Monday, September 28, 2015
Toward the Quasic Mind and Brain Structure The crane in the river helping shore up the loose wall facing the river broke loose and went downstream only to stop on a sandbar then brought back with ropes from land. So too the metaphor of gray and white matter at the confluence at whatever the mechanics and mechanism that tries to build exact from the days of pyramids. For or against the holographic principles so interpreted? Even then the vast descent of consciousness and its super recursions builds deeper than all this. We have the power to make people whole again and to treat them with dignity where in the day today living we can find a balance of equifinality.
I interrupt my composition of Ghost Town IV (the Quasic Brain) because of two blogspot posts. One by Lubos Motl which after you take away the name calling has an interesting discussion, especially from the standpoint of how he approached string theory then went on to learn matrices. Sabine posted her objections to some new ideas concerning the nature of the holographic principle at about the same time. I find nothing new in either view which on this issue comes to a head probably to the limit of debate on this level. One can read this issue i discussed all along and even quite recently. The inspiration for this was the re-reading of Tom Wolfe's book Look Homeward Angel which had an influence on my thinking early on. But I find the general premise mostly inadequate to make definite claims as to the nature of the structure of our Quasic Mind. I agree with Sabine that this debate has deep consequences. A better understanding of human consciousness and its development is one of them. Wolfe describes the child Eugene as his mind awakens to the world such as the river (highway) from Altamont to St. Louis. This debate at the foundations as physics seems to me about one of crossing rivers and in this case it is a matter of taste if we see it as limitless or broken into oxbows as it descends to the ocean. But the loops involved may as well be like the Wisconsin myth of the Round River. It is not about such a holographic principle that is based on our crude ideas of nerve connections- which in connectionism does exhibit holographic pyramids in brain structure. There is no certain guarantee that if we do not get the nurturing at a certain critical time that the brain is smaller and less efficient for the calculations in the gray matter and the communication in the white matter. it is not that simple, and that seems to me a matter of politics needing deeper science for solutions. Oddly, if they have printed a brain it is not clear that it could be used as say a computer chip. Unless they have the right underlying architecture. We in the digital age should understand that there is a trade off and compensation between the calculating and the communicating part of the brain, Anyway, here are the two post links if anyone cares to relate it to the discussion at hand. You see, there is as Sabine points out a confusion on sides of such equations, but the equations are not a simple region with a river to cross. Stringly conservative an Loopy liberal thinking will not transcend the problems, and certainly not Lubos as a young man's hopeful speculation of imagining the background of quasireality as the same thing as a moebious strip flatland topology. But as social animals we over and underrate our ability to know or see a bigger picture. http://motls.blogspot.com/.../no-transmission-principle... *** http://backreaction.blogspot.com/.../no-loop-quantum...
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
New Principle of Super-Recursion fractal of the prime 13 distinguishing bosons and fermions on the main and quasic diagonals up to 8 natural dimensions.
I am not a fan of artificial chess programs. It is fun when it happens to make the program seem to become desperate and lose going haywire. Today, I found a powerful new physics concept which I never would have found had I not tried to analyze the game for an edge for our chess club. I found logically extended nD chess.
AK this is how it goes with parallel models, hauntingly close similarities. So we discover the fourth dimension and Kant enters again by similarity to computers through the back door that required Einstein to generalize further. Or we throw in thermodynamics at the modern physics frontier as if we are unaware our metabolism is measured as a fourth power compared to volume. 10 classical dimensions to the fourth power warp ten faster than light as an absolute value? What of five powers, that is what dodecahedra and four space is all about as we seem to feel comfortable at some level of residual continuity ignoring descending dimensional symmetry. Horgan's quantum tetrahedra reaching deeper as scientific should come to mind here too.
A flat honeycomb of one infinite plane (brane) is not a complete (Euclidean or curved) description that fills or divides into crystalline unit elements all of general space. A local point and its connections removed (edges) to other points does leave a finite polyhedron from a flat infinite polyhedron. You are asking why 136 (triangles) rather than 144. Think about this. It is rather abstract and we can have too many triangles left over as hidden ones by half again. I cannot say I understand the debate here other than any theoretician worth his salt makes progress after core models crumble. On the other hand I know of no one on earth who has yet answered Dirac's (or Eddington's) deep question, why 136?\
Think about this. It is rather abstract and we can have too many triangles left over as hidden ones by half again. I cannot say I understand the debate here other than any theoretician worth his salt makes progress after core models crumble.
The natural dimensions can be thought of as recursive lattices. 5n for 2D, 7n for 3D, 9n for 4D, 11n for 5D...in the dynamic animation where the natural and hidden dimension foundation difference is calculating by arithmetic at null points of a precession space wherein Fabonacci ratios apply as the product of such dimensional differences in a finite group theory and implied superpositing up to the quasic dimension where the visualization by algorithm super reflections is a natural coherent Kover simulation. (See lesson 2 in progress) but this hypothesis to test may have other restraints to our percieved generalities as analog continuous groups. It may be we have reached the limits of experimental theory then theory itself as so limited as well. - or not, as Sabine says of publication "just do it" in all its profound conceptual simplicity (which Lubos does not get in his long artical lashing out incoherently even for string theory in that bizarre interval where we should not publish anything after 1929 quantum relativity up to the last 40 years at the beginning of string theory if we accept what pseudoscience and what is not.
In reply to our fine new thinkers and Lubos not worth reading anymore.
Of course there is a conductor for this symphony of the universe. Director for the dawn chorus on he moors and other wild places left across the world where the songbirds greet the morning sun . Or come the evening this winged cloud with finer eyes and ears than we have yet known, sing as loud again at the evening twilight. The in the silence of the day there are surprises, great events, an eclipse that disturbs the cycles of their continuum and they make such a fuss of their territory and warnings. But in the silence thru the night as much a part of the song that we see it in relief, those like you and I, mockingbirds, the peer review of all songs and with a song ourselves, sing all through the night.
May you hear them as much as dream you have dreamed of hearing them one day,
Young Nietzsche looking for his contact lenses or bifocal Franklin glasses on his hands and knees searching randomly in the grass below the lamplight.
The contradiction in the article is the statement on law that the declaration of independence is the law of the land. Do they understand what they write in a general or even assumed historical context? The most narrow minded position is when militant materialist science and militant religious fanatics is imposed as progress and said not an impediment to civil transcending beyond morality and freedom of inquiry to pursue security as sustainable wealth beyond equal opportunity in what amounts to a starcrossed but meaningless Marriage. Krauss does a service in popular communication promoting science even among those who disagree in their tragic first and true love in the balance. That two not even wrongs may make a right is more an issue of honesty in both camps of this debate. As such it addresses within our concerns of the people and those of expertise with the responsibility of leadership as a frontier scientific question. Krauss says 'should ' and not 'must ' as the article's title baits us, evidently in a world of no necessary realities where we strive to find sane exceptions. In reply to Don Lincoln on NY Times article.
Jaya Redefine 'curl', shift colors in sequence including hidden ones in simply connected irrotational centers, add other general and local escape angles that set measure for entropy as information, and take a more skeptical view of the limited fundamental theorem of calculus applied with quasifinite super-reflections.
I just read but cannot find to reply to an article titled: Will quantum decoherence be the downfall of American democracy? This analogy cannot hold for any state. The partitioning of a state is more predictable than QM formalism. Given 34 states they will split or become one higher union. What is the determinism that dispassionately drives a people to civil war? Empires rise and empires fall periodically. Unity could be achieved by a confederation if it seeks to expand its frontiers. The declaration of independence was not the law of the land but imposed from a leader who had the advantage of rapid communication yet even that has limitations for how many messages can be sent and received at the same time. The only perfect 'democracy' is when in industrial trench warfare there is no one left to play the game. We know also that in the case of religious sects the diversity of their dividing actually promotes the general trend of that religion's hegemony. Electrification although a quantum leap has failed to solve this modern mysticism as well.
I can imagine that could be done and many have tried to do it. (a string assumed physical could be defined by an angle up to minimum quantization not just its spin - if I now ask myself what you are asking me. The angle from an imagined particle center.) But we can see this as a measure of quality as well, more of a loop theory approach. But can we measure either on the level we are one with a measure? There is a third way as the difference in these invisible thereby views time or cause animated or not, teleology. I call 'quasicity', but there are more 3&4D such angles involved.) All these stances are in development with new assumptions and principles as well as rather complex systems that depend on denial of some assumptions or principles that hides development. That the universe at default like a quantum cat exists or not yet persists is not necessarily a question of quantity or quality such as the role of conscious in logic design systems models.
Does God create nothing? Beyond timeless space and spaceless time He is the final frontier. But only half of either universe can be measurable or rationally infinitely indivisible. The universe (or the abstract God) exists and not exists thus persist at some horizon where the center (singularity) and circumference (time and space) are both everywhere and nowhere.
Marni deserves a lot more than this. She is one of the greats of our age. We have not understood the full cost of our marginalizing such physicists... the issues is priceless.
If prejudice is the child of ignorance can conviction be the child of wisdom?You said "I don't know". That point mentioned in Sabine's paper
There is a much deeper issue here thinking about this that influences my thinking because of the lucid advice of which this essay is the perfect example. It is the Wagner in the background of some Hawking slowly evaporating desiring to run yet deep into the contemplation of problems of our existing, lost useful thought to which we now regret what was a time for effort. In this post-alphanumeric age whom is to blame? Academia? Those who set themselves up as judges of another's work? Perhaps the drive on the surface to turn last century's light into renewable but ever expensive text books for the sake of industry? Some of us, if not all of us are outside the bell curve like said by Jung of a few prophets. Or the whole process that extracts tribute by a token salute to a long list of names implied in a conspiracy research, Fermi escaped, and Einstein slipped through. In refuge some are wounded looking back at the evil miasma tied quite irrationally to some patch of soil its existence in world consensus so are driven to imagine some evil that would diminish their perfect pearls, shells or walls in walls that they focus the light within the light to achieve some ultimate fusion that save for such a fear science as we know it would not now exist. Maybe what Nietzsche said in Zarathustra, in his down-going, eternal return, trial by fire of etheral spirits against the indignity of the empty sky and its murder of carrion crows - we petition the prophet who responds one should not ask him lest he takes from them what little they already know. I do not exist myself as beyond a few friends it made a difference for that I am not part of a university. It does not matter because I as human have seen something of an original truth - but I regret the volumes of work so vanished or the time spent that such a wound in festering will undermine the positive awakening of our shared and private lives. If we were worthy and could confirm it then the ideal should be free to do inquiry or at least our scientists exempt from war. How little of great work may not have gotten through. Let us find a new way to teach, to acknowledge our youthful and ancient contributions of what may be the best of illustrations of those lost in the margins. But friend, I am not telling you something your own sensitivity to the human condition is not aware of on some level, of what you already know of that, don't you?
Thursday, September 10, 2015
The Crane or Mandala & Mantle September 10, 2015
On the road outside my apartment, a cave of solitude where time is lost in the count and my leaky normal dreams finds the end of summer and company moved to their own time that I come to the last of my resources well planed welcoming the solitude of my cave, a ghost town with no planning in relief against the depth of night against dangers outside the flatland nor of reliving the day in depth to sort or pick and choose that there is learning.
But the holiday, movable but periodic, that of Labor, some celebration leaving behind little meaning as if the passengers and the rail are but ghostly echoes of the age of trains. I step out of my doorway, not the cracks in the sidewalks, the denizens of the undergrowth trying to break through my thick glass windows and screens in search of warmth, not that it was cold but that it foreshadowed in them the tilting of the sky toward what in their hearts the once or all too familiar rocking vessels inside them between the dark and light.
In the fog going downward from the hillside I see the great water tower in the distance a little blurred and only a few souls about as the buses start to come to life, the sway of the bright legged gal's pony tail, typical, running toward me as I move to my side of the narrow path thru the park, she nods good morning per functionally as do I a soft morning offered not noticing how worn her face that stored so much sunlight. I may as well have stood in place while the city itself moved around me, no barriers encountered for it was just a greater ghost town. Only the fog seemed to remain constant, the distant torrential rains, its rapids a mind of its own.
In the East the crescent moon and star, Venus perhaps creeping down and glowing brighter until the rainbow of her belt explodes rapidly into its rainbow of red and blue before sunrise. Just fast or slow enough that like my wind up watch in steps I register the expected surprise.
I cut through the large parking lot empty of cars and see the tall crane start to do its robot arm thing as the hard hats are donned and it spins another day to deliver some beam of metal. I recall the progress of construction, note that the wall holds against the record anger of the river as once it looked like the bank would wash away. I am like the drone they use to view the progress from above, a fleeting moment of energy, an overview as if in my dreams.
I feel so small on the wide parking lot and the crane so tall, I wonder if it feel would it reach me. The means and the extremes my Dad taught me that I could measure by sight the angle of a smaller triangle to the unknown height if I measured as well walking to it. Yet here halfway to the North pole the North Star seems to forever fall weightless down and all around if I were to climb toward it holding tightly on the fixed shadow hour caster as if the day. My clock face stood on edge against the flat Druid circle in the sky then turned North East. I understood then that I would not need to walk toward it to measure its height, that all I needed was the angle, forty five degrees it would reach me, greater than that it would miss me. I seemed taller than the distant North Star save if I looked to the zenith through a whirlwind.
If prejudice is the child of ignorance can conviction be the child of wisdom?You said "I don't know". That point mentioned in Sabine's paper
There is a much deeper issue here thinking about this that influences my thinking because of the lucid advice of which this essay is the perfect example. It is the Wagner in the background of some Hawking slowly evaporating desiring to run yet deep into the contemplation of problems of our existing, lost useful thought to which we now regret what was a time for effort. In this post-alphanumeric age whom is to blame? Academia? Those who set themselves up as judges of another's work? Perhaps the drive on the surface to turn last century's light into renewable but ever expensive text books for the sake of industry? Some of us, if not all of us are outside the bell curve like said by Jung of a few prophets. Or the whole process that extracts tribute by a token salute to a long list of names implied in a conspiracy research, Fermi escaped, and Einstein slipped through. In refuge some are wounded looking back at the evil miasma tied quite irrationally to some patch of soil its existence in world consensus so are driven to imagine some evil that would diminish their perfect pearls, shells or walls in walls that they focus the light within the light to achieve some ultimate fusion that save for such a fear science as we know it would not now exist. Maybe what Nietzsche said in Zarathustra, in his down-going, eternal return, trial by fire of ethereal spirits against the indignity of the empty sky and its murder of carrion crows - we petition the prophet who responds one should not ask him lest he takes from them what little they already know. I do not exist myself as beyond a few friends it made a difference for that I am not part of a university. It does not matter because I as human have seen something of an original truth - but I regret the volumes of work so vanished or the time spent that such a wound in festering will undermine the positive awakening of our shared and private lives. If we were worthy and could confirm it then the ideal should be free to do inquiry or at least our scientists exempt from war. How little of great work may not have gotten through. Let us find a new way to teach, to acknowledge our youthful and ancient contributions of what may be the best of illustrations of those lost in the margins. But friend, I am not telling you something your own sensitivity to the human condition is not aware of on some level, of what you already know of that, don't you?
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
From this view the Big Bang inflation models and the Ekpyrotic Cyclic models are part of the same general picture rather than necessarily ruling each other out. I invite some discussion here to get down to the core primal (preaternatural) concepts, and will be adding some photos and other bits of relevant conversation here.
Saturday, September 5, 2015
Love is Quasifinite comes from a girl when discussing relationships in a bar and her work at the university (Photography, but she had lost an eye upset in a winter auto wreck over some guy. The was an avid reader of my lost poems and gave me honest feedback.) She insisted that she could sense another human as the DNA inside them gave off information for such things as how well they would fit together. She laughed when I tried to understand how she meant this. She said that if she was not married by 30 she would marry me. But she never made to 30. We laughed as I had talked a few years with her in the coffee shop from when she first hopefully started school.
Well, Rajasekaran Rajagopalan posted an link on facebook (so many I could not find on my slow phone and the quite well written reply was lost as the connections faded) concerning these issues along he lines of Penrose, and my friend Pitkanen. It concerned a Russian researcher whose articles and experiments in this (considered new age concepts by established science) seemed to me to have great merit when seen it depth that applies to our time. But his conclusions were still imperfect. Rajaeskaran, as we are well ahead in the technology had also posted on ortho- and para- states of water in a previous article. These two things linked rather well vaguely by quantum principles. When I was ten or so we did not know how photosynthesis worked, nor the role of ATP, nor for that matter the structure of DNA. Basically the Russian researcher felt that we are made of light, are beings of light. Considering some cosmic observations, especially the comet and Pluto and this idea of Hawking recently as another almost theory, one that considers dark and neutral information as to in the extremes if for all practical purposes the information is not lost but mangled in things like black holes and the entropy of surfaces, There is something to be said for this alternative view. I will be returning to this discussion as my connections get more stable.
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Back-reactions to Hawkings Supertranslation Paper
What do you think? I find it certainly disappointing and pretty much agree with Sabine's evaluation and frustrations. Rather impatience with the only two games in town, loopy and stringy. The smart phone market share like these camps seem fixed. Return to ideas of superdeterminism and minimum distance by her was a legitimate third opinion in an era where the utility of premises is at frontiers electic. (The simple shift from a 2D to 3D minimum quantized loop is continuous as well discrete 4 6 8 as to abstract intervals if classically Euclidean as a unitary foundation compromise.) What an entangled web we weave! As for me I have evolved beyond caring for things like publication. (From WTF to who gives a F. There is a limit to defining ourselves by debates with others including on the blogs) A pox then on both their houses! But climbing out of the gray goo of speculation there is a freedom found and new clarity where so many future optimistic things in day to day useful applications and yet not imagined future technologies are seen clearly. If civilized communication is possible it is only slowed down if thought to be useful as an instrument of resentment and revenge.. we finite lives should not be rendered empty by imperfect soft gravitron earthly forgiveness either. Are we scientists or social engineers? Sometimes, unfortunately, good fences make good neighbors.
PS seeing the paper on the PC (with perhaps there is something to be said for the internet as a medium to fade in its usefulness of the ever hopeful role of new media as well as say the state of Academia) I see nothing really new. It is not very translatable as straightforward, that is find its hidden agendas or assumptions once we translate the method of formulas or the sainted names. In fact it should be obvious that many have put forward these things on a foundational level even within those named in concepts and formulas. Either as a formal abstract structure or or vague field concept (they did not touch upon symmetric neutrality of the gauge itself... that is an entirely new area of inquiry). For example Nilpotent hypotheses of Dirac as reviewed by some modern authors excluded from the usual forms of publication but published elsewhere. What is their plus and minus J infinity but my consideration of spacious singularity? I note that in his usual way even Lubos has a strong if vague uneasiness or reaction to this paper. Is it the darling topic of the day? Is it true that new blood in the mix of invaders to a new place taking over a discipline or country and extending their own sense of universal laws must be coming from the dregs of groups fleeing tyranny? We either accept all people can so rise or we do not. But when they do the first thing seems historically the do not pass on their power to others and usually take their turn suppressing them in turn. Not that we do not need competent people to teach, raise up others - even the first Russian armies could not get along without officers effectively. We for some reason finally acknowledge there may be more than 4 dimensions but debate in the continuity of things as dualities if ideally or of a cruel thermodynamic indifference the value 2 means as in the paper we can insulate ourselves against the cold night by dividing space like a shirt without given in sacrifice the shirt to another off our backs. Some truths out there somewhere is all around us but we have not learned to see them in front of our face. It is not that there are alternative voices, nor a matter of intelligence, but a few people in our time try to speak with us in common sense genius once seen a little higher light- and bless them, bless the peace makers who hope they can bring us a better world where all may so hear them as they try to speak while dealing with their down-going to the hungry people of our small village. Such work is that of the gods and their struggle also. If Love finds us worthy.