures it of the whole or for an empty space the whole defines the piece shows that on our middle scale of things one person in his environs of the context of thought can change the whole world for good or ill or be hopelessly suppressed by it- we influence each other on some higher level. We can create a gray mud goo and mire to become trapped within should the general methods of something like remote view be awakened in the masses as with all de trope actors or the stars and understudies in the play of theories.

I find it odd after sitting on the simple idea of four space playable and not nerdy quasi-logical faery fields and chess that the universities with big explanations of the game, that derived from some idea of tri-chess as a three player game is no further along than the color cubes 16 by 16 (which upon further contemplation suggests the Monster group limits to what is general symmetry- a less than general philosophy really) in the Fourth Dimension Simply Explained as abstract motion in the great reduction of ideas, Euclidean at first, by methods that are difficult for memory (although the do realize these can be played on a two space or brane like idea of a physical grid) as if even in this age of inspired programming of 4D Rubik's cubes the awakening and suppression of such views as if still a mystical overview of higher space still leaves us a the level of the beginnings of the last century.

*********