The Steady State Source Omnium

The Steady State Source Omnium
L. Edgar Otto 15 March, 2012

Alternatively, we can regard the Omnium in totality as if a steady state model not changing in the general overall design. Under its compass particular subregions may changed radically as all things, fixed and moving, are abstractly within the compass of its quasifinite extent.

This has a advantage in that what makes any sub event unique in its existential moment of change as physical can be described as what physics we can imagine in those regions of scale and singularity as models for the material physics we can observe in from our local scale. In this sense the work of such physics that acknowledges the differences of ongoing change, or the minimum condition that evokes the concept of a current or flow will have a focus as a unique reality materially.

The source of this motion which can abstractly be described on the quasic level as a result of linear motion abstractly by a change of all coordinates will have a disadvantage that the mystery of the source is not observable and the paradox of ultimate creation is pushed further from the physics and corresponding metaphysics. So it is not clear that the reverse of an emerging and expanding universe presumably to unimaginable spans, the unreality of it especially when we continue the formulas to the eight and even 16 powers do we have a grounding that could not in theory vanish as some source to which we naturally place properties upon akin to our own or debate them as to a Deity as ultimate creator. But this experience is there and we are reminded of it when unexpected disastrous occur, calling the symbolically acts of God. Thus while these sorts of dynamic physical laws are grounded in the linear motion we cannot say if such a source from the imagined outside of the omnium beyond scale could not at any time unravel or be the ongoing sustaining of what we call reality in its mystery and vague, even chance, shadows of laws as probability relations.

This difference in the structural views and sustained ongoing difference (which we image energy as a source to do work for example the charges in the earth's atmosphere) may repeat but only after infinite times in infinite complexity so to do all states and levels of states once. But this does not answer if in some reality beyond the source the question of other distinct but totally hidden omnia resolves the paradox as if they exist. Also a Deity may be such a paradoxical omnic steady state if anything like the model of universe or an analog to our understanding of the nature of mind.

The question also of any patterns or information preserved and the conservation of them in respect to memory that may exceed the recording in this super dark concept of the nothingness- the creator beyond the concept of something or nothing, even beyond purposes, teleology in mundane or greater actions, beyond the question of what is the ultimate nature of irreversible phenomena in both the decisions made and the material events of steady state and cyclic endless time (akin in the very principle, grounded or not by a mere definition of limits or their containment as if to show only a direction of endless expanse- such as with the sense of what is prime reducing number nature and never reaching some ultimate or even different end, time in endless directions of which the whole of reality remains at the flat default of scales.

The principles, moreover, may explain gravity and its expression as part of such unique structural defaults of which metaphysical mental or physics theory may correspond on some level as to the intelligibility that would naturally apply to any such quasinfinite theories. These are needed to again adjust the arrows where some subjective structures may exist one way and not the other, into the apparent reality of scales and what is the ground as physics or subjective. How is the ultimate source distributed in the totality that would be encompassed by the Omnium?

Time is such a scale and can be said endless in the complex space, an idea around but explicitly pointed out by Hawking, an idea really the simple omnic equation, the zero, infinity and unity as a quasidynamic system. Einstein pointed out the situation is much more complex with moving reference frames, say the light thru a star and not that shifted by the general relativity around it. But through it we note also that a different sense of time can occur, a scaled time in which we can imagine in the physical exchanges of photons the actual time corresponds to that from the first beginnings of the so called big bang. It would be interesting if we can make clocks in the microworld more accurate than that or in he mixing of he shadows of neutrino mixing and influence these two, as if they are restricted in the physical world by a constant time that such clocks exist and can be set as if in a steady state relative beyond questions of the source and even capable of interpretation what amounts to remote particle physics of scale that for all practical purposes is seen and observed by all observers as observation changes in the normal effects at the limits of quantum laws and relativistic laws in the microworld within a changing but steady state omnic reality.

* * * * *

What sparked this train of thought was the simple observation on a walk today of how in this world, this town the architecture is so varied and shabby as if in the general world man's artifacts span designs of different times and in some cases seem as if rather modern and advanced, such as the state of the hospital and its environs. This variation of differences seemed to me to require a better explanation of which a logical theory will encompass only more rigid designs. Architecture as an art, of artifacts, reflects the human mind and its concepts as well as natures laws of space.

I had a stray concept to of what is a string in programming, that is the quotation marks that asserts successive things taken in order and together, that is was not to far from what would be needed to ground that theory of physics better if we are not to consider other aspects as given like source in the physics or some relation assumed for the laws of higher such structures and if in the science applied such concepts are in a sense physically real in effects.

But the general idea of the dynamic yet steady state omnium to which sooner or later the differences as if I would declare them a new state of some continuum or philosophical analog or if it mixes with other physical or supernatural concepts it seems to come down again on some level to the original term as if we would be content with a steady state but not expanding idea of only in physics the continuum level.

In any case those who say the universe is very ancient- even in some of the sects, and those who say it begain at some time ago recently, the whole issue and debate of evolution verses creationism becomes groundless unless it is a matter of very low level debate as to what we can now answer over the totality of the omnium and possibly short of heaven.

* * * * *