Neutrino Metaphysics

Neutrino Metaphysics (Part One: Linguistic Parameters and Arguments)

L. Edgar Otto 24 March, 2012

I have been busy off line reviewing the various htm standard languages off-line so my presence on the web and the amount of posting will appear slower than it actually is. But it is enlightening, as the process of web pages has its underlying logic such as the mathematical operations in the structure. Some of the things I have tried to do I see have been developed- if the world is intelligible just the use of the medium, beyond the managed content systems and the content itself (most people evidently seem to want to dwell in the content or the cloud and most who manage it find this a fine thing. But this attitude toward leaning and living applies to our habits and rituals and addictions in real life). If we understand, and are as intimate with the formal and underlying intelligibility or logic of our being one or the other can be an independent view of things of deep connections and of dynamic disconnects of our sense of a unified explanation.

I may for example not think of the internet as the end of the alphanumeric age but of the beginning of the next level of that age- especially me in the habit of not distinguishing a difference for the files between the text and the images- the not managed system does not care really for in a sense these are very much equivalent things- the design is the pattern in such cases.

In the teleoscoping of chains of information the question is are the infinite loops a good grounding, an expansion, or a reduction as to the intelligibility of a unique path of experience. In this sense the metalanguage is a statement where the loops have to be defined more including the statements of the obvious at the foundations (neutrino behavior in this sense in relation to supersymmetry needs some clarity too as to the design of the concrete language of the physics system).

Clearly, by thought or trial and error, the hypertext varieties of language have evolved, in some cases collectively and independently for the needs of recognizable content. But at the foundations the subtle difference between the parameters and the argument of a string of information has its ability to look at a point in the tree or array as if outside or inside the dream, and that itself from a metalanguage as if looking down outside of that- of course as in pictures there is a direction where the quality of reduction of information that is not done to speed things up, say the colors reduced in pictures can not be reversed as the design of the system hides and loses in the teleoscoping looping such information that can only come from a higher intervention of view so to be intelligibly replaced, or if lucky and as a probable thing, a mechanical reversal of a neutral error encoding. This can be a question of entropy (the efficiency of heat lost in the running of a machine and its access to memory retrieval) or in a sense it suggests intuition for creative new states and processes as if a system subjectively comments out the stages of the actual language instead of unveiling parts of a puzzle commented in by the subtle parameters and arguments. Could this not apply to a literal idea of string theory as a string of information as well in its behavior?

I find Lubos post yesterday, his terms God-ons and gauginos poetic and neutral but rather a mongrel of the Mediterranean and Alpine division of the races and culture of Europe, that only serves the Clingon or Esperanto of its day for the linguistics of international relations or as a working hypothesis where it is unclear who gets the Nobel prize in a particle discovery.

Modern computer systems (of which in the intellectual knowing of the underlying system even the wealth of color in images and words can loose its luster) are a little more democratic and scientifically humanistic in rational axillary language planning as it evolves toward shared states of an alphanumeric age (apparently linguistic elements have generational like hierarchies too- such as the phonemes and phenemes that relates at least to spirit of physics a level of discovery essentially right before a falsified view or theory is surpassed and thus considered the default grounding of what we can consider science and its particular historical context or interpretation.) In the expediency of war and civilization clashes, the fad of the day in content such as with poetry and music strives to take the raw creativity of say a Shakespeare there at the creation of such plays as romantic art far from the logic and echos of the early Greeks putting their feet on the shores of reason and science, to Goethe in his perfections.

So too in music as poetry the overly formal Wagner at the height of a long run where the passions are there for the most simple things for a generation such that the content is the reality of the medium and the state or revolution to the state in these extremes is for the managers of the content, of the shallow people, of consumers and slaves needed only for consuming.

In poetry Whitman is the center between the free verse and the formal rhythm and rime. In music some would say that swing is the glorification of a cultural stereotype and method watered down from each direction but just as real as if the people do not exist with the state or their religion being the ground of their meaning and purposes of living. Here we debate the nature of the parameters and arguments of what is the idea of stereotypes and what is archetypal.

There seems to be a residual coloring of a region and its people, ultimately artificial but there by war and default, where any view struggles to fill the whole environs and so declares itself the only unity of view. But in the Northern states or the Southern ones there are statues to those whom have done their duty- the generations after the civil wars still have their heritage of prejudices among brothers. So too the accumulation of these, worked to mellow down or eliminate, claims of guilt and reparations, who gets the wealth that arises from some loss for a people or gain for others, we find also deep divisions that persist from the so called greatest generations of WWII with a sub-element of the problems of Europe in WWI as if each generation is falsified as to war.

But I meant this to be for some insights of physics rather than trying to make sense of politics and culture... I will continue more toward this them in the next post or part. Let me just point out that Lubos seems to be arguing for the reality of the supersymmetry particles as real as those of the simpler physics models- logically, why should he not see that even greater systems would be in that sense as real? Where does one draw the line? In many ways I found his discussion of yesterday very understandable having been there as one can see from the diagrams and posts to that archetypal physics as if Lubos, educated in that sort of string theory I presume, has finally come around a bit to some of the views of our other new physics alternative bloggers- one cannot claim the ownership or management of a theory that is the birthright of everyone. It goes against a more open world of diversity which states and theories can advance to higher civilization and longer endure.

* * * * * *

The here syndrome or habit was mentioned on the html text- of which I did in the usual mimicking of the language when of course the deep philosophical issue other than trying to make the experience clear and not challenging to the net users- as to where in fact in the internet pages is the here.

* * * * * *

So, in the experience of using the web and computers, I find in the hypertext the design comes closer to ways I have envisioned such an ordering of context and methods could be done beginning with the more graphical representation (windows) and the relation to combinotorics and color. For example what I have done statically with frames (and the new inline frames are much closer dynamically) I find these are already possible on this end of what has changed since 95. But now I also see more things I can do with the abstract arrangement on these ground of a more logical and quasic design. In a sense this was always the converging end of our mutation of ideas, and for some things if we do get to make them clear and open, crystallized from vague metaphysics, a few of us are intuitive before hand and aware of the concepts and implications potentially and for some blind reach to breakthrough events. Intuition as intellect can be seen and done as a dynamic concept too. The interest in making connections and unities in physics so as to look for what may be fruitful new directions in others can also begin by awareness of the hidden or reality of supersymmetric grounding structures, as if a subconscious, in our selves. It is still hidden to our proofs and sense of uniqueness of possible worlds if there is a God that is the source and as a quasi-dynamic content manager (and all the paradoxes that raises).

On the other hand it is not clear to me that the study in itself of logic designs such as that of a the web is in a sense a waste of our time or is instructive as an argument or parameter as how we should or may live in the universe other than perhaps the why of it may transcend not only our being but enhance and upgrade our creative abilities to possible new here and now places we only briefly and in retrospect conservative gimps of breakthrough directions.

* * * * *

Metaphysical or Philosophic Neutrinos: (Part 2: The Inner Relations between Color and Physical Symmetry)

If we accept the reality of supersymmetry levels of concepts as physical and real as those of the usual symmetric physics (not to mention higher superduper symmetries) we can make the observation that color literally in the abstract is a dimension of mass and action of its own if we are to regard how the container of a group idea may vary from the usual grounding of action in the identity description of rotations and directions and so on much as we question the paradoxes of photons as influenced by gravity or influencing it by such action or even purpose, reductionist and irreducible to a minimum distance parameter or duration one or not (for example).

To imagine the reality of supersymmetry (and for that matter higher dimensions) is to imagine the reality of ideas of color in the permutations beyond that of simple light and dark. In this sense such physics in the formulas there are quasi-uncertain. If this is so then where I have analyzed the particles to interpret as color patterns, the 30 for example of the Conway-Otto matrices -again the 30 or 32 and so on in Lubos article and Keas counting-, which BTW explains the near misses of flatness as on a sphere of some so called impossible polyhedra or as a certain range of uncertainty in chemical bonding Fullerene like and other graphene properties including spin ice monopoles and the link between the cosmological constant and the Casmir scale of forces, is to imagine the reality of still further symmetry systems and the consequent problems of frequencies and hierarchies and so on...

So, it is a matter of core debate by the creative alternative theoreticians as to if there are levels beneath the Planck scales that are possible physics that also is reflected in the idea we can go before the big bang and even survive it (as in galatomic's theories) Or, at least in the level of consciousness if not the physics of an organic body, and because of p-adic general systems of binary and prime numbers, we can imagine a measurable hierarchy of analogs to the parameters of action for such constants. It is most ironic that the two views can declare the other is unreal. It is ironic that in our achievements of crystallization and unity in the advance of physics that these rare and comprehensives systems of things like string theory, loop theory, surreal numbers, and adelic numbers, and so on are not taken seriously and even dismissed as relevant to our sciences.

The issue of "Tanglement" arises philosophically here where the information can be an artifact of the math and the obvious. For in the Fibonacci patterns, vaguely the explanation in part of the broken symmetries of physics as dimensional group theory, the number of paths down to a certain level is the number of units on that level. Sometimes when we state the obvious it seems trivial and we do not look more deeply into the nature of such properties of continua or numbers- ask always the purpose of this irreduction to some conceptual level if we can stand the paradoxes and uncertainty inherent in our structure of logical design.

Tanglement- I here use as a general term, is after all part of a wider context of the quasic concern as to what is similar or identical for systems and object as some level of distinction. In this sense it is about the needed new physics for a better (than say the quantum idea) of what we mean by superposition- which in supersymmetry seems to work its place in the omnic flow of things in a sort of subconscious or collective conscious behind the scenes, metaphysically- but after all was science not begun as looking deeper and bringing to light such concepts hidden at the time?

As far as the general neutrino and neutrino like concepts go, this is also the obviously stated as an issue but thereby in a bottleneck of how we ground ourselves in a view to irreductions, as to if the "surface like, or holographic like' identity elements and directions of neutrinos are said to be Majorana or not.

I also wish to point out in Lubos article of which I think it has to do with a certain type of the five forms of string theory in its arrangement of group counts and shadows as we converge to our collective potential logical knowledge of the processes of physics (so to the frame or health of mind that can determine or resolve singularities by a 26 alphanumeric base system- see Nash, so to as to what is socially seen as a crackpot in theory if not in the obvious eccentric behavior of mad but beautiful scientists) that in the count of the supersymmetric in the world of just symmetry as real in the form of asking "what supersymmeteric particle so we already see?) thus the reality of higher ones in a wider span of space that in theory could enhance our range of phases and momenta vectors and directions- that this realization also implies before proofs of concrete restrictions (complex numbers as in fractals are not a restriction some claim for some idea of a brane or plane space- certainly not as restricted so some scale level as the Lorentz group) that a wider world in depth and span of these abstract logical designs are also part of our physical reality to so work out - together or in conflicts, in the waste of time taken from living and making a living, and loving...even in our lonely burden of isolation as we stand alone on the tightrope and uncertain path to choose or fall into some bottomless well, sink into loneliness with solitude but a ground of shifting sand and what the hell of it may it matter being creative in our one and only uniqueness that is one with the world, in our intuitive and independent work in isolation.

Or, just as in our roles the characters in a good novel take on a life of there own some authors just as the actors in roles can hear the voices, easier for some to learn the lines, for some to improvise, for all a sensitivity to higher color moods and their sense of their own physicality and identity in a wider world of what we are in the cosmos.

* * * * *


That's it for awhile as I continue my off line studies of the web languages. That old decision to stay inside as a child while the outside spring day and green grass calls to me, go exploring perhaps... I note in passing TGD has some interesting points today which also seem to me to have answers in the quasic view as we all converge, perhaps those in the net clouds retransmit what they are unconsciously learning.

Note: the second illustration here, a generic one, is for the development of in line frame anchors and so on for my webpage projects (to show my son perhaps).

The PeSla


* * * * *