Color as a Metaphor of Foundational Physics

Color as a Model for Foundational Physics
(and the Relation to Moments in the Moods of the Real)

Alternatively:

The Quasifinite Foundational Nature of Corpuscular and Continuous (general gray) Color Group Theory
(and the Intuitive Possibility or Error of Hypercolor)

L.Edgar Otto 12 March, 2012

With such simple models in mind questioning the foundation and checking the reality of the experimental context- some issues such the debates and thought experiments between the quantum and relativistic styles, Bohr and Einstein and so on, are rather old fashioned to the state of our technical and theoretical progress.

What is a discrete or binary event in the context of computational technology as it appears to us on the screen is really a difference of voltage in the circuits as to a positive or negative value that at a certain threshold declares virtually something as existing or not existing in the overall picture.

Newton establishes in the physical world that each color as broken down in the spectrum is not further subdivided into lesser or a range of lesser colors.

When the color is the same it is without scale in that a pixel representation will remain the same specific color within a possible continuous spectrum.

When the span of the pixel is decreased the resultant loss of information actually can multiply the range of colors and pixels in a region much like the limitation of a directional symmetry as to different axial lengths in aggregates can increase the general range of symmetries.

At the unity quasic pixel if we are to impose color differences related to the direction of axes and the implied variation of shifted discrete colors (which as if a shifting in a continuous color space are generated in a linear and intelligible manner including the count of perceptons) at the unit pixel the value can be one or one half, as in the case of particles less than this overly simplified model of physics as color variegation.

In particular this applies to the idea of viriality, of the difference in the kinetic and potential physics of formulas.

We can imagine one unit pixel that emits one photon of color and that as the scale increases we have the same range of color as a single color but there may be a quantum like discrete integral number of them of which these also measure the intensity or energy potential in relation to some grid or intelligible region.

At this level of simplicity we can go further to try to understand what we mean when we make the usual confusions of interpretation as if consciousness is needed for the existence of things, the view of one photon- yet this may be different from the single photon up from the micro world so viewed (in reflection or primarily) or down from the macro world (likewise) as a fundamental difference in the same quasifinite particle in its general quasi-intelligible expression to which we can make interpretations. In sense we can ask of the micro world does a photon exist until it is viewed by a sentient being just as with the star that is seen only years later. In this sense philosophically we can only postulate a quasi- general ideal observer to ground the existence of Being.

It is clear also that the differences in this simple color theory model are not strong enough in theory to suggest that the arrow of causation and time found as if a property in general in nature will explain the ultimate bias by some law or series of processes as that between the idea of matter and that of the dark variety upon their interaction. That theory needs a little more realization or modification or understanding of concrete results synthetically and analytically before we can find this aspect of total theories intelligibly intelligible at the foundations of the foundations. For subjective views in the general context of that which is real within some general region is grounded in the the world and our perception so immersed in it as the sense of what is the real.

* * * * *