Lampion Spring MMXII

Lampion Spring MMXII
L. Edgar Otto 21 March, 2012

In the center of abstract scale we find the Phoenix physics realm of what is general foundational energy in the universe.

This sort of energy or mass can be considered as quasifinite and ambiguously real within intelligible symmetric measure that can be distinct from other forms of mass that declares or discerns the arrow of energy which is also the grounding of quasic connections of matter as quasi-real.

The mathematics of remote models of the very large or very small scales, the depth and height of the universe no matter how deep or high the open or closed or repeating looping goes, with reference to the default of the subjective as a living flow or current, the temporal omnium that seems like time, is that which at our center of space and time in the living is abstractly independent in the span of space and time and is as empty a grounding for the reality of the subjective experience as what in real history can be recalled over progress in time- that in the subjective Phoenix realm of living things.

To make an illustrative metaphor the ground as a memory as if a region is quite remote from the present of living in it. This can be experienced if we go back to the places where we were very young and more sensitive to the world we take fore granted all around us and to the people there- that is if there has been a change or progress enacted by people. A natural return to the blank state may be more radical a change yet it is ultimately devoid of meaning. This is in the metaphor as if there is a subtle quality of spirit or soul within the Phoenix range, but one that defaults to the ongoing reality of the Omnium, our unique earthy souls.

It is clear that those who would explain such effects in relation to maximums of peak vitality in terms of what is some organ or its subjective content have merely divided the theory into what is not the spirit as an explanation, but have merely assumed remote things about the distant empty state. Inside this the scale where for an individual his own physical and mental extent has its range of boundaries and possibilities the unique and individual and species specific effect of its own internal middle scale should be considered where the state of illness or health is to be considered. A human in this sense is not necessarily a commodity on which to impose too incomplete or too rigid a theory.

In this realm also, in the particle world, we find the subtle higher symmetries wherein in entanglement, hyperentanglement, quantanglement and so on for these varieties of which we can symbolize as distinctions that the formalism of partial or multiply integrated unity is different in expression for the three space formalism or pure four space. But the Phoneix energy in an evolving quasi finite world, one that moreover encounters certain limitations of possible sequences at certain numbers on which the patterns of geometric structures teleoscope in a quasi-finite manner, the Phoenix subjective adds to the unique omnic directionality as well as concrete physical time to which the expression in the pattern of an individual as potential yet uncertainty in a more general expression of discrete numbers.

Clearly, these are distinctions not just from a material viewpoint but also from the idea of intelligible structures that is after all part of the unified description of quantum physics as to be interpreted by some as consciousness or as physical as so described for all practical purposes. It is also the nature of zeros or points of infinity that can be distinguished so as to distinguish the arrow of that which is steady state but a current of changing between these higher considerations of higher symmetries. Geometry by itself as not a living concept can be a blank desert also as well any pretensions in itself quasininite as it the driving dynamic systems to which our spirits are mere commodities as such is the social uncertainty of peoples.

Theories that limits things to these reduced poles of dialectics while not necessarily wrong in either remote direction of the view will fail to catch the essence of the middle and living state of things save by subjective communication of the view as significant implications and consequences. Surely a formalism of equations can be found between the razor thin tightrope or at a mirror plane of singularity for some physics unification- and yet clearly this is not easily done, also clearly we can reject some ideas that will intrinsically miss some point even if both are true in a debate, taking sides then some theoreticians say that modification of theory such as the limitation to special relativity- or as double (see Lubos) or of some form of modifying Newtonian mechanics, as wrong or to be ignored insofar as what is missed and assumed as anomaly. Breakthroughs have to have concrete and enduring extraordinary anomalies. This is as true as the varieties of what is thought the origins or foundations of that distinction we call mass for negative sign change (if we can consider the math one with the truth of physics) or that in the subjective phoenix way we find an distinct analog of the same thing.

It is this and not some voodoo based on blind reductionist physics that shows in living things the limits of those phenomena such as the extrasensory in the subjective itself as it too is a quasifinite universe of discourse. Yet it is especially the case in the Phoenix world of energy that it cannot be shown with certainty there are even subjective necessary realities but would act only at a distance and from one view while central be very rare from another view. The universe would at least be quasirelative or quasideterministic.

* * * * *

Note: I was a little under the weather, so I wrote this mainly for myself sitting on the keyboard and letting the ideas flow. It was in response to two streams of thought and to the comment made to me and my reply today a couple of posts ago. I am sore from laying on a crumples surface. But I have done a tremendous amount of graphics today working off line to the point where I only offer this less formal post. I would like to thank Gibbs for the info on the Abel prize as that pointed out to me the very issue or concern in how these quasifinite and discrete things have these dimensionless effects which solves the more extended problem I have called teleoscoping. Just as with patterns hidden in natural numbers this strikes me as an important contribution to more general theories as I ponder the structure of symmetry from Pitkanen's wormholes and RioFrio's blackholes, and Lubos opinions- I only wish I could make real sense of what to do about the elections. The propaganda even in entertainment (today I saw the movie about J. Edgar Hoover) looses something in the reality of what view to take in our social or physical history and while the young are deluded so many ways I cannot believe the all the people can remain so all the time.

I am not sure what I will do with the particular graphic as it was something I did on the side of the current project- but I post it because it is beautiful with two forms of the golden structures one in inverse colors and slightly smaller such that the spiral of squares making rectangles and rectangles making squares are both represented as I was using the resistor color code to express some page order for other illustrations.

* * * * *