The Universe on the Nano-scale, Modeled as Cellular Biology

The Universe on the Nano-scale, Modeled as Cellular Biology
( and Consequences for General Physics of the idea of Uniqueness )

L. Edgar Otto 15 March, 2012

A single cell with a nucleus that has a center, virtual or real as a non-necessary locus in space, a centroid also of a quasi-independence from physical structure is the other absolute grounding and distance to its mirror as universe.

Intuitively many ideas entertained by our imaginations, that is independent of the perceptions and agenda of people who try to add arbitrary embellishments to the core of our universal model as most likely in error pointing to some phenomenon - such as the possibility in hypnosis we might regain the span of unique memories and that the new possible reality or the analogy of false topology as if the possibility of hypnotic recall of past lives. But almost any such system if it has residual intelligibility can be covered by the ideas of a more general new metaphysical wisdom as physics, the physics of stereonometry or space relations in particular.

It seems to make more sense in the physical world that it takes time for certain phenomena to transfer their influences. This view, as if to formally declare as the constancy of the velocity of light as not a fundamental phenomenon when it reaches questions of the quantum discrete, suggests that if the two physics are unified, the closer they come to unification by any of their intrinsic methods it goes beyond the level of the center or state of things- a descent into the indistinguishably of the fixed and the chaotic. In short, the unification of the two physics is as a remote possibility to pin down in some certainty of equations as it is to resolve the singularity systems far from our central nano-time scale.

This does not base the world on the mental model, for like these analogs as higher level virtual models the underlying foundational theory applies, such as with the idea of string theory very remote and so treated by quantum and relativistic formulations. But its foundations are far from the center of natural stereonomic structure even if measured in theory over a continuum that coverages to the real of the Omnium. This is as if we the living and limited to our own structure of being and perception, self dual in a sense of the turns and twists and inversions, as minds can be said not so much to simulate our physical content dynamics of the body but to be over our spacious center of singularity (and creativity) self haunting as if the ghost ahead of time haunting ourselves.

So at the remote scales of scales within scales, beyond the surreal even as a grid or field for the measure real and only that or imposed by our reasoning, the string like theories including those of cyclic models of the cosmos using its generalization unto branes, as well as the quantum looping ideas of gravity as a constant or evolving defaulting model, cannot in principle be resolved at any idea of singularities unless it addresses these local issues of the third and other new physics. Our social world does seem to have a certain grounding to which that within us as that above seems a balance to which we are the ground with potential in the depth and span of universal structure. We should not make the usual mistake of imposing on ourselves a characterizing of how this social or political world should be arbitrary organized based on just incomplete ideas, false prophesies.

The proof of this, if it can be considered a proof, of this question of uniqueness, an idea now a little more central to my recent philosophic contemplations and as all vague and hopeful things dream like in the idea of some sort of unity and permanence- some recovery of lost things, loved ones, my great works of a thousand poems, youth, resetting the chances and opportunities of events in our lives literally, these entertaining sort of themes that is the embellishment of the human limited range of drama placed in the twilight zone, or this seen as but a wish and the ability to adapt to that wish if it occurs and is fulfilled that we find the dream, this proof if anything geometric as the last thing it could be such as the transfer of momentum from black holes thought it has to be a mechanism of magnetism (if of course at such creative frontiers we can resolve the quantum and uniquely something like magnicity on the nano scale, the spin ice) this will be from the explicit definition of the idea of Uniqueness where it is raised today as the question of how he exotic ideas of the two physics now all to familiar and understood related to the meaning and scale of our familiar world.

Uniqueness then conceived as if we did locate some pattern say on the classical but scaleless radius, sphere, of an electron near uncertainties and with wobble enough we imagine as with the exotic shifting of light that appears in the WMAP background this might tell us something of what we imagine would be evidence of a multiverse.

Consider a gumball with speckles in a certain pattern and it could be almost any pattern- one in particular that is the very speckle ball a child chooses that comes out of a gumball machine. In what sense is this the unique one given the uncertainty on one hand and the actual chain of events that fixes them in the chronology of those made concrete in the particular perception locations and all such general parameters of the idea of an overall omnic or super-duper symmetrical collapsing of matrix and wave functions into what we marvel again as a miracle as our familiar world.

We can argue for and against the unique state of such a child and gumball as far as its pattern goes- we can say it is a zillion things or but one thing or nothing at all. We could say that if we find some solution to understanding the pattern in principle it loses meaning and in a sense is less than nothing across any parameter or length of existence. To have a unique pattern is to imply an everlasting but potentially finite life-space lagging behind that of what may be the unique lifespan intelligible of the universe.

Artistically we can choose to view a pattern or a symbol or in such it influence what we view artistically just as surely as a photon in a sense determines the gravitation field yet is determined by in by some stance or view. It is even possible in a wider sense where we can shift certain views and be aware of the intrinsic curvature an shifting disembodied from the idea these are not abstract but of very small measure, that we can, knowing of the arts and allowed the pot of helium to boil even as we watch it, that we can change the pattern as if with our minds. One thing for sure it takes a certain amount of awareness, wakefulness, and comprehension of unknown origins to realize when such changes of state occur as if from the higher distant scales in an explicit feeling. If it is relative when someone in the time enters the event horizon near a black hole could they so distinguish when they become trapped in its gravitational well- perhaps, or that the issue is a spurious one to which other ideas on the scale of such concepts within the nano scale of cellular biology may still be a principle of the unique flow as distinguished importance.

We can expand things by the fiveness beyond normal dimensions and even duplicate and amplify them, but the proof while it works toward the greater scale in the division of space into five to achieve this, just as in the manipulation of time and space that a certain independent and non local motion would be possible to achieve a self inertia to travel forward in space and time, the pattern of the division between these general regions or dimensions is not shown in the depth of small scale detail- if indeed in theory it can be save the evidence that such seems to exist in effects and decay structures as of on some scale the division did occur even if such a dividing is not a question if it could be unique.

* * * * *



Illustration for previous post last night-

Arrow of Time and Energy, Beyond Teleology

L. Edgar Otto 15 March, 2012

That the same general metaphysical pattern can be projected on the universe, to the extent it is a projection of our unique perspectives as organic beings, from that perspective if the universe has an intelligible measure of its states and properties as physicality it can be seen to have a quasifinite lifetime over the age of the Omnium.

The general pattern is one of topology as the real or virtual dialectics of quasic physics and all that implies as to how and on what level our mathematics applies. It is perhaps where the logic of things will meet the mathematics without the problems of classes of classes as if a disembodied seemingly recursive pattern. An idea like string theory to the extent it is intelligible or anything as such on the remote small or large scale speaks for the uniformity on the average of physical laws. At this level of generalization the local arrangement of things in linear, hierarchical, or a random walk of related objects of interest in possible paths does not matter from the view of the higher or super-duper symmetry view.

Yet the physics of this, including the plateau of the physics of the poetic term energy I call the Phoenix physics, for that general concept also is uniformly ubiquitous as such laws of similarity and scaling, energy as a direct measure of this quasifinite life span of a universe with parts undergoing a change of scale. Of course the algebra applies in a real sense as to relative proportions of aging over time as well the ideas of those formulas that can be put into logarithmic forms. But again, this is a non-necessary relation to what we may consider as the real flow of time or purposes in some pathway over the potential infinity that is not clearly a boundary for the location at further distances from our centered, more or less, style of space embedded as our mind.

There are consequences of these views, at least as far as the current state and structural level of our cosmos, we note however that it must have had what seems a period of youth and perhaps one of indeterminate old age. It is absurd to try to measure the strings within the scope of the present state of things also that the widest scope or expansion of the universe can reach a projected certain measure as long as our physics is described merely as some for of super-symmetry. Beyond certain scales the remote small the remote great of which within that view we imagine could meet in a sense but do not necessarily do.

In effect we should apply the virial rule of the halving of the potential infinity singularity which is the center of a quasic plane as the simple concept of flatness as a multibrane. Thus there is an abstract center of things relative to the entirety of the Omnium. This can be expressed as the confinement on a plane or on a sphere as a physical modeling in a many pole dialectical relation.

In particular from one set of relations we quite imagine that physicality rules at different sub eras to explain how certain physical aspects are realized in the universe, for example the age at which the universe would take on light. And light seeming scaleless while we see half the range of its octaves races toward the abstract centers of the sea of singularities as does natural laws of the particles. If the foundation of string theory is also the quaternion rigid spins that involve double the degrees of things to return to points of an identity, not just the quarter twist that nature may not know which algebra or sting model it is in or may have some choices at local points in its decisions of decay. Also some centers are creative, that is the lighting up of stars at once, the universe itself, the cycles and creation of atoms and the logic or compass of their range.

So physically we can imagine the size of this sphere or plane of the universe beyond what is observable by light for on the continuum level, and the scaless nature as if shadow action.
But just as the muon concept is the half singularity but in the omnic arrow a beginning of existence at is minimum metaphysical level we can expect into the future a mirror of this in the lifetime of the Omnium that too a maximum sphere or brane, that as if a future state relative to we as the center of our own scale-wise in our space and time. In such a plane we can ask of that not seen or as real in a sense as to its general transitive and distributed properties, such as charge or mass in the background or any change of such constants, that what we do not see on the large remote scale is wider than what we can know of the hidden or perhaps the dark.

Thus these can be of different values working together such that the rates of expansion in the super-duper level of what is real and what is hidden defaults to a measure of omnic age. But as default it is unclear in the local here and now as to if there were actually previous states of being or to some level of things a few such states freely occur at adjusted rates for our perspective of the overall centered and true lifetime of the cosmos and the general transfer of energy conceived or said to be within it. But many phenomena follow this idea anyway as if analogs to say c or h can be held as foundational yet not necessarily fundamental, this explains why.

The general question of uniqueness of the breath of our established memory as that which can be mirrored or recorded, quite outside the individual and his events in question, is an open one as to the access of such memories in that they may only endure if the totality of a mind or brain somehow persists with access to the memories as a mediator for subjective and objective transfer of the meaning and information, or content as to what is the ultimate default of uniqueness and the ongoing teleology centered in simple, supersymmetric, and superduper symmetric ideas of time. But conceptually and intuitively we find these models of what we are to be intelligible in how we have imagined physics as well as philosophy and religion, after supersymmetry the spirit ends and the idea of a soul could begin, as a centered structure to the omnium as unique being, the sum total and yet the miscellaneous collection as a unified and dynamically living physics.

* * * * * *