Unique Paths of Self-playing Games

Unique Paths of Self-playing Games

L. Edgar Otto 02 March, 2012

To some extent the uniqueness of a developing game self-playing in the higher dimensions, where there are wide options to the path choices, the reality of the game is that which is the unique physical reality and the fixing in what seems a stream of absolute time. In this sense we can imagine a time flow similar to a space motion flow, that is an analog to general relativity involving conclusions we may make from the observation of dark flow beyond its apparent span and extent of observation. These effects apply also to the depth of the various mirrored continua and is grounded in the existential possibility of choices as in quantum absolutism. This then is the physicality current or flow and it may or may not vary slightly on all scales.

It is not so much that with physical parameters a fifth dimensional game will play itself, but it can. It is also a condition of non-necessity as to if this as current or flow is to be considered a physical reductionism or an emergence of phenomena. But it can be the case for a given perspective of unity, a quasifinite collection of unique and not necessarily connected superimposted real and virtual pathways adjusted in the general flow of time in all directions down from the continuum. Contiguity is that between the discrete and the continuous but it is not a spacious causative ordering- well, it is a quasi-ordering in a quasi-cardinal system of continua.

The awareness to the depth of the real in an enquiry is the creativity of artistic view so as to have some decision and direction as to the paths at the ground or foundational level where we are beyond the free will and fatalism of it all, and it is not necessarily a nothingness, filled or not filled, beyond or within the laws of conservation and entropy. So what makes the universe unique and viable is what makes the enquirer unique as well challenges his uniqueness in the learning as surely as a proper experiment within its own parameters will give in a non-necessary world a result of quasi-certainty. The creative enquirer is that which can fix the state of the system in the mental as well the substantial aspects as the unique physical.

We can still imagine in absolute quantum grounding that there are other but separate universes. But this, to the extent the universe seeks a unity over all continuous pathways would properly be called a quasifinite quasic set of such parallel universes.

I am not sure this sort of intelligible but philosophic logic is done properly in the face of all paradoxes. But paradoxes tend to confuse the situation to the extent the foundational questions arise anew and are not resolved with any certainty. On the other hand what this sort of reasoning seems to me in the process of enquiring is a streamlined path close to the question of the uniqueness of a soul and the universe sum total, Omnium, that the intuitions so creatively involved are clear and resolved when paradoxes are encountered.

It remains to be seen if such reasoning can be applied in these intuitive creative terms to the existence of God. That could be the exception and still uniqueness in the world exist- but as to if God is quasi-unique and what sort of idea of a Diety that would be is paradoxically still open. As Carl Sagan observed before you can describe an apple you must first have a universe. Perhaps this can be turned around in some for of mirrored logic. But what does it mean if God is unique that before you can have a universe you must first have a God? Or, unresolved in the facts if not the philosophic logic, can this be turned around such that both God and universe begins from the symmetry and substance of the apple containing seeds and all?

To deny purpose and teleology where it is unique, that the directions of space and time are not rigid vectors as in a rigid theory of them, nor chaotic vectors, is to deny the foundations of the universe itself and more so the idea of the properties we may observe in theory of a greater being. But this level of abstraction has to go beyond the physical and structural processes of the Omnium for such a God cannot be merely quasi-unique nor quasi-finite.

Of course, if I were to say to you, from my view it is certain that God exists and there is a personal and intimate if intermittent connection- you probably would only understand and as most dismiss or bond to the faith of commitment to what vaguely is beyond you, would that not be the same logic where enquiry itself is a paradox that I creatively have noted... I note that then, but it is only my as your own unique path where our multidimensional minds as living things are to a great extent self-playing games. Thus this sort of quasi-faith is the grounding that as creativity and originality is a uniqueness that goes beyond facts and faith, dreams and reality, myths and their scientific materialization. From the view of higher physics and its complexity our ideas of faith so far have been surpassed as to the clarity - but it is not certain that in the real we can find the correct path or be the correct but reasonable makers of moves with momentum into that path as the loss of pieces is traded so far for the patterns and structure in the chessgame of universal physics.

* * * * *