Evidence
L. Edgar Otto 19 March, 2012
Here I will post certain discoveries that seem to synchronously arise in the literature in which the authors have made a discovery from their view a part of physics that is a surprise, that has no other explicit explanation, or appeals to further experiments to make clear what is happening.
Today, from my view, as sometimes the norm over time in gazing at the articles or pictures that what is neatly put into tables of disciplines, presumably for the overreach of the average thinker or cost of the experimenter for a division of labor and costs of enquiry, diverse articles are relevant to my theme at the moment as if the intuitions converge in the air to cover the awakening of ideas of the day like said of the non-Euclidean geometries with independent discoveries "sprouting like violets"
Again, while it is hard to find four and five leaf clovers in a field among the three, once you do and trace it to the roots before plucking you may find from there many more knowing as the leaf number rises they get much rarer. It was some stratification to a child to find so many on a dare, but a game children play in the hide and seek of science.
Crudely it would seem that on one side of the Omnic asymmetric arrow or mirror that while half of nothing is still nothing, half of infinity cannot be said to be just infinity in a vague crude counting sense- the idea of counting and society as at least the Western expansion and ordering of the hierarchies of world design a new level and application the the new concepts of counting in the world.
But from the Omnium standpoint the talking of halving of the remote names of number, zero and infinity in the Riemann sense, the issue is really about unity and its halving- moreover it is the sense of unity and the result of it as evidence that is not a surprise from a general view that is the measure of a theory and its extent of application to physics.
Clearly, from the start the orbits in a solar system while not so perfect as say Bode's law, have a higher symmetry consideration as if quasi-finite laws blend in the structures- again to which they say when we find more data we will find more knowledge of this surprise of how planets form beyond the idea of simple aggregation of clouds and of course the radiation pressure from the central sun.
Clearly, in the biological world, the bacteria in our guts have an influence on our health to the point these may be an essential part of our evolution but why are we surprised, the gut outside the torus of the body, the negotiation of the worlds encounters internalized, that the relation of viruses inside them would not have analogous intelligible effects on the body as a whole, directly or indirectly?
Clearly, the general symmetry and the surprise between the DNA bases with methylated for unexpected proton transfer pathways, beyond the hydrogen bonding (as there are more foundational elements of atomic structure than the elements of the first stars) that such a symmetry while expected when we convert mass to energy so as to say what level a partner may be in mass to its antiparticle, can be an unexpected or surprising discovery to which I already imagine these new super-symmetry concepts apply. Moreover, what of the idea in general of the connections between bases as information and structure in more detail of the topology- or even deeper than that withing the geometry of the base itself?
So, is a zero point or region so unique its value is zero when we come to some place impossible for the electrons to be found as if a minimum unit or a zero amount of energy depending on the view- that is if there is nothing deeper than quantum theory.
Perhaps the measure of a new alternative theory is its coherence as explanation for evidence of its truth and of its unity when no other theory comes close to scientific explanation although something like DNA unzipping had only the synthetic vision of Fuller and now a more material or physical level of explanation.
I would challenge Pitkanen, give him an opportunity, test the general theory here and of his as a vision of greater unity, as an extension if not the extent of a basis we may say is quantum only, to provide his take on these three areas of research I find have a certain relevance of unity to my ideas, surprisingly and controversially relevant as pure intuition synthetically- that is it would be a very fantastic coincidence for the truth of this to arise from my abilities and efforts- that, if he has the time or cares to, he gives us his take from the alternative and unified view of TGD on the connections or not and concerns of these articles of evidence.
Perhaps it is also a measure of the realization of the consequences and extent of the application of such unified views as a measure of their depth and significance in how it related to other synthetic or symbolization theories. I would ask a lesser theoretician, possibly on the left wing of anthropology such as Dawkins yet reductionist not new age, if in a scientific sense, methylation is the mechanism that is behind the inheritances of culture and language structural development in us after all.
* * * * *
Sources: articles yesterday in science daily:
here
here
here
* * * * *
http://physicsforme.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/%ce%b1-remarkable-rectangular-looking-galaxy/
ReplyDeleteI saw that picture awhile ago. Ulla. It is rare obviously, but is one thing that the description of the universe as integration and differentiation is powerful enough to explain. My first guess in a vague theory anyway- consider the geometry that may be involved in the hexagon of Saturn as a little more complicated. Still it amounts to parallels of a discontinuity space and a smooth wave of continuous space with likely modification of chance influences in the sub space paths.
ReplyDeleteBut I did not think about it that much, that is it did not impress me too much, I just noted it and you brought out my thoughts on it. Still, it amounts to trying to solve the old problem of finding the area in a square of a circle. I guess the gods sometimes force the wrong pegs and work outside the logic. Anyway, you may have noticed Lubos attempt today to force the logic of the world in a system not powerful enough, the Lorentz idea as a plane group model. It works as far as it goes of course.
The same thing is wrong with the idea of the symmetry in a generalized Feymann diagram where we can twist them relative to the quasic grid and get complimentary maps of particle physics as if on a square of such continuous circles. This made me wonder if Matti has read my post way back or not or if we had some coincidental ideas.
Now Lubos, well, he is trying to reach beyond the debate to assert with this hundred year old physics that our intuitions on non-locality is the distinction and source of what is pseudoscience. Pathetic is the state of things I guess when even in the way things are done and taught the theory is far from the application of what works as expert and model system achievement.
Anyway I will check out that link now and hope I haven't made any foolish crackpot (oh wait Lubos had the intuition to rant I was worse than that- as if I care, and btw respect him highly). Sometimes the truth of things is simpler than make of it.
ThePeSla
Ulla,
ReplyDeletea lot of interesting hints and ideas of combined spirals in space and a vision of our future resolving to such a geometric form, certainly the best of a creative speculation that may have a certain higher dimensional truth to it in some vision.
Anyway, that emerald cut, thank you for a timely Saint Patrick's day link and Happy Spring to all of you.
Pe Sla
Nolin, welcome, you are linked to a very good educational and informative sight.
ReplyDeleteI am not quite sure if the obvious statement on numbers was to make a point on my view of things. Does it say that there is great height and depth of numbers even no matter how far the depth?
Certainly there are number in the middle also- in fact in the scale of things the length of a mouse or pencil is the center.
But such numbers may have special relationships in a wider view of space to which the background usually described of numbers as remote we observe as just a background to the real issue of how creatures respond to each other while time moves on beyond the individuals.
The actors, themselves or in the role of someone else are more important than the stage for the play in many senses - why?
We can descend in the depths of the very small and find the usual models of physics, such as that left in spherical harmonics to which we may have to make a distinction to the two zeros found, conceptually- but math does advance by our consideration of ideas on zero.
Some will say we do not understand entanglement when the models we make are logically extended as in the example of hyperentanglement in the nucleus. But devoid of anything but its objectivity these models are not that far away from Dirac- and the orthogonality of spherical harmonics for all the complicated formulas that we derive in the modern physics. We do not understand completely enough at the foundations the unity of numbers and patterns we find in the living.
It is not enough to say all the mass comes from some effects when it comes to scale, that gravity, time, matter, space are one thing- which in a sense they are. But this way to see the numbers is no more radical than what we are given- is a dimensionless constant a sort of modification as a source of mass? In screening of electrons is only that real as a metaphor to our perceptions of life in the middle scale?
So difficult, yet so focused and universal- so only we matter most to each other and that can be a bottleneck for clear scientific progress.
So we have a powerful tool here, let us use it this time for education and clarity- if I can help let me know. It is the default birthright of everyone. Of course I do not expect in the encounters in the world that when galaxies collide as to the truths of things that our spiral dreams become like a rare emerald- that perhaps it is in the mind of God already.
The PeSla
Nolan,
ReplyDeleteyou made your point so we do not need a repetition... spam 101? LOL
"You aint gonna pick somethin up on Interstate 95, not even a bribe... or whatever path on is on in our empty tanglements, its is in the motion and the translation, National seven on the road perhaps... Nothing is safe in the shadows, and no bit of virtual landscape can be fallow for long while the soil is resting, fract not the last drop of oil in our century of new pollution that will come at our doorstep if we continue old habits of thought even distant from technical conflicts.
The PeSla