The Impression is Non-necessary Reality of Consciousness or Higher Dimensions

The Impression is Non-necessary Reality of Consciousness or Higher Dimensions

L. Edgar Otto 17 March, 2012


The existence or not of higher dimensions or higher symmetry has its avocates which seem reasonable positions to take. In more familiar styles of debate the environs of making connections of views beyond those of one party or another as with other foundational issues, for one or the other may insist their side is obviously true, the discussion can go beyond the bounds, or sink into violence for the emotions raised that works at the core of their expectations and whatever the rights they may hold in their unity of being.

At first encounter with the idea of even four space, imagine if you will a simple and logical extension to basic machines to be described in it such as inclined planes, or better imagine some unit such as that of a measure term for electricity. It is challenging and interesting when we understand and are conscious of the extraordinary higher view far from the cartoon world where laws are overly simple looking down a space level. At this frontier of our existence we are apt to confuse the four dimensional environs as if the substance of consciousness itself. A few may go on to further generalizations and paradoxes where looking down from the higher view successively without end the significance of a unique consciousness is lost in the levels any of which can seem but a crude cartoon of unreal or overly real cosmic laws.

In general, any one human being may feel overwhelmed at the prospect of even viewing the expanse and multiplicity of say the galaxies or stars in the sky and feel infinitely small and insignificant, that line to cross over may seem to erase the substance and location of their hearts and soul. Yet others viewing this feel the hopeful and utmost inspiration. A few after some false hope realized, or who survived the loss in the sea of infinite scales leading to nothingness, have found their way again to a balance of view but wider awake.

For some who have lived awhile with the thoughts of wrinkles on a higher theoritical view other principles resolve things to their satisfaction. An issue like faced with the ultimate of a universe we could ignore the idea but in passing thoughts occasionally- ones that moreover is the same sort of uncanny feeling where we become closer and actualize our own life and what we imagine of some others- we can say God is the universe, in the creation and design, the universal and great, perhaps returned in the very small but never the lesser. For those whom have obtained a slightly more advanced view such a question is at best considered a philosophic one, far more simplistic than their new level of understanding so best it be acknowledged for the rise of wisdom's sake but buried in the archives as if a lesser science.

I have an objective vision of how such quasi-conscious chess games may be played but all the boards and pieces and the language and the metalanguages in the transformations of the player from state to state- the metaphor over a time for their moods and abilities, a four dimensional situation at least, will be but a cartoon character that does no necessary portray in the actual substance of our consciousness here and now as to what it is that makes such sentient choices human so as to cross imaginary insightful boarders. The human element is essential here but not necessarily something on the level of various ideas it enters the game we think as consciousness.

Nor can we in such models locally or as a general structure of greater spans and depths escape the logic of such environs by the mere appeal to things like vague chance models or mechanical ones or analysis of systems subjective or objective of purpose. For in a sense part of the reflective nature of consciousness is the playing of the game in which in the actualization of our uniqueness while alive we may learn something from structure as a steppingstone to what seems to have to start first from systems physical and objective. Time as philosophic as subjective or a fourth dimension is also not the key to what is consciousness but it is an intelligible way to discuss the paradoxes if we hope to find a better unified picture of what these things mean with us.

* * * * *