Discrete Abstract Stringy Wormhole Patterns

Discrete Abstract Stringy Wormhole Patterns
L. Edgar Otto 20 March, 2012

We imagine two concrete entities that can be connected physically by sight and touch, or between them paths that are not seen and not recognized directly as physical, real.

These patterns can be recognized in subjective theory or in observations of the physical arranged in a totality, or they can be a supersymmetry process that exists on some level of theory as a reflection of the imagination, a subjectivity.

We can also imagine the discreteness of the color dimensions which may be focused to a real or virtual center or can span the density of the whole- a subtle reduction of the colors with mathematical form. This is the same sort of process as the measure by Fourier methods to some grid of volumes and sub-volumes with which we measure the density of material objects over a span of space.

The imagination will naturally as it tries to paint a picture of unity on some scene, especially one that in its loose explosion does not equally develop over sub-regions as in the simulation of the matter in a nova explosion. It is this sort of thing in which on all scales we tend to impose on what materially seems random structures face recognition.

Such patterns we paint from the intimate sense within of how we see space are essentially the difference between that which is circular and that linear in the remote extremes and how the subjective, even if that is how the brain is wired, decides when it makes a decision in an arrow of ordinality which is the left and which is the right, a focusing of vital environmental information,

From the more synthetic and popular theorist we can raise the mythology of things like faces on mars which is pocked with craters of circular rims that alternatively in what can amount to sacred geometry are slices of cones through time that implies the realm of the wormholes as matters of hyperbolic geometry.

From more modern views of the universe in totality, in its depths where in that totality patterns arise because there is no where else, apparently, for the intelligibility of the structure to go and what is seen is physically unique in the arrow of ordinality of possible structures of the moment. Thus, and this reduction to geometry as evidence in the patterns seems more reductionist so objective as science as an analytic theory we postulate certain patterns in the COBE or WMAP backgrounds. But what is this telling us as our flights of imagination explain the axis of evil for example or other influences of attractors as evidence of parallel totalities?

There is the model of the jet steam for the weather in which we may consider a standing wave where snow is on one side and record heat on the other side. There is the potential for differentiation of what may be a neutral position. This neutral pattern like the influences of hormones in the brain or the differentiation of right and left brains in itself is not the stable given but may changed in the hidden depth or the span as well change the perceptions. These chemical clues may be as diffuse as the cells responsible for smell, but these can be colorless and odorless, a certain distance of effects. This also may reflect the differentiation of male and female mental organization as not a given as other models are possible and this model can be further generalized in its sub-varieties in humans, even within similar species who moreover react differently in structure and specific chemicals as to the virulence of even identical viruses.

So in the national news, because of the money and the insurance, erectile dysfunction of men is declared an illness covered by the general fund- and for that reason the nature of female orgasm is also promoted as something of a illness to be covered in the 75% of women said not to experience it, in the brain, second only to the intensity of epileptic seizures and its patterns and thus role of various frequencies. Again this is interesting research with motives for profit at least yet there is other data like the erectile enhancing drugs given to war wary Iranians in a study showed that they will not work without certain moods in the brain of the men who take them- that is the new story said that for women we have been focusing on the wrong organ.

It is not clear to me if such money for research is the most important thing we should be researching with limited funds so forgive my sense of humor when I read of such articles among those of more formal nature. Nevertheless, sex is a powerful metaphor and in explaining some issues of physics it is readily understood or in a mind free to wander the discussion if goes on too long as cleaver remarks say in a spontaneous play defaults to such innuendos- not to mention that a game of spelling, the ordering of patterns of chance words, is for that reason popular outside the elementary classroom experience.

But this sense of neutrality in geometry and patterns in nature, of artifacts of triviality and coincidence perhaps, is best seen from one side that finds just a physical explanation for patterns say of the sunflowers as a result of pressure or of the hexagonal shapes of wax cells the bees (and by the way apparently wasps have face recognition as well the ability shown in humans in a single nerve to do so.) Yet the mathematics suggest this golden ratio limit important when we get into the world of four space- so it is still a great debate by the sacred geometers at least as to if these sorts of patterns are dynamic in the foundational creation of structures.

It is certainly a great conceptual divide between those who take a stance on these issues as to what is science and what is the pseudoscience in the realm of actual science itself. These issues being at least the frontier realm of what is the nature of reality beyond our perceptions and imagination. These may be ultimately the most important as the pendulum swings back to foundational theories in general and the role of the geometry understood as significantly a center of theories this time around.

This seems to justify my own position where there is no intelligible balance between the roles of the feminine mind in physics to the point were we cannot understand the other side of things as if there is only a one way philosophy when we know now that in our species there is not default gender as either side suggests who desire to incorporate what the other has held in the power of some hierarchy. These views can only impeded our gain in wisdom as objective science.

So what does it mean when, for example, a blogger suggests something that will be perceptually controversial that the speed of light is not invariant over time and then goes on to suggest (I am sorry but I am not clear as to her project of yesterday as a funding for research or a praise for the recognition that this idea is dynamic and grounding) Is it that we discovered the measure that a mini black hole exists in the center of the moon? But in the context or theme of this post this raises other fundamental questions.

For example, how do we know if there is more than one such entity, in fact if a black hole is the mouth of a wormhole that has two ends can they not be the same sphere or rim to which if there is any distance between them it is cancelled or somehow implied only, real or not the influences of effects? Does the material objects in the existing and unique patterns determine the reality and discreteness of such wormholes? Or as with matter and gravity on the ground level can this be the other way around, perhaps paradoxically both ways?

And as for scale apparently someone realized that if there is a Higgs particle it is not clear how many such there are let alone how many types there are by existing standard concepts.

So in the exploration of patterns, real or implied more deeply than we have of our scaleless analog to the macro and micro worlds we have the general idea of these greater symmetries and dimensions. It is here in the painting of patterns that the issue of how to see the dimensions as compactified or not in the 2x2 or 3+1 formalism in four space, both can apply, as not a trivial but a fundamental question. In my illustration I suggest, well after the drawing rather than imposing a pattern before it and by the reduction of colors by binary power.

After all any general rotations and directions of which we can find definite and complete phase patterns does imply a general ground for things like a wider sense of what gravity is as a force or a falling along the lines of the same paradox as of the dynamics of phi and its patterns in a quasifinite world where in theory the idea of wormholes can in a mirror be independently finite, as with the idea of strings as fundamentally a reduction from space as if zero wormholes. It does not help to merely assert the equivalence to acceleration, especially acceleration of acceleration to reach the most coherent unified theory.

But the differences in the formal 2 by 2 or 3+1 count does not have to factor or divide the space equally into the given dimension or even completely at any one of them- that is the particles or dimensions in abstract space may be reduces to lower dimensions and space such that the arrow of general omnic direction shows only a small difference between sub-density default analogs for some of them. These issues too informationally discusses the nature of local and non local observed effects and the transitive ubiquity on all scales perhaps of say gravity as a mediator. In three space is quite possible that if there is a mini black hole in the moon that there are two somewhat distinct as if a measure, perhaps even should the situation be inverted that what we can style to explain things is a faerie field of stringy wormholes that may or may not reflect changes over time when its invariance for all practical purposes certainly seems the case as if any changes are not directly observed with scale.

But we already know that the differences in approaches to the classical and quantum theories can really be the same description while the differences we imposed as perhaps an accident of our imaginations.

* * * * *


Flowers in the Early Spring
L. Edgar Otto 20 March, 2012

For all its ephemeral beauty in the moment
the flower awakens timeless and immortal

Far away in seasons between the light and dark
from the gods and yet as close to them its reach

The buzzing bees come out before the nectar starving,
filling their weak legs & hollow compound eyes with pollen

So more flowers climb back into the womb of earth
fewer with desire to bloom again by the fallen at Arlington

Love said a disease, its granite obelisk a token
of the reaching for the sky, earthquake proof its edifice, pyramid

Only woman can dwell there in the prairie light of buttercups
reflected on their chins, their stormy rain rebirth daisy chains

Men think they are battle hardened so don chain mail & tin
armor, taking ground for conquest, no bullet with their name

Somewhere as the salty blood flows out, a lock of hair, a
photograph what of woman lost the soldier finds, explosions

Save the forgetting of the battle in the ritual of flowers
brought & fading stars on tattered flags brown winter colors

Yet I dwell with you still awake to drink of you in your prime
that neither storm or gods can break our wants our honor.

If the gods are aware, as you are in the bitter sweetness
of unrequited or tragic loss of love that always is yet never was

They must know as we both know of each other so find
themselves in the loving of the world as I so loved you.

* * * * *