http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120316175143.htm well now, are some things secret for some reason that research is not let out? Anyway you may see this is the very issues of similarity in the quasic view I have been thinking about.
Lifespan Paths and Consciousness in a
Simple Holofractal Quasic 4D Level
L. Edgar Otto 18 March, 2012
I present you with a first level model of the chess game, mostly blank so you can print and fill in the numbers of an actual game.
After a game we have a unique path, lifepath, of the game played. But while the living, existing in the game there are influences on the game we can regard as a change of the perspectives.
In the topology of the play we regard alternative moves between at least one player as conscious in the decisions made for any particular move, the other one can be considered as not conscious or assumed so. But within the perspective of the player making the decision to move, within himself there are considerations of holofractal differences in the boundaries and volumes of the chess board in which to base the styles of moves, and this shift of perspective needs not be alternatively shifted by either player- they can express moves over a wider span of the two player alternating move unique decisions.
These are of course equivalent representations of a game field of which between holography and fractal considerations we can make informational distinctions as to the reality of the information lost or gained, or as illusion, or emerging from the abstract boards while the lifetime of the game.
In this sense the imagined intelligible program or laws beneath the game is both an ongoing compiling of the data into physicality and yet the board and the topology is also the ongoing mathematics and geometry that is the live-compiler.
The continuous and discrete differences are a part of the ordering and factoring of the general idea of a quasic grid but as a resolution to a lifestate over the lifespan of such an indeterminate environs we note that in the case of the three space board the moves describe not just the circle line differences but that basic polyhedral (polytope on higher levels) are described.
The density of the reentry of multiple layering along Riemann's ideas can be a variation on the general rigid case of mathematical laws for a manifold. In such a more spacious span of freedoms of abstract motion and centering we may relate to the ideas of such uncertainty of decisions as if these are consciousness in expression or in substance.
In the symmetries involved we note also that at any general or point decision in the more general manifold we observe the flow or the uniqueness that grounds our ideas of symmetry building and breaking- quite possibly it is here that the arithmetic, especially of series of the irrational numbers existentially may kick in from a more general view of cosmic laws.
Still, in higher models there are more complicated forms of these symmetries of representations and these may be ultimately unified, or they may be transitive to the same regress of such infinite laws which remain both closed and opened. We do not explicitly directly experience such phenomena so are apt to doubt if such dimensions and higher symmetries exist- or we can imagine that if these are logically extended at least the complications of the landscape are intelligible as all manifolds may apply.
The analysis of such games after the fact that somewhere their physicality is established in a sense also is subject to our ideas of multiple density and holographic volume illusion. That is that part of what is not a unique contribution of all possible lifepath spans is not found in the recorded game as to which changes may have occurred between the states of the play while the living.
Philosophically, and psychologically as we define as fundamental geometry as the distinction of touch and sight, and that these are indeterminate over the manifold, and that these may have physical or mental influences in an environ or between say two people, we cannot know the mind of another so changed and touched directly even if this is possible. On the other hand with physical sight and touch in a concrete live event there are no necessary guarantees as to the reality of the encounter even while the life span of such physical encountering. But this from a more general view does not forbid that the physical event my act in the background as if there were real influences of such sentient perspectives ongoing and hidden while the game uniquely or generally unfolds over the lifespan of the Omnium.
* * * * *
Our Wish upon the Stars
L. Edgar Otto 18 March, 2012
What shall we name the nameless or name unspoken
particle as if a god? How close to a sensible English name so King James if a spoken word founds in myth a literature?
Or all the quantum cats with good Jewish names there at the creation of the birth of physics- Old Testament tribal gods a close as we get to save what can be of His face while in the desert thirst in our blood that stones can turn to water or rigid staffs turn into wave form snakes, the near and distant miracle, the mirage of nothingness?
The poetry repeats in its own mirror, emphasis and more the lyre and music, the meaning and the triteness of a psalm, the
adherence to the law and laws debated who share the space.
Creation that begins and ends in prophesy, self fulfilling, that the promised land, emerging past the broken vase to it finding completion again, the haunting mutation that adapts in the adapting, the claims to all the past among all who have pasts and will assert their differences with pride again.
For the soul in solitude against the vastness yet empty night at hand, uncertain our eyes respond or change the scene, the average soul clinging to the business of life, a given it is the simple poetry of being that makes the poem
I mean the wandering planets in their perfect time and circles, conjunctions, vanishing around horizons, making the tides that touch the seasons and the flowers while the cycle
Are these not the slow motion of Jupiter and Venus and sometimes the sickle moon that mark events, stars of birth of the once and only teacher, or some tally mark called disaster?
Is it as simple this much to explain our world, intimate with poems and songs- that is if we gaze through the sky the pinpoint light of stars vibrate and twinkle while the discs of sister orbs give steady light, dance thru their own phases as if to prove like Galileo things centered on some sun.
Or deep into a cave or well looking up in the bright light of day we can see the stars their whispering motion, moonlight.
In the stealth to which we dwell as much in frenzy as in reason, for those who commune with the cosmos at this dawn, moved every so slowly the the planets moved behind our chimney despite the passing clouds- harm not the wine, harm not the wine.
* * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment