Lampion A : The Steady Quasic Cosmos View

Lampion A : The Steady Quasic Cosmos View

L. Edgar Otto

The quasic ordering of the spectrum results in what is almost too obvious when transitive as parallel units over the span and depth of space. In this sense we are confined to the view as if the idea of all things save maybe higher gravity and mass, that an illusion of what in itself may be the effects as that given in a paradox of ambiguous existence, nonexistence. We are in structure then what we see on any scale and level.

It is a subtle change of view. There is no more beyond the WMAP data than we are remote from that for all of being and instruction are spaciously there, a quasi-absolute non-necessity. The totality of the dynamic omnium in particular is one with the dynamics of the totality of itself on many holofractal levels.

What then determines the energy and the shifting of the spectrum? If it is the properties of the main diagonal in this hierarchy of frequencies and color values generalized as if there is a uniform color space and its seeming analogs, then in a sense and locally the beginning or initial color is in the inverse of the information of quasic binary coordinate location the terminal color.

In the discreteness in physics these colors can come close as this dynamic line turns into dynamic circles. And over the span or depth the loops of color is echoed in binary quasic coordinate values. In terms of our familiar normal three space of the Euclidean plane and all the other planes that are included. including branes, that respect the inverses of fields and groups as a grounding we have more in the lattice than simply the distance from one such coordinate of the same color to another each describing the appropriate angle to the point of initial origin on the circle before it takes on its multipoles.

In this respect that the essential distance in four space being the flat and golden ratio, we can see it as an artifact of numbers and structure as to the evolving tree or fractal steady energy content of the whole, or we can see it as the dynamic foundation of what makes the Omnium move. But in making this distinction the choice of the reality of one or the other mirrored models is not simply a neutral place to which we balance the equations to make things simpler that such neutrality has its mirror, as in some ideas on the nature of neutrinos which in a sense are the same sort of ones that convey information thru the quasic field as a local phenomenon or a general one over all twistor space possibilities, angles, phases, volumes of density, the propagation of heat and so on.

Where intelligible phenomena are thus unique and sometimes a coordinate seen in a quasic space defaults in the operations of mathematics to zero or to those points we may consider singularities wherein on one hand we generalize the abstract topology and arithmetic and on the other hand we can still imagine things higher than the universe of which our uniqueness has at least an abstract connection or relation, quasically.

* * * * *