Cloning Quasic Cosmic Loop Trees in Nonnecessary Generation Coherent Systems

Cloning Quasic Cosmic Loop Trees in Nonnecessary Generation Coherent Systems

L. Edgar Otto 07 March, 2012

We reach a conceptual paradox or generalization of the concept of gender and generation for uniform physical uniqueness of the new existence space and inheritance of intelligible laws and numerical processes where in the generalization the question of radical transformation of a system is neither certain nor uncertain thus a closed or open question to the paradoxes, contradictions and tautologies of the sentient and organic bandwidth of perception and being.

The question is, outside of the offspring as a possibility of natural or analogical cloning of a spacetime universe, free in both directions of many or singular states of number, do we have a reversal of this as a higher and more general arrow of wheneverness time with the consequences of quasi-breaking of the nonnecessary symmetries involved? This holofractal concept justifies the inheritance as successive yet unique as a more defined individual system.

This possibility as a foundational structure, outside of the quasic generational permutations in resolving the quasi-independent quasi-coherent of a system and its subsystems under the hegemony of an aggregate, could indicate a certain range of generality where ontological phenomena are grounded in the higher generality of quasic loop string equivalence, a dark substance non-necessary to a light substance centering.

Of particular interest is the three plus one formalism to which I conjecture that three terminator codon or coordinate quasic pixels balance to the one initiator across the chemical properties of the abstract arrangement in a quasic field. This by fact or coincidence seems intelligible in the addition for we find 35+37+38, and that +25 as a sum to 135 which suggests this is the level of the fine structure compass and the general grounding of what we mean by dimensionless constant of all levels of such parameters.

For in the case of Fibonacci filing systems we can imagine the linear sequence, replacing the 1 then 1 of the sequence over the 24, that is 11 in cycle patterns when reduced, that ten follow in the next generation in the neutral or rest mode of the irrational slowest sequence tending toward phi (tau in Europe and Coxeter) that the tree does not necessarily continue in the phi efficient energy transfer explosion but by virtue of this quasi set of files on files as a tree, their is a sort of abstract energy independent of the conservation of the system similar to continued falling of a chain of dominoes by the process of its immersion in a field that is the gravity. In any case this has to be explained more than leaking through the idea of rigid branes (unless of course we have such a more general analog of a background and its universal containment, thus an Omnic Brane).

This of course raises again the question of at what transformation frontier can any such uniqueness in a system be recorded or conserved as well the question of the recall and rewrite of the process of memory (imprinted on the vacuum) and how such things interact in the past where quantum like they are not present unless sentient views. One possible solution is that the frontier of this great and grand super-generalization is that some Higher Sentience and Intelligence can be reasoned or shown to exist. Of course the question as to God as well as universe and Being is, as a non-necessary state of reality, why is such an entity there or rather than not- but this condition is itself the question of loop-string neutral symmetric paradox. In this sense there are hidden neutral aggregates of symmetry and everlasting uniqueness reflected as super virtual in the sea of higher particles where they touch our standard symmetries.

At this place order and open order in systems of information or complex spaces, and in the surreal ends or beginnings of transfinite cardinal and ordinal numbers as not necessarily a definite successor or precursor to a given unique system state is uniform throughout this omnic aspect of open time and quasi-open possible cloning of unique systems in the depth and span of quasic intelligibility. Thus it is not just an issue of memory and future causation or do first things in the sequence, but the same question of difficulties of perception of self and universe in the living or being of sentient structures and physical processes existing, themselves. In this sense we ultimately as sentient set the reality of the sequence of the directional consequences of reading which makes a particular characterization of the cosmos in its widest generalization confined into its infinite but bounded super-brane of the background or phaneron as unique to which all subsystems may be part of its quasi-unitary compass.

* * * * *

In the illustration I made a typo but decided not to change it for the idea of cycles in this context may need a new word. Cyc-o-les sounds good. The point of this term is that we can stack the limited and unique looping trees in a series and this raises the general question as to if there is a limit to the number of them, a hyper-symmetry patterns in the breaking and creation from a middle game life force like organic stance. In which case the patterns may be subject to the abstract analogs of patterns with the predicted, and Galois like properties of algebraic root limitations in the Fermat spaces greater than 5.

Of course in the abstract the cycoles are not limited to an action on just five levels of tree branching. The grounding philosophy or metaphysics here is that 0 and 1, a 1 by 2 quasic pixel thus the mirroring and the quaternion to octonion differences, 4n and 8n in general where these numbers show up- in this case 480 and so on. So at the prime number two as a class concept we map onto the cosmos the simple idea of 0 as non-exist or impossible and 1 as exist or impossible- we could go on to ground the complex number situations but should do so in relation to this quasic theory otherwise the mathematics is not powerful enough to address the questions or make the exclusion to some case the only or unique description of the topology.

On top of this, we have to have the "wildcard" as if between the 0 and 1 as extreme ends of what absolute number algebra party tells us (thus p-adics etc...) where there are no gray groups but it is intelligible to so design them. Wildcard I use the * as a symbol. In the illustration I show the double negative equal and right angle sign I have used for some shorthand of an instance or equality of non-necessity.

What determines the intrinsic looping, (and any number of them could loop at first blush to a beginning- thus showing me my teleoscoping problem was rather hard to see and figure out after all in the logic of it ) between the cycoles?

I do not know how this works in the general computer systems but I suspect that the linear 0 and 1 regions in say a text or a drawing is the homepage limitation that is not done beyond that with the other styles of modular numbers. In fact the text and phots are the same if we had the right encoding we read and search for them. I note also that until a system settles down and adjusts to the two views it will seem to go into unexpected loops but this will be harmless to the abilities of a system- it is not a virus as such anymore than the imposition of some view of an operating system.

Of course we have the default and might teach the system better ways of searching say between photos and the text but the grounding has to be reworked. Loops in general can cause duplications on duplications of whole systems and it much an unanswered question at the nodes of graphs at least in 1995 it was so. So it occurs to me that in the increasing duplication caused by embedded hyperlinks in hyperlinks between pages and domains and servers... that such a remaking from the ground up of the filing systems could easily find and sort the original order of the posting without taking up so much bandwidth and memory. Of course in practice we can link all filed things to the ground level and do regardless of how we search between levels.

The point also of my small logos is to arrange our themes such that a more general 0 and 1 initial-final states of reading will tend to organize them intelligibly. While this is difficult, especially if one is unaware of deeper processes involved beneath the content- in the case where such looping strings entangle our past memories in the abstract or virtual vacuum a simple meditation on the future rather than the past would help, to pass the threshold of that reworking of childhood memories- maturity in the old psycho-dynamic theories. For as difficult as such an encoding of files and themes is it is vastly less difficult than awareness of what happens in our coherent and broken mental processes.

* * * * *